Stephen, a rotund man with an acute case of rosacea and a few beads of sweat trickling down his face, carefully navigated his boxers over his deflating erection, visibly working hard to avoid tipping over onto the bed. He ran his fingers up the side of his wife’s still naked body, trigger her back to pucker up into pert goosebumps.
“That was great Janice, we need to do this more often,” Stephen softly whispered, trying not to disturb her post-coital glow. She refocused her eyes on him lovingly, her smile psychically channeling her internal ecstasy into Stephen’s understanding.
“Mmmmmm, honey, this … this was so good!” Janice purred, sensuously wriggling under the covers in a way that made Stephen want to crawl right back into bed for another round of mattress wrestling. However, his subconscious gave a pinch like a lactose intolerant rectum on a first date at an Indian restaurant. Stephen knew that he couldn’t keep up with his mid-life crisis. She was still a supple 23 with smooth skin and curvaceous volume in just the right places. He was a flabby, hairy 45 year old with a big house and a bigger checkbook. He knew he wasn’t enough to satisfy her; that’s what today was about.
“You know, we still have enough time to catch a movie. I heard that First Man movie is good.” Stephen emerged from the requisite catatonia after an orgasmic emission. “I’ve always been fascinated by movies about the Apollo program, Apollo 13 was great!”
“It’s all fake, you know,” a voice jarringly interjected from the chaise in the reading nook. “The moon landings were a hoax.” The voice was disturbingly earnest, with just a hint of condescension. Just the tone one would expect from the half-naked twenty-something Adonis of a man tapping away on his iPhone in the corner of the bedroom.
“What the hell are you talking about, Brad?” Stephen shot back, launching all-out thermonuclear body language war with the man whore in his reading spot. Stephen made a mental note to bleach the hell out of that chaise before sitting there again. If only that furniture could speak…
He snapped out of his train of thought with a realization that he couldn’t afford therapists for all of the furniture that was violated during today’s extended game of hide the pickle. Not while paying for that bitch of an ex-wife’s therapist, too. God, what a wrinkled old cunt!
Brad had leisurely removed his thong-ridden sweaty ass cheeks from Stephen’s sacred retreat, and was slowly getting dressed while he put together a parting shot that would extricate him from the room with his payment and without fucking up next week’s scheduled romp time with Stephen and Janice. He really wanted that damned 84″ QLED TV, whether or not it meant doing the devil’s threesome with some rich geezer and his glorified whore.
“The moon landing was a hoax. An American bluff to the Soviet space race dominance.” Brad muttered without addressing anybody in the room. He hoped beyond hope that this was the end of the conversation and he could go home and take a shower. He could feel that whore’s randy juices congealing in his beard, and he internally cringed at the thought of how much beard wax it would take to return his chin mane to its former glory.
“Brad, you aren’t even old enough to have seen the moon landing, how would you even know?” Janice sat up in bed, any remaining aura of afterglow having been replaced with a mix of mild annoyance and reluctant curiosity. Brad noticed her perky bosoms settle into an oddly attractive asymmetry, like a cute girl with a crazy eye. Janice, following Brad’s gaze, covered her mammaries in reflexive embarrassment.
“It’s all out there… you know, on the Internet. The videos were clearly produced in Hollywood. The artifacts are more of science fiction than science fact. I mean, you can even see the flags waving in the breeze! Who do they think that they’re fooling?” Brad felt his hackles rising, and he resigned himself to getting into this debate yet again. These ignorant fools don’t even know that the moon landing is fake… they probably think that Al Quaeda did 9/11 and Sandy Hook was done by a disturbed autist.
“Your-” Stephen started.
“Let me ask you a question, before you get started,” Brad interrupted, pausing for dramatic effect before continuing. “What evidence do you have that the moon landing actually happened?”
“Well, uhh,” Stephen was caught off guard and gathered himself under the disguise of thoughtful contemplation. “There are people who claim to have gone to the moon. There is a large amount of equipment still around that was used to send people to the moon. There is video of men on the moon. Hell, I’ve even seen a moonrock.”
“What do you find most convincing from that evidence?” Brad questioned, pretending not to notice that Stephen’s Trump-like penis was slowly retreating through the slit in his boxers into it’s fungal habitat like a snail tentacle after encountering a patch of salt.
“Well, I guess the video is most convincing,” Stephen tried to hide his defensiveness by leaning onto the edge of the bed, unintentionally flaunting his scrunched up coin purse through the widened hole in the front of his only clothing.
