Tuesday Afternoon Links

Howdy, y’all. Nothing has happened since the last time we checked in except that my eldest son has the diving part of soccer down pat. Also, he and the best athlete in his group (team?) had a decent shoulder-to-shoulder fair charge for a ball. The problem is, they were on the same team. Its still a work in progress, but he’s not coordinated enough to catch a baseball, so this is intro to team sports 101. The coaches out there are saints. Saints. Oh, but I picked up a sixer of Cigar City Oktoberfest. I’ll let y’all know in the comments if it is any good.

Links? I thought about running a couple of Sloopy’s since he’s been running my regularly the morning after. I assume if he’s awake he’s drunk after the way OSU quit when Purdue started running the ball in the 4th quarter, so I’m going to cut him some slack this week.

Trump gets another Supreme Court pi… what? She retired during W’s administration? Never mind. More seriously, I don’t wish that on anyone, even Supreme Court justices who completely bludgeoned the law of the land to keep educational affirmative action alive.

Most innumerate article ever? “We sold over 300M lottery tickets for this draw, there are 302M possible combinations. 75% of the possible combinations have been picked”. I’ll need A Leap at the Wheel’s help on this, but that sounds not fantastically out of statistical bounds.

OMG! Gorsuch is going let Trump count black bodies as 3/5 of a person in the next census! Just kidding. They blocked a deposition of a Federal official in a case about whether or not it is or should be legal to ask whether or not a respondant is a US citizen in the 2020 census. So they ask your age, ethnicity, race, and income, but they can’t ask citizenship status? T/W Slate. Holy cow, there are so many stolen bases it looks like a late-80s baseball game.

Also from the “That sonofabitch Trump” files: EPA cheers 2.7% decrease in US GHG emissions. Algore has a sad.

I always wanted a pair of glasses that would display the date as a HUD. SMDH. Maybe it can also display my heart rate and a bunch of other shit I don’t need for 99.9% of my day. Outside of professional use, smart glasses are a solution in search of a problem, and even inside professional settings, Its probably most useful for truck drivers.

I dunno, I’m going Motown today.

Comments

447 responses to “Tuesday Afternoon Links”

  1. Tres Cool

    Lotto Madness!

    1. Tres Cool

      Go ahead and just….HIT IT !

      1. Brett L

        For some reason, I always think this is a Spoon song when it comes on the radio.

        1. Tres Cool

          Nice slo-mo knockers tho

          1. Drake

            You convinced me to click.

  2. Tres Cool

    “She left the court to care for her husband, John, after he was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s.”

    It’s contagious?

    1. Suthenboy

      Actually, that is a possibility. The connection between various pathogens and conditions like Alzheimer’s , breast cancer, RA, etc is not 100% clear.

    2. wdalasio

      Not sure if it’s contagious. But, there is a somewhat interesting fact about Alzheimer’s – it’s one of the fastest growing diseases out there. That sounds like terrible news, until you figure out the reason. It’s because a lot more people are living to the age where Alzheimer’s shows up.

      1. Tres Cool

        Id imagine that better diagnoses and screening techniques have a hand in that, too

      2. MikeS

        Isn’t the same true for colon cancer? I thought I read once that if you live long enough, there’s a very good chance you’ll die from, or with, colon cancer.

        1. Tres Cool

          I heard the same only about prostate cancer.
          Guess its just cancer all the way down.

          1. MikeS

            I probably mixed up the two.

          2. The Last American Hero

            It’s prostate cancer for men. I don’t recall the ages, but basically every elderly man has prostate cancer. For most, it is very slow so it’s not worth treating since other things will kill you long before it becomes problematic. But if you lived to be 140, it would kill you even if everything else was functioning.

        2. Tonio

          Some type of cancer. You live long enough and you don’t die of injury, parasites, starvation or disease and something’s going to kill you. That something is cancer.

          1. Count Potato

            I thought Parkinson’s was the hard limit.

      3. Drake

        You can say the same about many types of cancer.

  3. Scruffy Nerfherder

    The glasses should immediately connect to the viewed person’s twitter/instagram feed. For your own safety.

  4. Playa Manhattan

    As obnoxious as I find the census… isn’t finding out how many citizens we have kind of the point?

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      Fuck that. If they care so much they can go around counting bodies.

    2. creech

      Citizens, no. The constitution (XIV amendment) says the census is to count the “whole number of “persons” in each state. Nothing about sex, genders, how much is your house worth, what are the kids’ names, do you have a toilet, or where were your parents born. For several decades, libertarians had a “Say No to the Census” effort.

  5. Chipwooder

    I remember when Slate was somewhat reasonable by left-slanted webzine standards. That was a long time ago now.

    1. Lackadaisical

      Yup, it used to be interesting to read to see what the other side was thinking. Now I’m afraid to read anything left of Mises.org and the glibsters.

      1. Echo Chamber!

        Even if we do send out scouts into those intellectual wastelands to measure fresh depths of derp.

        1. Lackadaisical

          I was slightly worried my supply of derp was going to get cut off when Derpetologist left to do real world stuff, but Scruffy has more than made up for it, fuck him very much.

  6. Count Potato

    “So they ask your age, ethnicity, race, and income, but they can’t ask citizenship status?”

    I can see age and income, but isn’t asking citizenship necessary? Isn’t that how they breed congresscritters?

    1. robc

      Actually, I think congresscritters are proportioned based on residents, not citizens.

      1. PBRstreetgang

        That was the issue in Evenwel v. Abbot, and I think that is generally correct.
        Fun Fact: A friend from law school argued that case in the SCOTUS (and lost) and is now one of the lawyers on the Harvard admissions case.

      2. Drake

        So California will be significantly over-represented in Congress.

        1. Bobarian LMD

          Not if we cut it off.

          /Lex Luthor solution

          1. Galt1138

            “Otisberg?”
            “It’s a little bitty place.”
            “Otisberg!?”
            “Miss Tesmacher, she has her own place.”
            “Otisberg!”
            “I’ll wipe it off.”

      3. Pine_Tree

        True, but I bet the founders would object if somebody tried to make the case that it should apply to an invading army.

        1. Lobsterbacks need representation too!

  7. robc

    I am waiting on smart contacts. No one needs to know that I am filming them.

    1. Brochettaward

      *nods in agreement*

      It’s really none of their god damn business what I do with video files of them in the privacy of my own home.

    2. Bobarian LMD

      Getting upskirt videos is a lot harder to pass off, though.

      1. Just Say’n

        Ain’t that the truth

      2. The Last American Hero

        Contacts on a shoe would be almost impossible to notice.

    1. Mr Lizard

      Sheesh what is it? The Alabama of the Midwest?

      1. Playa Manhattan

        Maybe the dad is just cheap, and didn’t want to pay for 2 weddings.

      2. Pan Zagloba

        Game of Thrones fans take it too far sometimes.

        (yes, I know, but it’s a superior title to “A Song of Ice and Fire”)

      3. Brett L

        Maybe they’re European royalty.

    2. C. Anacreon

      $100 says this never even makes it on network news or CNN.

      Pointing out massive immigration and loan fraud would just be just racist against women muslims of color.

      Good grief, she’s a triple play, you don’t think anyone’s going to allow the slightest negative word to be said about her? She could kill a busload full of kindergartners and it might come up on the Sean Hannity show, but nothing beyond that.

      Probably too late to influence the election even if it did make big news, haven’t most voters already voted via absentee ballot already?

      1. Suthenboy

        “…haven’t most voters already voted via absentee ballot already?”

        Just the dead ones.

    3. Pope Jimbo

      Uffda. I’ve been linking to that story for some time. That guy from PJ Media really did a good job of finding more info from the St. Paul school.

      Yeah, she married her brother on paper to get some sort of visa or student loan for him. It is stunning that she is able to keep up the stone walling and not have one reporter from the MSM push on this.

      But don’t worry, the AP reporters are on the case! The story pretty much accepts anything that Ilhan says without question.

  8. whiz

    smart glasses are a solution in search of a problem

    But they are so cool.

    1. Florida Man

      I could see using AR for LARPing.

      1. Bobarian LMD

        Shooting LARPers with a semi-automatic sounds like a good idea, but you could run into legal issues.

        /I’m not sure what you said there.

        1. Florida Man

          Lol. Augmented Reality for Live Action Role Playing.

          1. Lackadaisical

            Where do you draw the line between that and VR video games?

          2. Not Adahn

            The padded LARPer sword can break your $1000 AR glasses

  9. Mr Lizard

    “he’s drunk after the way OSU quit when Purdue started running the ball in the 4th“

    Your Future Reptilian Overlords are also still drunk and revealing in his pain

    1. To unrepentantly steal from RobC,

      I think Purdue just scored again.

      /Boilermaker reveling in the win

      1. Brett L

        That one kickoff in the 4th quarter where the OSU guy had to dive out of the end-zone to prevent a safety was the quitting play I’ve ever seen in D-I football. That guy was already on the bus in his head.

      2. Mr Lizard

        Yes it was nice to see they had them on the ropes then called STEVE SMITH off the bench to ‘finish’ them

  10. “We sold over 300M lottery tickets for this draw, there are 302M possible combinations. 75% of the possible combinations have been picked”.

    If each ticket was selected truly randomly, there would be about a 1/e chance that the winning combination hadn’t been picked:

    If there are n combinations, one ticket has a (n-1)/n probability of losing. (n/(n-1))^n approaches e as n approached infinity, so ((n-1)/n)^n would approach 1/e.

    1/e is about 3/8.

    1. Dr. Fronkensteen

      Some are duplicate numbers.

