Category: Social Justice

  • #Metoo In a Time Before #Metoo

    It was an early, cool spring day. I doubt that the daytime temperatures had even reached sixty degrees that day. For the most part it seemed like a typical Saturday at the fraternity house. We started early that day . . . well . . . we started early most days. Over the course of the evening I must’ve had about twenty-five Busch Lights. Nothing spectacular for an all day drinking fest, but I wouldn’t say I was at the peak of sobriety. I was still a freshman and still living in the dorms, at least nominally. The fraternity house was made to accommodate about 40 guys, but there were only about ten members at the time (that’s another story). So, I had my own room that I stayed in on nights that I obliged in the binge drinking. I stayed there most nights.
    Truthfully, the day was rather uneventful. As usual, I was part of the last group still awake and drinking. It was probably about 4am and we had moved the party up from the basement to the couches in the living room. The TV was on, the lights were low, I had a Rolling Rock in my hand that had been stolen from my big brothers room. I was probably half a beer from calling it a night. I certainly didn’t think I’d be getting laid that night.

    Pretty soon there was a commotion at the front door. A group of clearly intoxicated girls arrived. And not our usual girls who show up at 4am. Ashley came in and fell onto me, her head landing at my feet one the couch. She started snuggling with my feet and telling how much fun she had earlier that night. I had my shoes off, so essentially she was rubbing her face all over my socks. I have to admit, I was actually a little disgusted. I had athlete’s foot at the time and all I could think was that she was rubbing her face all over that. She was clearly there to see me and was quite aggressive. I remember my phrasing exactly when I drunkenly said, “ I’m going upstairs to get another beer, you can come if you want.” (Now that’s a pick up line). I guess I was a little surprised when she said yes, but I can’t say I wasn’t happy. I got up and she grabbed my hand. I lead her up the stairs and into the bedroom.

    Let’s take a step back for a minute and gather some background on some things. First things first, and do I hesitate in admitting this, but I was a virgin at the time. My college friends didn’t know that. Well, they might have suspected, but I never volunteered the information. I wasn’t completely inexperienced, I had done everything but sexual intercourse. Also, Ashley lived exactly one floor above me in the dorms. Her roommate was in my social circle, so I knew her relatively well. Well enough that I had a small crush on her. I had always suspected she had a crush on me too. The week before, while I was drinking at the fraternity house, she slept with my roommate. I’ll have more on that later. But for now, let’s just say that I was a little disheartened that she had slept with him and not me. I wasn’t in love with her, but I knew he didn’t care at all, so there was a little sting.

    When we reached the bedroom I shut the door. We started making out immediately. I casually broke her hold and grabbed another Rolling Rock, opened it and took a swig. I was nervous and I needed that moment of regularity, that pattern and feeling of normalcy to calm my nerves. I can’t exactly remember, but I assume I offered her some. I couldn’t have taken two more swigs before I was accosted and thrown on the couch. I didn’t mind. We were making out and doing some heavy petting for a few minutes. Clothes were coming off a piece at a time. Not in a fast and furious way that you see in movies, but steadily we were becoming more and more naked.

    At the point that there weren’t anymore clothes blocking the way, she began touching me intimately. I returned the favor. A few minutes later, I went down on her. I was fairly experienced at that and, again, it gave me a sense of normalcy, it let me remain confident. I was building up to the moment I would lose my virginity. I was nervous, I was happy, I was elated.

    I was certain that she was more experienced than me. I mean, she had a one night stand with my roommate the weekend before. That added to the pressure that I was experiencing. As I started to fumble my way through the process of losing my virginity, I got as far as resting my penis against her vulva. Was this it? Was this going to be the moment? No, it wasn’t. I was drunk, I was tired, I was limp.

    As I knelt against the edge of the couch, looking down Ashley, I realized I didn’t want to do this. At least not at this time, not in this place, and not in this way. In that split second of clarity, I knew that I didn’t want to lose my virginity drunk, half-erect, and on a filthy frat house couch at 4am. As cliché as it sounds, I wanted it all to be more special. Also, I didn’t want to have a quick fling with Ashley. I liked Ashley. I ask her out on a date and see if we could have something more.

    She seemed fine with stopping at that point. She was tired and drunk too and it was time for bed. We got half dressed and crawled up onto my mattress in the loft above us. It was a small twin bed in a cold drafty room. She snuggled into my arms and I fell asleep quickly.

    About 2 hours later, probably close to 7am, she attempted to wake me. I wasn’t fully cognizant yet and was definitely still drunk. She asked if I would walk her back to the dorms. What I should have said was, “No, It’s 7am and I’m tired and drunk. We’re both minors, we live in a zero tolerance county. I just went to jail last month for a minor consumption charge. Several of my friends have gone to jail for minor consumption charges while walking back to the dorms. It’s cold outside and a terrible idea. I’d like you to stay here with me for a few more hours and I’ll happily walk you back then.” But that’s not what I said. I uttered out, “no, but you can leave if you want.” I rolled over and fell back asleep. Now, I do realize that on the surface that looks a little rude. But, I didn’t mean to be so rough, I was drunk and groggy. I was awoken suddenly from a deep drunken sleep and not ready to answer any questions. I really didn’t think that she would gather her belongings and leave, but apparently she did.

