Colt Modernizes ā Cap and Ball Colts
The Walker Colt
In 1846, Sam Colt found a young man from Texas knocking at his door.Ā That young man, Captain Samuel Walker, was on a mission; he wanted Sam Colt to return to the business of making revolvers.
At this time Colonel Colt was engaged, as noted in Part 1, in manufacturing underwater electrical cable, tinfoil and marine mines.Ā Captain Walker wanted revolvers for the new-born Republic of Texas, but he didnāt want a rebirth of the .36 caliber Paterson.Ā He wanted a big, heavy, powerful revolver; a revolver for horsemen.Ā He wanted a dragoon pistol.
Sam Colt was apparently interested, because he sat down to create Captain Walkerās desires in steel.Ā The result of this process was the sidearm that first defined the form of the modern sixgun.Ā The 1847 Colt Walker held six loads rather than five, and the big cylinder, while described as a .44, was actually a .45, taking a .457 round or conical ball over as much as 60 grains of FFFG black powder.Ā The gun further had a hinged, attached rammer for reloading and a fixed trigger and trigger guard.Ā This was not only the first modern-form sixgun but also the first magnum revolver, as the big cylinder and the heavy .457 ball packed quite a wallop.
A few years back I had the pleasure of firing a replica Walker.Ā It was an interesting piece to handle, but sure as hell not a quick-draw piece.Ā The Walker Colt is long, heavy and cumbersome, but itās important to remember what the Walker was designed for; it is a dragoon pistol.Ā It was designed for horsemen, to be carried my mounted riflemen (dragoons.)Ā Some Walkers as well as the later dragoon models were adapted to be fitted with shoulder stocks but making the revolver a carbine presents the same problem that led to the demise of revolving rifles in general; the cylinder gap has a distinct tendency to vent hot gases and, if a gun is ill-timed, to spit the occasional lead shaving.Ā None of this is good for the shooterās non-firing arm.
The Colt Walker was effective but less than perfect.Ā Poor metallurgy in the early guns led to problems with ruptured cylinders, and the weak loading lever latch often led to the rammer dropping under recoil, jamming the gun up and preventing a fast follow-up shot.Ā In the end, this led to only 1,100 Walker revolvers being built.Ā These problems did, however, led to the next step in Colt sixgun development only a year after the advent of the Walker.
The Dragoons
A martial pistol must be powerful, reliable and tough; the Walker was powerful, but fell a bit short on the other two aspects.Ā So, what started with the Walker revolver led to several developments and refinements in the basic dragoon pistol.Ā There were four primary variants of the Dragoon revolvers:
- The First Model Dragoon, made from 1848 to 1850, with oval cylinder stops, a square-backed trigger guard, and no wheel on the hammer where it rode on the mainspring.
- The Second Model Dragoon, made from 1850 to 1851, with rectangular cylinder stops and a square-backed trigger guard. The first few hundred Second Models had the old V-type mainspring and no wheel on the hammer; later guns had the flat mainspring that would persist in Colt revolvers for many decades, along with a wheel on the hammer where it rode on the mainspring.
- The Third Model Dragoon, made from 1851 to 1860, with rectangular cylinder stops and a rounded trigger guard. Colt played around with the Third Model more than the others, producing some with folding leaf sights on the barrel, cuts for shoulder stocks, and so on.
- The 1848 Baby Dragoon, a small .31 caliber pocket revolver. This was later refined into the 1849 Pocket Revolver, which was popular among gold-seekers, gamblers and outlaws as a hideaway gun.
The various Dragoon pistols were popular but even the Third Model still weighed in at a tad over four pounds.Ā There was obviously a market for a lighter, handier gun, more along the weight of the old Paterson guns but more modern and reliable.Ā That led to the development of an icon among cap-and-ball sixguns, the Colt Navy.
