CPRM’s [REDACTED] Barbecue Recipe

By CPRM

Okay, a good barbecue starts with the meat. Pork is great because it’s cheap and takes on flavor. The best cut of pork for this recipe is [REDACTED]. This cut comes out moist with a crispy exterior.

Ingredients:

8 pounds of pork [REDACTED]
2 22oz bottles of [REDACTED] mustard
1.5 bottles of [REDACTED] mustard
1 pound of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
16 oz of [REDACTED]
1 Can of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
2 [REDACTED] [REDACTED] peppers
2 [REDACTED] Onions
molasses
A smoker grill
[REDACTED] wood chips
16 pounds of charcoal

We’ll start off with meat. I’m assuming you bought it in a store. So take your 8 pounds of [REDACTED] and microwave 8 minutes/until par cooked. (sounds nuts, but it works). Use a fork to poke holes in it and set aside.

In The Large Yellow Tupperware bowl add one pound of [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. Pour in 2 22oz bottles of [REDACTED] mustard, followed by 1.5 bottles of [REDACTED] mustard.

Add 16 oz of [REDACTED]. Stir.

Next, take the molasses and pour around the Yellow Tupperware bowl in a Fibonacci sequence from the center out.

It should taste disgustingly sweet. The taste will temper as the sauce caramelizes on the grill.

Use ½ the can of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

Now, in a food processor, liquefy 2 [REDACTED] [REDACTED] peppers, and 2 [REDACTED] onions.

Add the peppers and onions to the sauce.

The flavor should be coming together.

Now, use the other half of the can of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] to clean out the mustard bottles and food processor. Pour that into the sauce.

Submerge the par-cooked permeated pork [REDACTED] in the sauce. (If you are someone worried about food contamination, set aside ¼ of the sauce for cooking before adding the pork). The par-cooked pork will draw the sauce in as it chills.

Seal and store in the fridge for 16-24hrs.

 

THE NEXT DAY

Put 16 pounds of charcoal into your smoker grill and light by your preferred method.

In the smoker chamber add [REDACTED] wood chips or if you prefer, use [REDACTED] wood logs.

After the grill has reached temperature, fill it with as many [REDACTED] pork pieces as will fit. Close the grill, and close the chimney ¾.

Have a cigarette. Then open the chimney to full, this will prevent getting smoke in your eyes. Turn over all the pieces, add sauce to the part that was flamed. Close the grill, and turn the chimney back to ¾ closed.

Have a cigarette. Repeat the last step.

Have a cigarette. Repeat the step from before.

Have a cigarette. Repeat again.

The first round should be done.

Now repeat again, check to see if you need to add more [REDACTED]wood.

Do so until all the pork is cooked.

Place the cooked pork in an oven-safe container and cover with extra sauce. Place in the oven at 200 degrees adding the rest of the pieces as they cook.

When the pork is fully cooked, the outside should appear burnt, while the inside is moist.

If I do another article, we’ll add a side with my [REDACTED] salad!

Comments

159 responses to “CPRM’s [REDACTED] Barbecue Recipe”

  1. WTF

    Well, what a great [REDACTED] of [REDACTED] and I can’t wait to try it with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] , you truly are a [REDACTED] among [REDACTED] .

  2. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED], [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. [REDACTED] off, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]!

  3. Have a cigarette.

    Will this still work if my cigarettes are “funny”?

    1. commodious spittoon

      Like one of those exploding joke cigars?

    2. Just Say’n

      Your cigarette tells jokes? Funny jokes or Trevor Noah type jokes?

    3. Dr. Fronkensteen

      Funny how? Like a clown. Do they amuse you?

    4. Your cigarettes are funny…. LOOKING!

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!

      1. In what way?

        /Gunderson

    5. MikeS

      Funny like this?

  4. commodious spittoon

    8 pounds of pork [REDACTED]

    That’s a lot of pig. Does the recipe scale down okay? Could I try it with [REDACTED]lbs of pork [REDACTED], instead?

  5. Just Say’n

    This is a [REDACTED] piece and you should be [REDACTED] of it. [REDACTED] like this is [REDACTED].