    I woke up several hours later and realized Ashley was gone. I felt a little odd about it all, but figured that’d all work out. I was hoping that I could talk to her later and maybe arrange a date, or at least talk. When I went downstairs it seemed like everyone in the house knew I had gotten laid. I was young and dumb, so I let them believe we went all the way. I didn’t tell them that it only ended up going as far as me going down on her. I let them believe we had intercourse. When I got back to the dorms, I told my roommate that I had slept with her too. I chalk that up to being young, stupid, and insecure.

    I can’t recall if it was that day or a few days later when her roommate Casey knocked on the door of my room. I do remember being floored when Casey asked if I had raped Ashley. She elaborated that Ashley had told her that I had raped her that night. She told me that Ashley elaborated that not only had I raped her, but I kicked her out afterwards and made her walk home in the cold. Again, I never kicked her out, I phrased an answer to a question very poorly in my incoherent state. I explained the situation Casey in full detail. I told her that not only there not been a single no uttered throughout the night, but that Ashley was the aggressor in all of it. Casey clearly believed me, going as far as hand waiving the entire situation away. Saying, “that’s just the way Ashley gets when she’s drunk.” “She blacks out sometimes when she’s drinking.” But none of that really helped.

    I can’t describe the vast amount of emotions and thoughts that ran through my head. “How can this be? I’ve never hurt anyone! How can she think that happened? We didn’t even have sex! Hell, I’m a virgin! I kind of like her, why would I screw that up? This can’t be happening! What the fuck is going on? Shit, am I going to jail? Am I getting kicked out of school?” A million other thoughts in a similar vane passed through my head over the next few weeks. She never approached me directly. No police reports were filed. That didn’t stop her from telling others though. Now I won’t say that she ran around campus telling everyone everything. She didn’t. But she did tell her circle of friends. I knew all of the girls in that circle. I would have casually called them my friends before this incident. They stopped talking to me. They looked at me with disgust when they walked by. They stopped dropping by the frat house on the weekends.

    My friends all stayed by my side through the ordeal. A few of them saw her when she showed up at the house that night. They saw her snuggle with my feet. They saw that she was the instigator and aggressor. The ones who didn’t witness the event had no doubts either, they knew that I could never do anything like that. One of them confronted her about it. She straight up told him that she was blackout drunk, but she just knew what I had done.

    She sent me an email a few years ago. She apologized. She said that she had been blackout drunk that night and just assumed the worst when she woke up. She told me that she had talked to a mutual friend and my version of events was much more plausible than what she had conjured up in her head. The email seemed sincere, and it did make me feel better,  but I never responded.

    This all happened in the early aughts at a small college in the midwest. I can’t image what would have happened to me if this had happened in today’s environment, especially on the coasts. I still have a chip on my shoulder about the incident. I still worry that she’ll decide to #metoo me any day. In the current environment and with the way memories can change over time, I can’t help but worry. Even with her email apology on file, it could still completely upend my life. Isn’t it amazing that we live in a time that well over a decade later I’m still scared that she could ruin my life.

     

    As an addendum: In that email she sent. I found out that she lost her virginity to my roommate the in that encounter the week before ours. She wasn’t as experienced as I thought. Apparently, she had a crush on me too. That night she had gotten blackout drunk, went looking for me, couldn’t find me, and fucked my roommate. It looks like under different circumstances we could have had a relationship. It’s probably best that we didn’t.

     

    * names have been changed to protect the privacy of all parties involved.

  • The Parable of the Sleeping Tiger

    A long time ago in a land far away there lived a tiger, who had been hunting for two long days. He was very tired, so he decided to lie down in the shade of a mango tree, underneath some cool foliage, and take a nap. He fell asleep.

    Presently, he became aware that something sharp kept poking into his haunches. He opened one eye to see a little squirrel digging his claws in his side.

    “Say, little squirrel, what are you doing?” asked the tiger, who was wise and could not fault the dimwitted rodent for poking a sleeping tiger.

    “I’m feeling your muscles, to see how firm they are.”

    “Well, little squirrel,” said the tiger, flexing his paw, “feel my arm and then go away. I have been hunting for two days, and I am tired. I want to sleep.”

    So the squirrel felt the tiger’s muscle and said, “Thank you, Mr. Tiger. You’re very strong, but not as strong as the tiger in my glen.”

    The tiger snorted, for it made no difference to him who was stronger, and went back to sleep.

    Soon he was awakened to the feeling of his fur being rubbed the wrong way. He opened one eye. “Say, little squirrel, what are you doing? It hurts for my fur to be rubbed the wrong way.”