The Colt Navy Revolvers
My first sixgun was a replica of the 1851 Navy Colt, which is widely regarded as the best-handling sixgun made.Ā I see little reason to doubt that assessment based on my own experience.Ā My Navy had the standard 7 Ā½ā barrel and a brass frame.Ā Back in my youth in Allamakee County I did a fair amount of fast-draw and reflex shooting practice, drawing and firing from an old drop belt from which the cartridge loops had been removed and a Mexican loop holster.Ā That Colt was excellent for such things, smooth, light and slick as a snake.Ā I shot it with .380 round lead balls and 30 grains of FFFG in paper cartridges I made myself.Ā I got so I could draw and place six rounds in a regular paper plate at 15 yards very quickly, and with the paper cartridges and a brass capper could reload and recap efficiently, usually having the old gun back in action in about a minute.Ā I carried the capper on a string around my neck, paper cartridges in an old tobacco tin and generally toted the old Navy around with me on many of my adventures in woods and fields.
There was a down side that resulted in my eventually discarding that old sixgun, and that was the brass frame.Ā With every shot that steel cylinder hammered back into that soft brass frame, eventually deforming the frame to the point where I reckoned the old piece unsafe to shoot.Ā I had a couple of friends who were in a local theater group, so I seated some balls in the empty cylinder, hammered a few balls into the barrel and removed the nipples to render the gun useless, then gave it to them as a prop gun.Ā I would like to have another of these guns, but when the day comes for me to find another cap and ball gun, it will be a steel frame version.Ā Brass frame replicas are still common on the gun market as flies in a barn, but I canāt recommend them for the reasons described above.
Back in the day the Navy Colts were very popular.Ā The well-equipped cowpoke, lawman or gun twist frequently carried a brace of them in saddle holsters in addition to his belt gun; in the famous Charles Portis book True Grit, in that renowned final charge, it was with a brace of Navy Colts from saddle holsters that Marshal Cogburn engaged the four bad men, not the SAA Colt and ā92 Winchester wielded by John Wayne in the movie.
Ten years after the first Navy Colts were made, the Colt works brought out the ultimate Navy, that being the streamlined 1861 Navy, also in .36 caliber, with an improved ācreepingā loading lever and the added loading clearance introduced in the .44 Army Colt of 1860.Ā There was also a miniature variant, the 1861 Pocket Navy, later refined into the 1862 Pocket Police, both small-framed .31 caliber revolvers.
The Root Sidehammer
The Root Side-hammer Colt, designed by Colt engineer Elisha K. Root, was in some ways a better design than the traditional versions; its solid frame was stouter, and the rear sight was on the frame rather than on the hammer nose.Ā The Root revolver, introduced in 1855, was popular among officers on both sides in the Civil War, but it was a real pipsqueak, manufactured only in .28 and .32 calibers
The 1860 Army Colt
What many consider the ultimate expression of the Colt cap and ball revolver was introduced in 1860, just in time for the Civil War or, as Mrs. Animal calls it, the War of the Northern Aggression.
In many ways the 1860 Army combined the best of both worlds.Ā It was a much lighter and handier arm than the Dragoon pistols, and with itās .44 caliber loads packed more punch than the Navy guns.Ā It was a fine, well-crafted, well-balanced piece, handicapped only by itās open-topped frame and the odd placement of rear sight on the hammer nose.Ā This was perhaps the ultimate development of the Colt cap-and-ball revolver.Ā Its grip shape was so admirably suited to being fired accurately one-handed, even from horseback, carried over to the famous Colt Single Action Army and remains in use on the vast majority of single-action sixguns made today.Ā The use of a rebated cylinder allowed for the use of the same size frame as the Navy revolvers frame and kept the gunās weight to about two and a half pounds.
As with the Walker and Navy revolvers, it has been my pleasure to handle a few Army Colts, most replicas but notably one original, although we didnāt fire the original.Ā The Army Colt is a pleasure to handle, heavy by modern standards but the big sixgun points naturally, barrel rise under recoil is controllable, and the rotation of the curved grip in the hand brings the hammer spur nicely under the thumb, allowing for quick follow-up shots.Ā The .44 round ball or conical bullet in front of 40 grains of FFFG packs a hearty punch.Ā A few shooting sessions with one will bring home exactly why this was probably the most desired martial sidearm of its era.
And the demand for martial sidearms was about to explode.