      1. Playa Manhattan

        New math problem:
        How many are likely to be duplicate numbers?

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          *flashback to probability class*

        2. Brett L

          I did the math on tickets sold wrong. To get a $600M bump, you need to sell 600M tickets (lottery pays approximately 50% of the take — for reference the numbers guys back in gangland days used to pay $2 of every $3 they collected). So if about 75% of the possible number have been played, all of them have been played twice and most have them have been played 3 times.

          1. Winded

            I think that’s still wrong…to get a $600 million bump you would need to sell 600 million tickets assuming the 50% rake EXCEPT it’s not the present value growing by $600 million, it’s the total payout if you take it over 30 years. But the present value of the prize is only about 57% of the announced jackpot (not including taxes). With the announced jackpot at $1.6 billion, that means roughly a $24 million payout in year one (payments increase at a compounded 5% for the subsequent 29 years) and what looks to be a discount rate of about 3.35%.

            So, I think the fact that last drawing’s present value grew from 570 million to 913 million means about 343 million tickets were sold this week. The “sold over 300M tickets” from the article would seem reasonable.

            This doesn’t factor in that some of the money is also set aside to “seed” future jackpots, which is why every drawing following a drawing that had a winner starts at a $40 million announced jackpot, even if they didn’t sell 57% of 40 million tickets.

        3. Considering that you can manually choose your own numbers, I have no idea.

        4. Tonio

          But there are many players who consistently play the same numbers – birthdays, etc. Apparently there is also avoidance of the number thirteen and preference for the number seven. So that becomes more of a polling thing than a pure math thing.

        5. The Last American Hero

          Since people like birthdays as numbers and most peoples’ lucky number is under 15, there’s a lot more duplication than a total random draw would produce.

      2. That’s why I said truly random.

        If there’s a 1/e chance that the winning combination wasn’t picked, then it suggests that 1-1/e of the combinations should have been picked, which is rather less than 75%.

        1. Brett L

          One of my first programming jobs, I worked with a super smart Haitian guy who spent his spare time building a lottery picker. He told me that he had thrown out all the obviously impossible combinations like “1-2-3-4-5-6”. We talked about it for 3 hours and he still couldn’t understand why that combination was just as likely as a non-sequential set for the next draw. “But it never gets drawn”. Yeah, buddy, so did 200M combinations of non-sequential numbers. It was a great illustration of the fallacy of randomness.

          1. Suthenboy

            ^This^
            Try as you might the universe is always going to outsmart you. Also, despite impossible odds someone always ends up winning the lottery.

          2. It takes the combined might of almost the entire lower and middle classes of the United States to make one person wealthy. One evul rich person can make many people wealthy.

          3. Suthenboy

            I cant remember the name of the town but I remember reading about some small town doctor in the south that talked nearly everyone in town into buying stock in this start-up company named Coca-Cola. I want to say that was back in the ’20s? I cant remember for certain. Now they have a statue of that Doc in the town square and every family there are millionaires.

          4. Brett L

            Suthen that was Quincy, FL. Or one just like Quincy. Giant houses in the middle of town all out of place with the rest of the surrounding counties.

          5. Bobarian LMD

            So this Dr talked em all into being cocaine dealers?

            Persuasive fella.

          6. Lackadaisical

            Once they got a taste of ownership they couldn’t stop.

    2. Brett L

      I still don’t understand how e works. Why is this magical number here? I kind of remember the derivation but its just weird.

      1. I can’t do clear mathematical notation here, but:

        2/1 ^ 1 = 2
        3/2 ^ 2 = 2.25
        4/3 ^ 3 = 2.370…

        and so on; the series keeps going up* asymptotically toward 2.7182818… (which is e) but never hits it.

        My high school calculus teacher’s other job was running a liquor store that sold lotto tickets, which is how I figured this out 30 years ago. 🙂

        *Technically, I was showing ((n+1)/n)^n here. In my previous comment I mentioned (n/(n-1))^n, which would approach e from above.

      2. whiz

        e^x = Lim (as n goes to infinity) (1 + (x/n))^n, so for x = -1, 1/e = Lim (1-(1/n))^n = Lim ((n-1)/n)^n, which is Ted’s formula for the odds of no winners. But if m tickets are sold, we get Lim((n-1)/n)^m, which approaches e^(-m/n). For 600M tickets, that’s about 14% of the time (a winner 86% of the time). As Ted said, that assumes random picks, and a lot of people tend to pick birthdays, etc., which means more smaller numbers are chosen.

        1. Brett L

          That’s more in line with what I would naturally expect. That the actual numbers picked were less than a random distribution, but I’ve learned something from all of you today. Also, Ted had bad information from me when he approximated his answer.

          1. Lackadaisical

            Also, Ted had bad information from me when he approximated his answer.

            I think this is important to reiterate. Ted was far off on his approximation.

    3. blackjack

      When California first started the quick pick for the lottery, I was working at a Harley shop. One day a guy pulls in with a motorhome and like five bikes being ridden by his friends. He had a “no start” on his personal bike. I check it out and it’s got no spark. It was a beautiful custom by a big name bike builder of the time. It had a license plate that read “qikpix” in some weird code. Anyway, the ignition needed a 5 ohm coil and they had put a three ohm coil on it and burned out the module. I explained the problem and recommended a new module AND a new coil, so he would’nt burn the new module out six months later. He gathered his whole flock around and had a huge 30 minute pow-wow about whether he should replace both. Finally he agreed and I fixed the bike for him. He was massively paranoid that I was scamming him out of 50 bucks for the coil. Guy’s riding around with five of his closest friends, buying them all bikes and supplying a chase motorhome, after winning millions, and he thinks I’m gonna scam him out of 50 bucks. I didn’t even make any money off the parts I sold there. Fuggin hilarious! Made me question the value of winning the lottery just a bit..

      1. It doesn’t alter the innate cognitive capacity.

        1. blackjack

          No, but I imagine it led to an avalanche of scam artists trying to get a bit of the pie, hence the paranoia.

          1. Well, if you didn’t give away so much crap, and didn’t advertize that you won, you’d reduce the amount of scammers to closer to normal.

          2. blackjack

            Can’t really argue with that.

    4. nw

      That may be, but the relevant limit here is not ((n-1)/n)^n, but rather ((x-1)/x)^n as n -> inf,
      where x is 302M. lim x^n as n->inf = 0 for all 0 <= x < 1.

      You also switched (n-1)/n with n/(n-1), not that that's relevant to the actual probability.

  11. robc

    Most innumerate article ever?

    They have a procedure for splitting jackpots. It isn’t hard.

    And this one is probably gonna get split.

  12. Dr. Fronkensteen

    They want you all back in chains. They’re using all of those policy changes. We’ll let you know as soon as we can figure out what policies are actually racist. Starting with counting citizens as citizens.

  13. Playa Manhattan

    “EPA cheers decline in U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions under Trump administration”

    They’re not cheering anything because they didn’t get to fuck up the economy.

    1. Dr. Fronkensteen

      So I’m not free to gambol?

    2. Mad Scientist

      It’s too late! We’re all going to run out of oil by 1990 and starve to death by 2000!

      1. Dr. Fronkensteen

        Really? I thought it was the other way around. We’ll all starve and then run out of oil.

        1. Mad Scientist

          Doom! DOOOOOOOOOOOM!

          1. Bobarian LMD

            I had to eat my neighbor just yesterday.

            I used his rendered body fat for fuel to get to work today.

    3. C. Anacreon

      I set this story to my prog friend who had asked me to prove Trump had done one good thing, and when I said the economy, he said “the economy! is that all you care about? what about global warming! Trump is burning coal and accelerating climate change!”
      We’ll see how he responds. Most likely, he’ll say this was from a loser newspaper so it’s probably fake. “How come it’s not on NBC, CNN or the New York Times?”
      I’ll post his response, if he even responds.

      1. C. Anacreon

        My prog friend replied:

        “Read between the lies”.

        1. I don’t even know what that’s supposed to mean? Did he think it was supposed to be witty? It fails to convey anything and just makes me want to punch him.

        2. MikeS

          *rolls eyes through back of skull*

        3. Brochettaward

          Does anyone else question the ability to measure green house gas emissions accurately? And then we also have to trust the data provided by the likes of the Chinese on the matter?

        4. Lackadaisical

          Jebus. That is like ‘dog whistle’ level stupidity.

      2. Tonio

        He asked for one good thing, then you provided one and he got all incensed.

  14. Mad Scientist

    A heads up display in a motorcycle or car helmet would be fairly handy.

    Then you could watch porn while you race.

    1. Tres Cool

      mobile.youporn.com

  15. Titty Tuesday *squeeeezes* into your life.

    http://archive.is/Y1gmH

    A few repeats here, but all good stuff. Cleavage is a gift from Heaven.

    1. Pan Zagloba

      I read that as “Tiny Tuesday” and was worried someone hacked your account.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder
      1. yaaaaaaass…..

        1. Lackadaisical

          I always think that it would be uncomfortable to have breasts like that, then I remember the ability to enslave 50% of the human population and wish I had some big ol’ knockers.

    3. Mr Lizard

      A comment on #23, I see someone found one of the few attractive female mammals at that school

  16. Rufus the Monocled

    The source of libertarian angst I’m sure for many:

    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article220487840.html

    1. Mad Scientist

      I hope he snubs the Suns.

      1. Bobarian LMD

        Tickets to a Suns game?

        Worst. Birthday. Ever.

