Wednesday Morning Links

Who doesn’t hate the one game wild card playoff for baseball?  People from Colorado, that’s who. What a game last night. With a pitching masterclass by both teams, I don’t know if that game should have ended, but they all have to and the Cubs came up short again this year.  AL wild card game is tonight in New York.

It’s party time!

Elsewhere, Man City won, Juventus won, ManUre drew, as did Bayern and Real Madrid blew ou…holy shit, they lost to CSKA Moscow and its officially time to start pushing the panic button. Preseason basketball and hockey is boring, so it gets no mention.  But I’ll bring up just one more thing about the Ohio-State-Penn State football game from this past Saturday. No, not to gloat. But to illustrate just how bad some decision-making can be when you think you can do no wrong.

Birthday time!  Today we celebrate or acknowledge: historian George Bancroft, writer Thomas Wolfe, writer Gore Vidal, the father of butterfly goaltending Glenn Hall, rocker Eddie Cochran, singer Chubby Checker, tiger pal Roy Horn, singer Lindsey Buckingham, HOF outfielder Dave Winfield, HOF pitcher Dennis Eckersley, guitarist Stevie Ray Vaughan, grifter and racist Al Sharpton, “Boom Boom” Freddie Couples, hepatitis carrier Tommy Lee, actor Clive Owen, the lovely Neve Campbell and musician Gwen Stefani.

Sarah Jessica Parker reenacts her favorite episode

Its also the day on which the Gauls surrendered to Julius Caesar, the Duke of Montrose issued a warrant for the arrest of Rob Roy, Edgar Allen Poe was spotted for the last time alive, the motor-driven vacuum was patented, Trotsky founded “Pravda”, Woodrow Wilson fucked America over (and started the endless advance of the one-way ratchet) by signing a 1% income tax into law, “The Maltese Falcon” premiered, so did “Captain Kangaroo” and “Mickey Mouse Club”, jeez, so did “The Dick Van Dyke Show”, “The Andy Griffith Show”, and “Mr Ed”, Jerry West retired, the Watergate criminal trial began,  the coup against Noriega failed, and the Battle of Mogadishu, which was the loose basis for “Black Hawk Down” took place. Oh yeah, and OJ Simpson walked after being acquitted on murder charges.

OK, that’s it for that.  Now…the links!

 

“As a psychologist, I view truth as a fluid concept”

Christine Blasey Ford might have some explaining to do herself. Somebody get to the Bay Area and ask her these questions. You’ll probably find her in the Delta Sky Miles Diamond Club Lounge at SFO.

If you’re involved in a feminist journal and you’re bitching about the methodology used here, then you’re not serious about advocating equality or feminism or truth in research. Seriously, this is a bit of a long read, but absolutely stunning and hilarious in the absurdity of what these guys were able to pull off. (Open it in incognito or private mode-or somebody please provide an archive link in the comments)

The nanny state comes to Texas. Well, it was always here in some respects, but the creep, especially in Austin, is now complete.

When #believeher goes horribly wrong. But they’re, like, raising awareness to a bigger issue and if we’re gonna make a feminist omelet we’re gonna have to break a few eggs.

Look the money hit the account!!!

I feel bad for the lady, but this seems a bit excessive. No mind, they can just raise taxes!

If you’ve ever wanted to hear a killer explain how he did his thing, you can read it in his own words right here. The testimony is not consistent with many other evidentiary items, namely the video of the event. But who are you gonna believe, members of the jury…the brave, selfless officer or your lying eyes?

Well, it looks like you may be able to bang a robot in Houston after all. But be warned that Big Brother will be there to shame you. Why? Because fuck you, that’s why.

Well, I sure hope you enjoy this. I know I did. I mean…that’s every bit as good as the original.

Now go enjoy the middle of your week. Even if you’re a Cubs fan.

Comments

587 responses to “Wednesday Morning Links”

  1. Pat

    But they’re, like, raising awareness to a bigger issue and if we’re gonna make a feminist omelet we’re gonna have to break a few eggs.

    The issue isn’t the issue, the issue is the revolution.

    1. Well, they better start learning how to shoot if they’re gonna carry out a revolution. Because it’s gonna get to that point eventually.

      1. AlexinCT

        Why do you think they believe that the 2nd amendment must go and are so hardcore about it?

        1. Oh I know. But they do realize there’s gonna be a shooting war if they want to have a revolution where men are effectively put in cages, yeah? That’s gonna he against the most hardcore survivalist gun-keeping contingent. Who will gladly arm those who gave their guns up when they were forced to.
          And it will not go the way that the feminists want.

      2. Certified Public Asshat

        When I am over at Splinter looking for derp to bring here, there is one poster who likes to post a picture of a guillotine in the comments every time they talk about reforming government. You know, because he’s a bad ass and wants to start offing his opponents instead. Guns vs. Guillotines.

        1. Every post of that pic should be responded to with

          “Citizen Robespierre had his date with Madame Guillotine too.”

    2. mr simple

      That Daily Mail article is ridiculous. They all but give the men’s home addresses. What is the need for putting every bit of information they can find on men who’ve been falsely accused?

  2. Pat

    Well, it looks like you may be able to bang a robot in Houston after all. But be warned that Big Brother will be there to shame you.

    Perfect, getting shamed by Big Brother while banging a robot is my kink.

    1. That is… oddly specific.

    2. Slammer

      The AI in my sex robot is saying I assaulted her. What do?

      1. Reformat the storage device, clean the mmechanism and do a fresh install with the latest patchset.

        1. AlexinCT

          That is how the AI comes from the factory now that the cultural revolution has been won by the new SoCons on the left…

          1. Well there’s your problem, you bought an iBot.

          2. leon

            iBot? How individualistic. Woke people get the WeBot.

          3. Those are pretty rare, since the ruling that the trademark infringed on the WeaBot branding.

          4. mr simple

            As long as it’s not the WeeBot. That’s just sick.

      2. “Really, baby? You think I assaulted you? Why don’t you try in these magnetic earrings I bought for you? Yeah that’s right, bitch. Open your audio output device again and you’ll be wearing a magnetic bracelet!”

        Or that’s how I’d picture the response in a parody.

  3. When #believeher goes horribly wrong. But they’re, like, raising awareness to a bigger issue and if we’re gonna make a feminist omelet we’re gonna have to break a few eggs.

    I stand by my assertation that false allegations should carry the same penalty as the crime being accused.

    1. We need to go back to public shaming too.

      Notice that the identity of the person falsely accusing them is conspicuously absent from the story? They need to sue her very publicly for millions and millions of dollars.

      1. leon

        “Notice that the identity of the person falsely accusing them is conspicuously absent from the story?”

        I don’t get why news outlets refuse to print names after it’s been shown that the accusations were fabricated.

        1. “Because that would scare real victims away from coming forward.”
          -feminist activist assclown

        2. Pope Jimbo

          Because it will keep other women coming forward with their own BS allegations. Do you really want to silence women?

          Fucking shitlord

      2. Count Potato

        It’s not just the Daily Fail, it’s every article I’ve seen. Pictures of the accused, but even the name of the accuser.

    2. Trials and Trippelations

      That’s a pretty interesting idea

    3. AlexinCT

      Exactly UCS. Until I see people that tell a lie and try to ruin someone else, I plan to always assume allegations are lies until they prove out otherwise.

  4. The Late P Brooks

    I watched the new Amazon version of King Lear last night. Anthony Hopkins as Lear. Very good.

    1. Pope Jimbo

      I for one am appalled that this is happening in our country. I blame Trump and his abandonment of the norms of decency that our society has developed over the years.

      We are in the middle of a crisis where women are being assaulted by privileged men every single day and Amazon thinks it is OK to have an entire series devoted to some man Learing all over the TV screen? Uffda.

      1. If you’re auditioning for the reason magazine internship, this is the wrong venue even if that was the right thing to say.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          Um, OK. Do I still get some hair product as a gift for playing?

          1. I. B. McGinty

            Is that hair gel?

          2. Minoxidil body wash.

          3. Jarflax

            There is Something About this comment I don’t want to put my hand on.

          4. I. B. McGinty

            Take a 6 minute break and think about it.

          5. Nephilium

            It’s a gel-like substance…

            It could go in his hair…

          6. You get a jack and a tire iron. Congratulations!

          7. To be sure, the previous owner wasn’t using them.

  5. Pope Jimbo

    Uffda. You don’t know how happy this story makes me.

    I know it shouldn’t make me so happy that a person is having their life fucked over because of spurious poundMeToo allegations, but Keillor is so fucking smug that it is hard to remember principles over principals.

    1. MikeS

      Festival founding director Rick Kisonak wrote in an email that “the unexpected reaction on social media made it apparent some people viewed his booking as our condoning of sexual harassment.”

      Translation: “But he’s a liberal, we thought everyone had forgivien him by now!”

  6. MikeS

    Today is Random Acts of Poetry Day,
    So I thought I’d come here to say;
    Knowing this makes me feel very gay.

    1. Pat

      Today is Random Acts of Poetry Day

      First off, fuck yo bitch and the clique you claim

    2. leon

      The futility, life is unfair.

      Scrambling for words.

      Free verse is not poetry

    3. Wait Poetry?

      I thought it was “Random acts of pottery day”!

      *turns off kiln*

    4. There once was a man from the Twin Cities
      Who loved him some asses and titties
      So he waited for Q
      To post pics at 2
      So his afternoon wouldn’t be shitty.

        1. MikeS

          Barrows days
          Marrows glaze

          1. Darrow’s Maze?

          2. Bobarian LMD

            Narrow Gays.
            Twinks for days?

        2. There once was a servant of Swiss
          And never a pun did he miss
          So he’d narrow his gaze
          And objections he’d raise
          At the Glibs who were taking the piss.

          (Apologies to our limey friends)

    5. Pope Jimbo

      How’s this for random? Tying Brook’s love of King Lear and FourScores visit to Minneapolis today:

      “I am a very foolish fond old man,

      Fourscore and upward, not an hour more nor less.

      And to deal plainly

      I fear I am not in my perfect mind.”

      – King Lear (Act IV, Scene VII)

      1. MikeS

        Who wrote that garbage?
        It doens’t even rhyme.
        It’s nonsense about old age,
        For which I have no time.

        1. Let me count the ways
          we can argue for days
          about adding some thyme
          to the avocado slime
          until we get swiss to narrow his gaze.

        2. Pope Jimbo

          Isn’t there some outhouse out on the prairie you should be defacing with your “poetry”?

          1. When composing a ditty
            You’re supposed to be witty
            even out on the prairie
            somewhere west of Gary
            it’s not okay to be shitty.

          2. MikeS

            There once was a holy man from Minnesoda,
            who picked on the guy from Dakota.
            The NoDak got blue,
            and the next thing you knew,
            into a tree he crashed his Toyota.

    6. Pope Jimbo

      How about a Trigger Warning Mike?

      Some of us may be averse to poetry.

      1. Reading some verse
        won’t put you in a hearse
        but it would be a crime
        to not make the words sound similar.

        1. MikeS

          *askance glance*

  7. Rebel Scum

    Crowder’s new ‘Change My Mind’

    I started watching this last night and didn’t make it past the first person to sit down with him. She is literally too stupid to have a conversation. But she appears to have nice tits. So there’s that.

    1. MikeS

      Not nice enough for me to un-mute it.

    2. Lol. “Can I change your mind? Because I’ve been raped. And a good majority of my friends have been raped!”

      Yeah, at TCU. A place where you literally can’t find a place on campus without there being a police panic button visible.*

      *They bring this up on the campus tour.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        It’s their truth.

        1. He should have asked her how many friends she had and how many of them were raped. Then told the cop standing there that she told him she’d been raped and he would like to file a criminal complaint for her.

      2. Pat

        Even if it were true it wouldn’t necessarily indicate there was a “rape culture”. The plural of anecdote is not data.

      3. AlexinCT

        People that tell these sorts of blatant fucking lies need to be punished. That is the only way it will stop.

      4. Suthenboy

        I couldn’t watch long. Too cringey. Did she define what she means by ‘rape’? I have a suspicion she and I have different definitions.

        1. AlexinCT

          I am gonna bet money that if asked she will agree that she believes the false and unproven accusations made by that Ford chick that Kavanaugh groped her and put his hand on her mouth is rape. She also believes that if she consents to sex and the dude doesn’t call her the next day or dumps her, it is rape.

          1. Rebel Scum

            Yes that comes up. She believe all accusation against him, no matter the level of absurdity or lack of evidence.

        2. mr simple

          That was my reaction. Of course you can’t ask her that, which is why it’s always the first argument.

      5. My best friend is a professor there…I shall SOUNDLY REBUKE him about the horrid rape culture that exists there!!!!!!!!!!111!!1ELEVENTY!

        1. Maybe she and the vast majority of her friends went to the TCU game at Jerry World a few weeks ago and are just counting what happened in the second half.

    3. Her nice tits, by the way, have a big old belly under them. That’s why she’s got the sweater or jacket tied below them.
      Pass.

      1. AlexinCT

        #NoGUNTS4Me

    4. SugarFree

      Yummy. I love it when they call self-reporting “empirical data.” Words mean nothing. Delicious.

  8. The Late P Brooks

    The Bloombergouisie are talking about an earthshaking new NYT report claiming Trump committed some sort of elaborate long term tax fraud. I guess they have given up on the #METOO smears.

    They’re patriots, fighting for the soul of our nation.