And Then This Happened
Colt revolvers, especially the 1860 Army but also the Dragoon and Navy types, were soon in great demand as the War Between the States broke out.Ā Sam Colt, having foreseen the great increase in demand, had expanded the factory and, when the southern states began to secede, sold at least 2,000 revolvers to Confederate military buyers, an act which nearly killed the company when the war was over.Ā But what remains inarguable is the reason that the Colt revolvers were in demand by both Union and Confederate armies; they were tough, powerful, reliable sidearms, the state of the art for their day.
Sam Colt passed away in January of 1862, killed of all things by complications of gout.Ā The appellation of Colonel was real, Sam Colt having received a commission from the state of Connecticut as commander of the 1st Regiment Colts Revolving Rifles of Connecticut.Ā But that unit never took the field, and Colonel Colt was soon released from service.Ā But the erstwhile Colonel Coltās company was building thousands and thousands of Army revolvers and a variety of guns for the civilian market, they didnāt lack for competition.Ā Plenty of people were getting in on the sixgun action, including Americaās oldest surviving gunmaker, Remington, as well as plenty of others.Ā Weāll talk about them in Part 3.Ā Meanwhile, bigger things were afoot; about this time two men were set to change the world of sixguns forever.Ā Those two men were Horace Smith and Daniel B. Wesson, and they had an idea and a patent.Ā But thatās a story for Part 4!
Another great installment. This is shaping up to be an excellent series.
This is a superb series you’ve got going here, Animal. Well researched, thick with detail, and interesting as hell. Thank you!
Well written, too. Very nice.
Great work. Thanks.
Aww, you guys.
Real fun read! History is fun
You say these horses belong to them there pilgrims, eh?
Thank you, Animal. Your love for this subject really shows.
Looking forward to learning about S&W!
Wow. I’m really digging these.
Good stuff Animal.
The next revolver I buy will probably be “your fault.”
I was thinking the exact same thing.
A burden I will cheerfully bear.
Blame me if you get a seven shot Smith</a
This might change the answer 17% to the timeless question
Terrific series, as others note. Keep up the good work.
making the revolver a carbine presents the same problem that led to the demise of revolving rifles in general</em
Further, another risk at the start was cap quality: a percentage of those spit bits which isn't a problem for a pistol extended at length (well, your hand is in play) but is a mess to get right in the face because you nuzzled down on the comb of the carbine’s stock. As caps got better, this mattered less, and rifles were always working through this; everyone was probably happy to at least be moving past catching the occasional shard of quartz in the face.
You can’t say that civilization don’t advance, however, for in every war they kill you in a new way – Will Rogers
this is some impressive historical knowledge. thanks for writing this series.
Animal- have you read Blood Meridian? many of these early firearms are carried by the Glanton Gang in the story.
here’s a summary: https://frontierpartisans.com/1751/firearms-of-the-frontier-partisans-the-guns-of-blood-meridian/
I have not, but I’ll look into it.
the Third Model still weighed in at a tad over four pounds
My EDC for years was a SW686: 44oz; so, a monster by any measure. I’m 6-2, so that’s a hell of a weight out there on the end of my rigging. Then compare:
Four pounds is 64oz . . . ZomG1! Not that I care about Wyatt Earp fantasies, but he was said to merely buffalo miscreants in the forehead with his Colt; how would you like to get four pounds of steel in the face?
I’ll bet it got your attention.
I’m just imagining coming to the next day with ten stitches in your noggin asking yourself what did I do this time?
Two or three of those and you won’t ever be right again.
—STEVE SMITH
It wasn’t an uncommon practice in a scrap for one of those old-timers to bend a sixgun over a foe’s head. That possibility actually influenced some folk’s choices in sidearms. More in that in Part 4.
OT
i know some of you are interested in the film They Shall Not Grow Old. here’s a vid of a forensic lip reader (went deaf as a child) reviewing at least some of the footage that made it into that movie. fascinating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdmAfsm18tA
Looks interesting. My Grand-Uncle Archie eventually died of war wounds suffered during WW I.
I would bet the various accents in play would make lip reading a real challenge.
Yes, she does have that funny moment at the end when he tells her the speaker was a Lancashire man.