    [REDACTED] you

    1. That’s [REDACTED], don’t you think you were a little [REDACTED]?

      1. Just Say’n

        Look who the [REDACTED] it is. I was merely [REDACTED] on his post.

        1. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] {REDACTED] again.

          1. Just Say’n

            That was the [REDACTED] of remarks. I’ll take that [REDACTED] [REDACTED].

            [REDACTED] you

          2. You seem a little [REDACTED], maybe some [REDACTED] will [REDACTED] you.

          3. MikeS

            Hey! You two [REDACTED] need to [REDACTED] and [REDACTED].

            [REDACTED]!

  6. Sean

    [REDACTED] [REDACTED].

    I’m going back to the AM thread.

  7. KSuellington

    It seems like this sauce could use more quaaludes. But then again maybe that was REDACTED.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CA4yuz8qgj4

  8. Creosote Achilles

    I don’t know what’s going on here but I suspect this is a reference to something.

    1. It’s about [REDACTED], obviously.

      1. Creosote Achilles

        Clearly.

    2. commodious spittoon

      It’s a reference to HM finally revealing [REDACTED] in a thread last week. I forget which.

      1. MikeS

        I always miss all the [REDACTED] stuff!

        1. Don’t worry, it’s [REDACTED] as [REDACTED], so you [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

      2. Gustave Lytton

        What a [REDACTED]

      3. Creosote Achilles

        I am disappointed. I wanted to know who the [REDACTED] is. Guess now I’ll never know. Also I wanted to see if [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and [REDACTED] would defend [REDACTED]’s [REDACTED].

        1. It turned out to be [REDACTED], and as for the other, it was [REDACTED], hope that clears things up.

  9. 8====D [REDACTED] = [REDACTED]
    8====D ~ ~ ~ (_I_) = [REDACTED] o-:

    1. Just Say’n

      [REDACTED]!

      Is the bottom one supposed to be a [REDACTED]? I’ve never seen one that looks like a [REDACTED]. Or is that a [REDACTED]. Either way, [REDACTED]

      1. MikeS

        That comment made me [REDACTED].

        1. Creosote Achilles

          If it lasts [REDACTED] hours, call a [REDACTED]

    2. Chafed

      Must be HM links that were redacted.

  10. Gustave Lytton

    Also, [REDACTED] [REDACTED].

  11. commodious spittoon

    Two different mustards, though? Sure thing, Alton. Angling for that Michelin star much?

    1. commodious spittoon

      I bet you think russet potatoes are declasse. Probably only buy those fancy Yukon golds.

      1. MikeS

        Reds or GTFO. [REDACTED]!

        1. Purple! you [REDACTED] [REDACTED]!

          1. Gustave Lytton

            [REDACTED] are the [REDACTED]

            Do you even [REDACTED], [REDACTED]?

          2. A Leap at the Wheel

            No way. I can’t eat those purple potatoes. They look like someone took a rubber band, wrapped it around someone’s [REDACTED], and then just started to [REDACTED] the end of it, like, really going crazy and just [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] over and over until a blood vessel burst and it gets [REDACTED] all over the place.

          3. You’re getting the wrong [REDACTED] if that what you [REDACTED]

          4. A Leap at the Wheel

            Wait a second? [REDACTED]? I thought we were talking about [REDACTED]!

            Well that explains it.

      2. robc

        Okay, Tulpa, did you just forget to change your handle?

        1. Gustave Lytton

          No, you’re [REDACTED]!

      3. A Leap at the Wheel

        Knows what “declasse” means. Thinks Yukon Golds are fancy.

        WTF dude?

        1. MikeS

          [REDACTED] him, he’s a [REDACTED].

        2. commodious spittoon

          *hillbilly twang*

          NOT SO CLEVER NOW, AIN’T YA, COLLEGE

  12. Scruffy Nerfherder

    LOL

    Just got cussed out on the phone by a (now former) customer because I wouldn’t refund his credit card for $1500 and put it on his brand new house credit account. Mind you that this is the first time I’ve ever done business with him, so he doesn’t have a credit track record with me.