    “Oh, no!” said the squirrel. “I’m not rubbing your fur the wrong way. I’m testing the resilience of the hair fibers.”

    The tiger said, “Call it what you will—stop doing it.”

    “Mr. Tiger!” cried the squirrel, even as he continued to stroke the tiger the wrong way, “why are you angry with me? I have done nothing!”

    “You have awakened me, and you are rubbing me the wrong way. Please leave me to sleep, as I have been hunting for two days and I am tired. You have tested the resilience of my fur long enough now to know.”

    “Well,” huffed the squirrel, “your fur isn’t nearly so resilient as that of the tiger in my glen.”

    The tiger said nothing to that, understanding that the squirrel seemed even less clever now than he did before. “Go away, little squirrel. You are in my glen now, and I would sleep.” So he did.

    It wasn’t long before the tiger awoke to find little squirrel-fists full of tufts of his hair being plucked. “Little squirrel,” said the tiger, beginning to lose his patience, “I thought I told you to leave me be. Did you not understand that I have been hunting, and I am tired? Do you not understand that I have been very patient with you so far, and that I could gobble you up if you anger me?”

    “Well! I never!” pronounced the squirrel. “How dare you be angry with a little squirrel like me. I have done nothing to you that you should be so upset about!”

    The tiger tried to be more patient, as it was clear to him that the rodent had no sense. “You have awakened me three times when I have told you of my wish to sleep, you have poked my haunches, rubbed me the wrong way, and pulled my fur out of my skin. How can you say you have done nothing? Begone, rat, before I eat you.”

    The tiger saw that the squirrel was much offended by this speech. The squirrel replied, “Well, in any case, your fur is easier plucked than that of the tiger in my glen!”

    “Then go torture him and leave me be so I can sleep.”  And he did.

    No sooner had he fallen asleep yet again when tiny rodent teeth bit down into the tender flesh of his ear. He awoke with a deafening roar.

    The little squirrel scampered just out of reach and the tiger, rubbing his ear, said, “You really are not very bright, are you?”

    “How dare you!” squeaked the squirrel as he danced an angry jig. “I have not lowered myself to calling you names! How petty you are! The tiger in my glen is not petty!”

    The tiger, being wise and patient, would have ignored the rodent, but for the gleam of wicked intent he suddenly glimpsed in the eyes of the squirrel.

    “You have been bothering me on purpose,” said the tiger slowly, seeing that the squirrel was not stupid—just disturbed and wicked. “To what purpose, I do not know, but on purpose nonetheless.”

    “I have not!” said the squirrel. “I have been comparing you to the tiger in my glen! How dare you not let me perform my examination just because you are sleeping. You are out here in the open, at the mercy of just any squirrel! How dare you accuse me of bad things!”

    “Well,” said the tiger thoughtfully, “did you get what you were after?”

    “Oh yes!” replied the squirrel, gleefully, a look of triumph in his eyes.

    “Good. Then you won’t mind if I—”

    And the tiger gobbled him up—and finally got some rest.

  • Civil War II: Antifa Boogaloo (The third edition)

    Image result for antifa civil war

    Occasionally, it’s good to see where we stand in regards to our political infighting in the good ol’ US of A turning into armed conflict. 13 months ago, I wrote an update that highlighted some of the dynamics that may spark Civil War II. Looking back, I mostly stand by what I said at the time, but some of the dynamics have cooled off since then. Specifically, I wrote:

    Overall, I’m still pessimistic on the chances of widespread fighting. I think the worst we will possibly see is an LA riots type situation. However, as shown in Charlottesville, all it takes is one body for the self-righteous leftist media to climb on top and start agitating. Like a high-stakes game of “Press Your Luck,” both sides keep smacking the button, hoping to hit the political jackpot, ignorant of the lurking Whammy.

    I still believe that to be true. I’m of the belief that the Left can only muster a LA riot as their maximum amount of agitation. They simply don’t have the fortitude nor the logistical ability to take the fight to the Right. The Right is, and for the foreseeable future will be, the key to any true armed conflict. The Right has the equipment, the tactical advantage, and the fortitude to wage war on the Left if ever pushed to do so. The Left has the motivation, but no ability. The Right has the ability, but no motivation.

    Except for the fact that conservative media is continuing to find its own voice by stoking outrage, driving a wedge between themselves and the leftist mainstream media, the Right has nothing to complain about. They have the reins of the federal government, as well as most state governments. They’re winning the charter school battle, and the traditional media is self-destructing. If things keep going the way they are, the leftist hegemony in the universal institutions of society will be broken within our lifetimes.

    Image result for images street fight antifa

    In my opinion, there are only four ways that a civil war breaks out: 1) There is a significant federal gun control act put in place; 2) the Left grows a pair of balls and takes the fight into the suburbs; 3) Trump is impeached and removed from office in a blatantly corrupt proceeding; or 4) Your average middle-class working man or woman has a substantial chance of losing their livelihood to SJW bullshit. Frankly, 1) and 2) seem highly unlikely.

