Read the series
This article is for informational purposes only. Suthenboy is not a credentialed expert. Do not attempt any of these activities without first consulting an expert or a manual published by accredited experts or manufacturers.
The number one consideration in choosing component cases and bullets is price. There are lots of manufacturers out there but the quality of the cases all meet the same requirements for material and dimension. I have never found that any one brand is better than another. What I have found is that used surplus military stuff can be a problem. Military brass is thicker and softer than civilian brass. This is because military loads are higher pressure and a looser fit in the chamber. The loose fit is so the cartridges will still chamber under adverse conditions (mud, sand, water). Because they are a looser fit they need to expand more to seal the chamber so they are softer. Because they are soft and higher pressure the walls of the cases are thicker. Resizing these cases can be a real struggle. I once ripped my press off of its bolts trying to resize some 7.65×51 NATO brass. The straight wall pistol cases are fine and the 5.56 NATO is ok but after that buy commercial brass. The military stuff also has shorter life because of overexpansion and the resulting work hardening.
For standard calibers there are multiple outlets including Midway, Brownells, Cheaper than Dirt, Black Hills and a host of others. Just do a search for ‘bulk brass reloading’ and you will get oodles of suppliers. For non-standard calibers the suppliers are spotty. Some calibers are seasonal, meaning they are only produced once every ten years or so. Some suppliers will have some calibers sometimes and others not. You just have to search. I once found where Black Hills had bought all of the 375 Winchester produced and was selling it for a song. I bought a lifetime supply.
Another consideration for cases is the priming. Standard priming means the primer flash hole is single and centered in the bottom of the case. All standard reloading dies are designed for standard priming. Another type of priming is Berdan priming. This type case has two small off-center holes in the bottom of the case. Normally these cannot be reloaded without special tools and are a pain in the ass even with that. Stay away from Berdan.
For priming you definitely want quality, consistent, reliable primers. The best on the market I have found is CCI. Remington and Winchester are good. I have never tried any foreign manufacturers. They are pricey anyway. With primers you want to handle them carefully. I use tweezers to manage them. Never touch them with your fingers. Any oils from your fingers can kill the primer. Any oils or grease from your bench can spoil the primers. Open them fresh, use them immediately without touching and then put the package away. Never subject the primers to any kind of shock. The priming material is very powerful. It may seem like a tiny amount but it wont seem that way if you set one off.
The primer is a small swaged brass cup. Inside the cup is the priming material and on top of that is a little three legged anvil so that the priming material is mashed between the cup wall and the anvil upon being struck by the primer. This little anvil can be ejected from the cup if the primer is set off outside of the cartridge case. Even smashing one with a hammer can cause small pieces of shrapnel to fly. Be careful with primers. Don’t screw around with them. It is all fun and games until someone gets their eye put out.
Gunpowder. I love gunpowder. I love the look, the smell of fresh powder and the smell of burned powder.
Gunpowder does not explode. Gunpowder burns. It is a very rapid but very carefully controlled burn. Because the grains burn on the exterior adjusting the surface area of the grain can control how fast it burns. The fastest burning powders are flakes. American gun powders are small disc shaped flakes. Adjusting the width and thickness of the flakes controls the burn rate. These powders are used in pistol and shotgun rounds. They are lower pressure and lower velocity. European powders are square flakes but the principles are the same.
Next up are tube powders. These are primarily for rifles. Tube length, outside and inside diameter governs the burning speed. The tube powders are the ones most likely to be severed in the powder measure. If you really want precision with tube powders you have to trickle them into the scale by hand instead of using the powder dispenser. I can load without any margin of error at all using that time consuming method but with standard hunting loads I prefer using the powder dispenser.
The last powder type are ball powders. These are the slowest powders. They are for Magnum loads in pistol and some rifles. Burn rate is governed by ball diameter. These guys can give tremendous pressures and velocities and can also be metered out very consistently.
Remember, after choosing your load only use the exact powder, powder measure and bullet style and weight in the published load. Never mix those combinations and NEVER, EVER, EVER mix two different powders together.
A consideration in choosing the load is recoil. For every force there is an equal and opposite force. Heavier bullets generate more recoil than light ones. Faster bullets create more recoil than slow ones. Another factor in recoil is the powder. In addition to pushing 200 grains of lead out of the barrel at 2500 fps you are also pushing 50 grains of powder out of the barrel at the same speed. You can add that mass to the bullet mass as recoil generating. Finding a load that gives comparable speeds but using less powder can make a noticeable difference.
In general there are three different type bullets and they all require different considerations in loading.