“The video?” Brad scoffed, barely reining in a condescending “harumph” that would’ve been the last nail in the coffin of his plans to continue to rock the world of that naked vixen whose cheek still showed the remnants of his primal rut. “The video could just as easily have been fabricated. In fact, it has many issues that indicate possible fabrication. If you strip away your trusting bias, you-”
“Trusting bias? I’m the one with a bias?” Stephen shoved away from the bed, causing Janice to flinch in a way that tore her out of whatever trance was allowing her to tolerate this idiotic debate. She slid out of the sheets, and walked, intentionally seductively, to the closet to grab some clothes. Movie or no, she was going to get dolled up, if only to make Brad feel jealous and to distract Stephen from this inanity. She knew how Stephen was, he’d talk all night if somebody didn’t distract him.
“Yes, you’re too trusting of the media and the government. Humor me for a moment and approach the moon landing from a skeptic’s point of view,” Brad was clearly enjoying this a bit too much. He could feel the blood coursing back into his flaccid meat tube.
“Ok, I’ll play along. As a skeptic, I see a bunch of video seeming to show people in suits on a rocky surface with low gravity. I see a rock that doesn’t look like a normal rock I could find in my backyard. I’ve seen a full sized model of a rocket that could plausibly send these men into space. I’ve heard more than one person talk as though they have been to the moon.” Stephen was also enjoying this a bit too much, although not with the sexual repercussions that were stretching Brad’s thong under his sweatpants. “I guess that if I didn’t trust what I was told about these things, they could represent anything from a legitimate trip to the moon to a conspiratorial hoax. I don’t have any direct evidence that anybody has actually been on the moon.”
Brad nodded in approval, cutting in before Stephen could assert dominance. Brad chuckled internally as he recognized the same power play he used while directing the three person play that was the violation of Janice. “But why wouldn’t you believe them? They have no reason to lie, right?”
Brad paused, locking eyes with Stephen and not faltering when Janice sauntered back into the room, stuffed into a mini-skirt and halter top that looked like it was about to burst. “Wrong! They were losing the space race! The Soviets beat them to every major milestone, and the Americans were desperate for the upper hand. It was a pivotal time in the Cold War, and the Americans couldn’t afford to lose this one.”
“I mean, I guess that’s plausible, but Occam’s Razor seems to suggest that it’s more likely that they actually did it rather than some massive conspiracy including thousands of people to fake a moon landing.” Stephen, unlike Brad, made no attempt to hide his notice of Janice’s provocative dress.
“What is there to believe if we can’t trust the history books, the contemporary records, and the testimony of others?” Janice contributed, to the shock of both Brad and Stephen.
“That’s just it!” Stephen supported “If we don’t trust the government and historians about the moon landing, what can we trust them about? What is truth when you don’t trust anything outside of your own first-hand experience?”
“Now you’re talking! Question everything!” Brad said, betraying his love for the X-files and for pot. “How do you even know that there is a place called New Zealand? There are pictures and videos, and people pretend that they have been there, but without actually going there, I have no idea that such a place exists.”
Stephen, obviously annoyed at this turn of conversation, pulled Janice close, pressing her soft body against his. “You’re a moron, but your point is well taken. I can’t know that something is the truth unless I’ve directly observed it. Everything else is built on some sort of social trust. It’s an assumption that people won’t collectively and casually lie to you about history and science and other things that you can’t and won’t verify.”
“So, are we going to watch First Man?” Janice asked, sliding her hand down Stephen’s pantleg in an obvious sign of impatience.
“See you next week, Brad,” Stephen asserted with a finality that caused Brad to turn and walk out the door.
Good God, man.
“Now you’re talking! Question everything!” Brad said, betraying his love for the X-files and for pot.
Nice.
SugarFree has a lot to answer for, though.
Do you really want to see SF’s answers? Before lunch?
It isn’t cronyism if MLB donate to both sides?
MLB isn’t in the business of playing favorites or politics—just making sure that the league stays on the good side of those currently in Congress.
There are two sides?
They like to pretend for the proles.
When players try to point out inequalities great or small, or advocate for social justice, or criticize the government for how it marginalizes the poor and the downtrodden, most fans don’t want to hear it.
I need a lefty sportswriter cheat sheet: when Colin Kaepernick or Lebron James prattle on about their political beliefs, that’s good. When Tim Thomas or Curt Shilling do it, that’s awful and racist.
The article implies something else: that all athletes should shut up all of the time.