    1. Slammer

      Tax stuff? So we’re back to the beginning of the Cycle?

      1. Crazy Eddie does not see when opportunities have closed.

        /shrugs all 3 arms

        1. Chipwooder

          His prices are……INSANE!!!

    2. AlexinCT

      Fling shit at the walls and hope some of it sticks and changes the decor so Hillary can become president….

    3. Ayn Random Variation

      Funny, I came into work today and one person was screeching about Trump raising the debt and another about the U.S. being a weak laughingstock because the whole U.N. laughed him off the stage.

      I quickly tan into my hole and shut the door. I’m not checking on here to see if the regular Trump bashing coming back means the Kavanaugh liars have been exposed….

      1. Mojeaux

        Kavanaugh fatigue. Back to Trump.

      2. AlexinCT

        Yes, yes they have…

        I heard Ford’s boyfriend came out and all but basically called her a pathological liar.

        1. Yeah, that story is in the links!!!

          1. AlexinCT

            That’s why i didn’t link it again Sloopster!

          2. Nephilium

            Who has time to read the links? And did you hear about the guy in Utah who had the Browns let him down while Lou Reed played?

          3. Bobarian LMD

            Links? You don’t say…

        2. Pope Jimbo

          The ex-boyfriend showed that he has no idea how to play the game.

          1) He talked on the record. Everyone knows you start the game as “anonymous” and tease out your real identity.
          2) He provided real names and dates. A pro would have told him that using the actual name of the person she coached on passing a lie detector test just limits your story. How can you tweak it to make it better if everyone already can run down the facts.

    4. Certified Public Asshat

      From the NYT article:

      Much of his giving was structured to sidestep gift and inheritance taxes using methods tax experts described to The Times as improper or possibly illegal.

      So…which is it?

      1. AlexinCT

        It’s illegal if a person that the left doesn’t like does it, regardless of what the law says, just like it is just bad judgment when a lefitst breaks a real law and not worthy of any legal consequences…

        1. Gustave Lytton

          +1 Clinton check years later to cover back taxes & penalties

        2. mr simple

          Eh, if a Dem lies on their taxes then the IRS hard drive holding that data just gets lost.

      2. gift and inheritance taxes

        Taxes that should be abolished, btw.

  9. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Watch Ben Wittes try to convince himself that Kavanaugh should withdraw even though he knows he’s been railroaded.

    It’s a sad display of moral weakness from someone who obviously knows better.

    I am also keenly aware that rejecting Kavanaugh on the record currently before the Senate will set a dangerous precedent. The allegations against him remain unproven. They arose publicly late in the process and, by their nature, are not amenable to decisive factual rebuttal. It is a real possibility that Kavanaugh is telling the truth and that he has had his life turned upside down over a falsehood. Even assuming that Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations are entirely accurate, rejecting him on the current record could incentivize not merely other sexual-assault victims to come forward—which would be a salutary thing—but also other late-stage allegations of a non-falsifiable nature by people who are not acting in good faith. We are on a dangerous road, and the judicial confirmation wars are going to get a lot worse for our traveling down it.

    MORE BY BENJAMIN WITTES

    Kavanaugh Bears the Burden of Proof
    BENJAMIN WITTES

    The Most Damaging Thing That’s Happened to Trump
    BENJAMIN WITTES
    Brett Kavanaugh
    The Confirmation Wars Are Over
    BENJAMIN WITTES

    The Flaw in Trump’s Obstruction-of-Justice Defense
    BENJAMIN WITTES
    Despite all of that, if I were a senator, I would vote against Kavanaugh’s confirmation. I would do it both because of Ford’s testimony and because of Kavanaugh’s. For reasons I will describe, I find her account more believable than his. I would also do it because whatever the truth of what happened in the summer of 1982, Thursday’s hearing left Kavanaugh nonviable as a justice.

    Read Deborah Copaken on facing her rapist

    A few days before the hearing, I detailed on this site the advice I would give to Kavanaugh if he asked me. He should, I argued, withdraw from consideration for elevation unless able to defend himself to a high degree of factual certainty without attacking Ford. He should remain a nominee, I argued, only if his defense would be sufficiently convincing that it would meet what we might term the “no asterisks” standard—that is, that it would plausibly convince even people who vociferously disagree with his jurisprudential views that he could serve credibly as a justice. His defense needed to make it possible for a reasonable pro-choice woman to find it a legitimate and acceptable prospect, if not an attractive or appealing one, that he might sit on a case reconsidering Roe v. Wade.

    Kavanaugh, needless to say, did not take my advice. He stayed in, and he delivered on Thursday, by way of defense, a howl of rage. He went on the attack not against Ford—for that we can be grateful—but against Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee and beyond. His opening statement was an unprecedentedly partisan outburst of emotion from a would-be justice. I do not begrudge him the emotion, even the anger. He has been through a kind of hell that would leave any person gasping for air. But I cannot condone the partisanship—which was raw, undisguised, naked, and conspiratorial—from someone who asks for public faith as a dispassionate and impartial judicial actor. His performance was wholly inconsistent with the conduct we should expect from a member of the judiciary.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Ugh, I hate that copy/paste add-on crap they sneak in there these days.

      1. Tonio

        I consider it legit to edit it out.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Can anyone seriously entertain the notion that a reasonable pro-choice woman would feel like her position could get a fair shake before a Justice Kavanaugh? Can anyone seriously entertain the notion that a reasonable Democrat, or a reasonable liberal of any kind, would after that performance consider him a fair arbiter in, say, a case about partisan gerrymandering, voter identification, or anything else with a strong partisan valence? Quite apart from the merits of Ford’s allegations against him, Kavanaugh’s display on Thursday—if I were a senator voting on confirmation—would preclude my support.

      So if I take Wittes argument seriously, all the Democrats have to do to poison a candidate is to treat him like utter shit in public. The ensuing hatred of the party then makes the candidate unsuitable for office. Perhaps, Kavanaugh should have hidden his disdain and anger, would that have been better? In Wittes’ world, appearances matter more than reality.

      1. leon

        “Can anyone seriously entertain the notion that a reasonable Democrat, or a reasonable liberal of any kind, would after that performance consider him a fair arbiter ”

        1.That’s the risk DiFi put her party in when she decided to try to ruin this guy’s name.

        2. You could say this safe thing about RBG due to comments she has made. The point being we need to look at jurisprudence not partisanship.

      2. AlexinCT

        The precedent being set here is that the left will never allow the other side to seat a SCOTUS candidate that threatens the revolution, especially if said candidate will change the balance in a way that will hinder the clique of marxist pedants the left has so far put on the court from railroading the constitution and the people to promote the lefts power grab.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          All other things I’ve picked up form this sorry episode aside, this has convinced me the Roe v Wade needs to go. I’ve been a fence sitter on that issue for most of my adult life, but now I realize how badly it has poisoned the court and why it should not be in their domain to decide. Regardless of how you feel about the actual issue, the court far overstepped its bounds and in doing so, created a political crisis that has been simmering for decades and is just now coming to a boil, threatening to take the rest of the political system with it.

          1. AlexinCT

            Why do you think the left is so desperate to make sure the court is populated with people that would overstep their bounds to push their agenda over a court that would revert back to following the law and the constitution, huh?

      3. Pat

        Can anyone seriously entertain the notion that a reasonable Christian baker would feel like her position could get a fair shake before a Justice Ginsburg, who officiated gay marriage ceremonies prior to ruling on the issue? Can anyone seriously entertain the notion that a reasonable white man would feel like his position could get a fair shake before the Wise Latina?

        1. AlexinCT

          Now you are just being obtuse pointing out the obvious. What’s next? You will demand that the court actually stop legislating from the bench and just did what they were supposed to?

      4. Rebel Scum

        reasonable Democrat

        I am sorry to say that the Jim Webbs of the Democrat party appear to be extinct.

    3. Pat

      It’s a sad display of moral weakness from someone who obviously knows better.

      He had won the victory over himself.

    4. Christ, what an asshole.

    5. Rufus the Monocled

      Wow. Just fucken wow.

      Wow.

      Piece of unprincipled shit.

      I wouldn’t even want to consider the possible unintended consequences of a Kavanaugh withdrawal. You may as well drop the presumption of innocence and due process because they’re just suggestions now.

      One question for this douche: How would you feel if it was your fucken son?

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        I sweat because I care.

        But the part of the ‘if it were my kid what would I do?’ part of the calculation seems to be dangerously overlooked.

        All these parents who support this madness need to stop think and reflect about what they’re saying, doing or writing.

        1. Rufus the Monocled

          Fricken frick &@&@^#&^#$ frick mother fricken fricasee fricken rabbit…

          I swear because I care.

        2. Tonio

          Mmmm, I hate to go full socon on you, Rufus, but I suspect that those parents of boys who are on board with this are mostly SJW loons, batshit-crazy single mothers, etc.

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            Oh, probably. For sure. Which makes it more troubling. They’d sacrifice their own son.

        3. Mojeaux

          Sweat works.

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            Depends what you’re doing.

            Ahem.

          2. SugarFree

            Vaginal self-lubrication is a process closer to sweating than anything else the human body does.

            Sweat works.

          3. AlexinCT

            I was gonna post “Pics or it didn’t happen”, but then I remembered that you don’t wave a red cape at a bull unless you want him to charge at you, and we all know about SF…

    6. cyto

      This was pretty much the Matt Welch take.

      “I don’t know what happened. Nobody does. I don’t like the way the democrats handled this. I can’t believe politics has sunk this low. Therefore, Kavanaugh should withdraw or be defeated.”

      TOS also has a prevailing notion that he lied about Devil’s Triangle, despite having people of the same age saying they have never heard of the new definition. (I certainly never heard a 3 way described that way, and we had a list of such metaphors. Also, despite having such a list of euphemisms, I don’t think there were any in my circle who checked that box in high school.)

      They did have one salient point amid the incoherent blather…. They say Kavanaugh claimed membership in the Ralph club because he had a sensitive stomach and ate beans one time. I think they conflated a couple of things – the boof stuff went with the beans IIR, but I aint going back to verify. Anyway, Ralphing can only mean barfing after over-drinking in that context. So if he claimed otherwise… well, he shouldn’t have.

      1. Since when is a three-way a sign of anything? Vote New Puritanists in November!

  10. Old Man With Candy

    If you’re involved in a feminist journal and you’re bitching about the methodology used here, then you’re not serious about advocating equality or feminism or truth in research.

    This is a wonderful troll, quite equal to Sokal. Especially since the title gave it away and the journal editors STILL didn’t pick it up.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      It’s their truth.

      1. AlexinCT

        And everyone knows that you are only a good person when you accede to the demands of deranged people that reality be overridden by their broken and idiotic fantasies.

  11. Rebel Scum

    When #believeher goes horribly wrong.

    #FakeButAccurate

    1. AlexinCT

      Please explain to me genius how else are we going to encourage victims to come forth if they could face repercussions for lying, huh?

      /prog asshat

  12. Pope Jimbo

    BTW, I hate not only the wild card game, but the idea of a wild card. For that matter, I haven’t cared much for baseball since they added the extra divisions.

    As a kid, one of the great things about baseball was how unforgiving the playoff races were. Only 4 teams were going to be in the playoffs. No wild card participation medal teams allowed.

    Sometimes it sucked like in ’88 when the defending World Champion Twins played way better, but were aced out by the A’s. The race was tight pretty much through the end of August if I remember correctly. The Twins lost the race when they lost a couple series to the A’s late.

    I’d rather watch a race like that than some silly series in the playoffs. Now get off my lawn!

    1. Slammer

      It’s just extra games for extra revenue for owners and MLB and media. Invented hype.

      1. AlexinCT

        ^^^THIS^^^

      2. Pope Jimbo

        Amen.

    2. Old Man With Candy

      Shit, I remember when there weren’t any playoffs. Best AL record faced best NL record. And mirabile dictu, both leagues had the same rules.

      Now get off MY lawn.

      1. Team OMWC managed…

        1. Pope Jimbo

          FAKE NEWS!

          Is there any doubt that OMWC managed any other team than the 1902 Chicago Orphans

      2. Private Chipperbot

        What was it like before electricity?

          1. MikeS

            And less revolting.

          2. I don’t see watt you mean.

          3. MikeS

            Ohmy you are so dense sometimes.

          4. I don’t see how that statement is conductive to good discourse.

          5. MikeS

            Next, joule be telling me you are an expert on that.

          6. No, it’s beyond my capacitance.

          7. MikeS

            Maybe we should stop this and go back to our current duties.

          8. Why go direct? We could alternate.

          9. MikeS

            Sooner or later, this should spark a very narrow gaze.

          10. I expect it shortly.

          11. MikeS

            If you and I have to provide that outlet, so be it.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          It was a far more insulated society.

        2. AlexinCT

          They were not enlightened enough..

    3. They you gotta get rid of interleague games and the weighted schedule. But the problem is, those tend to drive gate and TV revenues.

      Sorry gents. The WC and three division layout ain’t going away any time soon.

    4. DrZaius

      The sooner you realize sports exist to separate you from your money the better off you’ll be.

  13. PieInTheSky

    Costa Coffee advert banned for criticising avocado breakfasts

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45716845

    An advert for Costa Coffee has been banned for urging customers to buy a bacon roll rather than avocados.

    The radio ad featured a voiceover which said there was “a great deal on ripen-at-home avocados” but they will only “be ready to eat for about 10 minutes, then they’ll go off”.