    However, let’s take a trip into the Derplight Zone yet again, and see what’s gonna kick off Civil War II: Antifa Boogaloo.

    Image result for derplight zone
    Isn’t that the Outer Limits?

    Let’s imagine a world where this prog-leftist corporate circle jerk intensifies for a few more months. Dicks and Nike and Levi were the precursors, but now we’re seeing major companies daily announce their intentions to fund gun control groups and SJW shakedown groups, and every time a shitlord sneezes in front of an oppressed class, it’s a national case. The constant drumbeat of this shit starts to take a toll not on the A-listers, or even on journeyman race car drivers and local sports announcers. Now it’s senior regional managers and executive editors and anybody with any modicum of power in the workplace either getting #metoo’d or N-worded or pronouned into trouble with HR, no matter the veracity of the allegations. The incentives are there, ruin the life of your shitlord boss, and you’re not only a hero, but the perfect candidate to replace them.

    My wife is already concerned about such things. She wants me to do the Mike Pence thing and completely refuse to meet 1:1 with women. Unfortunately, I can’t do that 100% of the time, but I do it as often as possible. I’ve even talked with a couple of coworkers who are concerned about the same thing. They’re not comfortable being 1:1 with women because all it takes is one unprincipled woman with an axe to grind or a path up the corporate ladder, and you’re radioactive.

    Anyway, in a world where outrage firings go from one every few weeks to multiple per day across various industries, the primary mechanism for avoiding armed conflict begins to erode. The biggest thing that keeps the US from melting apart in a fiery battle is that most average, everyday people have more to lose by fighting than they have to gain by being rid of their political opponents. When one’s livelihood is legitimately targeted, such incentives flip, and armed conflict is inevitable. Once a critical mass of people feel substantially threatened, they will retaliate violently.

    Image result for fired sjw

    Another relief valve in American culture is slowly being eroded. The Internet, for all of the gasoline it dumped on the political and social fires burning in our culture, also gave a platform for people who agree with one another but not with the mainstream media to commiserate, vent, and discuss current events without feeling smothered by the MSM’s blatant agenda. Now that the push has started for deplatforming, the relief valve is gumming up. Folks on the right are running out of patience when it comes to abridging the 1st and 2nd amendments, and if there is a substantial leftist push to deplatform most conservative, alt-right, and libertarian voices on major social media, it’s like holding a flamethrower to a gas can. God forbid they start trying to get the DNS servicers and site hosting companies involved… overstepping into complete censorship on the Internet will end violently. The Alex Joneses of the world may get completely silenced before the right wakes up from its slumber, but if a mainstream conservative/republican were to be deplatformed or completely silenced, I think more than a few right wingers would see the writing on the wall regarding the 1st amendment.

    Image result for online censorship

    I think that the left is moving fairly slowly and methodically right now. They know they can bide their time until the midterms, and that after the election, they can go full nutzo on Trump and the alt-right for another year and a half before they need to cool off to look semi-sane for the 2020 election. However, I think there is a narrow path to a very bad place. I think that it starts with a legit blue wave, giving the Democrats a majority in the House and a neutral split of the Senate, if not a slight majority. From there, “all is right” in the world again except for Trump, who would quickly be brought up on charges for an impeachment hearing. The inevitable vitriol from a Trump impeachment, possibly leading to isolated violence would be all the impetus a prog-leftist Congress would need to regulate social media and begin deplatforming the right en masse. Also, once that “racist, sexist, bigot” is out of the way, the easiest virtue signal in the world is to dump a ton of money into a bureaucratic leviathan for helping colleges and companies deal with the #metoo crisis through strict enforcement and a liability shield for companies who shoot first and ask questions later. Maybe toss on a recession as the cherry on top? Repealing the tax cuts and passing a medicare expansion would probably trigger a recession.

    The right would very quickly go from having a ton to lose, to having nearly nothing to lose, and I think violence would be inevitable in such a situation. How likely is it that all of this falls into place? Infinitesimal. However, it is the one clear path I see to organized violence.

  • Wednesday Afternoon Links

    Before Rufus gets a chance to ask the question: yes, some of us DO work. One of those people is apparently Brett. I guess getting loaded on cocaine and blowing strangers is just for fun. In his absence, I’ll be providing links. If someone posted something earlier, I apologize. I haven’t been paying attention.