    It’s nice when they make the decision easy for you.

    A little bit of googling indicates that he’s a grade A asshole. Gotta love the internet age.

  13. SP

    Thanks for the recipe, CPRM! May we please use it in the (eventual) Glib [REDACTED]book?

    1. How many [REDACTED] have you collected so far?

      1. Gustave Lytton

        [REDACTED]

        1. That’s not enough, we need at least [REDACTED].

          1. SP

            You are [REDACTED].

            But I’d have to [REDACTED] to provide an actual [REDACTED].

          2. MikeS

            I [REDACTED] it when SP [REDACTED].

    2. Old Man With Candy

      Will the Glib [REDACTED]book have a recipe for a sammich for you to make me?

  14. Ownbestenemy

    I plan on making a [REDACTED] [REDACTED] pork [REDACTED] tacos this weekend and drinking copious amounts of [REDACTED] during the process.

    1. Make sure you get her consent first.

      1. MikeS

        [REDACTED] that.

      2. Ownbestenemy

        I [REDACTED] consent, but had no knowledge of the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] agreement from the last time I ate the pink [REDACTED]. Such is [REDACTED].

        1. Hope you’ve got a good lawyer.

  15. Just Say’n
    1. Just Say’n

      He’s moved into the Pat Buchanan category (“good Buchanan” and “bad Buchanan”). There’s “good Tucker” when he talks about foreign policy and “bad Tucker” when he talks about almost anything else

      1. MikeS

        I don’t follow him closely, but from what I’ve seen he’s pretty good on 1st and 2nd amendment issues, too.

        1. He’s gotten a lot better than his first go-round on Fox. I think he’s grown up some.

          1. MikeS

            Maybe the bow tie was a progressive bow tie and it was controlling him a la The Hat & The Hair?

  16. In spite of how [REDACTED] (((REDACTED))) sounds, this is pretty [REDACTED].

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MITPKDE850

  17. Breet Pharara

    I had sex with [REDACTED] and now I have [REDACTED] on my [REDACTED]. Advice.

    1. Don’t [REDACTED] in [REDACTED].

    2. Grab a knife and [REDACTED] with your [REDACTED] then use [REDACTED] to stop the bleeding. You should be fine.

      1. But what if it [REDACTED]. Wouldn’t he then need to [REDACTED] in order to [REDACTED]?

        1. I didn’t think of that. Nevermind.

  18. The Late P Brooks

    Reds or GTFO.

    I’m glad somebody around here can be trusted.

  19. Gustave Lytton

    Local school board endorses defenseless victims with their virtue signaling opposition to not prohibiting adults from choosing whether to carry or not, intentionally mislabeled as “arming teachers”.

    Fucking [REDACTED]s.

    1. I’m in favor of issuing select-fire M4s to all teachers and dosing them with PCP before class everyday.

      1. Does dosing an M4 make it more accurate?

        1. BakedPenguin

          Depends. Who do you want to shoot?

          1. I plead the [REDACTED].

      2. Gustave Lytton

        Do I have to turn it in at the end of the day or do I get an additional new selective fire M4 every morning? And can I [REDACTED]?

        *begins researching teaching requirements..*

        1. Hold on now, we can’t go inflating the education budget with Daily M4s. That’s [REDACTED]. The capital investment is not meant as a recurring expense. Maybe some [REDACTED] and [REDACTED], but how many trigger fingers do you have?

    2. kinnath

      The local TV station took three teachers to the local range and ran them through a training simulator without providing any actual training first. Unsurprisingly, they all did terrible and said they wouldn’t trust themselves or other teachers with weapons — that’s why we have SROs (like the guy that stood cowering outside the school in Florida).

      Apparently, my good friend who is retired Army with a recently received Masters in education can’t be trusted not to shoot innocent kids during a mass shooting incident.

      1. There’s no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.

        -Inquisitor Toth.

      2. Gustave Lytton

        I would imagine they would do even worse on a two way firing range, without a firearm. Or any weapon.

        [REDACTED]

        1. kinnath

          We have a word to describe these people — victims.