    The advert told people to choose the “better deal” of a roll or egg muffin.

    Two listeners complained that the ad, which aired in June, discouraged people from opting for fresh fruit.

    This right here is funny

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      All radio and television adverts must comply with the UK Code of Broadcast Advertising (BCAP) which states that comparisons between foods must not discourage fruit and vegetables.

      Politicians excluded

      1. Christopher Reeve and Ian McKellan hardest hit.

      2. Count Potato

        Everything is illegal in England.

    2. Pat

      Solution: put both avocado and bacon on an egg muffin.

      1. Why do you hate food?

      2. PieInTheSky

        Honestly I had some hybrid eggs Benedict with bacon avocado and hollandaise sauce and overall was a little to rich…

        1. Suthenboy

          Same here. I have had to cut down on the breakfast business. I get queasy to easy in the mornings. Sometimes wife and I just have toast.
          I am sure it is not all of the vodka from the previous evening.

          1. PieInTheSky

            I generally have light breakfast workdays. Weekend a breakfast beer cuts into the richness.

            I am used to always eating breakfast otherwise i would try some intermitent fasting i keep reading great things about it

          2. commodious spittoon

            I skip breakfast and call it fasting, but it’s 80% laziness.

    3. SugarFree

      Avocados are fruit? I thought they were just how certain types of trees took a shit.

      1. mr simple

        Damn it, SF. When I laugh like that it shows others I’m not actually doing what I should be doing.

    4. Rhywun

      Two listeners complained that the ad, which aired in June, discouraged people from opting for fresh fruit.

      This is how you know you are living in a country that is not free.

  14. Rufus the Monocled

    Innocent men’s lives will be ruined and true victims of sexual assault are pushed aside.

    That’s what all this politicized hashtag bull shit hogged by narcissists and opportunists is gonna happen.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      accomplish

      Yeesh.

    2. Raphael

      Also add in they’ll send male-female relationships back to the Victorian Era.

      1. AlexinCT

        This is why I tell the team blue #metoo fanatics that all their current prudish and insane antics seem to tell me is that the SoCons won the culture wars.

      2. Pope Jimbo

        My fear is that this time around, it will be the men that are locked up and confined to the house. They are too dangerous to let loose. They might see an uncovered ankle and go nuts. Better lock them into the cellar and only let them out when you absolutely need them (to kill a spider or change a lightbulb).

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          Of course, men will be allowed in society. The difference will be that women will have a cudgel to use at any given moment, with no risk, with no repercussions. The same goes for minorities, or homosexuals, or non-binaries, or whatever the flavor of the month is. Everything will be reduced to a power struggle with battles over victim status just being the opening phase of the war. Logic and reason will be fully abandoned and individual rights completely skewered.

          Finally, when the only metric left is power, violence is the only possible outcome.

          1. Rufus the Monocled

            I’m sticking to the ONE belief I think I’m right on since the 1990s: We’re in an intellectual dark age.

            That there are people who actually think the hearings is appropriate or Russia stuff is ‘real’ only points to it further.

          2. Pope Jimbo

            Hey, Welch said on the 5th Column podcast that we won’t know if the Russia collusion investigation is a witch hunt until after the investigation is done.

            *That was the comment that made me finally unsubscribe. Love Kmele, but I just can’t stand the others any more.

          3. Rufus the Monocled

            Losing Welch.

            He hasn’t impressed me since Trump’s election. He seems to be falling in line with the bull shit.

            I’m reading Peterson’s 12-step book. If I wasn’t already irritated by Welch’s article about him, I’m more so now. There is plenty of issues raised in the book that were perfect for Reason to pick up on and discuss from a liberty perspective. Particularly in Step 8 about lying where he discusses how gulags come to be.

            Yet, not a single nuanced take on that they took.

            Instead they just took a lazy, generic, he’s an alt-right we don’t understand his popularity crap.

            And then the Gillespie interview about Peterson seeing ‘post modern’ monsters under the bed.

          4. tarran

            Yep. Again and again, they fail miserably.

          5. AlexinCT

            You are not far from the truth, Rufus. A bunch of idiots have gobbled up the idiotic marxist dogma beliefs that basically serve to turn things upside down and break every possible working institution and are demanding we live by those rules, and then labeled the people that believe this shit and peddle it as the new intelligentsia. It should be frighting to people that actually want reason, logic, and facts to rule the day.

          6. Rufus the Monocled

            Talk to people who take the ‘other side’.

            Not literate at all.

            Superficial, facile and ill-informed twits seeking immediate faux-intellectual self-gratification.

    3. PieInTheSky

      No man is innocent

  15. Scruffy Nerfherder

    SJWednesday: I Actually Found an SJW Article Not About Kavanaugh This Week Edition

    5 Ways To Create a Femme Friendly Workplace

    There’s a myth is that if you have enough women and femmes in your organization, your organization is automatically not sexist or femmephobic. This is absolutely untrue, especially if the only way for women and femmes to get ahead is to emulate men and masculinities.

    When I talk about femininity and masculinity I am talking about what society has named “feminine” (E.g. nurturing, values relationships, connects to things emotionally) and “masculine” (lack of outward emotion, aggressiveness, places self above others).

    Femmes are people who identify as a femme, usually because of some connection to prioritizing, appreciating, or embodying elements of what has been labeled “femininity.” Some femmes identify as women, some identify as men, some identify as nonbinary or genderqueer, some identify only as “femme.”

    I’m a femme who has a lot of privilege in the work world due to my education and whiteness. I’ve realized that there are things I had been both consciously and unconsciously doing to fight back against the femmephobia I’ve experienced in activism and employment. Here are some of the things that I’ve done to push back when I can, and helped me to cope when I can’t.

    1. How do they find so much raw stupid to distill down to pure stupid?

      1. AlexinCT

        Word salad 101…

        One of the mandatory classes for your usual “studies” and far too many humanities college grads (or dropouts).

      2. You guys do realize this is probably being done by AI via some algorithm, right? You can’t find people this stupid in the wild.

        1. Nope, I’ve met stupid this strong.

          Get out and talk to the dumbasses some time. It will re-kill your faith in humanity.

          1. commodious spittoon

            There are plenty of dumbasses out there living really kick-ass lives. My first wife was a dumbass. She’s a pilot now.

        2. Nephilium

          I’ve run into people that dumb and evil in the wild. The quote: “The math all sounds correct, but it doesn’t feel right.”

    2. PieInTheSky

      what is a Femme again?

      1. A sexist, racist person claiming to be a woman.

        1. A Leap at the Wheel

          If you can’t be more punctual about these things, we are going to have to request you come up with a new user name.

          1. He’s also been slacking on his appointed displays of disapproval of humor.

      2. Chafed

        The answer is fluid.

    3. leon

      ‘”masculine” (lack of outward emotion, aggressiveness, places self above others)’

      If you label Masculinity as something bad, you can see how it is a bad thing.

      I see in Masculinity these features : protecting, supporting, responsibility for family.

    4. Rebel Scum

      due to my education and whiteness.

      You’ve been educated but you are not intelligent. And you happen to be a racist.

    5. Bobarian LMD

      5 Ways To Create a Femme Friendly Workplace

      …And the #1 answer, stop hiring men?

      Play us out, Paul!

  16. PieInTheSky

    Dwarf planet ‘the Goblin’ discovered on outskirts of solar system as hunt for Planet X continues

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-03/dwarf-planet-the-goblin-discovered-on-outskirts-of-solar-system/10331800

    1. AlexinCT

      This thing is basically a 430 mile rock. That’s nothing but a glorified commet, even though its orbit is not standard. TAnd tat whole “planet X” thing they are all looking so hard for has baffled me. Do these people not realize that you don’t need this mass affecting the other bodies in the solar system to all be concentrated in one entity? I suspect there are thousands of Goblins out there so far out in orbit that we simply have not detected even 1% of them so far. I also know for a fact that Mr. Lizard’s people use those rocks – after they install some serious heating elements, of course – as forward staging bases!

      1. PieInTheSky

        You just want all the unobtainium on planet x for yourself

        1. AlexinCT

          The person that brings that rock into orbit and mines it will be the first trillionaire, and I plane to be that guy even if I have to walk out there to get that rock!…

      2. Mr Lizard

        Pft as if. You’re deserts are far more preferable. In fact we started Burning Man as an MWR event for our guys. It’s also a great opportunity to swap out mammals with skin suited Overlords and vice versa.

  17. Rebel Scum

    Her Shrillness is still talking.

    She waxes non-philosophical about how the vast right-wing conspiracy and how those big meanie Rethuglicans don’t want gov’t programs because they hate poor people (and blacks and women, obvs) and how The Don is totes a white supremacist shill (bc Pro-fascist leftists started violence in Charlotteville, VA…). But this stuck out to me.

    Clinton added that “when you are dealing with a political entity like the modern Republican Party, that is trying to win at all costs, it’s hard to know quite how to get in there to have that conversation.”

    She singled out “two major, substantive reasons” why Republicans supported Donald Trump “despite the doubts of other Republicans”: the Supreme Court and “cut taxes, cut it to the bone.”

    “Disable the government as much as possible. Throw us into exploding deficits and unbelievable debt, then go after Social Security, and Medicare and Medicaid, which they’ve never liked anyway, and they’re are on the path to doing that,” she added. “And they seem almost lethal about it, you know, their budget process up on the Hill right now is all about, how do we take money out of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, using the excuse that, well, we’re going to have these big deficits and debts. And of course they are the ones who have really hit the ignition on having such a fiscally irresponsible policy.”

    1) Proejection
    2) IF ONLY!
    3) Sure. It’s not like those programs are bankrupting us or anything.

    1. leon

      We really live in different realities. She thinks the government is not a necessary evil, but something actually good.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        No she doesn’t. She thinks it’s a useful tool for her to exploit for power. I honestly don’t think she cares about anything other than that and prestige.

        1. leon

          Fair point.

        2. AlexinCT

          As long as said government’s evil benefits them, too many people are not just quite content to turn a blind eye to it, but actively cheer it on…

    2. Pat

      I’ve been hearing about how Republicans are going to literally end Medicare and Social Security for 2/3 of my life thus far.

    3. AlexinCT

      I lost the election because the unwashed masses rebelled against my ideology’s agenda of destroying the middle class because the only workable system these marxism based socialist shit shows can deliver are a two class one. You know, one where the plebes are all equally miserable and basically kept busy by sicking one identity group against another, while the real powerful ruling class get to live wealthy lifestyles. It is not accidental that under capitalism the rich can wield power, but that the only people that can be rich under socialism are the powerful.

    4. Rufus the Monocled

      Why do publications like TA give her any space? It’s truly bizarre because she’s nuts.

      1. AlexinCT

        I wish the answer was because they know she is nuts and figured letting her show others she was was the reason Rufus, but it seems thy actually agree with the stupid shit she says and think she is just brilliant for being that stupid.

      2. Suthenboy

        This. She is a stone cold sociopath. Remember her laughing about getting a child rapist off and laughing while she said ‘Who cares?’

        When a person like that is denied their will they go completely off of the rails. She has been that way for a while now. She’s nuts.

    5. Pope Jimbo

      So when does she throw her hat into the 2020 ring?

      You know she is going to. And you also know that she is going to be hard to beat in the Dem primaries. She sucks as a candidate, but she knows how to work the levers of the Dem party.

      1. SugarFree

        She’s waiting to see how the midterms shake out. Any hint of a blue wave, and she will announce.

        1. Pope Jimbo

          I think the opposite. If the blue wave is a dud, she will come back as the “adult” and run the socialist kiddies out.

          1. SugarFree

            Hm, yes, I can see that. Or she’s ready to argue herself into running for either circumstance.

          2. Bobarian LMD

            Or any other circumstance you can come up with…

            Throwing a coup? Well she really should have been elected anyway.

          3. SugarFree

            Even the craziest Dems know a coup will never work without the military to back it up.

      2. The Last American Hero

        The only thing tastier than her and her supporters’ salty ham tears in 2016 would be the batch of 2020 tears that follow getting pwnd by The Donald twice.

        I just got a tingle up my leg.

  18. Raston Bot

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6dv6G1FWxk

    Crowder’s latest Change My Mind is “Rape Culture is a Myth” on TCU’s campus. the first lady is hysterical so jump to 19m to avoid her. the police on campus were solid during her breakdown. they told the lady she could leave if she wanted to and not be part of Crowder’s show.

    1. The least interesting work product he produces. Still a pass.

      1. Raston Bot

        it needs some work. i blame his boring content in this segments on the subjects that volunteer to engage him.

        1. cyto

          Yeah, I couldn’t watch it.

          But I love the idea. Just let crazy positions be exposed by drawing them out for further explanation.

          It is also interesting to see the house of cards they have built upon made-up terminology. Layer upon layer of opinion dressed up with a new made-up terms. After a few decades they have arrived at “made-up term 1 and made-up term 2 therefore madeup-term is undeniable!” It is akin to philosophy or theology in that, but without the academic rigor.

          1. Raston Bot

            person #3 or #4 said that his position is so nuanced that he can’t articulate it. Crowder had to get him to clarify and the kid deferred to “my professors who have read 100 books and papers on the subject”

  19. Pat

    Federal judge rules Tesla must defend itself against lawsuit alleging it mistreated foreign workers

    A federal judge denied Tesla’s motion to dismiss charges in a lawsuit claiming that it mistreated foreign workers. This means the automaker will have to defend itself at trial against allegations that foreign workers at its Fremont factory worked shifts that violated forced labor laws and were threatened with deportation if they reported injuries.