But I don’t think that’s the sympathy of most folks inside sports or out: most folks simply want the folk with whom they disagree to shut up; but that wouldn’t make the article’s point.
The simpler question of how pointless regulations lead to cronyism goes unasked. In the case of MLB, though, I’d generally argue that they are simply bribing government principals so that regulations that never should have been written in a free world don’t get written in the actual world. So, oddly, if you want the world you deserve, you must bribe the government not to govern you.
So, oddly, if you want the world you deserve, you must bribe the government not to govern you.
And that’s the rub, isn’t it? Once you get in the habit of paying the government to leave you the hell alone, everything changes. Your business changes. The people who become indispensable to the business are the ones who know which wheels need to be greased. And going from “leave me alone” to “screw over that guy who wants to compete with me” or “help pay for my stadium” isn’t so much of a journey. The same guys can deliver it. And it’s just a few dollars more.
Have a modern version of Danegeld…
this is well put
That’s basically what happened to Microsoft. They didn’t pay the protection racket, so it went after them on spurious anti-trust charges.
You don’t say.
“What we saw over and over yesterday was that the group – the caravan, as we call them – would push women and children to the front, and then begin, basically, rocking our agents,” Chief Patrol Agent Rodney Scott said in a CNN interview.
“Several agents were actually struck by rocks,” Scott said, noting that three were injured.
National Border Patrol Council president Brandon Judd backed up Scott’s assertion, saying male migrants used women and children as shields as they threw rocks at U.S. border agents.
“They pushed women and children up front. And then behind those women and children, they started throwing rocks, cement bricks, they started throwing bottles at our Border Patrol agents,” Judd said in a Fox News interview.
What are you talking about? About time men got out of the way and let the woman lead for once.
I believe him, but you’d think they would be taping all this and could show video. Hell, put some drones (not that kind) or choppers in the air and get aerial shots. So what if they are technically over Mexico. What are the Mexicans going to do about it?
You wanna know how to get Capone? They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. *That’s* the *Chicago* way! And that’s how you get Capone. Now do you want to do that? Are you ready to do that? I’m offering you a deal. Do you want this deal?
I caught part of a NPR sob story account of how these migrants just want to have a dialog with the border agents but discovered tear gas was present and had to flee in terror.
As someone who has experienced CS in an enclosed space, it’s an annoyance but hardly the same as eating machine gun fire. Which is usually what happens when you physically assault a defensed border. Having a dialog…utter bullshit. These fifth columnists are goddam lucky they live in modern luxury filled society.
CS does wonders for blocked sinuses, that’s for sure.
I never thought that amount of snot & mucous could come out of my head or in such a short amount of time.
Which installment of this series will it be revealed that Janice is a RealDoll?
They argue over whose turn it is to clean up. Brad whines that Lysol is filled with carcinogens. Stephen reminds him who’s paying.
City of Toledo has some interesting questions for their weapons contracts.
Hope Toledo cops like their new Chinese guns.
AK47s for everyone!
How many “assault weapons” stolen from unsold manufacturer inventory are used in crimes, exactly? Somewhere in the range of guns stolen off careless, idiot cops?
Not as much as the guns that are purposely run to the Mexican Cartels by the Federal government.
Most, since most guns are black, or very dark shades of grey, and thus assault weapons.
Not to mention how many have that thingy that goes up, or a pistol grip.
Wow! Toledo spends 150k/year on weapons. Totally worth pissing off millions of gun owners.
They also seem to forget that cops are civilians.
any gun manufacturer that attempted to humor the Toledo city council with gun control-friendly responses would face a national blacklist in hours.
civilian use
Police are civilians.
So. Much. This.
Until the police agree to be bound by the UCMJ and have their unions disbanded, I don’t want to hear shit from them about “civilians”.
Trick questions. I found the answer key:
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Non-functioning ones
4. No
5. Fuck no
6. Yes, our dealers may be assured that they will have sufficient stock.
1&2 should be no as assault weapons is a fictional category.
Maybe if responsible gun makers had refused to arm the Cleveland cops, Tamir Rice’s parents wouldn’t have to hold a vigil or pray for their son.
Do they define assault weapons?
Do they realize that cops are civilians, and so any firearms that the company agrees not to sell to civilians can’t be sold to them?
Isn’t every dealer required by federal law to conduct background checks?
Why would a firearms manufacturer invest in ammunition tracing technology? All guns have a serial number, so they already have a tracing “technology” for them which doesn’t require any further investment.
How is it possible to use industry best practices “at a minimum”? Isn’t it pretty definitional that there are no practices better than best practices?