  20. The Late P Brooks

    Dear SP-

    Not long ago, I noticed that links open in a new tab from these pages. I like that.

    I’m still in the *right click / open in new tab* habit, but I’m getting better.

    kthxbai

    1. slumbrew

      … I noticed that [external] links open in a new tab from these pages. I like that.

      Hear, hear! Now I just get confused when it’s an internal link.

      1. I don’t rely on websites to decide whether the link should open in the same tab. If I click on it, it should open in the same tab. If I middle click it should go to a new tab. If I right click and explicitly select an option, that’s the one I want.

        1. slumbrew

          True, but they have quickly changed my behavior on this particular site. Every little bit helps my RSI.

        2. Too bad we didn’t solicit your opinion first….

          *sighs for lost opportunity*

          1. [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

          2. I have the proper clearance…

            He said “You’re great!”

          3. *revokes Q’s Clearance for leaking*

    2. grrizzly

      I meant to ask it for ages… Why doesn’t the Home keyboard button work here? On every other site on the internet I can get to the top of the page by pressing Home–but not on this site. It’s interesting that the End button works and I can get to the bottom of the page.

      1. It works for me.

        1. grrizzly

          It doesn’t work for me in Brave and Chrome, the two browsers I use. I’ve just tried IE and Firefox—there the Home button works as intended.

          1. It would then look like a browser-related problem.

          2. Sensei

            On Windows try CTRL+Home

      2. slumbrew

        Doesn’t seem to work with Chrome or Brave (same rendering engine), Firefox works, Safari works (all OS X).

    3. SP

      Most links will by default, for several months now, but there are some on the Editorial Team who override that (you know who you are). Links in comments from the Glibertariat should open in new tabs.

  21. commodious spittoon

    Hm… shoulder butt roast (wait, what?) $1.49/lb.

    *sigh* two week break between terms and I’m leafing through grocery store circulars.

  22. The Late P Brooks

    that should be: “open in a new tab by default” if it wasn’t clear.

    1. It is author’s choice, but we pretty much all do it.

      1. MikeS

        Really? Sometimes it doesn’t open in a new tab and I wasn’t sure if it was my computer or what. Now I know.

        [REDACTED], Swiss!

  23. RAHeinlein

    In today’s Union extortion news:

    The hotels got into trouble after members of the New York Hotel Trades Council union who work at the Plaza and Sofitel raised health and safety concerns related to staff training and other issues, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

    New York union members made those complaints as part of a coordinated effort to help resolve a separate union dispute in Canada, people familiar with the matter said. A Toronto hotel union has been in tense contract negotiations with a property managed by Fairmont, the same company that manages the Plaza.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/guests-turned-away-at-new-yorks-plaza-hotel-victims-of-labor-dispute-1525363336

    1. Stay Ionized, people.

  24. The Late P Brooks

    Why doesn’t the Home keyboard button work here? On every other site on the internet I can get to the top of the page by pressing Home–but not on this site.

    It works for me. Maybe because I haven’t allowed Mozilla to inflict the CRITICAL UPDATE on me.

  25. The Late P Brooks

    It is author’s choice, but we pretty much all do it.

    Huh. Knowledge is [REDACTED].

    1. slumbrew

      It’s “good”, isn’t it? “Knowledge is good.”

      1. No, the saying goes “Knowledge is Power, Guard it well”.

        1. commodious spittoon

          Knowledge is power, and power is privilege… no wonder SJWs revel in their ignorance.

  26. The Late P Brooks

    The local TV station took three teachers to the local range and ran them through a training simulator without providing any actual training first. Unsurprisingly, they all did terrible and said they wouldn’t trust themselves or other teachers with weapons — that’s why we have SROs (like the guy that stood cowering outside the school in Florida).

    “Now that you have been through this, what do you think would help you to perform better next time? Do you have any questions or suggestions?”

    “That’s a [REDACTED] question.”

  27. Chafed

    OT: Had a challenging morning in court today so I headed to Starbucks afterwards to decompress. Half the time their oatmeal is fine, the other half it’s watery. Maybe instead of closing for racial sensitivity training they can close for food prep training. It’s just not that hard to make oatmeal.