    2. Ed Wuncler

      When I was a kid my Mom gave us two options. We could either have a big birthday party and invite all of our friends but we would receive no presents from her or she would give us whatever we wanted (within reason of course) for our birthday and a small dinner with the family. I always chose the latter. Didn’t want to deal with my peers on the weekend and also, my Mom generally got us some cool ass presents.

    3. C. Anacreon

      It would be interesting for an enterprising young reporter to make some calls to other families to find out why zero out of 32 kids invited didn’t come.
      I’m guessing that there are issues with the mother-whose-husband-works-in-Alaska that has raised eyebrows among the other catty, gossipy moms in town.
      Anyone care to hazard a guess why no other mom from his entire class would allow their kid to go to his party?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        I’m betting it’s because they weren’t actually invited and this was a social media setup from the beginning.

        1. Chipwooder

          *dingdingding*

      2. Just Say’n

        I’m guessing it’s because the kid has a single mom that is unbelievably hot at flirts with all the other dads.

        1. Playa Manhattan

          You’re halfway there.

          1. SugarFree

            The kid flirts with all the hot dads?

          2. Playa Manhattan

            For money.

      3. Mr Lizard

        As always with the half-assed reporting habits of your species one easily discovered data point was not found: pics of the mom.

      4. Rufus the Monocled

        She’s sleeping around?

    4. Just Say’n

      Why would his parents publicize that? And those kids who didn’t show up have some awful parents.

      1. SugarFree

        Maybe it was all a set-up, a gofundme scam.

        1. Rufus the Monocled

          This cynicism suspiciously sounds like it would come out of the mouth of someone who didn’t have stupid kids come to his party.

          EH?

          Hmmm?

          1. SugarFree

            My birthdays were always over at my grandparent’s house. And I preferred being the only kid there. More attention for me.

          2. Rufus the Monocled

            You, your grandparents and your “friend” Paul who would antagonize you, right?

          3. SugarFree

            Friends are for the weak.

          4. RBS

            I thought you said “analyze.”

          5. Bobarian LMD

            Anal-ize.

          6. Rasilio

            No he said … “anal-IZE”

            His friend would analize him

        2. Just Say’n

          If his parents wanted to set-up a gofundme scam shouldn’t the kid be saying something about how he has inside information about Russian collusion and the government is trying to silence him or something? Or he could say he slept with the president and then mock the president’s genitalia, like an adult.

          Pretending like kids didn’t show up to your party is low

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            Like saying you have cancer but don’t?

        3. RBS

          There are always a few parents who either rsvp and no show or don’t rsvp at all and no show but 32? SOunds like a scam to me. Anyway, fuck everyone involved, except that poor kid who either has no friends or his mom is a cunt.

          1. Florida Man

            It can be both. Poor bastard.

          2. Lackadaisical

            I laughed, but that idea hadn’t crossed my mind. Poor kid.

          3. Playa Manhattan

            “Our son is really embarrassed. We’re going to make him more embarrassed by putting his picture and story in the newspaper”.

          4. Rufus the Monocled

            Gotta admit, him sitting alone next to pizza is pretty effective.

            I’m gonna use it one day if I ever need to pull at the emotional strings.

          5. Trigger Hippie

            *looks around kitchen, looks down at plate*

            Hey!

          6. Chipwooder

            Exactly. If you said you invited 10 kids and no one showed, maybe I might buy that, but 32??? That’s absurd.

            I still think UCS was onto something when he guessed that she put the wrong date on the invitations.

          7. Gadfly

            Anyway, fuck everyone involved, except that poor kid who either has no friends or his mom is a cunt.

            I’m guessing the latter. I remember a few times growing up being sent to some strange kids’ parties because my mom had been told by their mom that no one was coming, and that was just too sad for my mom to let happen. If this kid’s mom can’t muster up a few sympathy guests, especially for a six-year-old, I’m guessing something is wrong with the mom’s social skills.

  17. Negroni Please

    I’m looking to pick up a cheap AWD vehicle for winter mountain driving and I’m looking at the Honda HR-V right now. I know it’s slower than an asian grandma driving a minivan, but it looks cheap, reliable, and has pretty good cargo capacity for a tiny little shitbox.

    Any of y’all have any experience with these? Want to recommend something else in the shitbox price range?

    Thanks.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Used Forester, as a bonus it makes it easier to pick up WNBA players.

      1. Negroni Please

        I’m almost certainly going used no matter what and the used Foresters are quite a bit more than the HR-V. The Crosstrek is on my radar though.

        1. kinnath

          There is a reason for that.

        2. Drake

          The HR-V, Mazda CX-3 and Crosstrek are all pretty much the same size. Foresters are quite a bit bigger.

          My wife looked at all of them (new) earlier in the year.

          1. Negroni Please

            What did y’all go with?

          2. Drake

            Infiniti QX30 – which is really a Mercedes GLA. Ended up paying a little more than a top-of-line Crosstrek and less than the equivalent Outback.

    2. Mad Scientist

      Subaru. It’s always Subaru.

      Or spend a little more and get a 4WD pickup. Shovel the snow from the driveway into the bed in the winter, have a truck in the summer.

      1. Brett L

        My brother has done very well up the hill from Denver and Boulder in a 4WD Tacoma. Jut gotta keep the rear wheels down like you say.

    3. SugarFree

      I believe I have made several persuasive arguments for buying a Subaru.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Along with several persuasive arguments for voting for Cthulthu?

        1. SugarFree

          Some traditions go back eons.

        2. Dr. Fronkensteen

          Vote for Cthulthu.
          Why vote for the lesser of two evils.

          Vote for Cthulthu.
          He’ll eat you first.

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            That’s very sexist.

      2. Negroni Please

        I know the Subarus used to have a huge longevity problem as in the drive train fucking implodes at 100k miles. Is that no longer the case?

        1. Mine is closing in on 120k, and the drive train is going OK as far as I can tell.

          1. Playa Manhattan

            The final piece of the puzzle.

          2. MikeS

            hahahahahaha.

        2. SugarFree

          I was just making a joke about my running Halloween features, but the comments actually do spend quite a bit of time arguing the merits and demerits of Subaru ownership…

          https://glibertarians.com/2018/10/subaru-horror-theatre-vol-1-memory-lane/

          https://glibertarians.com/2018/10/subaru-horror-theatre-vol-2-the-road-less-traveled/

          https://glibertarians.com/2018/10/subaru-horror-theatre-vol-3-forever-young-take-the-subaru/

          1. Lackadaisical

            Benefit: Consuming the soul of your grandchildren to become younger
            Con: Evil car that haunts you after you take it to the dump

        3. kinnath

          135K miles on our 09 Forester. Of course, it’s a manual, not an automatic.

    4. kinnath

      Subaru

      Repeating from last Wed’s horror thread. Subaru. Ugly, boring, dependable.

      Our ’09 Forrester will plow through any blizzard we get here in Iowa. We don’t get huge snow falls, but we do have wind which means we do have drifts.

      1. AlmightyJB

        My sister recently bought a Suburu and loves it. I was looking at the Ascent which is their largest SUV and has close to 9″ of ground clearance. I like the larger Toyota Sequoia better but I’m not sure I like it 20k better. Not really ready to buy yet anyways. Getting ready to make my last car payment.

        1. AlmightyJB
      2. Not Adahn

        My WRX/STI isn’t that boring.

        1. Yes it is, you’ve just become inured to it.

          1. Not Adahn

            I need to find a track to take it to and see how much of the speedometer is bullshit.

          2. If my GPS is accurate, my spedometer shows 2mph higher than actual.

            I’d rather it be higher than lower if I can’t get accurate.

          3. Not Adahn

            No, I mean the speedometer goes up to 180, but I can’t test that on the roads around here.

          4. Oh. Well, that’s different.

            I suppose it says something when my first thought is the accuracy of the instrument rather than excess meter capacity.

          5. Not Adahn

            This one is right on, at least compared against the various radar displays around town.

            All my BMWs’ speedometers read higher than actual speed.

    5. NO SUBARU.

      Get a used 95-01 Cherokee automatic with as low miles as you can find. I bought one 7 years ago that had 96K at the time, now it’s up to 157K and I have never done anything beyond routine maintenance.

      Much more fun and they last forever. I have a buddy who works at a 4×4 customization shop and he says he routinely sees Cherokees from that year range with 300K+ miles.

      1. Florida Man

        Get a beige one and kill off what little is left of your social life.

      2. Negroni Please

        Jesus. That sounds risky. Also a cursory search shows me the lowest mileage nearby is 195k….

      3. Mad Scientist

        Don’t buy anything made by Jeep Chrysler unless you also buy a mechanic.

        1. Chipwooder

          One who specializes in rebuilding transmissions

    6. Florida Man

      Pick up with 33’s, son!

    7. B.P.

      Buy as much Toyota as you can afford. Go back as many years as you need to.

      1. Florida Man

        I’m lifting my 2010 Taco next weekend.

      2. Negroni Please

        I’m a big Toyota fan but even used Tacomas are too much and the late model Rav4 is easily the least inspiring suv on the market.

        1. Florida Man

          My wife has the 2012 RAV4 with V6 and 4×4. It’s pretty fun to drive. No factory five MK4, but fun.

          1. Negroni Please

            Yeah they stopped making the V6 4×4 in like 2013 I think. All the newer ones are pathetic.

    8. Suthenboy

      I have a 2007 Jeep 4-door Wrangler. It’s a beast. That fucker crawls through the woods, over logs, through mud pits etc. It is practically invincible.
      It’s got 200K on it and I have never had any problems with it. It gets amazingly good gas mileage. I dont know how to recommend it because the quality, capability of the Wranglers varies wildly with year of manufacture.
      I dont worry about inclement weather or road conditions. As long as I have that under me I have complete confidence.
      In any case I will be driving that thing until the wheels fall off of it or off of me.