    The ruling comes just a few days after Elon Musk agreed to resign as Tesla’s chairman (while staying on as its CEO) to settle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC filed a complaint in federal district court last week charging Musk with fraud related to his tweets in August that he planned to take Tesla private at $420 a share.

    In a ruling made on Monday, Judge Lucy Koh of California Northern District Court in San Jose dismissed five out of seven claims in the lawsuit, Lesnik v. Eisenmann SE (case number 5:16-cv-01120), and denied motions to dismiss from Tesla subcontractors Eisenmann Corp and ISM Vuzem.

    Other vehicle makers (Mercedes-Benz, Deere, REHAU, LaX, Volkswagen, Dicastal, and BMW) were also named as defendants, but dismissed because they aren’t included in the two claims that will go to trial.

    1. leon

      Are the workers bringing the suit or is it the government? I can’t tell.

    2. AlexinCT

      What foreign workers? Canooks and Messicans? Or are we talking third world sweatshops?

      1. Pat

        The class action lawsuit was filed in 2016 by Gregor Lesnik, from Slovenia, and Stjepan Papes, from Croatia, on behalf of foreign workers covered by B-1 visas. Both Lesnik and Papes were hired by ISM Vuzem and sent to the U.S. to work at Tesla’s Fremont facility. The suit alleges that foreign workers were paid far below minimum wage and worked “extreme hours.”

        1. AlexinCT

          Are those cities in Elbonia? (Just kidding).

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      “We had to mistreat workers for the environment….duh. Means justifies the ends. Or is ends justifies the means? Whatever. Intentions are what matters. Not results and certainly not the conditions faced by some third world deplorable. They should just shut up and be happy.’

  20. The Late P Brooks

    Crimnul!

    That is to say, Trump was in the money-inheriting business. And that business was essentially, and not just incidentally, illegal. The Times found 295 income streams created by Fred Trump for his son, many of them illegal on their face. The English language has terms for people who make large sources of money from illegal activity: criminals.

    The article makes clear that Trump is safe from criminal prosecution largely because tax-law enforcement is weak, and many of his apparently illegal activities took place too long ago to prosecute now. That does not minimize his culpability in any moral sense though. It’s merely a testament to the general immunity from consequences that wealthy people enjoy, and regular people do not.

    The revelations illustrated the degree to which Trump was paradoxically the most under-vetted presidential candidate since the invention of American mass media. It’s not that there was a dearth of Trump coverage — just the opposite. There was so much Trump coverage, for so many years, that it overloaded the circuits. New Trump outrages kept crowding out old Trump outrages. Trump produced so much that was bizarre, offensive, unprecedented, or otherwise newsworthy that some of the basic vetting work could not be completed.

    Trump Derangement Syndrome- the gift that keeps on giving.

    1. Pat

      Yes, the problem with a guy who had near-total tabloid media saturation for a 20 year span while he built and imploded high profile casino businesses and acrimoniously divorced 2 wives is that people just didn’t know about who he was.

    2. AlexinCT

      The English language has terms for people who make large sources of money from illegal activity: criminals.

      Yeah and the US Espeionage Act is also very clear about what should happen when government agents send classified material via an email system on an illegal servers that allow foreign powers to then hack and track that shit, all so they can hide the criminal activities of a supposed non-profit that basically functioned as a pay-for-play entity, but I never saw the asshats at the NYT do anything but try to obfuscate these indisputable facts (or for that matter call the douchebags at the FBI and DOJ that under orders from the Obama admin turned a blind eye so Obama would not be taken down if Hillary was prosecuted) so she could run for president.

      Fuck them.

    3. Pope Jimbo

      Like I said yesterday, I won’t listen to anyone complain about Trump’s tax avoidance unless they also railed about Tim Geithner getting the Sec of Treasury job.

    4. Count Potato

      “The revelations illustrated the degree to which Trump was paradoxically the most under-vetted presidential candidate since the invention of American mass media.”

      Because he hasn’t been a celebrity for decades?

  21. Suthenboy

    I see today that the left is getting very desperate. They are basically stamping their feet and screaming “NO!NO!NO!NO! Because we said so!”
    Cavanaugh will be confirmed is my guess and the elections next month will be a disaster for them. Hillary is back to calling voters the worst. Cruz is getting poisoned mail. Republicans and Trumpers are being harassed in public. Any bets on some no-shit political violence before the election?
    We are watching the death of a party. Good riddance. They never should have let the lunatic fringe pinkos take over their party.

    1. PieInTheSky

      If this is not a symptom to a diseased symptom I don’t know what is.

    2. PieInTheSky

      Also you are all a bunch of closet republicans /troll

      1. I’m an open Republican. It’s just no one ever bothers to ask outside of the polling site on primary day.

        1. PieInTheSky

          I know you are. Probably a few more… but most are pretend libertarians

          1. Pat

            By voter registration I am officially unaffiliated. I’ve never participated in a primary or caucus for any party. I’ve voted for candidates from the Republican, Libertarian, Independent American and Constitution parties. Never voted for a candidate from the Democratic party and can’t imagine I ever will. Make of that what you want.

          2. robc

            I registered GOP for the first time in my life in 2007 in order to vote for Ron Paul in the Prez primary.

            I kept it after that to vote for his son in primaries.

            I was registered Dem from 1987 to 2007. I tried to register LP in 1998 but apparently the county clerk ignored it and left me in the Dem book. I didn’t even know this until 2007.

          3. Bobarian LMD

            Well, the LP is a raging shit-show.

            Twitter manifesto

            The only viable course is to continue supporting the right candidates and pushing libertarian principles where you can.

            And the only place that small L’s get any traction is in the GOP. Amash, Massie, and Paul are more effective than the LP will ever be.

            And Trump is accidentally the most libertarian president we will likely ever see.

          4. robc

            If Massie will run to replace McConnell, whenever he retires, I could have a great pair of Senators.

          5. Suthenboy

            I dont like being labeled at all. Labels dont tell much, everyone means something different when they use a particular label. I sure dont want to be associated with the LP. I have never registered with a party. I have always registered Independent.
            You are correct. A lot of people that call themselves libertarians are not, but I haven’t really noticed any around here. This is as liberty friendly a crowd as you will ever run across.

          6. Chipwooder

            I think that’s an overstatement, although I’ve always been open about the fact that I’m not a 100% doctrinaire libertarian. I would say that my beliefs are, in general, closest to libertarian by a significant degree.

            Anyway, from a party politics perspective, I would say I’m an anti-Democrat first and foremost. The GOP sucks ass. They’re frauds. They’re liars. They promote many things I find repellent. However, I think the Democrats are much, much worse. I will never vote for a Democrat for any reason, ever, period. They are 100% pure evil. There are some Republicans I would vote for and many more who I would not. The sad fact of the matter is that candidates who are close to my beliefs stand virtually no chance of being elected to anything. I had high hopes for Rand in 2016, but he went nowhere.

          7. Suthenboy

            Rand isnt done yet. He is still a young man. Besides, he is doing quite well where he is.

          8. tarran

            I’m glad Rand Paul went nowhere. He’d have been toast. He’s not used to running a hostile organization. If he won – and that’s a big if – he’d have been a one-term president whose political career would be over.

            Instead we have a senator who is slowly undermining the walls the tyrants are building.

          9. cyto

            Plus, we got the toilet speech. It ain’t “don’t fire til you see the whites of their eyes”, but it is the best screed against government overreach in the last decade.

          10. Rebel Scum

            Democrats are much, much worse. I will never vote for a Democrat for any reason, ever, period. They are 100% pure evil.

            Same view here. As I mention above, and given the right circumstances I could vote for a Dem in the vein of Jim Webb. But those Dems are extinct. Current Dems want power for the sake of power and they absolutely mean to rule you with an iron fist.

          11. PieInTheSky

            I am trolling stout yeomen

          12. Bobarian LMD

            I assume that to be always true, Mr Tepes.

          13. mr simple

            I’ve never been much of a joiner, which is why I’m actually the One True Libertarian©.

    3. leon

      “We are watching the death of a party.”

      Hardly. And I don’t think they will do so poorly in the elections. I think most people have bought into the “Kavenaugh should just go away” line.

      1. Who have you been talking to?

        1. leon

          True it’s anecdotal, but the co-workers I hear are the ones with the attitude that he’s a rapist, to the Republicans need to nominate someone else.

          1. As far as I can tell, not even my team blue co-workers are buying it. So I’m not going to wager very heavily on the coming election.

          2. Rufus the Monocled

            That’s the part of the calculus the left is genius at. Keep howling like mental cases and eventually ‘moderate’ minds just look at the other side being attacked and say, ‘We know they’re full of shit but maybe you should just go.’

            And that’s how you get gulags.

            The GOP needs to hold the line. I’m telling you.

          3. cyto

            Yeah, I agree with this.

            This is like the terrorists in middle eastern countries who keep bombing cafes and markets. Eventually the people get pissed at the government for failing to stop them instead of the terrorists. I don’t understand the psychology, but it exists.

      2. Suthenboy

        As the party is now it cannot survive, but I will admit that making predictions is hard, especially about the future.

      3. LJW

        The only thing I see dying is due process. I’d be terrified to be accused of rape and have to face a jury with several Democrat women on it.

          1. Count Potato

            Don’t forget the Duluth Model:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model

      4. Drake

        I think he should just go away to the Supreme Court. If assholes weren’t pushing for evermore government, we’d never hear from him again.

    4. Pat

      As long as Collins and Flake are senators he’s not getting a vote. There will be a new accusation literally every 7 days and renewed calls for a new 7 day investigation of the credible and explosive new allegations in perpetuity. Flake’s out when the next congress convenes next year. Collins is there until 2020. After the elections, regardless of result, the party leadership will call on Trump to withdraw the nomination and find a nice, moderate candidate that they can confirm quickly, and voila, you have Anthony Kennedy 2.0.

    5. AlexinCT

      I see today that the left is getting very desperate. They are basically stamping their feet and screaming “NO!NO!NO!NO! Because we said so!”

      Erm, that was all they have done since Trump won the election they thought they had rigged for Hillary…

    6. straffinrun

      We’ve always been and always will be at war with the lunatic fringe. Who cares if the party called “The Democrats” disappears?

    7. Chipwooder

      If only we were witnessing the death of that party. Vermin are notoriously hard to kill.

      1. straffinrun

        I don’t think they’re dead by a long shot. They’ll be back in power soon enough. Sucks, but I wouldn’t bet against it.

        1. Chipwooder

          I don’t doubt it. So much of this shit is cyclical anyway. Since both parties do a lot of awful things, before too long people are tired of their shit and decide they’d rather get the other’s shit shoveled on them for a while.

        2. AlexinCT

          People forget too soon. One would think after the last century and the murder of over 120 million while close to 3 billion people lived under the hellish yoke of communism, and the brutal and destructive second world war where that other leftist ideology fascism was fought, killing another 70 million people, you would figure nobody would want anything to do with these collectivist ideologies. And yet, here we are today with people again going all weak in the knees for this horrible shit.

  22. The Late P Brooks

    Femmes are people who identify as a femme, usually because of some connection to prioritizing, appreciating, or embodying elements of what has been labeled “femininity.” Some femmes identify as women, some identify as men, some identify as nonbinary or genderqueer, some identify only as “femme.”

    You don’t say.

    1. PieInTheSky

      If they were serious male female and nonbinary would be enough. No need for additional identities

      1. You can’t scare up more victim points with a fixed identity set.

        1. Bobarian LMD

          “I am the specialist snowflake in the whole snow storm! How dare you try to define my lived experiences, you raging shitlord!”

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder

        If you limit it to that, how are the thousands of genders studies students/professors going to distinguish themselves with new scholarship?

    2. AlexinCT

      That is not a chick with a dick: it is a dude with tits.

  23. Pat

    Tim Cook calls removing Alex Jones simply ‘curation’

    In an interview with Vice News Tonight on HBO Apple CEO Tim Cook publicly explained some of the reasoning behind removing Alex Jones and InfoWars from the company’s podcast app and App Store. According to Cook, the move wasn’t politically motivated, or coordinated with any other tech companies, as he denied ever discussing the subject with them.

    Instead, he said: “What users want from us and what we’ve always provided them is a curated platform. We think the what the user wants is someone that does review these apps, someone that does review the podcasts, someone that on like Apple news, where a human is selecting the top stories. And that’s what we do.”

    Think different.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      At least he’s being honest in a roundabout way.

      1. that reeks of circular reasoning.

        1. MikeS

          That’s how people in his orbit talk.

        2. Pope Jimbo

          I’m sure you will go on and on about the superiority of 4 way stop honesty.

          1. Tundra

            The “Minnesota Standoff”.

          2. MikeS

            Guy eastbound: *waves northbound through*
            Gal southbound: *waves eastbound through*
            Gal westbound: *waves southbound through*
            Guy northbound: *waves westbound through*

          3. Tundra

            Then they all go at once.

            Amazing, really.

          4. Pope Jimbo

            The worst ever is a 4 way stop with 4 old Japanese ladies. Watching the amount of head bowing and imploring the other to go first is amazing.

            So yeah, Minnesoda is bad, but Okinawa was waaaaaaaay worse.

          5. fried

            I just paused to consider how Israelis, who are generally pretty dismal drivers, might handle a four way stop. It made me realize that in all the time I’ve been here, I don’t think I’ve ever encountered such an intersection. Weird.