    • Cody Wilson’s no good, very bad day. I want to believe this guy has been caught up in a plot to “neutralize” him, but he seems to have set served himself up on a silver platter by signing up for a site called SugarDaddyMeet, exchanging nudes with a minor (article says the girl was *under* 17 the age of consent in Texas [you’re welcome for keeping you off a list by looking it up for you]), and then hiring her for sex. The bragging about being “a big deal” may not have been helpful either.
    • I’m sure all of you nerds have already seen that Linus Torvalds–father of Linux–is taking a breather so that he can think about not being a dick to a group of people volunteering their time. In the wake of this there’s now a code of conduct, which has of course been immediately decried as the SJWification of the Linux kernel. I’m currently fantasizing about Buddhist monastic life.
    • Normally, this story would have me glancing at the headline and moving on, but how can I resist linking to a story with the phrase “rape by use of drugs, oral copulation by anesthesia or controlled substance”. The surgeon in question is relatively pretty, and I can guarantee his near future will include rigorous training on the value of consent.
    • I assume this is just fake news meant to fluff The Meg, but it’s still neat. “the males would each travel in a V-shape pattern as many as 140 times a day. It’s unclear if the behavior is related to mating or if they are hunting for different species of fish.”
    • Speaking of unfortunate interactions between adults and minors, Mr. Michael Aliperti threatened to shoot an 11 year old who beat him at Fortnight and got arrested for it. Mr. Aliperti should fix a cup of chamomile and take a long hard look at where life has taken him.

    Our user engagement analytics department indicates that we need more Minnesota content, so…here

  • Jeffery David Sachs Is a Sanctimonious Prick

    O, what a marvel it appeared to me,
    ⁠When I beheld three faces on his head!
    ⁠The one in front, and that vermilion was;
    Two were the others, that were joined with this
    ⁠Above the middle part of either shoulder,
    ⁠And they were joined together at the crest;
    And the right-hand one seemed ‘twixt white and yellow;
    ⁠The left was such to look upon as those
    ⁠Who come from where the Nile falls valley-ward.
    Underneath each came forth two mighty wings,
    ⁠Such as befitting were so great a bird;
    ⁠Sails of the sea I never saw so large.
    No feathers had they, but as of a bat
    ⁠Their fashion was; and he was waving them,
    ⁠So that three winds proceeded forth therefrom.
    Thereby Cocytus wholly was congealed.
    ⁠With six eyes did he weep, and down three chins
    ⁠Trickled the tear-drops and the bloody drivel.
    At every mouth he with his teeth was crunching
    ⁠A sinner, in the manner of a brake,
    ⁠So that he three of them tormented thus.
    To him in front the biting was as naught
    ⁠Unto the clawing, for sometimes the spine
    ⁠Utterly stripped of all the skin remained. ⁠

    The Divine Comedy, Canto 34, lines 37-60 (Alighieri, trans. Longfellow, 1867)

    Today, in an op-ed penned for CNN, Jeffery Sachs reminded all and sundry that he is an vile, unrepentant prick. As the avatar of the demoness Abyzou made manifest in flesh, Sachs used his op-ed as an opportunity to weave the textual fabric of self-righteousness to clothe the emaciated and decrepit form of his morality. Having donned the cloak of sanctimony, Sachs proceeded to list the ways in which he would use armed violence to redistribute the wealth of Bezos, Zuckerberg, Page, Brin, and Gates to satisfy his own prerogatives.

    Sachs, in all his munificence, states that he would first give these robber barons of the Silicone Age the opportunity to “voluntarily” donate 1% (and who among us could argue with a mere one percent?) of their net worth per annum, but admits that “when they don’t, governments should put on a 1% net worth levy to fund the basic health and education needs of the world’s poorest people.” Not content to employ the legal monopoly of violence held by government to strong-arm Elon Musk into giving up his rocketships, (and by “strong-arm” I mean “asphyxiate for not paying taxes” all Eric Garner-style) Sachs concluded his jeremiad with the dire prediction that the Neanderthal-browed, proletarian mob, having been whipped into frenzy by the populist murmurings of Donald Trump, will storm the campuses of SpaceX and Blue Origin looking for blood:

    The mega-rich expect the adulation of the masses and often get it. Yet the forbearance of society for the antics of the mega-rich will soon wear thin. Too many people are suffering, too many lower-skilled workers are losing their jobs and earnings, too much wealth is being frivolously squandered, and too much power over our lives is being asserted by big tech and other corporate giants.

    Donald Trump channeled the rising unhappiness into his electoral victory, but his trade wars and tax cuts for the rich only widen the divide. Real answers depend on redirecting the mega-wealth towards those in urgent need.

    Nevertheless, like a mafioso “convincing” a shop owner to contribute to his protection racket, Sachs offers us a way out, “[f]or those who don’t do so voluntarily, governments should put a levy on mega-wealth.” Let us be mindful, however, that when we pay indulgences to the Church of Sachs, what constitutes “mega-wealth” would be, of course, determined by its high priest: Jeffery David Sachs, the Quetelet Professor of Sustainable Development at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs and Professor of Health Policy and Management at Columbia’s School of Public Health. Oh, what burden must rest upon his wrinkled brow! How fortunate are we to be living in an age where we can hear, from his honeyed lips, the pronouncements of our philosopher-king, Sachs! Indeed, have no fear! For once we have achieved Sachsian utopia, he assures us that “there will be enough time and wealth to reach for the stars.”