      1. Mad Scientist

        That’s the thing with Jeeps. You either get a Wednesday car or a lemon.

        1. Bobarian LMD

          And good used ones are usually too fucking expensive.

      2. AlmightyJB

        Jeeps are tough but I’ve heard that the ride is not as smooth as a lot of SUVs. Not a huge deal unless your on the road a lot.

    9. Tundra

      No opinion but budget for good snow tires. Over many years of winter driving it’s the most important part of the equation.

      1. Negroni Please

        Supposedly that doesn’t matter as much where we are and most people I talk to don’t bother with snow tires unless they don’t have an AWD.

        Obviously up there on the surface of the moon where you live, the situation is likely pretty different

          1. Spudalicious

            I run Michelin Premier LTX on my Tahoe. They’ve been great tires on snowy/icy roads so far.

        1. Tundra

          Ice.

          Most new car tires are flat out shit on ice. Good mileage = terrible stopping on ice. Even with AWD.

    10. blackjack

      I’ve got a ten year old saab 9-7x and it’s pretty nice. I call it the “saabrolet” because it’s got the trail blazer chassis/drivetrain. 290 hp straight six with bigger brakes and sway bars, awd, traction control, plush assed interior and air ride out back with an onboard compressor and hose to inflate the tires. Sticks like glue in rain and handles nice all the time. I paid around 4k with 80k miles.

    11. Semi-Spartan Dad

      I really like my Honda Pilot. I’m able to take everywhere around the farm.

      The guy who delivers my hay can’t make it up the hill in his F-350 towing a trailer with 150 bales. The Pilot’s able to pull the truck and trailer just enough to get it up the hill.

    12. Lackadaisical

      Depends whats near you. I got a used hyundai accent for ~10k with 10k miles on it. Total cost to own is something like $0.15 per mile counting gas and insurance, assuming it makes it to 100k miles (at 85K now).

      Also, snow tires and AWD are for pussies, live a little.

  18. Rufus the Monocled

    Someone should do one of Pelosi’s speech farts and Hilary’s slapstick physical comedy together.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      DO I HAVE TO THINK FOR EVERYONE?!

      DON’T ANY OF YOU WORK?!

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Not anymore, I quit my job

        *waves winning lotto ticket around*

      2. Mojeaux

        Today, my work is sucking my soul.

          1. Mojeaux

            I loved that movie.

        1. Dr. Fronkensteen

          You hang around here and you still have a soul?

          1. Mojeaux

            I keep it shielded in a lead box when I’m here.

          2. C. Anacreon

            Put your soul into a box, put the box into a car, drive the car around the world
            Until you get heard

            /World Party

        2. Florida Man

          I was on vacation last week and got kicked in the teeth Monday at work. Hopefully today will go more smoothly.

          1. Playa Manhattan

            Where’d you go? Orlando?

          2. Florida Man

            Partly yes. Halloween horror nights at universal. I also went to Georgia for the sunbelt expo.

          3. Suthenboy

            My stepson was supposed to go to that but at the last minute a problem with his children came up. I was disappointed. He and his wife would have had a blast.

          4. Florida Man

            The Expo or HHN?

          5. blackjack

            Just got back from Biketoberfest in Daytona. Florida is great. I can’t wait to go back.

          6. Florida Man

            Glad you enjoyed your visit. Bikefest is one of those things that’s close by but I’ve never done.

  19. Count Potato

    “At least 30 people were injured when a large portion of a floor at a party near Clemson University’s campus collapsed, dropping people into the basement early Sunday morning.

    Witnesses said the party at the event space of an apartment complex was just getting started when the floor collapsed.

    “Everybody was jumping, next thing you know, I’m jumping, I had my hands in the air and I can feel myself falling. Then I wake up, because I blacked out, and there [were] girls everywhere with blood all over their face,” Leroy Pearson told CBS affiliate WSPA-TV.”

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/clemson-university-party-floor-collapses-30-injured-today-2018-10-21/

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I’ve already heard talk that there should have been a sign that said “Don’t let 300 people jump up and down simultaneously on this floor.”

        1. I was thinking of this.

    2. Tres Cool

      No doubt that this was playing .

    3. Playa Manhattan

      “girls everywhere with blood all over their face”

      Rolling Stone is on the case.

      1. C. Anacreon

        Grab its motherfucking floor.

      2. Trigger Hippie

        I was thinking more along the lines of a Hat and Hair story.

    4. Private Chipperbot

      I’m jumping, I had my hands in the air

      But was she waving them like she just didn’t care?

      1. Rasilio

        Apparently it wasn’t just the ceiling which couldn’t hold us

  20. The Late P Brooks

    I’m looking at the Honda HR-V right now.

    Is that the one that looks like a new iteration of the Element? I know somebody who has one (Element) and she seems to like it. Much more utilitarian than the CRV, which is a big plus in my book.

  21. blackjack

    Oldies?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6Uht69h8Is

    This is the best my earldom has to offer

  22. The Late P Brooks

    Apparently the HRV is not what I was thinking of.

    1. SugarFree

      You can get vaccinated for that now.

  23. Count Potato

    I can see this ad having the opposite result:

    https://twitter.com/AdamParkhomenko/status/1054510160692109312

    1. Just Say’n

      Oh man, if I worked for Heitkamp or O’Rourke I’d have to admit that the race is pretty much over and this ad is just meant to get my candidate a sweet progressive lobbying job after the race.

      This is real bad

      1. MikeS

        Yeah, no way this helps either of them.

        Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to go start spreading this around North Dakota. Won’t take long.

          1. Just Say’n

            She probably says that South Dakota is so much better than North Dakota. She’s literally a monster

    2. Mr Lizard

      Made it through exactly 3.7 seconds of that.

      1. Chipwooder

        Longer than me – once I hear that harpy shrieking on the elevator, that’s it.

    3. Brochettaward

      I can see this ad having the opposite result:

      The imagery they show that is supposed to be motivating is of things that most people find ridiculous. The images they show that are supposed to make people upset, like just Kavanaugh’s face, don’t. At least not for the reasons that the person who made the ad thinks they will.

      So, yea, it will have the opposite result for anyone who isn’t a frothing at the mouth fucking progressive.

    4. Michael

      “Hackneyed” was the very first word that came to my mind while watching that.

      1. Michael

        Also, fucking CCR? Seriously? This is a smug Boomer’s ultimate late stage nocturnal emission.

        1. MikeS

          Re-covered by Fogerty and the Foo Fighters, so it’s totes hip

          1. Chipwooder

            The Foo Fighters are like 50 years old now! Their debut album is 23 years old.

          2. MikeS

            gawd damn I’m getting old

    5. Semi-Spartan Dad

      I was halfway through before realizing the ad was intended to be supporting the Dems.

    6. Bobarian LMD

      I tweeted back that this looks like a false flag operation.

      It’s gonna explode in their faces.

    7. “I’ve been so depressed lately. This video is giving me life! We have some absolutely amazing candidates, activists and voters! This gives me so much hope.”

      KYS.

    8. Lackadaisical

      so…. Are you telling me a republican didn’t make that?

  24. The Late P Brooks

    You can get vaccinated for that now.

    Unfortunately, I am not at risk.

    Curses!

  25. Is there any reason that a citizen’s gender or sex or whatever needs to be legally defined, within the context of the Constitution? I mean, if you’re a citizen, gender/sex should never matter. Unless there’s something I’m missing…

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/civil-rights-groups-call-prospect-creating-narrow-definition/story?id=58675663

    1. tarran

      Let me explain. It’s illegal for the government to discriminate with respect to sex and race. And in order to make sure that they don’t discriminate, they collect that information they aren’t supposed to use, and deny services to people who refuse to provide that information, and pay close attention to it. They need to make it a factor in their decisions to ensure that they look like they are ignoring it.

      1. I’m guessing the actual legislation will look something like what you just said.

        1. Bobarian LMD

          Except harder to follow.

    2. wdalasio

      i keep seeing the argument that sex itself (as opposed to gender) isn’t binary. The case that the advocates of this argument bring up is that of intersex babies where there are genetic combinations beyond XX and XY. Now, I’m concede that I’m not a scientist or a doctor and can’t say with certainty. But, aren’t those cases simply birth defects? I know it’s considered mean and cruel and nasty to suggest that nature has rendered someone in any way defective. But, my understanding is that, in those cases, the particular offspring can’t reproduce without technological intervention. That pretty much sounds like the definition of a birth defect.

      1. Sooo…. how about the govt. just gets out of the business of sex/gender and only deals with citizens? I still really don’t see what it matters to the govt.

        1. Brochettaward

          Well, you’d have to make a lot of changes to existing laws and regulations to make that happen.

        2. wdalasio

          Not opposed to it, in principle. Of course, as Brochettaward points out, that implies a lot of changes to the existing rules. And my impression is that a lot of the people pushing this issue wouldn’t be too crazy about the implied consequences (female draft, an end to sex and gender discrimination suits, etc.).

          1. Ok, that makes sense. I just couldn’t think of any laws that involved gender. Thanks.

        3. Rasilio

          How can you give special consideration to woman owned businesses if you do not have a legal concept of women?

          In otherwords they want the government to keep the gender concepts so they can continue to give special handouts to the disenfranchised womxn but also make it so the the poor trannies don’t lose out on the sweet sweet bennies

  26. The Late P Brooks

    Negroni- Toyota 4runners and highlanders are quite popular around here. No idea what you’d have to pay for one.