          6. Chipwooder

            And you had to be extremely cautious because you have the gaijin “Y” license plate, which we all know stands for Yankee Your Fault.

            My favorite thing about Oki was seeing the honchos repeatedly pull over to piss in the middle of the street.

    2. straffinrun

      “We’ll think for you” -Apple.

      1. That is the motto of their design department.

      2. Mojeaux

        That has always been their motto, what with their walled garden.

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      Gotta give it to the totalitarian left. They sure know how to be creative with their jargon in justifying their authoritarian impulses.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        I don’t think he sees the irony of his position.

        Jones never called for the suppression of anyone’s speech. Cook is doing exactly that. Which means, he’s the totalitarian but he doesn’t see himself as that because he’s a zealot.

        Again.

        It’s this mind set that leads to gulags.

      2. commodious spittoon

        Leftist authoritarians in a generation: We’re merely “curating” bodies to remove the offensive bits.

    4. Suthenboy

      “It wasn’t politically motivated. We just took him down.”

      Sure, Tim.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        Spun another way:

        “We don’t want to suppress your speech, we just want you to think before you speak and shut up because it will hurt others.”

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abQwa99i5r8

    5. cyto

      The most obvious lie is that it wasn’t coordinated with any other tech companies.

      That’s just stupidly nuts.

      You guys are actually going to claim that you all simultaneously did something you’ve never done before and used to explicitly state that you would never do, and you all did it to the same group of people and you did it at the same time. Randomly. It just happened…. like, you know, a coincidence.

      Holy crap, that takes balls.

      1. AlexinCT

        Tells you what their opinion of your intelligence is..

  24. The Late P Brooks

    The RESISTANCE gets bolder.

    A suspicious envelope that was addressed to President Donald Trump was intercepted by the Secret Service on Monday, US authorities say.

    The envelope did not enter the White House, according to the authorities.

    ———-

    The Secret Service said in a statement that the envelope addressed to the president “was not received at the White House, nor did it ever enter the White House”.

    It said it was “working jointly with our law enforcement partners to fully investigate this matter”.

    The incessant demonization continues, and when some mentally unbalanced true believer finally manages to harm a low level nobody with this sort of antic, the NYT and WaPo will publish longwinded chinscratchers about political polarization (Trump’s fault, of course) and the need for a national conversation about tolerance and inclusivity.

    1. Pat

      Oh come on, a little ricin in the mail is just typical juvenile hijinks.

      1. Chipwooder

        I mean, what do YOU do with your surplus castor beans?

        1. Trade them for Pollux leaves.

        2. Bobarian LMD

          Trade them for a cow?

      2. Certified Public Asshat

        Splinter comment:

        I wonder which right wing Christian militia separatist group sent this thinking this would start the race war, and I wonder what left wing group will be blamed for this.

        1. straffinrun

          Fuck. Real life beat my parody again.

    2. straffinrun

      To: PreZidEnt FasCiSt

      FRoM: TotAlly NoT A prOGresSive

  25. wdalasio

    From the #believeher article’s headline talking points:

    Victim had claimed she met Badkoobehi in a nightclub who invited her back to his Wynn Las Vegas hotel suite to carry on drinking

    Victim? More like, “victim”. I mean, crap, when they show pictures of the falsely accused, but not the false accused, you know things are bad. When they don’t even name her in the article, but give details about each of the falsely accused, you know things are worse. But, when they’re still referring to a false accuser as “the victim”, you know we’re entering Christine Blasey Ford levels of utter horseshit.

    1. cyto

      Yeah, I noticed that too.

      They also said they were proven innocent, but never really said how. There was mention of a cell phone video, but no video, no context for how a video could contradict her story…. nothing.

      But we got mugshots of the victims of false accusations and detailed descriptions of their workplaces. Because that’s the relevant set of facts to get down. #MeToo!

  26. The Late P Brooks

    But, when they’re still referring to a false accuser as “the victim”, you know we’re entering Christine Blasey Ford levels of utter horseshit.

    I want to know more about the exculpatory video evidence. I can’t help thinking it’s her, saying, “Come on boys, don’t quit on me now! Get back in here.”

    1. tarran

      I like how they share all sorts of details about the victims of her false allegations and nothing about the bearer of false witness.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Makes you want to go all Old Testament on them.

        1. How will raining for two score days and nights do any good?

    2. Pope Jimbo

      “I’ve got a cavity that needs drilling!!!”

      1. AlexinCT

        That’s what she said!

    1. Suthenboy

      Yikes. Fuckin’ whites terrify me. Tigers too. Both of those see humans as food. Bulls are no joke either.

      1. Chipwooder

        I forget what percentage of shark attacks on humans come from great whites, bulls, tigers, and makos, but it’s the vast majority of them.

      2. Semi-Spartan Dad

        Bulls are no joke either.

        I had three guys load fill the barn loft for hay a few weeks ago. I wasn’t with them and forgot my bull was loose. He was raised almost as a pet so is very friendly.

        They didn’t know that though, and I was told all 3 experienced farmhands nearly shit their pants when he came charging in to be petted.

        1. Semi-Spartan Dad

          *though I do need to keep a large stick on me when I’m in the fields during breeding season. The bull gets overly playful and can be dangerous just due to his size.

        2. commodious spittoon

          You can raise him as friendly as you like but he’ll always have a taste for human.

      3. Bobarian LMD

        They say that whites don’t really see humans as food, they mostly mistake us for seals. That’s why they typically only bite once.

        It only takes once, though.

        Bull sharks actually will actively eat people though. Jaws was loosely based on a New Jersey bull shark that ganked a number of people.

        1. cyto

          The nice thing about bull sharks is they can swim in brackish water. So we get them in the canal behind the house. The one the kids and I swim and kayak in.

          Luckily, the water usually isn’t very clear so you you can’t see them if they are around. You know…. so you don’t worry so much.

        2. AlexinCT

          What kind of crazy animal would eat people willing to swim in Jersey? Jeeze.

    2. Raston Bot

      holy shit that’s hard to watch

  27. Rufus the Monocled

    I know he got a run out of it, but was taking Rizzo out an error by Maddon?

    My first reaction was, what if it goes extra innings and they need his bat?

  28. The Late P Brooks

    Instead, he said: “What users want from us and what we’ve always provided them is a curated platform. We think the what the user wants is someone that does review these apps, someone that does review the podcasts, someone that on like Apple news, where a human is selecting the top stories. And that’s what we do.”

    Based on previous discussions on this topic, doesn’t that make Apple a publisher, and liable for the content they “curate”? I wonder how long it took the legal department to schedule a sitdown with Cook.

    1. tarran

      Remember that reporter in DC who violated DC gun laws live and on camera in a bid to humiliate an NRA spokesman? Remember how he wasn’t prosecuted?

      There’s one law for the lords, and another for the little people.

  29. Just Say’n

    https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/

    Can’t read the WSJ article, but this article was written by the professors who trolled the academy.

    1. AlexinCT

      I bet they want his head chopped off for daring to gore their idiotic dogma.

      1. Just Say’n

        But, remember, this totally isn’t just a religion. They definitely believe in research and following the data. They just also have unquestioned dogmas that all should abide by and never question. These academics just need to take a leap of faith and accept these dogmas as correct, despite all evidence to the contrary.

        PS: This is totally not a religion

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      1 paper (the one about rape culture in dog parks) gained special recognition for excellence from its journal, Gender, Place, and Culture, a highly ranked journal that leads the field of feminist geography. The journal honored it as one of twelve leading pieces in feminist geography as a part of the journal’s 25th anniversary celebration.

      The mere existence of “feminist geography” is a stain on scholarship.

      1. AlexinCT

        I thought that Q’s links were all about “feminist geography”? Am i wrong to love them hills and mountains?

        1. Bobarian LMD

          “feminist geography”

          Show me on the map where the bad man touched you.

          1. AlexinCT

            This guy gets it!

    3. Juvenile Bluster

      Part III: Why Did We Do This?

      Because we’re racist, sexist, bigoted, misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, transhysterical, anthropocentric, problematic, privileged, bullying, far right-wing, cishetero straight white males (and one white female who was demonstrating her internalized misogyny and overwhelming need for male approval) who wanted to enable bigotry, preserve our privilege, and take the side of hate?

      No. None of those apply. Nevertheless, we’ll be accused of it, and we have some insights into why.

    1. Just Say’n

      I can’t believe anyone could say that with a straight face.

      Where is CNN’s snarky chryon correcting Kerry?

    2. MikeS

      Ignoring the obvious Chappaquiddick; it’s OK to do whatever you want as long as you “step up and own it” afterwards? Fuck off John. Please go away.

    3. Playa Manhattan

      There’s no sugarcoating it:
      He stepped over the line.

      1. Chipwooder

        Let’s not argue over ‘oo killed ‘oo – this is supposed to be a ‘APPY occasion!

  30. Chipwooder

    We can’t have a lush like Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court!!!! How outrageous!

    1. Drake

      Hilarious

  31. Pat

    Florida man tried to buy girl from mother at Walmart, police say

    PORT ORANGE, Fla. – An 81-year-old man who offered money to a woman at a Port Orange Walmart to buy her 8-year-old daughter on Friday has been arrested, Port Orange police said.

    Police said Tracy Nigh was sitting on a bench inside the Walmart on Dunlawton Avenue with her daughter when she said Hellmuth Kolb approached them. The mother said he asked her if she was married and then asked about her 8-year-old daughter.

    “It seemed like a friendly conversation,” Nigh said. “He didn’t seem like a threat at first.”

    Kolb then began asking Nigh several times if she would take money in exchange for her daughter.

    “The first amount was $100,000, the second amount was $150,000 and then the final amount was $200,000,” Nigh said. “I then said ‘No, we have to go.’”

    1. Juvenile Bluster

      He should’ve gone to Costco. He could’ve gotten 5 for $450,000. Much better deal.

      1. Playa Manhattan

        Yeah, but they spoil before you can finish them.

      1. Tundra

        Fast fingers, wdalsio. Nicely done.

      1. wdalasio

        Great minds.

    2. Certified Public Asshat

      He’s 81, the woman should have stood up, flipped him the double bird and stone-cold stunned him before slapping on the walls of Jericho.

      Florida needs to do Florida better.

    3. MikeS

      “The first amount was $100,000, the second amount was $150,000 and then the final amount was $200,000,” Nigh said. “I then said ‘No, we have to go.’”

      A tough negotiator, that one.

    4. Count Potato

      (shit that happened) (this)

    5. mr simple

      Someone should link to that scene in Blues Brothers. You know the one.

  32. Pat

    People have been calling Brett Kavanaugh a ‘dry drunk.’ What does that mean?

    People are still talking about Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s intense testimony last week over allegations that he sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford when they were both teenagers. One description of Kavanaugh that has come up repeatedly on social media is ‘dry drunk.’[…]

    “Dry drunk” isn’t a phrase made up by the Twitterverse. It’s a term that was first coined by the founders of Alcoholics Anonymous. It’s important to recognize that dry drunk syndrome is an actual psychological phenomenon, American Addiction Centers says, and it can happen to anyone who is struggling with addiction.

    Dry drunk syndrome describes “a constellation of symptoms that occur after someone stops abusing alcohol yet still exhibits the majority of the maladaptive behaviors that are associated with alcohol abuse disorder and alcohol dependency,” addiction specialist Neeraj Gandotra, MD, chief medical officer at Delphi Behavioral Health Group, tells Yahoo Lifestyle.

    Those symptoms include “very poor frustration tolerance, impulsivity, and the inability to appropriately weigh the consequences of their decisions,” Gandotra says. “Also, there are some very strong personality components that become more greatly exhibited such as feelings of superiority, very little tolerance of frustration or concession to others. They tend to be even more angry once they’ve stopped drinking.”

    1. Chipwooder

      Kavanaugh must be the best actor on earth if he’s been such an alcoholic for so long without anyone noticing.

      1. AlexinCT

        Just like Trump and his illegal activities, he is a master of confusion!

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Nothing he’s done in the last 30 years matters. It’s all a ruse to cover up his drunken teenage and college years.

    2. Tundra

      Is this what is meant by ‘scraping the bottom of the barrel’? Because that’s some weak shit there.

    3. commodious spittoon

      Normal people would withstand an onslaught of vitriolic calumny for a week, then thank their abusers for it. Only a “dry drunk,” or some other variety of moral reprobate, would give an impassioned defense of himself and call out his slanderers.

    4. The Last American Hero

      Another medical “professional” diagnosing people without ever having even met with the subject. I’m sure the ethics and licensing folks will get right on it.

    5. Jarflax

      So in their world being groped through clothing at age 15 is a devastating trauma that derails your entire life, but having a crowd of smug liars do their best to utterly destroy you and your wife and children is no reason to raise your voice?

    1. Drake

      I thought they had lost their faith.

      1. Just Say’n

        No. Like other universities, intersectionality is still the predominate religion

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          It’s a damned stain on Western civilization.

          1. Just Say’n

            Even worse, it’s a damned embarrassment to Daniel Eugene “Rudy” Ruettiger (the pride and joy of Joliet Catholic).

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I can already hear the howls of protestation from the professional student victims. It will be interesting to see if Notre Dame administration has a spine, as opposed to USC or the other one that censured a prof this past week for daring to disagree with the party line.

    3. Mojeaux

      Comments almost all against Ford.