Alright, one more. Why are questions 1 and 2 separate questions? Do they really think someone is going to manufacture assault weapons for civilian use, but not sell them to civilians?
Maybe they’re covering their bases in case they ever come across a pre-1986 product.
All ammo is now tracers.
They do work both ways.
Hope Toledo cops like their new Chinese guns.
…or HK’s
Nope
Absurdly expensive, but disgusting civilians like you and me can buy them.
I am quite certain you knew I was referring to the SL-8, which is most certainly, and in nobody’s imagination going to ever be mistaken for a G-36, or any MP-7, or an MP-5 in a caliber above .22LR, or a UMP that wasn’t turned into some abomination to give it the appearance of a “sporting rifle.” Only their pistols are identical for both government and civilian sales.
Seriously, you have more money than sense to entertain the idea of buying an HK branded AR, even with a piston.
Oh God. *soldiers on*
It gets better. Trump makes an appearance (so to speak).
The orange mushroom?
It costs very little to fabricate a story (tell a lie). It costs a great deal to maintain that story with the cost increasing exponentially with the duration the story must be maintained and the number of people required to maintain it.
The moon landing happened because hundreds of thousands of people were involved in making it happen. And that is vastly more likely than hundreds of thousands of people maintaining a lie for 50 years.
This.
If you want to tell me that a conspiracy happened I am willing to listen you you then grant that conspiracy magical abilities at coordination, luck, and hundreds of individuals keeping the secret I am going to call you a loon. The number of people who would have had to be involved in faking the Apollo 11 moon landing would have been in the hundreds. The number of people involved in faking all 6 moon landings would be well into the thousands at a minimum. Today, with the existance of sattelite imagery of the landing sites…
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/images/584392main_M168000580LR_ap17_area.jpg
The number of people who would have information to conclusively prove the landings were fakes would be well into the 10’s of thousands and any reporter who broke the story would go down in history so there is plenty of incentive for the story to be told and yet all we have are whackjobs spouting non falsifiable theories to prove it.
At this point we can categorically reject the idea that the moon landings were fake.
Not to mention the multiple laser reflecting mirrors left at the “landing sites” that scientists use to this day.
Yep. From a paper I wrote a few years back:
“In the [JFK] case, the conspiracists, including [author] and [author], require us to believe that not only did some outside organization pull off the crime of the century, but also that they did it without anyone involved talking about it while, AT THE SAME TIME, leaving important clues to their actions littered from Dealey Plaza to Washington D.C.”
Here’s a delightful video by a film maker, saying it was easier to go to the moon than fake the video.
YOU LIE!!
I first read this as Brad and Janet, and kept waiting for Tim Curry to pop out of the closet in drag.
Poor Tim Curry. He seemed like one of the good uns.
Dammit, Janet. I want to screw!
In case you didn’t know, a well-known Chinese billionaire, is a member of The Chinese Communist Party
Filed under, “You don’t Say?”
“surprise to many”
only in the thriving marketplace of economic and political ideologies that is China.
What the fuck does being a party member have to do with the price of tea?
Yeah, I got a chuckle out of that.
Alibaba declined to comment on Ma’s Party membership, but said political ties did not impact the firm’s operations.
“Political affiliation of any executive does not influence the company’s business decision-making process,” a spokesperson said in emailed comments to Reuters on Tuesday.
—
Well if they say so, i guess i’ll take their word for it.
The real interesting thing about Alibaba is their stock sign, BABA, which is the ticker for a Cayman Islands shell company.
I wouldn’t touch that stock except for minor day trades. institutional holders are out of their minds for buying it.
I would say that same about China in general. The whole place is a house of cards waiting to collapse at the slightest sneeze by some random nomenklatura. The way they’ve managed to hoodwink the world into sinking so much money into them is baffling.
totally fair
also fair: Exxon and Arthur Andersen were things once
Although, TBF, in both those cases there was some real problems AND the prosecutors at least attempted to use the law…yeah, you’re right, that does sound like China,
ugh: Enron
XOM is miles away!
Wait, Alibaba has a market cap of nearly half a trillion bucks?
yup
Who doesn’t like a party?
Under socialistic systems the only people with money are the ones in power…
I can’t believe they actually published this. I was really fucking drunk when I wrote it.
By the way, I should add that I’m not a moon hoaxer. I just combined two things that were funny to drunk me with a navel gazing question about burden of proof that I had been chewing on for a while.
Right… we know what you are.
Flat Earther.