    In the ancient mythology of Mediterranean and Mesopotamian cultures, envy was thought to manifest as harm to the person envied through the “evil eye.” Indeed, the Latin word for envy, “invidia” originates from the verb “invideo“(i.e., in+video); literally meaning “to look into/against”, but having the connotations of “being envious of,” being prejudiced against,” or “wishing harm upon.” To combat the baneful influence of the invidious evil eye, people in these cultures wore protective amulets. (And many still do!) One of the most common and powerful amulets against the evil eye was known in Latin as a fascinus.

    Pictured: An example of a fascinus.

    While our cultural mores may have fallen so far that we may scratch our heads over the import of a flying phallus creature, our ancestors knew that this is a perfect example of sympathetic magic, that is ‘like produces, or wards off, like’. And what better way to combat giant pricks like Jeffery Sachs than with a giant prick?

    Having read this article, you may, perchance, wish to purchase a fascinus. If so, you may start here. And if you have less propriety than I do, you may wish to use this as your shipping address.

    And, if you found this article fascinating, there’s a reason for that.

    Pictured: Glibertarians.com Founder Action Figures (L to R – OMWC, Swiss Servator, jesse.in.mb). Available at the Glibertarians.com Gift Shop: Collect them all!
  • Libertarian App-roved Collectivism

    Libertarian App-roved Collectivism

    [et_pb_section bb_built=”1″][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”image” _builder_version=”3.10.1″]

    [/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”3.10.1″ color=”#ffffff” /][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.10.1″]

    Socialism in the USA can happen any time now and I’d be cool with it.

    Seriously. It can happen any time that the Socialists in the USA want it, all thanks to Capitalist technology. And the Capitalists shouldn’t even mind.

    The Socialists can design a Meetup/Hookup-type app that matches Socialist Makers with Socialist Takers. Members would either be a Maker-Seeking-Taker or a Taker-Seeking-Maker.

    Those numerous guilty well-to-do Socialists, the Makers, those convinced of their regretful privilege, who have excess income/possessions/accounts/shoes/value can register on the site as Makers-Seeking-Takers. Likewise, the suffering masses of Socialists, the Takers, upon whose backs the Makers have trod in their patriarchal white-male-cishetero (regardless of whether or not you are such a thing, for if you’re a Maker it’s this oppressive identity class that forced you to be unwittingly successful) pursuit of greed, will register as Takers-Seeking-Makers.

    The Makers will be subject to the “From Each According to Its Ability” questionnaire to determine their Bougie-ness, their level of unacceptable indulgence. And in their turn, the Takers will complete the “To Each According to Its Need” profile, so as to determine their level of Victim’hood. The app will then find matches among these Socialists, appropriately pairing equal levels of Bougie-ness to Victim’hood. The ensuing orgy of wealth transfer will be epic!!!

    Naturally, the affluent Democrats suffering from white guilt will flock to the site, abandon their “you first” approach to benevolence, and shed their damning excess. No longer will obstructionist conservative legislators force Socialists to take lavish vacations, own expensive homes, patronize Starbucks. The Socialist Makers will finally be free to voluntarily give away to the Takers all that they are able. Existing charities already accepting donations and aiding the less-fortunate will cease to be a hindrance to the Socialists’ attempts at uplifting their fellow [insert preferred pronoun here].

    That’s all the brainstorming I’ve time for. I entrust the Glibs to naming the app, adding features, etc.

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • Tricks of the Trade: The Horoscope for the Week of April 29th

    So you want to be a fortuneteller.  Congratulations!  You’re a moron!

    There are a very few limited instances when putting up a crystal ball shingle is a good less than catastrophically bad idea:

    1.  It’s a front for your illegal business
    2.  It’s a money-laundering operation
    3. You are otherwise unemployed, and/or bored AND you have no expenses involved with obtaining your venue.

    In the same vein as giving a junkie some chlorox with which to sterilize their shared needles, here’s a little advice about succeeding in the X-mancy business.

    "Cleo" was already taken, obviously
    This is the look you’re going for

    First off, be a woman.  You might get away with being an astrologer with a Y chromosome, but for palmisty, cartomancy, scrying or psychic reading ain’t nobody gonna pay you for your opinion.  Once you are a woman, invest in chunky jewelry and scarves.  Consider dying your hair, but for the love of Gaia, do not have it professionally done.  You need to do it yourself.  The look you are cultivating is “sketchy.”  Respectable people make crappy fortunetellers.  There needs to be something… off about your appearance — the difference between “underbridge dweller” and “reclusive gypsy” is in the attitude and how you set up your surroundings.