Roger that; imagine if he was trying to read one of my relatives
I am planning on “dragging” my high-functioning autistic son to see this, and I want him (us) to have a little historical perspective before going. I have done a little intertoob searching for some concise history, but it kind of overwhelms me. Any suggestions? I feel a bit sad that I can’t remember crap about history anymore. The Archduke was assassinated-war on is all I can remember.
Her speech is amazingly clear for someone who’s deaf.
I bet he didn’t put up with dawdling service!
Duvall’s character was a cunt.
Gus? He was awesome. That bartender needed a counseling session.
And never get into a bar fight with Robert Duvall.
Tennesseans wandering ’round west Texas with guns spouting off in Latin: repeatedly proven bad idea!
Anyone into gun and horse pr0n ?
FirstWife could ride and shoot, but she was NOT into blanks.
Now wife is a horse girl. She used to barrel race and run dude strings when she was young. she bought a horse a few years ago and I don’t think she’s ever been happier. Two of the kids bought horses too. They’ve got a little going concern happening because all of the Grand-daughters are entranced. I’ll die before the horses do.
I like my horses in chrome and on two wheels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRvCvsRp5ho
Awesome. Already on my āroad warriorā playlist.
Ugh. Just ugh.
^
Meh. Iām cheezy like that.
How about fiberglass and 3 wheels?
That. Is. Fabulous.
I remember reading that the old cap-n-ball guns like the Colt Navy could be converted to use cartridges. Was that a popular path with owners of the day, or did they just buy a new pistol?
I’ve heard of this but have no idea how prevalent it would have been. My own calculation is no way: give my trusty revolver to some guy who’s gonna modify the hammer and frame (at great expense) just so I can pay for store-bought cartridges? That’s a lot of trouble and risk just to keep your powder a bit more dry.
Probably depends on the caliber, too as to whether you can get a strike on the primer . . . so there’s the geometry question (also: rimfire or center? There’s that whole Remington vs LC thing, isn’t there?).
And the beauty of cartridges is sliding them in without pulling the cylinder. The cap pistols wouldn’t have had the gate, and that’s just not something that Joe the Farrier is going to finesse down at Ye Olde Blacksmith is going to do well . . . maybe there’s a work-around, but this is all getting entirely messy
kind of like: can I convert my truck to 4×4 or to manual trans? Technically yes; practically: just go buy what you need which will work right and probably not cost that much more at the end of the day.
I’ve heard some varying accounts on how much of that was done. You can buy conversion cylinders for your replica guns these days, though.
I think I’ve seen the modern conversions: sweet little CNC projects that work and are affordable. That’s a cool century and a half removed from what Hank from Hobbs could hammer out.
Nobody needs more than
105 rounds.Excellent addition! Moar please.
Excellent series. Thanks for this!
If I had my shit together I could do a fly-fishing tutorial but alas, I have little shit to gather.
I’d help, but my old eyes are having trouble with those fucking size 22 flies!
For those that are interested, my next article on making cider drops late tomorrow afternoon.
Unfortunately I won’t be around. Heading down to the DogHouse in Canal Winchester this weekend.
Enjoy
Lol I used to live in Canal Winchester back about 15 years ago
Are you one of these guys
I love the idea of small cap / small investor business.
I am. I like to tell people that I own part of an international brewery. š
If you have a 401k, you probably own some Bud stock too.
Owning part of an international brewery is easy. Owning part of a domestic only one is harder (although Sam Adams is public too).
Probably, but ABInBev didn’t give me two cases of beer when their production facility went online. And I’m guessing their shareholder meetings aren’t big beer fests.
Another great article. I’ll endorse the 1860 Army model as well. It is a pleasure to shoot. While I would never hunt big game with it, I think a rabbit hunt with it would be fun.
True story: I was a virgin when I matriculated at a small midwestern college . . .oops, wrong window . . . starting over:
Close buddy couldn’t see; he carried a sawed off 12 for most of our high-jinks, but he also carried (TW . . . erm: really, literally, a trigger warning) something like this. The kits were made in our home town (the shop’s still there but my guess it’s got a ton of Chinese content anymore), and, if I recall, you didn’t even need to be 18 to buy black powder (handy for any number of things which the Federales are charged with our not doing (or at least their prosecuting afterward); oh, that reminds me, seems like someone did get convicted for something eventually).