  33. Michael

    Christine Blasey Ford might have some explaining to do herself. Somebody get to the Bay Area and ask her these questions. You’ll probably find her in the Delta Sky Miles Diamond Club Lounge at SFO.

    But she uses twenty dollar words like “indellible” and “hippocampus”. She also wears cool glasses. Fuck your need for any explanation, shitlord!

  34. AlexinCT

    Which one of you freaks is doing THIS??

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Knee-highs for me or GTFO

    2. Goes from one to two is “more”.

      I suspect the number is still tiny.

    3. Chipwooder

      “Men”? I don’t see any men in that article.

      Shit, I don’t know why WOMEN wear those ridiculous, uncomfortable things. Well, I guess I know why, but it’s unnecessary. If you see a good looking woman wearing anything from sandals to running shoes to Timberland boots, she’s still someone you want to get with. I think I’ve seen my wife wear heels higher than a couple of inches maybe twice ever.

    4. I don’t think anyone – even the gayest of gays – want to see me in size 13 stilettos

      1. AlexinCT

        Paging Jesse for a claim verification!

  35. The Late P Brooks

    Dry drunk syndrome describes “a constellation of symptoms that occur after someone stops abusing alcohol yet still exhibits the majority of the maladaptive behaviors that are associated with alcohol abuse disorder and alcohol dependency,” addiction specialist Neeraj Gandotra, MD, chief medical officer at Delphi Behavioral Health Group, tells Yahoo Lifestyle.

    You’ll never be cured. Give us money.

    1. Tundra

      Hey man, it’s a major industry here. These guys lead the rackets.

      My cousin went through that place a few times. Funny, he only got clean when he decided to stop taking drugs. On his own. With no ‘clinical’ help.

      Weird, huh?

      1. AlexinCT

        What’s weird is that it always works out that way….

  36. Playa Manhattan

    I’m seeing a lot in the news about the FBI interviewing new witnesses for the Kavanaugh investigation.

    Question: Did they ever interview her?

    1. Chipwooder

      Apparently not, because her lawyers sent a letter complaining that they weren’t going to interview her. I don’t think they’re interviewing Kavanaugh either, since they both already gave sworn testimony.

      1. Playa Manhattan

        I’m certainly not satisfied with the softballs they lobbed at her.

    2. commodious spittoon

      Anthony Hopkins as King Lear. I think I’ll watch this tonight.

      Shakespeare directors these days too often fall into a rut, unable to resist showing they’re au courant by pushing topical political themes from the day’s paper or (if all else fails) making everything a Nazi allegory. Eyre, though, is going for sheer ticking-bomb excitement, keeping up a brisk pace and shortening the speeches so that the characters interact via something approaching the brief, barbed exchanges of today’s best television.

      Say, maybe there’s something to intellectualizing modern fare with classical stories rather than saddling classical stories with our stupid modern politics.

      1. commodious spittoon

        *sigh*

    3. Hyperion

      So, is this week when the FBI announces the appointment of a 2nd special investigator to investigate Kav’s involvement with Russians?

  37. The Late P Brooks

    Gaslighter-in-Chief

    Just this week, Trump deployed a classic gaslighting technique when asked whether Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh would be disqualified if he had lied about or mischaracterized his history with alcohol. Rather than answering the question, Trump said, “There are bad reports on everybody” and launched into accusatory remarks about Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker and Dianne Feinstein.

    This is not normal behavior from anyone, let alone the president of the United States. But Trump’s behavior is so continually outrageous that it has been normalized — and mainstream Republicans who fail to call him out for fear of retribution are complicit in constructing this alternate reality.

    Dictators and would-be dictators use these same tactics to gain power and control over their constituents. The more gaslighting continues, the more off-kilter and confused the population becomes, until people are too tired to fight back.

    That Trump. What a scamp.

    I like how the dumb bint doesn’t even bother to offer up any coherent definition of “gaslighting”. If you’re an enlightened anti-Trumpista, you already know.

    1. Chipwooder

      Holy shit, they have REALLY fallen in love with that word.

      1. RAHeinlein

        They have ruined another perfectly good word – now I can’t use it – Ingrid Bergman weeps.

    2. Playa Manhattan

      He could have said whataboutism, but he didn’t.

    3. Suthenboy

      That is not gas lighting and it is a common evasive technique you can see politicians using any day of the week. In fact, nearly every time you hear one speak.

      1. fried

        as someone who literally wrote a book on the subject, you’d think she could spot the difference between evasiveness and making your partner question his or her own sanity. she looks young; did she even watch the movie?

        1. Does she even know there was a movie?

          1. Gustave Lytton

            Two movies.

  38. Annoyed Nomad

    Re: Ford’s ex-boyfriend. Dated her for 6 years – sounds like he dodged a bullet not continuing the relationship. I’d like someone to ask him if she ever spoke in the “vocal fry” little girl voice that she used at the hearing. I’ve read that her psychology background would make her aware that some sexual assualt victims tend to speak that way. So did she do it for show? Her claims are really starting to stink.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      ‘I knew six days in she was a little off. So much so it took me six years to carefully plot my way out of the relationship.’

      1. AlexinCT

        He was worried about boiled bunnies is my guess.

    2. commodious spittoon

      She has a ratemyprofessor page, so I figure she must have lectures out there.

      1. AlexinCT

        The lectures, along with her posts and anything that might show you what sort of shitshow she is – including her year books – seem to have been scrubbed just before she was trust into the forefront by DiFi… Conveniently, some would say.

        1. Count Potato

          The FBI should dig those up, but they won’t.

          1. AlexinCT

            Democrats told them not to bother, is my guess.

    3. RAHeinlein

      She used the annoying fry/pretend cry voice while reading her written state or talking about the alleged event – she moved to little girl sweetness or naivete when responding to Mitchell or the SJC.

      1. AlexinCT

        Looks like the lady questioning her didn’t fall for it like so many people that still pretend she was credible.

        1. RAHeinlein

          Mitchell did a good job, and her memo/report was excellent. Grassley made the correct decision to go with a professional.

          1. AlexinCT

            Sure as hell denied those team blue asshats the ability to claim a bunch of white men for the KKK attacked her and raped her all over again….

    4. Raston Bot

      Arbour sums up her voice perfectly..

      https://youtu.be/QSeyvYq0ZlA?t=3156

  39. RoadSplosives

    So the latest Kavanaugh evil to be revealed is that he helped squash the idea that Vince Foster could have been a homicide instead of a suicide.

    Must be confusing to be a lefty these days. https://www.yahoo.com/news/sinister-battle-brett-kavanaugh-over-202425923.html

    Is that why Hillary hasn’t complained about Kavanaugh?

    1. Playa Manhattan

      I think she hasn’t complained because she was told not to.

      Because…. her husband actually raped somebody, and then she smeared the victim.

      I wonder what she thinks of the current bimbo eruption.

      1. Chipwooder

        Treading lightly, she is.

      2. RoadSplosives

        Current bimbos are to believed. All bimbos are to be believed unless the accused is one William J Clinton.

        1. commodious spittoon

          Real Democrat heroes don’t leave a bimbo to testify later.

    2. RAHeinlein

      HRC was on the media circuit making the case for an “easy FBI investigation” almost immediately after the Ford allegations surfaced. Kavanaugh noted Clinton revenge in his opening statement last Thursday.

      1. RoadSplosives

        You’re paying closer attention than I am!

        1. You haven’t even been paying us attention lately! I haven’t seen you ’round these parts in a while.

  40. Hyperion

    “Christine Blasey Ford might have some explaining to do herself.”

    Is there anything she didn’t lie about? So, there’s this and apparently she lied about the 2 front doors also. I can’t confirm this one, but there’s chatter going on that she claims to be a psychologist when in fact, she is not registered in CA as any type of medical professional.

    Can I just, under oath, stand up in front of Congress and lie about being a medical doctor and still be taken seriously? I don’t remember? I don’t recall? Wiped it with a cloth?

    1. Drake

      The problem is that an investigator would have to listen to her speak and start contemplating suicide after a few seconds. It’s not worth the risk.

    2. commodious spittoon

      Name the right criminal and you can claim you saw him dancing naked in the woods on hexennacht and still be feted as a lefty darling.

      1. Hyperion

        “you can claim you saw him dancing naked in the woods”

        While consorting with da debil?

    3. Chipwooder

      I put together a list of like nine things in yesterday’s links, and still people added things I had forgotten. This broad’s story has more holes than a wheel of Jarlsberg.

      1. AlexinCT

        If you will allow an observation, I would say that wheel is 12% cheese, and the rest is holes.

    4. fried

      not that she isn’t, generally speaking, full of shit, but you don’t need to be an m.d. to be a clinical psychologist. California being California, though, there’s almost surely a licensing board for therapists.

      1. They heard her petition, then decided she was too much of a risk to her patients from her voice alone.

    5. Michael

      My guess is that she chose psychology as a course of study in an attempt to fix something horribly wrong with herself and maybe never completed her doctorate. I’ve met a few women through mutual acquaintances that did exactly this, and they were completely nuts.

      1. invisible finger

        I have a relative that did exactly that. Who knew that abortions were so mentally traumatizing?

        1. A lot of people. But it’s taboo to talk about it. Can’t risk the next lambo for the planned parenthood board member.

  41. Drake

    Minnesota Democrat Rep. Keith Ellison called his ex-girlfriend Karen Monahan a “bitch” over a fight about money, he admitted to an attorney his own party hired to investigate domestic abuse allegations against him.

    Burn him!

    (For being a moron and letting a girlfriend spend his money)

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      If they go off the rails so badly that I feel compelled to stick up for Ellison I’m going to be pissed.

      1. Hyperion

        I’ve already stuck up for him, here. The guy is innocent until it’s proven otherwise, I don’t care who he is. And it’s also not totally unbelievable that the GF could have been a bitch and not illegal to call her that.

        I’m not sure how the left actually believed they could start a massive witch hunt and that no witches would be found among their own. Unbelievable stupidity.

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          I haven’t been following his situation that closely to be honest but going after a guy for calling a woman a bitch in the context of defending himself from serious allegations is too much. If the allegations are found to be true that word pales in comparison to the substance of what happened so it just seeems silly and unfair to me.

        2. commodious spittoon

          Waiting a couple years before making a stink, and only when the ex gains prominence, is a huge hit to credibility in my book. I don’t know whether that’s the case here; for all I know, she’s had a complaint open for years, and chose now to use political leverage to resolve it. But if it’s a case of looking for a payout–or revenge–after enduring a poisonous relationship, only one side of which we’ll ever hear about, then no, much as I despise Ellison, that’s BS. Especially if she conspired with her son to out this “video” she’s unwilling to release and perhaps doesn’t have.

          1. invisible finger

            The video is still in production.

          2. Hyperion

            We have an entire generation being churned out by public schools and Universities both public and private, who have been brainwashed for more than a decade that the highest achievement you can achieve is to be a victim.

    2. The Last American Hero

      Is Karen the sister of Haven?

    3. Rebel Scum

      Called his gf a ‘bitch’ in the midst of an argument? Yea, no ones ever done that. I still think the guy is a pos, but that in and of itself is not terrible.

  42. Tundra

    Seriously, this is a bit of a long read, but absolutely stunning and hilarious in the absurdity of what these guys were able to pull off.

    Amazing. I don’t know anything about that world, but it appears to need a serious intellectual enema.

    Still chuckling about this:

    Affilia, a peer-reviewed journal of women and social work, formally accepted the trio’s hoax paper, “Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism.” The second portion of the paper is a rewrite of a chapter from “Mein Kampf.” Affilia’s editors declined to comment.

    Well played, former professors.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The problem is that the authors still think there is value in that steaming pile of dogshit and that it’s just being corrupted by the greivance mongers. What they don’t get is that identity politics is baked into the entire field of humanities now and postmodernism is the support structure for all of it. Until postmodernist philosophy is attacked, forcefully and effectively across the board, this shit will only get worse.

    2. A Leap at the Wheel

      I do. I say leave it as it is. If you clear out all the scoundrels from these departments, they are going to go somewhere else in society. Right now they self-identify as useless and everyone knows it and no one takes them seriously.

    3. commodious spittoon

      To summarize, we spent 10 months writing the papers, averaging one new paper roughly every thirteen days. (Seven papers published over seven years is frequently claimed to be the number sufficient to earn tenure at most major universities although, in reality, requirements vary by institution.)

      If they’re this prolific, and their fraudulent work so indistinguishable from the normal fare, why not put ’em on payroll?

  43. The other day I went jogging, and after a mile or so I saw a gaggle of running high schoolers turning down the same street I was about to take. The race was on!

    I was on one side of the street while they were on the other. For a solid quarter mile I managed to keep ahead of them and even put some distance between us.

    Of course they were a bunch of high school girls. ::shame face:: And I felt like I blew out a lung.

    1. commodious spittoon

      That’s pretty impressive what with catcalling and waving your willy around.

  44. The Late P Brooks

    Confess your sins. Abase yourself. Accept and embrace your humiliation.

    Imagine how differently it might have played out if Ford and Kavanaugh had met in a private room with a trained facilitator instead of making separate appearances under the klieg lights of a nationally televised hearing that many saw as a kangaroo court. In a restorative justice process, Ford could have asked Kavanaugh questions; she could have described the particulars of her suffering, how she had come to this point in her life, and what she needed to move forward.