    1. slumbrew

      You should get the sous vide egg bites instead, as they are delicious (the ones with bacon, obviously).

    2. So what you’re saying is that you were a paying customer who didn’t get arrested for trying to use the bathroom and then refusing to leave when asked? You just cost yourself a 7 figure settlement! What an amateur.

      1. A Leap at the Wheel

        Well he said he was having a bad day at court, so this checks out.

  28. Stinky Wizzleteats

    What the [REDACTED] is wrong with the United Kingdom, a continuing series:

    Christian legal group that represented Alfie Evans’ parents to undergo a government investigation.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/law/2018/may/02/legal-watchdog-may-investigate-christian-group-over-alfie-evans-case

    At this rate the U.K. staying a part of the EU may actually be liberty-preserving.

    1. Wow. Not only will we go after you, we’ll go after your lawyer if you try to defend yourself. That doesn’t have a chilling effect at all. Not. at. all.

      1. “[their lawyer’s] legal advice was ‘inconsistent with the real interests of the parents’ case’”

        WE will decide what your best interests are peasant! And if you hire a lawyer to argue on your behalf and that conflicts with what we have already determined, we will destroy him as well as you!

        1. commodious spittoon

          W-o-o-o-o-w is that dark.

          “Your interest is to shut up and watch your child dehydrate and die. Your lawyers suggested otherwise, so they must be punished.”

    2. Suthenboy

      I am tired of hearing about this. They sold themselves out for ‘free’ healthcare. This is what happens when you sell yourself. You become the property of someone else.

      1. So no fighting back, now, you hear! Some of your predecessor voted in people who did this – so, sorry if you kid has to die, but too bad.

        That was a loathsome comment. Reflect on it.

        1. “Some people get the government other people deserve”?

      2. Jarflax

        Suthen, doesn’t that basically mean collective guilt?

        The one nuance in this case I have been struggling with is this:

        I absolutely despise bureaucrats having the power to withhold care/decide when death is in someone’s best interest. So I agree with the outrage in this case.

        However, irreversible loss of higher brain function means death in my book, and keeping someone in this state alive against their will is abhorrent. In other words, the issue here for me is who got to make the decision NOT the decision they made.

          1. Jarflax

            completely aware of what was going on, just unable to move or communicate.

            Higher brain function was still present

          2. What’s not stated is whether they knew that at the time or if it’s something she told them in retrospect.

          3. Jarflax

            True enough, but even so my point stands. If Alfie’s parents had chosen to end treatment I would not be disturbed by their choice. Would you?

          4. No I would not because they would have been choosing it. The issue at hand is the NHS imprisoning Alfie and starving him because they determined that his life was forfeit.

            It was his parents’ call, not the NHS.

            The example above, exceptional though it may be, is illustrative that family members holding on that their loved one may recover is not insane or Quixotic.

          5. Jarflax

            And that is all I was saying. The issue here is not the withdrawal of treatment, not the death of the child sad as that is, it is the usurpation of agency by the bureaucracy. Some of the responses I have seen are so focused on the tragedy that they miss the point. This case was awful, but so was the whole idiocy of the US Congress trying to force Terry Schiavo to be kept on life support.

          6. Just Say’n

            The NHS didn’t know what he had, nor were they able to determine that he was unaware of what was going on around him.

            We put down dogs more humanely than what was done with this toddler.

    3. Just Say’n

      I mean, of course, the Christian group is going to be investigated now. How is this surprising?

      In our own country government tries to silence Christian dissenters through contraceptive mandates, restrictions on pro-life facilities, and restricting pro-life protests. And we have religious liberty, unlike Europe.

      The Christians are the only real radicals in our society anymore.

      1. ‘And we have “religious liberty”, unlike Europe’

        FIFY.

        1. Just Say’n

          Ah, yes, I forgot the scare quotes. Well done, Q. Thank you

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      There were multiple pro 2A walkouts yesterday.

      https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/573420002

      Haven’t seen too much coverage of them for some reason…

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          Because most people aren’t news junkies, not covering something that’s newsworthy but they want buried is an extremely effective tactic.