    1. Playa Manhattan

      I’m part of an online forum for GX owners. There are a shitload of them in Colorado. Some cool mods too. Lifts, winches, overlanding gear…

    2. Negroni Please

      Those are bit big and pricey. My dad drives a highlander and loves it. That thing is a tank.

      1. B.P.

        My 1997 4Runner has over 260K miles without a hiccup…. even after my wife’s cousin ran it into the back of a parked trailer at a decent speed. My 2006 4runner has about 140K and is just getting started. They do retain their value, so used ones will cost you for sure.

        1. WTF

          160k on my 2008 4runner, going strong and never needed anything but routine maintenance.

    3. Don Escaped Texas

      We’ve got almost 200k on our 4runner, but I don’t recommend it

      as anything other than a work truck, like an engineer visiting off-road sites. It’s bulky, awkward, drives like a dumptruck, and uncomfortable; I’m infinitely more comfy in my C1500HD 2WD, which can’t hold a candle to the Toyota as a lunar rover, though.

      AWD in something that’s comfy and steers is the answer for snow. Trucks are just stupid on-road in snow if you don’t need the towing or toting capacity (this from a guy who drives nothing but trucks). AWD manages traction to all four wheels constantly in a way that most others systems just can’t; it will solve a lot of little handling/steering problems before you ever know you have them. I like Subaru and Volvo, and I hear the MDX is solid.

      Ice is another matter: there is no good answer, but there are some very bad answers: my big honking truck in 4WD!!! As seen in ditches everywhere. Any mechanism that locks one tire’s drive to another’s (even the differential in traditional 2WD), leads to drag which increases risk of one tire’s breaking loose. Once, I drove 500 miles from Fort Worth to Memphis in a Passat with meaty Michelins (my brand for all situations) on mostly ice and did okay: 27 hours; the overpasses in Dallas were the worst of it.

      Get the snow tires, the type without studs (studded tires are verboten in some states and tear up the tarmac on a dry day).

      1. Spudalicious

        Blizzaks ftw.

  27. Count Potato

    “The Hippie-Capitalist CEO Who Wants to Win a Nobel Prize With Sober Raves”

    https://noisey.vice.com/en_us/article/4339xd/the-hippie-capitalist-ceo-who-wants-to-win-a-nobel-prize-with-sober-raves

    I’m trying to imagine a worse headline, but nothing is happening.

    1. SugarFree

      More horrific than anything I’ve ever managed to come up with.

    2. Brochettaward

      That may be the worst human being since Hitler.

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      Lol. That Hilary cut out. Yes, because who else screams ‘spirituality’ than a stupid witch-cunt, right?

      Quacks.

    4. Chipwooder

      Jesus Christ, it’s like an amalgam of the things I hate the most – raves, shitty dance music, hippies, and Hillary.

      1. Suthenboy

        I fucking hate the smell of patchouli.

        1. Mojeaux

          #metoo

          1. Bobarian LMD

            “Get your patchouli stink outta my store!”

          2. Chipwooder

            Was that the last good movie Cusack made? I’d say yes.

          3. Bobarian LMD

            Was that after Grosse Pointe Blank?

          4. Chipwooder

            Looked it up and yes, it was. High Fidelity was 2000, GPB was 1997.

          5. Identity 2003
            Ice Harvest 2005
            The Raven 2012

  28. Brochettaward

    I haven’t been around the last few days, but I’m sure that The Caravan has been discussed. Isn’t it kind of obvious that Trump made some over the top comments, and the media in their typical rush to outrage are spending one of the crucial final weeks before the elections covering a story that most people agree with Trump on? People aren’t going to care about his MS-13 and AL QEADA comments. They’re going to see 10,000 people wandering slowly up Mexico to break the law and think this is insanity.

    1. Drake

      The pictures sure look like an invading army in column march.

    2. B.P.

      I’ve already seen some “Stop reporting on this, you’re helping Trump!” pivoting.

  29. tarran

    Posted this accidentally on a dead thread..

    Jeffrey Tucker looks at the deplatforming and is unworried:

    What’s happening on digital media today is the attempt to recreate a civic consensus of opinion such as existed in the pre-internet age. Consider this: From the end of World War II through the Reagan presidency, there prevailed only three television networks. The government itself exercised the primary influence over the content. These networks began to think of themselves as public utilities, a ruling class, a protected elite, and they dispensed canons of the civic religion on a daily basis.

    All of that has blown up. The cartel crumbled in the late 1980s, creating an avalanche of speech that only grows in power. Now the Big Three combined take up only a small percentage of people’s attention relative to the millions of other possible venues. And speaking of millions, the Big Three have become hundreds of millions of people with instant live-television cameras in their pockets, which they can use to broadcast to the multitudes, with zero civic control on the content.

    Yes, you can be banned from this or that venue. You might have to shift and create a new log-in and try a new service. There is no shutting this system down, despite all the talk of curation, censorship, lawsuits, algorithmic fixes, and so on.

    I think he’s correct; this sort of discrimination has always cost the discriminator. Just as a racist man who refuses to hire black carpenters has to pay a premium for refusing to hire perfectly good carpenters, Facebook and Twitter are losing out on advertising dollars, both from the potential advertisers they’ve booted off their sites, and the potential eyeballs who wander away to more interesting venues and make the sites less attractive to the advertisers they’ve kept.

    Eventually, Facebook will curate itself to a tiny community that is free from trolls where everyone lives in fear of the cattbutt… Hey!

    1. Playa Manhattan

      I think we can trust Dan Rather.

    2. Just Say’n

      This is weird coming from Tucker considering that he was attacked by the woke brand of libertarianism for praising Jordan Peterson. To the point where he actually had to write a follow-up article defending the fact that he can enjoy anyone that he likes.

      Does Tucker honestly believe that liking or disliking Jordan Peterson is somehow a legitimate reason to ban someone from an online platform, because it will eventually extend to that.

      Just because someone behaves like a fascist on his own property doesn’t make him any less of a fascist

      1. tarran

        No. What Jeffrey Tuckere is saying is that all Facebook and Twitter can do with their bans is make themselves less valuable. They are no different than a member of the KKK who refuses to do business with black people. Facebook can insist that only people with white skin get to use their platform. It will make their platform less useful, especially in comparison to something like Minds that is happy to do business with whites and blacks.

        The person who discriminates unreasonably always bears and economic cost that is not borne by the person who refuses to do so. That’s why they needed Jim Crow laws – to protect the racists from losing business to people who didn’t give a shit.

        1. Just Say’n

          Man, I’m not good at reading.

        2. Pan Zagloba

          Yes, assume spherical Internet over the timespan of about a century and he’s 100% correct.

          Only, how’s Minds doing for advertising? How about Bitchute? Which corporations want to be branded as “gives money to Nazis?”

          Don’t blaspheme and you’ll do fine. So vast majority of userbase will not be kicked off the platform. And that’s all they want – remove as many points of intersection between normies and Bad Thinkers. For all the hate Twitter gets, “The Left” would be in a stronger position today without it. In all honesty, Adpocalypse must have put fear of God in all the major online services – the amount of money lost from shedding users is nothing compared to your ad partners telling you “well, we think what with all the Nazis, you are besmirching our good name, so crack down or we pull. Oh and while we have you over the barrel, we are renegotiating the terms.”

          Trust me, I want to be wrong, but I have put $50 on Alex Jones not recovering half his YouTube audience on a new platform and I’m feeling pretty confident about winning that one.

          1. B.P.

            Aren’t the folks branding corporations as “gives money to Nazis” a small and increasingly irrelevant minority? I know moneyed interests are scared shitless of them, but I’d think on a longer time horizon they’d eventually stop kowtowing to them.

          2. Pan Zagloba

            Who cares if they are a minority? Since they are the same class of people who have many important positions in various corporations, their voices carry more weight. As a side benefit, how many of the major business are in the same conglomerate as various old-school media groups? Why wouldn’t the order come from the to to squeeze the people wrecking the competitors?

            Shit, why would Paypal and Square take down Freestartr? They weren’t losing money on it, since they just take a cut of transaction. But, it was Kickstarter For Nazis, so, go fucking build your own payment system.

          3. tarran

            Oh people will suffer.

            It won’t be pretty. Just as black people started migrating up north* to evade Jim Crow, we will have to migrate to new platforms, many of which have yet to be created.

            The good news is that the underserved markets and resources created by the deplatforming actually makes it easier for those new platforms to nucleate from an un-implemented idea to a going concern.

            *I know, the bastards should have stayed in the south and fixed it rather than bringing their dysfunction to the north! No Alabamian has a right to move to Indiana because borders mean something!

          4. Pan Zagloba

            That analogy is horrible. The North already existed, was the richer part of the country and migrating blacks were incorporated into the existing economic and social body.

            If you want a better analogy, try Puritan colonization. Except that was still done through chartered companies in mother country, and…well, Roanoke was a thing.

          5. Heroic Mulatto

            migrating blacks were incorporated into the existing economic and social body.

            I think some of the old folk still around might quibble with you about that.

          6. Pan Zagloba

            I think some of the old folk still around might quibble with you about that.

            Sigh…I knew that was coming and yet walked right into it. And since I complained about analogy, I can’t complain about missing steps in my disputing it.

          7. The Last American Hero

            Croatoan nods.

          8. Luther Baldwin

            Enh… any new platforms that get created will eventually get shamed into doing the same thing as FB and Twitter. Unless they’re run by McAfee or someone else who doesn’t give a fuck.