One day he drew and fired on a rabbit such as we were always kicking up on one of our strolls and actually hit the thing going away somehow. I think he shot 45 ball which made a particularly gruesome traverse of Bugs’s GI tract. It didn’t turn it inside out, but I did blow through and ratified Big John’s dedication to carrying on an empty cylinder.
Ya know what Don? As a newbie, sometimes I think you are full of shit.
what? he actually hit something, one time, out of thousands of rounds; guy was totally blind
Good news: I’m probably going back to work, so you’ll have to find someone else to grind out HVAC, west-Texas, chemicals, Old Man River, engineering, redneck, exwife, confederate, winter-test-fried-walleye, finance, ballistics, what-I-don’t-like-about-Krakow, SEC sorority chick, and Chevy small-block stories during the 9 to 5. Think of all the electrons that will be saved.
Sorta OT. Back in the early 1980’s Remington made “Accelerator” rounds. They fitted a .223 with sabot into a 30.-06 cartridge. I hit an Arizona jackrabbit with one at around 50 yards and the animal disappeared into a pink mist. When I got to the spot where the jack was the heart by itself next to a small cactus and still slowly beating.
I remember those. They struck me as a solution in desperate search for a problem.
On that note; back in the early 80s I experimented with light .30-30 loads using 110 grain bullets meant for the .30 Carbine and a light powder charge. My idea was that, confronted with a tasty-looking rabbit, squirrel or raccoon, I could swap out the full-house load in the chamber with one of these and commence operations. They shot reasonably well but I don’t recall every firing one at game.
I too, as one of the few on here not obsessed with guns, like these articles. Nice history and revolvers really were as much art as practical.
For anyone in the Orlando area (or who can get to that area), in case you’re unaware, we have Buffalo Bill’s right near downtown, for all your black powder shooting needs.
Also “second” the praise for the series.
* lights RCDean signal *
Lame duck Walker signed the poison pill laws.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/wisconsins-walker-signs-sweeping-lame-duck-gop-bills/ar-BBQXndA?li=BBnb7Kz
That’s the wrong Walker for this article. š
Those bastards!
I mean, who the hell do they think they are! Telling a governor he can’t make law by fiat! It’s so undemocratic! The PEOPLE have spoken!
Was it FourScore who summed it up the other day: all the Dems need to do is secure the Wisconsin House and Senate to undo whatever they wish.
Say it ain’t so, Joe.
Maxwell’s 18-game career in The Show probably over after kneeling during Pledge . . . and gun and assault charges.
…and he’s 28…and he hit .182 last year…
Well, he is ‘older’ at 28. Guess I’ll skip Spring Training again this year. Being a free agent ain’t necessarily a career move.
…after coming into spring training out of shape.
Who wouldn’t want to hire someone who shows such dedication?
It’s Friday afternoon and there’s another great article about revolvers. Awesome.
Thanks Animal, a job well done, as usual.
Thanks for the article. I am really ignorant about the evolution of guns and these are a great lunchtime read for me that teaches me about something I have just taken for granted.
hermano JuliƔn will run
He’s unqualified, though: never built a casino in Jersey and never was married to a President.
Why can’t we all just get along like they did in the good old days
This is an amazing article: pages of factually correct notes that don’t really support any clear conclusion or justify any plan. History majors FTW!
you know who will be fine? us. Americans will be fine. why? because we sell ammo by the barrell..
https://www.brownells.com/ammunition/rifle-ammo/lake-city-7-62mm-nato-xm80-bulk-barrel-prod124686.aspx
Cool. No chance one of those points bumps into one of those primers going down the road ?
i assume somebody ran something by legal.
Are they all just rolling around in there loose or packed in layers?
(1) Don’t know if its shipped loose in the barrel. Could still be boxed or even shrink-wrapped bundles.
(2) I’ve gotten ammo shipped loose before (in plastic bags). I don’t think its much of a risk with modern ammo.