No shit.
“Dear Glibs…”
“I never thought this would happen to me.”
small mid-western college, always
I guess nobody in Ohio got laid in high school? Because it can’t be that Southerners can’t write compelling fiction.
THE Ohio University or THE University of Miami Ohio?
… wait a second…
all this sex stuff was just a cover to get me to read some philosophy crap?!?
*flips keyboard*
Dammit, you caught me!
*disappears in a cloud of smoke *
“Now you’re talking! Question everything!” Brad said, betraying his love for the X-files and for pot.
Hey, now!
Good work, Trashy. You probably don’t want to know what dark muses other Glib authors turn to.
In his city, R’lyeh, SugarFree lies, sleeping.
I feel soiled. In a, I need to take a hot shower and scrub down with a wire brush, sort of way.
But which would be worse after reading the “erotica” which appears at this site, feeling like you need a hot shower or feeling like you need a cold shower?
Brain bleach.
Feeling like I need to take a cold shower would be so shocking that I would feel the need to take a hot shower and scrub down with a wire brush.
I could post some blood-running-south erotica if SP let me.
OT.
I hate when people say idear
Could you use that in a sentence please?
he has no idear how tuh
Right, talking like Toe-mater. got it.
in these here parts, it’s simply “maters” and “skeeters”
I thought the iDear was the new Apple line of sexbots?
He’s a coworker and every day he says it at least 3 times. It’s like being stabbed in my ears with a shard of rusty metal.
A twisted way of putting the moon hoax out there. I remember as a little boy watching the lunar module take off from the moon on TV
TV an ancient form of video
And the drama and anguish of ‘Houston, we have a problem’.
Mom would go through the papers and clip stories out for my scrap book, but I guess it was all a hoax
Are you saying she was in on it?
From the Manafort article on Reason.
Tony|11.27.18 @ 11:45AM|#
I’d be happy to make a list of things I think Obama did wrong. I don’t worship politicians like so many of you libertarians.
John|11.27.18 @ 11:51AM|#
Then make it. And item number one can be how he allowed Putin to run wild for 8 years. Until you make the list, shut the fuck up. Saying you can make a list without actually naming your criticisms is just you being the same lying partisan hack you always are. Make the list or shut the fuck up.
Tony|11.27.18 @ 12:00PM|#
His biggest flaw was trusting that his own brilliance could turn Republicans into not-sociopaths. There’s lots of stuff with Russia that they kept secret that in hindsight might have better served us if revealed, but again, everyone thought Hillary would win and the issue would be better dealt with later.
That. Is. Awesome. “His flaw is that he is just so smart, but he couldn’t get those damned troglodytes to listen to his infinite wisdom.”
And how long has Tony been on the Reason website? If he learned anything during his time there, he would know that libertarians aren’t into worshiping politicians but he knows this and is just a disingenuous partisan hack.
I know an acquaintance similar to Tony and I refuse to ever talk politics with him because he argues in bad faith.
We got Winston, a nice acquisition, Tony is just a long term troll
argues in bad faith
They assume the moral high-ground. It really grinds my gears.
he knows this
I am not sure he does. How can you be called out on something like incorrectly referring to the US as a democracy by half a dozen people every time you do it but still continue to do it? People who are like this (and I know too many in the real world) and their general lack of ability to think boggles my mind. The dumbing down of the population, particularly in historical knowledge and civics is going to lead to actual tyranny.
They assume the moral high-ground.
Plenty of that going around both sides.
This.
I absolutely believe the progressive left is evil. It would take some divine intervention to chip away at that belief.
The difference, however, is that I can argue from first principles to stated conclusions somewhat coherently. They don’t even have first principles. They have ad hominems and blatant hypocrisy. How can a post-modernist claim the moral high ground with a straight face? They don’t believe in morality in the traditional sense. Oh right, they believe in one first principle… might makes right. Everything else is a tool to accumulate power by any means necessary.
I absolutely believe the progressive left is evil.
#MeToo
ad hominems and blatant hypocrisy
can’t stand it no matter whose team is guilty
Michelle had the right idea about staying high; maybe somebody will try it some day. I hate all the excuses that folk grind out especially when they know their guy is wrong, unworthy, tasteless, or unprincipled.
Being outraged that regular folks think the US is a democracy is still tiresome and stupid.
The reality is they’re attempting to take the moral high ground by signaling the correct virtues and/or claiming a moral authority by virtue of victimhood. In reality, “taking the moral ground” is almost always an attempt to shut down debate by shaming the opponent.