  30. Just Say’n

    Aw, man. Is this real life?

    https://twitter.com/BruceBartlett/status/1054788112193331200

    @BruceBartlett
    Follow Follow @BruceBartlett
    More
    Key differences between Donald Trump and Adolph Hitler–Hitler served honorably in the military, Trump didn’t; Hitler was faithful to his wife, Trump cheated on all his wives; Hitler wrote a book, Trump’s were all ghostwritten.

    1. Mad Scientist

      Key differences, huh?

      1. Drake

        One of them was a vegetarian who loved his pets, the other was a monster.

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      “Bruce Bartlett

      @BruceBartlett
      50m50 minutes ago
      More
      Anyone who really thinks a comparison between Trump and Hitler is absurd should watch “Triumph of the Will” and then watch one of Trump’s MAGA rallies. His rallies are easy to find. Fox runs them uncut.”

      Also, did Obama write his fiction?

      One little problem fatso-fucko: HITLER KILLED OVER SIX MILLION JEWS, RETARDS, GAYS AND GYPSYS.

      Asshole.

      1. Count Potato

        “Retards, Gays and Gypsys” is my favorite Cher song.

      2. Chipwooder

        Triumph of the Will, eh Brucie?

      3. Tonio

        “Retards.” Yep, there’s your sensitive liberal for you.

    3. Brochettaward

      Trump murder-suicided his wife and they were only married for 40 hours. Also fairly certain he cheated on Eva Braun repeatedly in the time before that. F-.

      1. Lackadaisical

        That was the part that bothered me most too.

    4. Mad Scientist

      Trump didn’t write a book that you can read unattributed passages to and watch all the little progs nod their heads in agreement.

      1. Suthenboy

        ^This^

      2. Pan Zagloba

        I dunno, I’m sure you can find some China pieces in there they would have not only nodded to but applauded even with author known pre-2015.

        Of course, these days, China Is Awesome as far as progs are concerned. No matter how many Interpol chiefs they disappear.

    5. Then he doubles down saying that immigrants are going to be Trump’s Jews. Un-fucking-believable.

      1. Just Say’n

        Q, I’m looking forward to your Halloween costume girly pics.

        1. I’m making a list and checking it twice.

      2. WTF

        That’s why they are so desperate to get into this country.

    6. creech

      These contrasts are fun. How many more can we come up with? Hitler hated the Russians; Trump is in love with one. Hitler loved the mountain air; Trump is a Florida seashore kind of guy. Hitler loved fine art; Trump has never set foot in an art museum. Hitler wore fashionable riding boots; Trump wears bloodsucking banker wing tips; Hitler loved classical architecture; Trump loves modernistic crap decorated like a brothel.

      1. Lackadaisical

        I confess that I like wingtips and the Trump building in Chicago. But Classical architecture *is* demonstrably better.

          1. Lackadaisical

            “The Schwerbelastungskörper was built in order to determine whether the unconsolidated Berlin ground could support the weight of the planned triumphal arch.”

            That might be the dumbest thing I’ve ever read. Aren’t Germans supposed to be good at engineering? Terzaghi sounds German, right?

          2. Look, even engineers need good baseline data. So they did a scale test – using 1:1 scale.

          3. Pan Zagloba

            Hey, it turned out, yes, ground is unable to support this building. So either an experiment that either had to be done to prove to some numbnuts that calculations are correct or an experiment in the “well, we’re not sure what the scaling is like here, let’s just get some actual data” category. In either case, legit engineering.

          4. Lackadaisical

            It may technically be ‘legit engineering’, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t dumb as all shit. There are several easier and cheaper methods available, even in 1933 or whatever to figure that out. Unless you posit case 2, in which case, refer to my first sentence.

  31. Don Escaped Texas

    But if m tickets are sold, we get……….

    There needs to be an Annual Glib Rendezvous where could we meet and have
    a/ 18 hole golf tournament
    b/ tactical pistol tournament
    c/ poker tournament
    d/ brewing / tasting contest
    e/ bikini judging contest

    It should be held in a state that has no income tax.

    1. Florida Man

      You can do four of those things in Florida. I’m not sure how big your poker games has to get before a raid.

      1. Florida, where the air is more water than air, Florida? No thanks.

        1. Florida Man

          Pass the word to your fellow New Yorkers.

          1. Snowbirds don’t listen to me.

            If I could make them listen to me, New York wouldn’t keep electing the morons we do.

    2. JaimeRoberto, Public Intellectual

      There’s no way I’m putting on a bikini for you guys.

    3. EvilSheldon

      This would beat the hell out of the Modern Pentathlon.

  32. tarran

    It turns out that sentient articles of clothing are having a much wider impact on world history than we realize. Mark Steyn has found a piece of the puzzle.

    A big piece.

    A very big piece.

    Consider this revelation:

    I lent my tie to Tony Blair. True story. This was a couple of years back, at the BBC’s New York studios, where I happened to be early one Friday morning when a callow youth wearing jeans and a ghastly leisure shirt wandered in from Fifth Avenue. I assumed from the mad, random grin that he wanted to recruit me for some sort of religious cult, so I was about to call security when he announced that he was Britain’s Shadow Home Secretary and had been obliged to interrupt his Manhattan vacation to respond to that week’s prison breakout “down the line,” as they say, to BBC Radio in London. He did such a good job that they asked him if he wouldn’t mind saying the same things all over again, this time for the TV news. They could film him above the waist, so the jeans wouldn’t show, but he was still concerned about his open neck and, as I was the only guy in the building, he inveigled me into handing over my tie — a tasteful yet splashy number from Ogilvy’s in Montreal, if memory serves.

    Suddenly this nobody shot to power:

    A couple of weeks later, I was in Britain and sought out a political insider: “Ever heard of a fellow called Tony Blair?” I said. “Claims to be shadow Home Secretary. I lent him my tie.”

    “Are you nuts?” said my friend. “He’s now the new Labour Party leader, 87 points ahead in the polls, the most popular man in the country after Tinky-Winky in the Teletubbies. He’s completely revitalized the Labour Party, got rid of all that socialist baggage from the past. He wants to sever the party’s union ties.” Well, I can’t say I blame him, I thought. All that kipper-wide polyester and hideous paisley motifs. I met Tony again a few days later when we were both on the David Frost morning show. At breakfast afterwards, he was churlish enough to deny me full credit for his victory in the leadership race, but he did concede, à propos that BBC interview, that back at Labour HQ no one had paid any attention to anything he actually said but they did comment favourably on the tie. The spin doctors, not to say the knit-and-weave doctors, thought its bold colours projected both authority and innovation, gravitas and dynamism. You’ll notice that my own neck now projects none of these qualities.

    Since he took office in 1997, bewildered observers have tried to get a handle on what’s known as “the Blair project.” Taking advantage of the vast powers that accrue to the Queen’s first minister under the Westminster system, Mr Blair has set about remaking the United Kingdom with an unprecedented zeal. For example, he’s wrecked the House of Lords and turned it into a worthless chamber of cronies and has-beens. He’s introduced “asymmetrical federalism” to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, allowing the last to maintain privileged relations with sovereign governments (Dublin), as Quebec does with France. An Ottawa-style Upper House of pliant deadbeats, “distinct society” status for problematic territories, the introduction to Scotland of a local Parliament divided between separatists and “soft nationalists,” the unceasing demand that ancient institutions and symbols “modernize” themselves for the needs of a multicultural society … After four years, it seems pretty clear that what Tone’s exciting “New Britain” boils down to in practice is boring old Canada. “

    I think back to our encounter in New York and find myself nagged by guilt: Did some sinister Canadian organism jump the evolutionary chain from my Ogilvy’s necktie to Blair’s bloodstream? On the day I bought it, had the elderly M Trudeau perhaps tried it on? Did some fatal Trudeaupian virus seep through Tony’s shirt and lead him on to the Canadianization of Britain? Surely no sane person would deliberately model every single one of his constitutional reforms on Canada, given that Canada is one of the great constitutional swamps of the western world. Surely, if he was going to mimic North American federalism, he’d take up successful US ideas, not failed Canadian ones. But the tie I loaned Tone is now a noose around the collective neck of the United Kingdom. Britain’s second Canadian Prime Minister (after New Brunswick’s Andrew Bonar Law, who briefly occupied Downing Street in 1922-23) is defining the country out of existence.

    It’s not an organism on the tie. It’s the tie itself!

    1. Florida Man

      Sounds like Kill La Kill.

      1. Sensei

        Dear God, I was going to make the same comment… If you understand all the meta references it’s hysterical.

        The title is a huge play on words. These words are all pronounced exactly the same – homophones are why kanji are so important to writing Japanese.

        切る – to cut
        着る – to wear (clothing)
        キル “kill” in katakana from the English
        斬る – to kill (a human)

      2. Bobarian LMD

        Only with zero sexiness.

        1. Sensei

          Mako Mankanshoku’s voice actor, Aya Suzaki, is cute as a button and has a great sense of humor.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U425-F3QFo

    2. Rufus the Monocled

      Canadians who brag about the fucking Charter are retards.

      They should be embarrassed given the standard set by the U.S. Constitution. But nope. We think we came up with something just as dandy if not better!

      This county sometimes is so insular and myopic it makes me wonder.

      1. tarran

        /reports Rufus to Human Rights Tribunal for not posting a translation in joual

        1. Rufus the Monocled

          Don’t get me going on that.

    3. Lackadaisical

      So… like the Hat and hair?