The first are the lead bullets. These are usually cast but sometimes swaged. Cast bullets are made by pouring molten lead into a mold. The hardness of these bullets is adjusted by varying the mixture of the alloy. Pure lead is soft as chewing gum and will cause heavy lead deposits in your barrel. This can be very difficult to remove. I have seen barrels so heavily leaded that the rifling was completely filled. Leading occurs because the high friction between the bullet and the barrel causes the contact surface of the bullet to become liquid resulting in heavy lead streaking. Repeating this over and over results in heavy deposits. The easiest way to remove barrel leading is with Mercury but that is hard to come by these days. Stay away from pure lead. The easiest way to prevent leading is to put a small copper cup on the base of the bullet called a gas check. I highly recommend gas checks.
Typical bullet alloy is Lead, Tin and Antimony. The lead is for weight, the Tin for hardness and the Antimony for ease of casting. You can buy pre-mixed alloys for bullet casting but my preferred source is waste lead. In the past that has been wheel weights from garages. This mixture is anybody’s guess. It is usually pretty hard but does lend itself to limited tempering. By simply dropping the bullets out of the mold into a bucket of water while they are hot you can harden them but they only keep their temper for about one year. A freshly cast and tempered bullet of this style is a wonder. I have had 44 magnum cast flatpoint bullets penetrate 12 inches of oak with almost no deformation. There are more sophisticated methods of tempering but we will get into that later.
Swaged bullets are made by pressing sections of lead wire or lead powder into dies using a hydraulic press. Those pressed from wire are a bit softer than cast bullets and those pressed from powder (common for 22 long rifle) can disintegrate on contact with a target.
Copper jacketed bullets allow for much higher velocity loads as copper fouls the barrel much less than lead because copper has a significantly higher melting point. Jackets can also be adjusted to allow for controlled expansion in the target. They aren’t nearly as hard as solid cast, tempered bullets but for most game they are more than sufficient. Never mix copper jacketed loads with cast bullet data and visa versa. The increase in friction between the copper jacket and the barrel causes the powder to burn at a much higher pressure. Only use data listing jacketed bullets for jacketed bullets.
The last kind of bullet are the solids. These are swaged or machined individually from solid copper or solid brass. They are very expensive. They are designed for high penetration and low deformation in tough, dangerous game. Because they are solid they will not compress as easily as the other type bullets causing still higher pressures to develop. Only use loading data for solid bullets with solid bullets. It is unlikely that you will ever load many, if any, of these.
Jump over to Midwayusa.com. Choose SHOP DEPARTMENT – > RELOADING SUPPLIES and peruse the powders, primers, brass and bullets. You will get a good idea what is available and at what prices. Before you do, hide your wallet from yourself. You will be like a kid in a candy shop.
If you have managed to slog your way through my articles, congratulations. You are probably a reloader at heart. Encyclopedias can be filled with all of the information about reloading. Everything in the world has been tried and retried but it is still fun to experiment with. You can shoot more and cheaper, you can make specialized ammunition for all kinds of uses. If you are not that into all the technical information you can buy one of the reloading kits from any of the manufacturers and stick strictly to the published data. You can load for one caliber or a hundred. You can shoot 500 S&W or 10mm Auto for nearly the same price as 38 Special. You will have access to obscure calibers or highly specialized ammo. Whatever you decide to do never forget: SAFETY, SAFETY, SAFETY. That goes for more than just reloading.
Where have all the pretty pictures gone?
I see that a few more people are submitting articles lately. they have overcome their fears and insecurities. It was inevitable. Running a website is a big deal, a full time job. I suspect it is putting extra pressure on those editing these pieces.
I also have a suspicion that soon the scheduling is going to get tighter. They will have to publish more articles per day.
I cant really express how much appreciation and respect I have for the Glib founders.
From now on I will be taking my own photos and sending them in with the submissions. I hope that takes some pressure off of them.
Oh, I had thought you’d provided the pictures before. If I’d known it was an editorial addition I wouldn’t have complained.
It can go either way. I usually include my own pics, but they often do the pic and blurb on the main page.
With full access for contributors now, you can upload photos and include them in the article.
I had originally supplied my dick pics for this article but they were removed to keep our Family Friendly certification.
The big gun, huh?
Pump action.
I bet its got the thing that goes up, right?
Bipod mounted.
Thanks for the submission! I don’t shoot enough to make the economics of reloading work. I’m hoping that may change in retirement.
In my case my submissions increased because I gained access to the publishing tools and makes creating an article much more efficient.
What happens if you mix different powders?