          1. Lies by omission.

  29. commodious spittoon

    I accidentally [REDACTED] 93MB of .rar files.

    what should i do…is this dangerous ?

    1. .rar files? [REDACTED] [REDACTED]. You’re [REDACTED], bub.

    1. Who doesn’t?

  30. The Late P Brooks

    “I think that for me the purpose of journalism is to raise, you know, the voices of people who maybe don’t have a voice,” Schneid explained. “I think that in its own right, journalism is a form of activism.”

    Golly, Journalism Barbie, that’s awesome.

    And what about the voices of people who have the audacity to say things you don’t want to hear? Are they allowed to have “a voice” or would you prefer to censor them?

    1. She misspelled “propaganda”.

      1. The Last American Hero

        Is that the country next to Wakanda?

    2. BakedPenguin

      Waiting for her to scream “You’re not my supervisor!”

    1. Gustave Lytton

      Private citizen Michelle can go [REDACTED] herself.

  31. mexican sharpshooter

    [REDACTED] Titty Fucking [REDACTED]. I [REDACTED] all of [REDACTED] right [REDACTED].

    1. “Titty Fucking”

      Go on…

      1. Jarflax

        One day I was sitting at my desk at the Chive and in walked [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] then she [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] my [REDACTED] until I [REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED][REDACTED]. It was [REDACTED].

        1. I need a cigarette.

  32. robc

    https://www.ncaa.com/news/golf-men/article/2018-05-02/teams-and-individual-selections-2018-division-i-mens-golf

    Golf regionals were announced yesterday. I searched for Ohio St and found 2 hits…they are hosting one of the regionals and 1 individual player made it. The team seems to be missing. What happened, Sloopy?

    Georgia Tech is the 1 seed in the Raleigh regional.

    As bad as GT golf has choked over the years (0 national titles), not even making the tournament isnt even an option.

  33. Gilmore

    Very good article in Areo magazine on the uniquely vapid mode of “Intellectual” marxist scribbing @ Jacobin

    (and probably applies equally to the inanity in things like Current Affairs)

    Jacobin is for Poseurs

    some choice bits:

    “…most people find such an honest embrace of communism ludicrous. Marxism thrives precisely in proportion to how much it backpedals from its identity….

    The essential paradox of modern Marxism is that it has largely exorcised the ghost of its core tenet, socialism. Jacobin confronts the history of socialist governments only glancingly, if at all. It rarely considers what socialism would mean in practice. When it tries to flesh out its millennium, the response is rambling, imprecise, and often concludes by acknowledging that socialism might just be a rebranded reformist capitalism.

    [Gilmore: *see: “BUT MUH SCANDINAVIA”-arguments from people claiming ‘socialism works!’; as tho Sweden is successful because of its welfare state, and venezuela is a failure because of its ‘capitalist’ vestigates]

    This half-hearted Marxism was born in the university. [bingo!] … [it] provides a systematic approach to social analysis, gives easy answers to complex questions, and makes even small incidents relevant to a universal theory of history, easily contextualizing scholarship in a deep pool of literature. In the university, Marxism became a tool for critiquing the status quo, nearly, if not entirely disentangled from a concrete vision of the future.

    If Marxists no longer believe that history is driven by the economic interests of defined and conscious classes, in what sense are they Marxists?

    0

    He also touches on something that has always irritated me about modern socialists = their abandonment of Marxist notions of “class” which were so central to his ideas, which had nothing to do with gradations of “income” or wealth, but in the nature of ownership and source of income and wealth;

    e.g. a small business owner who made little money, but controlled his own destiny, would have not shared any ‘class interests’ with people who simply shared his ‘income band’; he would have more in common with landed gentry and corporations, because of his concern for property rights and his ability to gain return from capital investment.

    whereas most modern leftists think “class” is a mere disparity of wealth or income. Its not ‘marxist’ at all, in that it seems utterly ignorant or (or concerned with) the role of capital.

  34. bacon-magic

    [Redacted]! Keep it [Redacted].

  35. Spudalicious

    Mmmm, pork belly burnt ends. A delightful dish.