White privilege, white guilt, the patriarchy, imperialist… these are all psychological and verbal techniques to minimize opposition by creating a sense of shame that is not directly correlated to any specific action, but inherited from society writ large, thereby becoming undeniable.
I reject all of it.
He and John deserve each other. Both of them are partisan hacks who gleefully ignore anything that conflicts with the narrative inside their heads.
Tony is a troll. John just has a few deep-seated anger issues.
“You don’t want to see me angry. I argue in bad faith when it get angry!”
LOL
Sort of like a car wreck, I take a twisted amount of pleasure watching it though. Not every day, but shit like that makes me laugh.
Still miss the John/MNG fights. I don’t think anyone John opponent has reached MNG levels since. Tony and Bo are hacks compared to MNG (and I will admit that I might be giving MNG too much credit since he was the first I saw when I joined the TOS)
joe round 1 was better than MNG. He wasn’t the same when he came back. Like Petrino or Mack Brown.
Neu Mexican wasn’t ever a troll, but he was a good to spare with. Except for his crazy idea that tax revenue was chaotic, therefore the laffer curve had no meaning.
He and John deserve each other.
I’m disappointed in you. I thought you were smarter than to say that.
“His own brilliance”….ahahahahaha.
The same people who now are more paranoid about Russia than James Jesus Angleton ever was just looooooooved that “The ’80s called, they want their foreign policy back” line.
More and more the leftists that I know talk like this. They also like to assume that, in a conversation about gov’t and philosophy, that you should be the one to move closer to their position. I was told recently by one such leftist that there was no reason for our convo for exactly that reason. I was told “You’re not here to learn or to come closer to me. You’re just trying to win the conversation.” Yea, it’s called debate, asshole. And it is not my fault that you engage in every single logical fallacy in the book. I’m not sorry I called you on it either, not that you learned anything in the course of our short debate. “Winning the conversation”=trying to have clear, effective communication. And no I am not “coming closer to you” because our beliefs are diametrically opposed to one another. You want to enslave your fellow man with collectivism (under the guise of compassion…) and I want people to be free individuals. Fuck, I hate how stupid people are that they can’t understand disagreement or even present a logical case for their beliefs, let alone remotely understand what and why other people believe different things. Critical thinking is dead. ///endrant.
(p.s. I have had it up to here *raises hand to eye level* with this ‘feelz > reals’ bs)
Think of it like religion. No true believer ever had a conversation with a nonbeliever starting with the idea of “maybe I’m wrong”.
It’s their donation time.i don’t miss them.
Will they be calling out to the Glibs like the last fundraiser?
They did that? Classy.
I got an email begging for a donation. (I think they were begging; I only saw the header and haven’t read the email yet.)
I used to work with a guy who claimed the same thing about Bill Clinton. He would lament that Bill was so smart that the other pols couldn’t understand his ideas. And because they knew he was so smart the feared him and would do anything to block him.
Asking for specifics would never lead to anything. Just the repeated claim that he was “so damned smart”.
In order to explain it you fairly, both you and he would have to be as smart as Bill Clinton in order to comprehend the sheer magnitude of his smartness. You think there’s room for 3 people that smart on the planet? There is not! So you’ll just have to take his word for it that Clinton is really damned smart.
I know a guy who says the same kind of shit.
Bill is incredibly smart in a very particular way. The man can work a room like no other and he’s got a hell of a political gauge. That in no way means he makes the correct decisions.
Billy was a flimflam man.
This.
Moped perps dumped
Scotland Yard officers are specially trained to end pursuits of law-breakers on mopeds and motorcycles — by striking them with their own vehicles
As for cops and English, this seems reasonable; the footage is amusing.
Stealing is violence, you silly bitch.
I don’t have the facts about or an opinion on Manafort, but I very much like the idea of plaintiffs winning libel suits and everyone toning it TF down.
YOU MUST PICK A SIDE!
I need facts; I don’t think I have all the facts * shrugs *
As if facts matter.
supposedly the Grauniad has visitor logs to the embassy where Assange is holed up.
I legit LOLd.
That was classic Glibs prose.
This Andrew Heaton fellow is fun.
I was wondering, how often do the feds do 2 week prison sentences? It seems strange to me. This is the guy who supposedly started the entire Trumputin investigation, and he’s doing all of 2 fucking weeks in prison. For lying to the feds. Seems rather strange.
He had to be home to keep an eye on Ma’am and Webster, Ben Vereen might try to steal him again.