  33. Atanarjuat

    Not long ago we had the discussion about olive oil and its contribution to virility in the aging male. Plus it tastes good. But I’ve heard a lot of stuff you can buy isn’t the real thing. How do you know you’re not getting the fake stuff?

    1. Pharmaceuticals are better.

    2. Drake

      Is there a picture of olives on the bottle?

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      Very easily.

      The issue is more where they claim, say, it’s Italian olive oil but it’s mixed with Tunisian and Turkish. That kind of thing. It’s a problem but you can work around it. Outright fraud where it’s not olive is rare.

      Just go to a place you know and trust. Look for D.O.P. designation (it’s a little like wine).

      I just go to to a guy I know. He imports from a private producer.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        https://www.realsimple.com/food-recipes/shopping-storing/more-shopping-storing/olive-oil-buying-checklist

        “If an oil is labeled “product of Italy,” that signifies only that the oil was packed and shipped in Italy. The olives could have been grown, harvested, and pressed in, say, Tunisia, Greece, or Spain. To find out where an oil really comes from, look at the estate name.”

        Pretty much in a different way what I was saying.

        1. And? Is there some magical quality of Italian olives that makes them different from the Spanish?

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            Not the point of what they’re saying.

            If it says ‘From Italy’ but the olives are from elsewhere it’s misleading labeling.

            It’s the same problem in Spain.

          2. Rufus the Monocled

            It used to be the same problem in wine too by the way. They would ‘play” with the grape varieties and claim something they weren’t. That’s why France organized itself like it did and Italy soon followed.

      2. Chipwooder

        It’s also oil being sold as “extra virgin” that is no such thing.

    4. Mad Scientist

      Drink more pineapple juice.

      1. Keep the wife happy!

        1. Lackadaisical

          Ever the optimist.

    1. Akira

      Hitler’s book fucking sucked. Dull, rambling, and disorganized. I’ve never heard those complaints about Trump’s books. Also, I’m pretty sure ghostwriting is almost universal in the category of “dumbass books that politicians write”.

      Also, since when do Leftists give such great accords to serving in the military?

      1. Mad Scientist

        When it suits their purposes. It’s no different from insisting on eating their cake and having it too.

  34. Brett L

    Update on the Cigar City Oktoberfest. Its a Marzen. Its fine. For some reason the first six-pack of the season are delicious, pretty much regardless of brand, and then they all just taste the same. Stupid German brewing laws.

    1. Florida Man

      I bought my wife the Yeungling Octoberfest. I’ll sneak one tonight and report back tomorrow.

    2. Negroni Please

      That’s exactly how I feel about Märzenbier. Every year the first one I taste is incredible and gets me all excited for fall beer and after the second one I shrug my shoulders and go back to drinking pale ales.

  35. Suthenboy

    Aaaaand Fox just reports (they actually sent a reporter) that 80% of the so called migrants are males under 35 y/o.
    That is more or less what I see in the photos.

    1. Michael

      Also, expect them to complete a thousand mile trek on foot just before the election.

    2. Tres Cool

      Military age….

    3. Lackadaisical

      Reminds you of the ‘migrant crisis’ in Europe.

  36. Atanarjuat

    https://www.autoblog.com/2018/10/22/nhtsa-shuts-down-unlawful-autonomous-school-bus/

    Not sure if y’all have seen this. This might make John as happy as an hour on a park bench with a feeding model.

    1. Suthenboy

      The real world is not a sic-fi novel. Electric cars are the dumbest idea I know of.

      1. MikeS

        Exactly! Flying cars are what the people really want!

        1. Suthenboy

          No shit. I want to be able to fly to my brother’s house in Texas in an hour and a half, shoot clays all day and sleep in my own bed that night. The redneck riviera in three. I could be home with a couple of gallons of scallops and have supper cooked before dark.

          1. Raven Nation

            How about a self-flying car?

            https://futurism.com/flying-taxi-new-zealand

          2. Suthenboy

            That is almost exactly what I had in mind.

    2. Urthona

      I don’t have a problem with it, but it seems cruel to torture the kids with a top speed of 8 mph. A bicycle would be faster.

    3. Don Escaped Texas

      Test vehicle permits are very restrictive. I’ll bet there was some foul-up between developers, distributors, and fleet: the approval was doubtless by parties with no appreciation of NHTSA.

      In driving test vehicles from Daytona to Big Bend to Baker’s Grade to Bemidji, half the road time is paperwork each time you hit a new state….it’s tricky stuff. Also, FL has some of the dumbest and most restrictive school bus standards: pass there and you’re good to go nationwide.

  37. Count Potato

    ” Faith Goldy Finished Third In The Toronto Mayoral Election And Says This Is Just The Beginning

    Over 25,000 Torontonians voted for her.”

    https://www.narcity.com/ca/on/toronto/news/faith-goldy-finished-third-in-the-toronto-mayoral-election-and-says-this-is-just-the-beginning

    1. Pan Zagloba

      Huh, that’s more Toronto Nazis than I expected. Especially since A True Nazi would never ever vote for a woman.

    2. Lackadaisical

      Would.

      Even if it does count as sticking it in crazy.

  38. B.P.

    Stupid class action lawsuit….

    https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/class-action-lawsuit-accuses-electric-scooter-companies-of-gross-negligence-due-to-injuries

    …prompts stupid response from scooter company:

    “We believe that the climate crisis and our car dependency demand a transportation mode shift, and clean energy vehicles like e-scooters are already replacing millions of short car trips…”

    I’ve gotta hand it to the Urgent Care employee quoted in the story, though:

    “The more scooters that are out there, the more gravity attacks we will have.”

    1. Suthenboy

      Gravity attacks. I love it. I am stealing that.

      Clean energy vehicles that run on coal. That require the consumption of ten times the energy it takes to move an equivalent gasoline vehicles the same distance. Nice.

      1. Pan Zagloba

        Gravity Attacks! is a legit good title for a book or a movie.

        1. Luther Baldwin

          Sequel to Mars Attacks!…?

          1. Pan Zagloba

            Mars Attacks! is a pretty good title, but it’s self-explanatory. Gravity Attacks! promises not only action, but mystery as well.

          2. Heroic Mulatto

            The sequel to Mars Attacks! was Dinosaurs Attack! anyway.

            Only real OGs know what I’m talking about.

          3. Untrue. I know what you’re talking about. So it can’t be “only”.

          4. Heroic Mulatto

            Maybe you’re a real OG?

    2. I hate those fucking things.

      I had to stay overnight Downtown last month and it was like a neckbeard invasion force traveling on pre-adolescent personnel carriers.

      1. Mad Scientist

        The last time I was in Denver I was staying at a hotel downtown, about 10 blocks from my office. One morning as I walking along the 16th street mall I saw a beardo riding a unicycle and juggling some dumb thing or other. Do this day I’m surprised he wasn’t wearing a t-shirt that said “LOOK AT ME!”

      2. B.P.

        Ha. That’s about right. Those things are tearing around everywhere, in and out of traffic, on the sidewalks, etc. I do find it interesting that society becomes increasingly, and absurdly, safety-obsessed, and then a couple of companies dump piles of quick-moving scooters in the middle of Drunk City USA.

      3. Tundra

        We were at the U of MN last week and they were everywhere. The young lady giving the tour was downright nasty in her disdain for the scooters and anyone who rides them.

        I noticed that kids would just leave them anywhere. I assume there is some way to control who rides them?

    3. Brochettaward

      It doesn’t matter if you believe in gravity. It will find you.

  39. Suthenboy

    I did not know this because I have not spent time around donkeys. We had one mule when I was a kid. Cows, horses, goats, hogs, chickens, ducks, geese, yes but no donkeys.
    Apparently it is not unknown for donkeys to sing. Did anyone else know this?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg7ftpjhJ08

    1. Semi-Spartan Dad

      Not ours (4 donkeys). They just bray like jackasses.

    2. B.P.

      I think it’s a call to prayer.

    3. Playa Manhattan

      Sing? that was only one note!

  40. Tres Cool

    /takes out match
    /lights pilot
    /steps back and turns burner to 11

    /ignites Q SIGNAL

    1. So many euphemisms you could play off of.

      I think I’d go with these:

      https://img.fciencias.com/uploads/2015/08/two-blue-footed-boobies.jpg

  41. “Headless, the body rose to its feet.” – Prince of the North Tower, Part 24.

    1. Tres Cool

      Alternatively, “Hillary: A case study”

      1. Well, the Narrator is fighting a troll.

          1. Lackadaisical

            This one, right here.

    1. Tres Cool

      Her armpit stretch marks make me uneasy for some reason.

      “Thats not where you get linea negra!”

    2. Suthenboy

      Every time I look at these girls I cant help but think there is a lot of…work…done. They all look too much alike.

      1. Mad Scientist

        Future hackysack champions.

  42. Heroic Mulatto

    OMG! Gorsuch is going let Trump count black bodies as 3/5 of a person in the next census! Just kidding. They blocked a deposition of a Federal official in a case about whether or not it is or should be legal to ask whether or not a respondant is a US citizen in the 2020 census. So they ask your age, ethnicity, race, and income, but they can’t ask citizenship status?

    Not that anyone cares, but I could see a case for the argument that since responding to the census is required by law, a question about citizenship status could put Les Undocumented at risk of self-incrimination in violation of the 5th.

    1. I could see that if the question is a multiple choice sort of deal. If it is a simple “are you a US citizen, yes or no?” question, I think the 5th amendment issues go away.

      1. I mean, lawful permanant residents can answer “No” without fear, so the data point is not saying anything about whether they are here illegally.