    Kavanaugh could have asked his own questions, and at the same time, he could have faced up to what many perceive to be established facts—his pattern of drunk, boorish behavior as a teenager. Digging deeper, he might have finally been able to move past his flat, repetitive denials and, as Archila suggested, “hold the harm he has done.” In this process, they—and we—could have moved away from a world of sides: innocent and guilty, winner and loser. Survivors of sexual assault might have finally received some real justice, and seen some real recognition and grappling. Those who perpetrate sexual misconduct might have realized there was a way to be held accountable without being sent into permanent exile.

    There has been a heated debate about whether Kavanaugh should be punished for what he may or may not have done as a teenager. But I agree with Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern that the real question, in judging Kavanaugh’s fitness and character for a seat on the bench of the Supreme Court, is whether he is willing to come to grips with his past conduct and show remorse and insight. A person who is willing to reflect and change is qualitatively different than someone who is not. A restorative justice process would have offered Kavanaugh that chance to show us—and Ford—whether he was up to doing that difficult, humbling work.

    And, of course, the possibility that Ms Ford might be wrong (if not intentionally mendacious) is never for a moment contemplated.

    That guy was a boorish lout. We know this, a priori, because he is a white overprivileged male.

    1. Stinky Wizzleteats

      Sounds like restorative justice isn’t really justice to me. The left really does want to throw the presumption of innocence on the old bonfire, don’t they?

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        It’s just a hindrance to achieving power.

      2. AlexinCT

        Only for those not members of their tribe/team.

    2. Chipwooder

      Confess! CONFESSSSSSSSSSS!

  45. Hyperion

    The latest trend in the newest witch hunt seems to be about what a menace to society anyone who ever drank in high school, is. Which pretty much means 90% of our adult population are a menace to society. Liberals? Yeah, that sort of lost any meaning a while back. So now, we need to go back to high school to judge people’s character? Why the hell stop there? Let’s go back to Kindergarten. The left have completely lost their fucking minds. How can any sane person be on board with this? Oh, and not even to mention the rank hypocrisy of these idiots. So, it’s totes OK that the Beto dude in TX was drunk and left the scene of an accident when he was in his 20s. But it’s an earth shattering unforgivable sin that Kavanaugh drank in high school? Fuck these morons with a flaming cattle prod.

    1. I drank in high school. And had sex. And smoked pot. Good times.

      And in college, I did even more of all that. But yet I somehow – years later – still manage to hold down a job, have a mortgage, keep my family fed, etc. Amazing that.

      1. But due to your confession, you are ineligable to hold office if appointed by a republican.

        1. Hyperion

          We don’t need no stankin confession! Guilty! /the left

      2. Hyperion

        You’re an overly privileged rapey shitlord who’s oppressing women, people of color, and the poor. You just haven’t had it feminazisplained to you yet.

    2. invisible finger

      I willing to accept that every piece of legislation voted on by someone who ever broke a law be declared null and void.

      1. Hyperion

        Problem is, legislation gets voted on by members of Congress. And none of the things they vote on actually apply to them.

  46. Thank God A.J. Hawk survived.

  47. The Late P Brooks

    I was on one side of the street while they were on the other. For a solid quarter mile I managed to keep ahead of them and even put some distance between us.

    Of course they were a bunch of high school girls.

    CREEPER!

    1. Playa Manhattan

      Yeah… and he wasn’t even jogging; he was in his car.

      1. Chipwooder

        *wild applause*

    2. Hyperion

      They were just keeping behind him a little so that when he collapsed on the sidewalk, they could cross over and take turns kicking him ‘Get off our sidewalk, gramps!’.

  48. Tundra

    You Idiot Reporters Are Making It Worse

    Goldberg is a douche, but he’s right sometimes.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I read that, and yes, he’s dead on in this case.

    2. Count Potato

      “Which brings us to the current moment. Democratic senators who announced they would never vote for Kavanaugh under any circumstance keep getting asked if the FBI investigation they demanded will be “enough for them.” Enough for what? To still vote no? I’m not criticizing the Democrats themselves — though I obviously could — I’m criticizing the people who interview these senators. Time and again, these journalists interview the Democrats as if they were open-minded about this investigation when in every breath they insist that the investigation will be illegitimate if it doesn’t prove what they want it to prove.”

    1. fried

      Ms Swetnick’s attorney Michael Avenatti called the statement “bogus and outrageous” and called for the FBI to interview Ms Swetnick and Mr Ketterer to assess their truthfulness.

      doesn’t the FBI very specifically *not* make that sort of assessment?

      1. Chipwooder

        Yes. They simply compile interviews.

      2. Hyperion

        When the FBI achieved hero status for starting the Mueller witch hunts, the left got this idea that the FBI are now their personal bludgeon to be used against whoever or whatever perceived enemy they can dream up. They all imagine themselves as little Hitlers who can call out their brownshirts at a moments notice. Sort of like being on the board of directors for your local HOA, only more violent.

        1. Old Man With Candy

          I don’t think of Avenetti as Left. Or Right. Just whatever it takes for self-promotion.

  49. Foxy females ready to flood your fantasies with fun!

    http://archive.is/2RBbl

    Most excellent group.

    1. PieInTheSky

      24 looks cute

  50. pan fried wylie

    if their food scraps are going to a compost bin instead of the trash, they may be able to downsize to a smaller trash cart

    “If you gain all your weight in your ass, you may be able to downsize to a smaller belt.”

  51. Tres Cool

    Swiss efficiency in recycling. Takin that shit to the next level .

    1. There has been some debate as to whether the earnings should be returned to the deceased’s beneficiaries or go into state coffers. The latter is what is happening. The recycling project is set to earn the city of Zurich 100,000 Swiss francs (€87,700) in revenue each year.

      That’s just wrong, the other Crematorium was correct when they stated

      “The ashes belong entirely to the relatives, not the crematoria or the state,” Ursula Lauper, a spokeswoman for St Gallen’s crematorium

      The crematorium and the state have no right to this material. Ghouls are better behaved.

      1. Tres Cool

        Momma Tres was buried with a couple thousand dollars worth of jewelry, as it was her wish. In hindsight, I question the wisdom of that.

        1. pan fried wylie

          It was her decision to leave that property to the gravedigger instead of you. Get over it.

          1. Tres Cool

            Oh, I’m “over”. My brother has 2 daughters, and some of the pieces may have made nice heirlooms.

            Que sera, sera.

          2. pan fried wylie

            re-read, but this time imagine me with my arms crossed, with a super-cereal expression, maybe even some finger wagging.

            oh, or, even better, replace me with Atticus Finch, since he’s all the rage lately.

            or, even better, where’s that goddamn sarcasm font already.

          3. Tres Cool

            I cant do that. Your avatar makes me giggle.

          4. pan fried wylie

            Someday i’m going to lightpaint one with a tophat.

  52. Hyperion

    Am I the only going to predict that the FBI are soon to lose their hero status with the left? Again.

    1. Tres Cool

      Trump shoulda just hired Comey to run the investigation, then on day 3 or so, fired him again.

  53. Lachowsky

    https://imgur.com/IvmxFmZ

    Dear government,

    Please stop forcing manufacturers to put vullshit failure prone wattage limiting devices in my ceiling fans. It’s annoying and I’m tired of fixing these things. Thays the second ceiling fan in my house and the 3rd or 4th one at someone’s else’s house that I have gotten rid of.

    1. PieInTheSky

      what is the point of ceiling fans? never understood

      1. Tres Cool

        To provide you added surfaces to dust.

      2. To even out the thermal layers by mixing the hot air by the top with the less superheated air near the floor.

        1. commodious spittoon

          You wouldn’t have to worry about that if you left your home open to the elements so it’s boiling hot or frigid most of the year. That’s mom’s theory, anyway.

          I realized, looking up at her swamp cooler this weekend, that she’d done a shit job covering it for winter. Then I realized she’d never taken it off for the summer. Now I wonder when’s the last time she ran it. Crazy lady.

          1. Bobarian LMD

            Where can you live, where a swamp cooler actually functions, that doesn’t get so hot that not running it would kill you?

      3. Lachowsky

        There less chance of getting hit by the blades than if you put them on the floor.

        1. PieInTheSky

          why have a fan at all?

          1. Not all of us live in sarcophagi in constant-temperature underground mauseleums.

          2. PieInTheSky

            how does a fan help? AC is a gift from the gods. A fan?

          3. Even with AC, Without fans, you will need a lot more AC wastage to get the same temperature.

          4. Raven Nation

            As the saying goes, “Fans cool people not rooms.” Our bedroom is small and, as UCS pointed out, if we only ran the a/c we’d need to set the thermostat to be about 60 to be comfortable. A ceiling fan cools your body with the moving air, and we can set the thermostat higher. Also helps in the kitchen when cooking.

          5. Lachowsky

            I have a large fan in my living room. 52inch blades. In the dead of summer, I can keep my house at about 80 degrees and with the fan running, it’s as comfortable to me as a 72 degree house. Running a fan motor uses a hell of a lot less energy than running the compressor in my a/c unit.

          6. pan fried wylie

            mom got the power company to do an energy saving audit a while back, and their best recommendation was giving your clothes a 2nd spin in the washer, because motors convert electricity into motion more efficiently than heating elements convert it to heat.

            the heat capacity of water prolly has something to do with it too (shaking water off is more efficient than evaporating it)

            Running a fan motor uses a hell of a lot less energy than running the compressor in my a/c unit.

            *than running the compressor AND the fan motor in your a/c unit. oh, and the blower. like, the math is stupid simple:

            fan motor VS blower, compressor AND a fan motor

          7. commodious spittoon

            I was told there’d be no math energy austerity.

          8. pan fried wylie

            Obviously you couldn’t hear my over my ceiling fans.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      For that matter, stop forcing printer manufacturers to put non-avoidable energy saver modes on their shit. The thirty second warm up times waiting for a printout ticks me off.

      1. pan fried wylie

        For the two times a year I print paperwork for the HR dept.

        Oh, and 30sec to wake up, but you’re leaving out the 10mins for it to decide it can connect to the same fucking wireless network again.

        1. Playa Manhattan

          “Please consider the environment before printing this email”

          1. Who prints e-mail? that defeats the purpose

    3. Lachowsky

      Also, from the land asinine regulations-

      Around 2007 or so, the government mandated that all 3 phase industrial electric motors had to be ‘high efficiency motors’ electric motor manufacturers had for years been offering standard and high efficiency motors for sale.

      The difference between the two is the amount of air gap between the O.D. of the rotor and the I.D. of the stator core. The high efficiency motors have less room between the two.

      The only wear item in an electric motor is the bearings. As the balls in the bearing wear, the rotor of the motor moves inside that air gap. If the rotor makes contact with the stator core, the motor grounds out and will blow out its windings: which runs the motor. The fact that all these motors have a government mandated smaller air gap means that if wear problems in bearings aren’t proactively monitored and corrected, then the effective life of an electric motor is severely reduced. So, now we have ‘high efficiency’ electric motors that blow up as the bearings wear instead of standard efficiency motors that develop end play and start causing coupling/linkage/gearbox issues when the bearing wear.

      1. But muh feeeeeeeeelz about electricity usage!

      2. pan fried wylie

        you’re not supposed to count the energy cost of material extraction, construction, and shipping of multi-ton equipment, you shitlord.

    1. Hyperion

      It’s probably just a symptom of UK society in general. He doesn’t actually need a working Brain, the gubmint will tell him what to think when thinking is needed.

    2. Count Potato

      Yikes. Story seems a bit suspicious though.

  54. Raston Bot

    “I was very troubled by the tone of the remarks. … The interaction with the members was sharp and partisan, and that concerns me,” said Flake, who was instrumental in initiating a week-long FBI investigation into the allegations. “I tell myself, ‘You give a little leeway because of what he’s been through.’ But on the other hand, we can’t have this on the court. We simply can’t.”

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh-flake/flake-concerned-by-kavanaughs-partisan-interactions-at-senate-hearing-idUSKCN1MC22M

    a little leeway for two solid weeks of slander? are you fucking shitting me? if you can’t have someone with a spine on the court, then that’s the Dem’s playbook 100% from here out: attack, slander, attack, slander until the nominee fights back –> then it’s “oh, we can’t have a partisan on the court”

    1. RAHeinlein

      Flake is right, it was partisan, Kavanaugh pushed-back on the part including those who were attacking him.

    2. commodious spittoon

      Kindly fuck off into retirement, idiot. Could AZ quit sending bitchy prima donnas to Congress?

    3. Raven Nation

      Flake & Reason seem made for each other.

    4. Hyperion

      Either Flake is the cuckiest cuck boy of all time or he’s a Dem plant. I don’t see how it could be otherwise. He behaves like he has some sort of serious hormone imbalance. Is he undergoing sex change?

      1. R C Dean

        My theory:

        McCain had Flake’s balls in a jar on his desk, and would let Flake use them occasionally. When he died, he left them to Lindsey Graham, triggering the sudden rush of testosterone that we saw last week.

        It explains all the facts. Prove me wrong.

        1. commodious spittoon

          McConnell, Graham, and Grassley share one ball between them, and pass it around when needed.

      2. SugarFree

        No, he just hates Trump. Which is understandable, but his further problem is thinking any of this shit really matters, as if respectability is really something to be concerned with.

        Embrace the chaos, Jeffery. Embrace it like a long lost love.