    Good luck with that
    Nice try

    Do you think you’re psychic?  Great!  This is going to help lot.  It’s like they say, “sincerity is important, once you can fake that, you’ve got it made.”  The most successful psychic I know acts exactly as if they believe their own bullshit completely.  She has never dropped the facade in front of me.  Remember, you’re mostly a salesperson at this point, so have confidence in your product!  What if you can’t actually believe that you have the power to foretell the future?  Well, there is a solution to that.

    Drugs.

    Remember the oracle at Delphi?  Paint huffer.  Not from a spray can, but all natural organic hydrocarbons straight from Mother Earth’s crack.   If you want to go with the classics, you can choose ether, but what with the usual accouterments of candles and incense, I wouldn’t recommend it if you don’t want to go all Richard Prior.  But be careful that you don’t overdo it.  “Not entirely safe, not entirely sane” will draw the attention of the mark; “Crackhead” will have them scurrying for the door without paying.  The point of the drugs is to take the edge off your internal censor and *ahem* “open your mind to” the possible connections between the real world and your divinatory tools.  The only difference between “psychic” and “psychotic” is “cot,” which is what you’re probably going to be sleeping on if you choose to ply this trade.

    There is one skill that is pretty much mandatory if you’re going to make this business a sole/unaugmented source of income:  cold reading. This is a skill that can be learned, so do it.  Prestidigitation is also extremely useful, both for forcing cards and well… we’ll get to that

    Ideally, they should be less physically imposing, as well
    Notice that the mark must ALWAYS be wealthier than you

    Last thing:  if you want to make real money, you’re going to need a permanent premises so that you can build a clientele of suckers.  And if you want to really take them for what you can get, you’re going to need to commit some felony-level fraud.  This is going to end badly, if for no other reason that former marks, even ones that you that you didn’t even rip off will eventually be upset with your advice and having a fixed place of business means they know where to find you to make their displeasure known, or to send the local constabulary.  If you are satisfied by the rewards of one-off clients and the occasional petty larceny (this is where prestidigitation comes in:  if you keep your workspace cluttered, claustophobic, and filled with garish colors and patterns, this can make the mark more distracted and less likely to remember that he set down something small and salable, particularly if he didn’t notice you palming it.) then it’s safer to adopt the M.O. of grifters everywhere and keep mobile.  Carney life here we come!  Actually, renaissance fairs are a pretty good deal for an aspiring fortuneteller: the one-person tent is the cheapest premises you can have and is perfect for the kind of work you need to do, you have a constant flow of new clients pushed right in front of your flap, and those clients are in a pretty good mood and won’t actually take your advice too seriously.  Plus lots of them are drunk.  Blessings to Eris and Dionysus for drunken marks!

    I should probably also mention that dial-a-psychic is a thing that exists and my closest fortuneteller friend makes her living doing this, but I’ve never seen it in operation first-hand.  so not only do I not know anything about it, I don’t even know enough to be entertainingly ignorant about it.

    Also the marijuana is usually ass.
    Renfair. Pros: lots of one-off clients, steady income. Cons: herpes.

     

    Now, on to this week’s chart!

    This week has a couple of strong markers, and an oddly large number of tension/uncertainty indicators.  The more definite signs are for good fishing, and an extraordinary alignment (Sol-Mercury-Venus-Saturn retrograde) for relationships.  This is an excellent week to meet new partners, but a terrible week for breakups.  If the squeeze hasn’t gotten his crap out of the house KK, maybe it would be better to put it off until next week.  On the tension front, we have TWO different cross-alignments of opposition influencts;  we have change and stability signs on top of each other (Mercury in Capricorn) as well as balance/flux juxtaposition (Luna in Libra). If you are having difficulty figuring out WTF is going on in your life, this probably is why.*  The positioning last week that encourages sports betting  (Mars-Saturn retrograde in Capricorn) and masturbation  (Jupiter retrograde in Scorpio) remain this week, so have fun with that .

    *no, this is not why at all.

  • Two in the Pinker; One in the Stinker

    Last week, as part of his latest book-shilling tour, Steven Pinker looked us straight in the eye and threw down the gauntlet with his Big Think rumination “Why libertarianism is a marginal value and not a universal value.” Pinker argues that “the free market has no way to provide for poor children, the elderly, and other members of society who cannot contribute to the marketplace.” Furthermore, Pinker claims a robust social safety net as a necessary characteristic of a “developed” economy.

    Of course, this is argument is even more laughably fallacious than his criticisms of the connectionist model of language acquisition. To support his premise, Pinker indulges in a false choice fallacy, argumentum ad populum, and the beloved ‘Somalia fallacy‘. It truly is a mediocre bit of hackery that exposes the poverty of his arguments in just a little over 4 minutes.

    Split Pinker’s wig and bust his cheeks open in the comments below, and when you are finished, you can wash your ears out with this.