    2. Pan Zagloba

      But isn’t census supposed to be anonymous? And if you are taking money under the table, doesn’t the household income question present the same issue?

      I mean, if you lie, who is to know?

      1. But, PZ, These poor illegal aliens undocumented immigrants dreamers never lie to the government!

      2. Playa Manhattan

        Baby Jesus.

        1. Pan Zagloba

          But he’s just a baby, he’ll forget it in like 30 seconds.

      3. Heroic Mulatto

        But isn’t census supposed to be anonymous?

        Not in the U.S., at least.

        And if you are taking money under the table, doesn’t the household income question present the same issue?

        Good question, and I agree, it would…so let’s get rid of the the census except for counting people.

        1. Lackadaisical

          Ding, ding ding, we have a winner!

          If they want to put more questions on, just amend the constitution like God intended.

        2. Pan Zagloba

          From the US census site:

          2. Are my answers safe and secure?

          We collect data for statistical purposes only. We combine your responses with information from other households or businesses to produce statistics, which never identify your household, any person in your household, or business. Your information is CONFIDENTIAL. We never identify you individually. Learn more about how we protect your information.

          I mean, I guess census taker could call ICE on you if you answer “three citizens in household” but you look brown…except, why would they not do that even if citizenship question is skipped?

          1. So waht you’re saying is, HM is going to get deported?

          2. Pan Zagloba

            Yes, but because he will post one link too many.

          3. It’s not as if the US government can protect any of your other information.

        3. Suthenboy

          Agreed. Aside from counting people for the purposes of congress who I am, what I have and what I do is none of their damned business.

          1. Pan Zagloba

            Yeah, well, until you abolish draft and modern warfare, states would like to know number of men in each age category.

            And until you abolish Medicare and Social Security, likewise for population breakdown by age.

            Medicare and the rest of War on Poverty require breakdown by income (a poor proxy for wealth but easier for most people to produce a ballpark in on the spot).

            And when you achieve Individualist Colorblind Melting Pot Utopia, race/religion/sex questions stay.

            Those are all noble goals, I’m just saying, there’s solid reasons why they are there and by solid I mean “people who decide want them”.

        4. This. So much this.

  43. Playa Manhattan

    Facebook is surprisingly quiet around here.

    Odd, since a NAZI plane just crashed on the freeway.
    https://abc7.com/small-plane-crashes-on-101-freeway-in-agoura-hills/4543306/

    1. Pan Zagloba

      Were any Spitfires sighted in the area?

    2. Mad Scientist

      Wow. In the first photos I saw of that the plane was intact and only lightly on fire. In yours it’s just about gone. I didn’t even know Los Doyers had a pilot’s license.

      1. Playa Manhattan

        Being an illegal, he doesn’t.

        1. Mad Scientist

          I guess that explains why he couldn’t tell the difference between the 101 and the Camarillo airport runway.

    3. Tres Cool

      Maybe they cant understand the banter ?

    4. Count Potato

      “Fire officials said the pilot, who appeared to be the only person on board, was not injured. Fire officials said no other vehicles were involved in the crash.”

      Wow.

      1. Tundra

        No kidding. Nice of the media nerds tell us what plane it was.

  44. Count Potato

    “It’s okay to let your transgender kid transition — even if they might change their mind in the future”

    https://www.vox.com/2018/10/22/18009020/transgender-children-teens-transition-detransition-puberty-blocking-medication

    TW: Vox

    https://twitter.com/clairlemon/status/1054860192230207488

    1. There is no such thing as a “Transgender kid” Mutilating children like this is abuse and cannot be tolerated.

      1. Even the hormone “treatments” are abuse at that age when they cause lifelong damage to physical development.

      2. Stinky Wizzleteats

        Considering that the majority of these kids either grow out of it or they grow up to be homosexual and not transgender, I’d have to agree.

      3. Meh, If it’s their kids they can do what they want with them. No skin off my nose.

        1. Abuse and neglect are the times when “It’s their kid” doesn’t fly.

          1. It’s a tightrope we’re walking on here. Fall off to one side and parents are allowed to sell their 8 year olds into prostitution. Fall off the other and the government is taking your kids for letting them walk to the bus stop.

            I wish there was a bright line there, but common sense is an oxymoron.

          2. Call me strange, but I don’t see “Permanantly sterilizing your child through deliberate chemical exposure or surgical mutiliation” as being in the gray area.

          3. I hear you, but I’m with Unciv on this one. Minors aren’t granted the same rights as adults because as a culture we recognize that they haven’t developed the mental or emotional sophistication required to make decisions that have significant lifelong consequences. Facilitating a decision like this for a child because it’s “their body and their choice” or because you want to demonstrate your respect for the transgender community is like handing the keys to a drunk and blowing into his car breathalyzer because you don’t want to infringe on his right to self-determination.

          4. I agree. I think this type of stuff is textbook abuse. However, I see a direct path from this to circumcision to any number of other mundane familial choices.

          5. We’re granting rights now? I thought they were inalienable.

    2. One of the replies in the Twitter thread got it right, more or less: “Lovingly and kindly accepting people with some gender ambiguity is good. Evangelizing gender/sexual ambiguity to kids is stupid&threatens the health of the gene pool.” I don’t know about threatening the health of the gene pool, but I feel pretty certain that elective medical procedures that alter a developing child’s body in an attempt to superficially match a different gender are a horrible, horrible idea. What people do as adults is their business, and I know transgender adults who are much happier in their own skin as the gender of their choice. That’s not the kind of decision a minor can make responsibly, and allowing a child to make that sort of a choice in the name of social justice is nothing short of cruelty.

      1. Don Escaped Texas

        This is all going to come back to bite them in the ass in the next 20 years when these kids are like wtf did you do to me

        Yes and Yes.

        To me this is just another example of short-term pain and fear getting in the way of better, long-term decisions: it is hoped to avoid a particularly weird and rare version of growing up, a strange program in any case, so ardently that an even more bizarre, grotesque, and quite possibly painful path is chosen.

        Almost all the flaky prog “solutions” are more painful in the long term. Whoever implied earlier that delaying gratification was core to success was spot on; the corollary is that all the happier short-cuts actually are worse that the pain they wish to avoid.

    3. Not Adahn

      There is an odd cluster of FTM and male-presenting women at my workplace. Well over 0.2% of the population. I don’t know if this area is a hub for that sort of thing or not.

      1. Well, there’s 0 where I am, so you’ve got the lot for the whole region.

    4. Lackadaisical

      Though the hormones left Alex with some cosmetic changes — redistribution of body hair and fat

      LOL. I will let Q know that a little hair and fat redistribution is no big deal.

      Another good sign that the writer is crazy:

      The reality could not be further from the truth.

      Poor motherfucker thinks that truth and reality are not the same thing.

      The vast majority of transgender kids who begin hormonal treatments do not change their minds about medically transitioning. For the very small percentage who do, like Alex, this isn’t the horrible outcome that conservative media outlets lead people to believe. Sometimes “de-transitioning” is just part of a person’s healthy psychological development.

      Citations needed. That Harvard link further down is cock blocked.

      From one of their supporting sources:

      “Transgender children reported depression and self-worth that did not differ from their matched-control or sibling peers (p = .311), and they reported marginally higher anxiety (p = .076). Compared with national averages, transgender children showed typical rates of depression (p = .290) and marginally higher rates of anxiety (p = .096). Parents similarly reported that their transgender children experienced more anxiety than children in the control groups (p = .002) and rated their transgender children as having equivalent levels of depression (p = .728).”

      Uh, isn’t saying a p-value of .311 or .290 not exactly the same as getting a real conclusion? They have a good chance of being wrong there.

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        It’s not exactly a lifestyle that should be encouraged for the sake of a child’s long term mental health:

        https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/AFSP-Williams-Suicide-Report-Final.pdf

      2. Don Escaped Texas

        P values tell you whether you can reject the null hypothesis; what you prove (disprove) depends entirely on how the null hypothesis is constructed.

        “Transgender children reported depression and self-worth that did not differ from their matched-control or sibling peers (p = .311).

        I think what they’re saying here is that the null hypothesis = tranx kids depression is that same as the control group is rejected.

        Forgive my not digging into this; I just don’t care. But my first sentence is very valuable even if I blew my every inference after it.

        I don’t care because freedom has nothing to do with statistics; if 99% of guns can be proven to cause murders, that has nothing to do with my right to have one.

      3. RegicidalManiac

        I’d be genuinely embarrassed to report a P value like that as though it means something.

        Then again, we’ve established that these people have no shame.

      4. Suthenboy

        “The reality could not be further from the truth.” – crazy dumbfuck

        “Once a person is demoralized you cannot fix them. You are stuck with them.” – Yuri Bezmenov

    5. AlmightyJB

      This is all going to come back to bite them in the ass in the next 20 years when these kids are like wtf did you do to me you f’ng psycho assholes.

      1. Luther Baldwin

        This is how you get “they/them” on their FB profiles.

  45. Count Potato

    “Left Wing Mobs: An Explainer”

    https://twitter.com/i/moments/1051467831852830721

    1. straffinrun

      Left wing moobs. *Posts gif of Shirtless Schumer*

      1. Luther Baldwin

        *projectile vomits*

      2. Tres Cool

        *mixes ammonia & bleach*

  46. Suthenboy

    Goddammit. I cant sit here. My dogs are farting the place up so bad the paint is peeling. What the hell? I just let them out.

    1. Fart back at them.

    2. JaimeRoberto, Public Intellectual

      Yeah sure, blame the dogs.