        1. Flake is behaving as if he has identified a common enemy in Trump and is happy to support erstwhile ideological foes in order to stick it to him. This is the kind of thing you see when two different parties clearly share more fundamentals in common than not, and I’d argue that in this case it’s the career politician in them that unites Flake and co. and the Dems against Trump and people who sympathize with him. And the thing is, I don’t even believe that Trump’s anti-establishment bona fides are particularly strong, but that doesn’t matter. The problem for Flake and the rest isn’t that Trump is or isn’t anti-establishment; it’s that he’s perceived that way. So even if he’s the same old same old, he can’t be seen as propelling a successful anti-establishment platform, because that would threaten the status quo that politicians on both sides of the aisle have gorged themselves on for decades.

  55. Hyperion

    Huge blow for Trumpnazis

    So, the UN has ordered, ORDERED the USA to stop not playing fair with Iran. Nice headline there, MSN.

    1. Rufus the Monocled

      Dear UN,

      Kiss my white ass.

      Love,

      Donnie

    2. Rebel Scum

      Is an E.O. sufficient to remove the UN delegates and have the building razed?

      1. Bobarian LMD

        The Donald knows Real Estate.

        He should hike the rent until they move out then convert it into condos.

  56. Chipwooder

    Seriously, we simply CANNOT have someone with a documented history of underaged drunkeness on the Supreme Court!

  57. Rhofulster

    Every time I hear Winfield’s name, I think of his pals Ron Behagen, Corky Calhoun, And Bill Musselman. #believelukewitte

    1. Chipwooder

      I think of George Steinbrenner and Howie Spira

  58. Count Potato

    “Gamboa asked councilmembers to block KinkySDollS opening in the city because it “would exacerbate the risk of sexual assaults for women” as men accustomed to using the human-like sex objects could transfer the behavior to real people.”

    So you are saying they are going to get married?

  59. Count Potato

    “If you’re involved in a feminist journal and you’re bitching about the methodology used here, then you’re not serious about advocating equality or feminism or truth in research. Seriously, this is a bit of a long read, but absolutely stunning and hilarious in the absurdity of what these guys were able to pull off. (Open it in incognito or private mode-or somebody please provide an archive link in the comments)”

    Private mode didn’t work. Or I’m doing it wrong. Could someone put up an archive?

    1. Chipwooder

      incognito doesn’t work with WSJ. It used to, but no longer.

      1. Count Potato

        Oh well.

    2. Playa Manhattan

      How do I do that without my name being on top of the screen? When I’m logged in (which you have to be), it says my name.

  60. RAHeinlein

    California bans animal testing for cosmetics:

    California Gov. Jerry Brown has signed Senate Bill 1249, the California Cruelty-Free Cosmetics Act, into law on Friday, Sept. 28.

    Authored by Sen. Cathleen Galgiani and co-sponsored by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine and Social Compassion in Legislation, SB 1249 will make it unlawful for cosmetic manufacturers to sell any cosmetic in California if the final product or any component of the product was tested on animals after Jan. 1, 2020, with some exceptions for regulatory requirements.

    “With the passage of SB 1249, California now leads the country in supporting modern, reliable cosmetic safety testing, while protecting animals from unnecessary suffering,” said Galgiani.

    https://www.happi.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2018-10-01/gov-brown-signs-california-cruelty-free-cosmetics-act

    1. How are you supposed to know if it’s safe unless you test it?

      1. Tres Cool

        Why am I hearing Pelosi saying “you have to wear it to find out whats in it” ?

      2. invisible finger

        Orphans.

        If that’s too offensive, then prisoners and other welfare recipients.

        1. I’d rather use animal testing protestors. “We have to test it on something. If you’re willing to take their place, we’ll test it on you. Otherwise, piss off.”

    2. R C Dean

      Trying to read the tea leaves on the FBI wrapping up early. I think this means they did some followup on the accusations of sexual assault, and that’s it, without investigating Kav’s high school yearbook, frat boy days, etc. And, given that DiFi is demanding that the report be kept secret, I’m guessing they turned up more problems with Ford’s story and junked the other accusations.

      Ford’s ex has come out with a statement, too. Its anonymous, so for the moment I am disregarding it per my standard that if you won’t put your name on it, I won’t take it into account.

      1. commodious spittoon

        Is it anonymous? I thought it was redacted by the judiciary committee. In any event, it’d be easy for Ford to out his name or out it as a fabrication.

        1. Chipwooder

          Yes, it was redacted.

          FWIW, the friend who was supposedly coached by Ford has denied that it ever happened. However, I’ve been told that the fact that Ford knew the names of some of Kavanaugh’s high school friends means she’s telling the truth, so the fact that the ex-boyfriend knew Monica McLean’s name, and she is in fact a friend of Ford’s whose name was not public before this, must mean he’s telling the truth. Right?

          1. commodious spittoon

            McLean’s was public: she signed a letter in support of Ford.

            I hadn’t heard McLean denies having been coached. Seems like a tough thing to prove either way.

        2. R C Dean

          You are correct. His original letter had his name, which was redacted.

          I see that the now-FBI agent that Ford is supposed to have helped with lie detector testing (which she denied at the hearing) is saying Ford did no such thing. It seems an oddly specific thing for her ex to make up out of thin air.

          1. commodious spittoon

            That’s easy, put her under polygraph. Wait… shit.

      2. Count Potato

        “And, given that DiFi is demanding that the report be kept secret”

        I looked, but couldn’t find where she said that. Only people saying she said that.

        1. commodious spittoon

          Since this kooky betrayal of process, Feinstein has been speaking solely through sympathetic media surrogates. Almost like she doesn’t want her wrinkled ass associated with this stunt.

          1. Bobarian LMD

            Lindsey yelled at her and hurt her feelingz.

        2. R C Dean

          What I have seen is purported quotes from Feinstein. Looks like these background investigations are usually confidential to the Senate anyway, and that’s how this one will be handled.

      3. RAHeinlein

        All that matters is the President’s “vicious” and “vile” comments from last night night’s rally:

        “How did you get home?” Mr. Trump asked, mimicking a questioner during last week’s hearing that also featured a defiant Judge Kavanaugh.

        “I don’t remember,” Mr. Trump said in mock response of Dr. Ford.

        “How’d you get there? I don’t remember. … Where is the place? … I don’t remember. … How many years ago was it? I don’t know,” Mr. Trump said, the crowd cheering.

        “Upstairs, downstairs, where was it? I don’t know. But I had one beer. That’s the only thing I remember.”

        Michael Bromwich, one of Dr. Ford’s lawyers, wrote on Twitter that Mr. Trump’s comments were “a vicious, vile and soulless attack,” adding: “Is it any wonder that she was terrified to come forward, and that other sexual assault survivors are as well? She is a remarkable profile in courage. He is a profile in cowardice.”

        1. Chipwooder

          Oh my god, he said snide things about her???? The bastard.

          1. RAHeinlein

            Repeating factual statements is vile.

          2. whiz

            Well, he really doesn’t need to do it, he’s an ass, and it doesn’t help his cause (unlike some of his other ramblings). He should just let Ford get charged with perjury and maybe then crow about it.

        2. Raston Bot

          he should shut up b/c it’s not helping. but he’s at a rally full of red meat and potatoes GOP and they demanded to be fed.

          1. Stinky Wizzleteats

            Those are also the same kinds of people who will, or won’t, show up to vote for Republicans in their senate races. It’s a pressure tactic and he knows exactly what he’s doing.

          2. pan fried wylie

            Fucking 2D chess!

          3. pan fried wylie

            expanding that thought, this is the Knight’s move isn’t it, one step to the side and two forward, or two to the side and one forward? Either way, he’s making it to the finish line before the guy making one step forward and two steps back. They dropped that piece in the early versions of chess.

          4. Stinky Wizzleteats

            I’m not one of the Trump is a genius guys but this kind of move doesn’t take much genius. Seeing the Republican base cheer that will enter the thought process of the senators that are waffling and stiffen their spines. You don’t think that’s plausible?

        3. Rebel Scum

          I found it amusing.

  61. The Late P Brooks

    it “would exacerbate the risk of sexual assaults for women” as men accustomed to using the human-like sex objects could transfer the behavior to real people.”

    They should ban marriage, based on that line of reasoning.

    “Well, my wife lets me fuck her pretty much any time I want; that means I should be able to bang the hot new receptionist if the urge comes over me. Why should I have to wait ’til I get home?”

    1. commodious spittoon

      That line of reasoning is even more an indictment of marriage than sex dolls. Fungibility between live women is much greater than between women and dolls. Sure, your wife might not be in the mood, but you stand a good chance of persuading her. So why not treat your secretary as persuadable? She’s a woman like your wife. Contrast that with what I assume is the appeal of a sex doll: it’s not a woman. That’s the point.

      1. commodious spittoon

        “3DPD” and anime obsession and body pillow waifus is a phenomenon among a certain demographic of unfuckable young men for a reason, and it’s not because they’re obsessed with pulling Revenge of the Nerds hijinks to score with hot women.

      2. pan fried wylie

        *formulating analogous analogy between hamburgers and textured soy protein product*

        DOES NOT COMPUTE *blue smoke*

    1. AlexinCT

      This is what desperate douchebaggery looks like.

  62. The Late P Brooks

    given that DiFi is demanding that the report be kept secret

    Unexpectedly!

    1. Bobarian LMD

      be kept secret and leaked at a later date.

  63. AlexinCT

    Anyone seen that the Mueller team shed another 2 attorneys? What got me however was the following passage in the article:

    Two prosecutors detailed to the Russia investigation for the past year are returning to their duties in other parts of the Justice Department. They join two other attorneys who left the team, assigned to investigate potential ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, over the summer.

    Note they avoid mentioning that the two unnamed Mueller team members that “left” this past summer – Strzok and Page – were not dropped by Mueller team after a ton of the previously unreleased or blacked out text exchanges were finally released showing how much of a partisan hack they were. These two were part and parcel of that cabal that let Hillary walk and then invented the Russian collusion hoax to torpedo Trump, and they became liabilities.

    The rest of the article sucks just as bad as these fluff pieces usually do, as it doesn’t address the key issue here, which is that Mueller’s probe is winding down because there is simply nothing more for them to do in their fishing expedition and that whole Russia collusion thing was nothing but bullshit.

  64. straffinrun

    I managed to get drunk tonight without raping anyone.

    1. You fail at patriarchy.

    2. AlexinCT

      LIAR!

    3. RAHeinlein

      But did you throw any ice?

      1. straffinrun

        The line was too long.

  65. Chipwooder

    Well, it’s all over for Kavanaugh now: celebrities are protesting!

    1. R C Dean

      That reminds me: did I see that there was a gofundme for Kav?

      1. RAHeinlein

        I just checked – there appear to be several.

        1. commodious spittoon

          Watch him donate the proceeds to FIRE.

    2. Chipwooder

      I am reminded of this scene from the criminally underrated Used Cars

      1. Raston Bot

        loved that movie

        1. AlexinCT

          Ditto.

    3. Playa Manhattan

      Lena Dunham…

      If she came out against burning infants alive, I’d be for it.

      1. “Playa Manhattan converts to the worship of Moloch”

  66. The Late P Brooks

    I don’t know if it has been mentioned specifically, yet-

    There is an article (sorry, no link: fake news) about some dentist who is saying he went out with that Swetnik chick, but he dumped her when she expressed her desire for multiple male partners simultaneously.

    1. Chipwooder

      I thought he was a weatherman?

      In any case, Swetnick is clearly a nut and she’s already backpeddling on her story.

      1. thrakkorzog

        You don’t need to be a weatherman to see which way the wind blows.

        1. Bobarian LMD

          Apparently, it she blows in several directions at once.

      2. R C Dean

        I have a feeling when this is done, she will find that her security clearances stripped, and her job as well. Its laughable that someone making this public display should have any security clearances at all.

        1. Playa Manhattan

          She has a public trust clearance to work for the IRS, and we all know how honest they are.

    2. Playa Manhattan

      He’s not down with the wobbly H?

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Why do I find the possibility that Swetnick dated a dentist so incredibly believable?

  67. The Late P Brooks

    I thought he was a weatherman?

    Oops. You’re right. I got my train schedules mixed up.

  68. R C Dean

    I’ve come around on Ford. I was willing to give her some benefit of the doubt that something happened that she reconstructed in the academia pressure cooker into a traumatizing sexual assault. But as her story has fallen apart, around things that have nothing to do with the assault – fear of flying, the door thing, the offer to do the interviews in CA, the refusal to release the therapist records or name of the therapist, etc., I have come to the conclusion that she is just lying about the underlying accusation against Kav, too. Her stories about when, where, and who have just shifted too conveniently to stymie confirmation/disconfirmation. She has been a willing participant in the Dem’s hit job, which was constructed from day one as a last minute smear to force Kav to withdraw.

    1. straffinrun

      That and she said that she never advised anyone on lie detectors. Tangled webs.

      1. AlexinCT

        Criminal charges for her and censure for Feinstein are warranted.

    2. whiz

      I’m not quite there yet. Oh, her account is totally IN-credible, but I believe there is still a chance that she had a bad experience in the past and that the Dems are just (ab)using her.

  69. straffinrun

    What is with the midget fetish on the main page lately?

    1. Sloop goes through themes until he gets bored of them and wanders off to some other image set.

      1. Bobarian LMD

        And the whole midget fetish…

  70. FOS

    Did u guys get ur president alert?

    1. Nope.

      /dead phone.

    2. Tonio

      I can neither confirm nor deny…

      But even though it was planned it’s almost as if they think they might need it soon…

    3. MikeS

      Yep. It was the best alert ever. Super classy. A very, very good alert.