     

     

  • Emails to the Contact Us form

    Hello,
    I’m contacting you on behalf of HiLee – a leading bio cosmetics company with a special focus on beard care.
    We’re interested in publishing an article on your site. If you’re open to it, we’ll send a pitch for your approval.

    We’ll be happy to pay a fee if required.

    We share unique tips, report about recent development in the industry and always make sure that the content we create is relevant and informative to the site’s audience; we don’t engage in self-promotional pieces, worry not.

    Please let me know how you’d like to proceed.

    This was a tough one not to respond to. I am interested in beard care. Very interested. But we felt that if we were going to run an article on beard care, it should be by one of our commenters and not from an outside company.


    Hi, Jill here with OverdoseWatch.org
    Heroin and opiate relapse remains a KILLER amongst the community of the recovered.

    This is why you should include more resources for maintaining and managing sobriety on your site.

    It should be obvious why this was so unsuitable: We hate sobriety and love overdoses. Personally, I try to overdose at least three or four times a week. I go a few days without an overdose, I get anxious and itchy all over, like ants crawling on my skin. I may not even finish this post without a quick OD.


    WE NEED TO START EATING POOP, THE ONLY WAY TO SAVE THE WORLD. EAT MY OWN POOP EVERY DAY, EAT AND PROVIDE YOURSELF WITH THE NUTRIENTS YOU NEED TO SURVIVE IN THIS WONDERFUL WORLD OF SIN. ENJOY YOUR COWORKERS SCHEMATIZE, SCARF LOCAL FIREMAN OR TEACHERS DUMP LOAD. WHAT YOU CHOICE IS CURRENT DIARRHEA FLOWING FROM WITHIN. WILL YOU ALLOW ME TO WATCH YOU FROM A DISTANCE WHILE I EAT MY POOP AGAINST YOUR WINDOW. SOMETIMES DURING THE DAY, SOMETIMES IN NIGHT. GROW WITHIN ITS GLORY, AS YOU PROVIDE YOURSELF WITH ALL YOU NEED. PRAISE HIM FOR YOUR BOUNTY AND CONSUME. MAMMAL LOVE IS OK.

    We simply asked for more from this solicitation. Thousands of words more.

  • A Political Theory about Libertarians

    I thought about titling this “Hey Hihn, how’s this for deep libertarian thought?”, but I’m not that spiteful. This article is based upon an idea I’ve been tossing around in my head for a while. It usually comes back to the forefront whenever we’re talking about transfolk or open marriages. As with all of my articles, I make no representation that I’m not unknowingly ripping off some philosopher or, even worse, walking into some trap.

    http://www.vitamin-ha.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Obama-bows-to-Burger-King.jpgThere seem to be two types of libertarians… really more of a spectrum with clustering near the edges. On one end is what I’ll call the Deferentialists. The Deferentialists work from the premise that when an individual makes a decision, it is the right decision for them. Deferentialists’ motto is “live and let live.” They’re deferential to the individual’s decision making.

    On the other end is what I’ll call the Restraintists. The Restraintists work from the premise that when an individual makes a decision, it is their decision to make, whether or not it is the right decision. Restraintists’ motto is “who am I to tell you what to do?” They restrain their own sense of morality to avoid overstepping their authority.

    http://www.bslw.com/images/posters/authority_control_200x300.jpg
    The oddest image that came up for “authority”

    I’ve written in the past about my authority-based view of rights. To sum it up, your mom had the authority to wash your mouth out with soap when you cussed as a kid, but a politician doesn’t have the authority to punish you for your speech. This places me firmly in the Restraintist camp, and I think that all libertarians who care about being effective should join me.

    The Ineffectiveness of Deferentialism

    When viewed from a simplistic and static point of view, Deferentialism and Restraintism achieve the same thing. Should the government implement a law implementing some social goal? Deferentialism says no because the social goal may be right for some people, but it may also be wrong for some people. Restraintism says no because even if the social goal is good, the government overstep of its authority is evil, and the ends don’t justify the means.

    However, Deferentialism is ineffective in two ways. First, people, even Deferentialists, tend to have a line drawn in the sand where they shift from relativistic deference to the individual to a more absolutist stance. For example, Cosmotarians tend to be Deferentialists up to the point where their particular identity politics ox is gored. Second, Deferentialism gives no answer to Cultural Marxism. Deferentialists are either forced to kowtow to the virulent left, or they end up drifting authoritarian.

    http://www.talkativeman.com/img/Deference_to_Authority.jpg
    This image seemed oddly appropriate.

    In contrast, Restraintism handles both of these issues differently. Restraintists have absolutist stances for everything, so there is no line drawing to be done. Any failure to properly act libertarian on a certain issue is a failure of moral restraint, not a philosophical deficiency. Similarly, Restraintism isn’t hampered when facing off against Cultural Marxism. While Restraintists would never strip away the rights of Marxists, they’re free to criticize, ostracize, and attempt to curtail the creeping growth of Cultural Marxism.