I was just being silly, but I do like the idea of drums of bullets: kinda like a chest of gold coins to run your hands through.
Speaking of mouth-to-ass ammo, who should write the article on why you can’t get a lever action in 30-06 (Suthen, of course).
Google – BLR 30’06 Browning
Little that turns out to be good or bad in history is inevitable….World War I broke out in no small part because the successors to German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck were unable to discipline the power of the modern German state he did so much to bring about.
Sorry, this sort of contradiction definitely undermines the author’s credibility in my eyes. If WWI could only be prevented by having a German leader with the skill and strategic foresight of Bismark (plenty to dislike the about the guy and his politics, but he was a very talented player of geopolitics), then, yeah, WWI was pretty much inevitable.
Nice job. I’m glad the glib hosts post these in the middle of the day before I switch from the caffeine cycle to the ethanol cycle.
Try Irish Coffee, that way you can do both at once.
I tried that once; got thrown out of the gym for napping on the recumbent cycle.
*rimshot*
For those of you who thought that designating certain big tech firms as publishers would curb online censorship (this includes me), it looks like that ship is about to sail:
http://thefederalist.com/2018/12/13/the-new-nafta-trade-deal-lets-big-tech-squelch-conservative-speech/
The new NAFTA bill has a clause inserted that exempts tech companies from the publisher vs neutral platform requirements. It must be nice to have the money to buy special favors and exemptions from politicians.
More rent seeking in another managed trade deal
What the hell is an amendment to the CDA dealing with a purely domestic issue doing in a trade treaty, anyway? Plus, I like that its in there even though neither Canada nor Mexico wanted it.
Odds that the Repubs do the right thing and yank it before ratifying? Not zero, but very close. The Repubs are so bad at this they pass legislation that hurts themselves. What a useless bunch. At least when the Dems pass legislation that favors one party and its supporters, its their own party, not their opposition.
Of course they did
https://twitter.com/ClaraSorrenti/status/1073313402485923841
“Actually, Stalin single-handily defeated the Nazis..”
Confirmed: Socialists believe in socialism, because they are woefully ignorant of history
He also ‘saved several ethnic groups from nazi extermination.’
So you know fuck those Tartars.
The supply of useful idiots remains copious.
You canāt argue with that…because heās fucking delusional-itād be a waste of time.
Which would mean that Nikita Khrushchev fell for Western propaganda when he denounced Stalin?
There is a straight line from “I literally don’t know any history before 1990” and “actually, socially isn’t bad”.
This has to be a parody. There’s no way that anyone can be this delusional.
A quick perusal of his twitter feed makes me think he’s serious. It’s a who’s who of dumb ideas and blaming the West for all the ills in the world.
“…like it or not, Joseph Stalin was one of the greatest anti-fascists in the history of the anti-fascist movement.”
Sometimes I actually wish I had a Twitter account.
Well, you can’t argue against the fact that Stalin’s International Socialists prevailed over Hitler’s National Socialists.
he never murdered anyone
This is probably true to the same extent that Hitler never murdered anyone, in the sense that neither of them personally killed anybody (as far as I know).
I do find it odd that he put together a Russian empire (over the Soviet states), and then a Soviet empire (over Eastern Europe), but somehow defended people against colonialism.
(meant to post this here)
Thanks to whoever linked to Barstool Sports the other day ā I hadnāt looked at it in awhile but that led me to this fantastic video of lacrosse from back in the day.
Brutal. Itās like Iām back in high school.
That’s how I remember lacrosse from my college days. Probably half the lax team played rugby with me in the Fall. They were a rough bunch.
Okay I admit it: Reading zerohedge comments are a guilty pleasure of mine.
I dont know why, maybe I just like knowing their are people crazier than me.
I’ve gotten lots of good prepper tips off ZH comments.
there. I really know the difference. Honestly.
Now I want a cap and ball pistol
Thanks Animal
Technically, dragoons are infantry that use horse for transport, then dismount for fighting. It is not Animal’s fault that the term was corrupted to mean light infantry.
Also, First!
This is a good article. Thanks!