Powder A (faster grains) will cause Powder B(slower grains) to burn faster than it was intended to burn. They will act like little fuses.
The question is – how much of the hand will have to be amputated because of it?
Or will you lose one, or both eyes.
Depends. Every failure is different. Most injuries are minor but some are not. Most of the blast goes away from you or vertically.
My preferred method of surviving a failure is 100% successful and I bet you can guess what it is.
Don’t fuck around and do things properly the first time?
You get a gold star Q
Do you know who….. oh never mind.
Me, when I learned my alphabet?
Always have an Orphan do it the first time you do a new experimental procedure?
*raises hand*
Is it…safety?
I was going to go with remote shooting robot.
Have someone else shoot the first few rounds of each batch?
They always get a little squirrely when I go and duck behind a concrete wall.
I never use some else’s reloads. I’m very careful, load on the low end. Most North American critters are fairly easy to kill. One never knows what someone else is reloading. There maybe some that think a mag load is more accurate but it ain’t the load, its the shooter. Good article, Suthen, you covered everything well. Hopefully you have piqued interest in the hobby and more will decide to give it a try. It’s not cheap to start and one may well end up spending way more that the price of store ammo. I haven’t shot store ammo for over 35 years. Unfortunately I don’t shoot too much anymore, for a variety of reasons.
Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
You may have used too rich a load there, Chip.
Alright, is this a euphemism, or are we still talking about ammo?
I was talking about ammo, as chip was vaporized by a mini-nuke.
The euphemism department is upthread.
How is it we’re not still doing phrasing?!?
Ah, cmon, no one spotted it as a Ghostbusters quote?
Sorry, Egon, I found it funnier to be intentionally oblivious.
Great series, Suthen.
I assume that you need to be careful with older firearms when it comes to heavier loads. You’ve mentioned in the past that certain guns have had issues with cracking, etc. What resources do you use to make sure you don’t wreck anything?
You are correct. The older guns you have to worry about are anything pre-ww1as metallurgy was not as sophisticated and many of those guns were designed for black powder which is a much slower powder and thus lower pressure. black powder burns a max of about 1200fps where some smokeless can burn 4000+fps.
If your gun is chambered in a modern caliber it is a modern manufacture with good tool steel.
Ex. 45 Long Colt was originally a black powder cartridge. If you have a Colt in this chamber from before 1900 it would be a bad idea to use a modern, smokeless hot load in it. Very bad idea. 38 special, 44 special, 32 special are the same way. As a result you will find that commercial loads for these calibers are very wimpy and you will see warnings on the boxes
I’ve read a lot about people having mishaps with old school .45-70s and using modern ammo in them. They simply weren’t strong enough to withstand the pressures generated by current loads. The good old days .45-70s were essentially big slingshots; heavy projectile lumbering down range. Now that we have Marlin 1895s and Ruger No. 1s with modern machining and metallurgical techniques, there are companies loading the damn things so hot they approach .458 mag energies. Put one of those in an antique and kiss your arms goodbye.
Can you recommend a good (mordern) lever action 45-70, preferrably side-door loaded.
Marlin 1895. 100%. I love that rifle.
heh. I cant say anything bad about the marlins. If I had to get anything other than a Henry, it would be Marlin.
The marlin action is the weakest of the lever actions but still well within the pressure tolerances of all of the cartridges it is chambered in and that goes especially for the 45-70, a low pressure cartridge.
I’ll have to look into the Henrys.
Henry.
They are heavy and that helps a lot with the recoil. Also, it is a top quality design and manufacture.
At first I didn’t like them because they are heavy, but they are smooth, reliable and pretty – a work of art really. I also came to appreciate that weight.
https://www.henryusa.com/rifles/color-case-hardened-edition/
They are heavy and that helps a lot with the recoil.
This here. Aside from its accuracy, the reason I lurv my .300 is the weight (which is considerable) dampening the recoil. A flinch is a terrible thing to acquire, and the reason I don’t shoot magnum handguns.
You can train yourself out of that. Put two or three randomly in the chamber, spin it and close it without looking. Then when you shoot you dont know if there is going to be recoil or not. Concentrate on the sights and slow squeeze on the trigger. On an empty chamber you can see if the sights stay on target or not. Do this a dozen cylinders or so and your flinch will disappear. Also, more shooting will acclimate you to the recoil. It really isnt that bad once you are used to it.
I should also mention there is this thing called reloading. I load all of my 44mags down a good bit. I make a few hot loads for hunting and the rest I load down to around 850 fps. They shoot about like 45LC.
I mostly got rid of my shotgun flinch that way. Mostly. Every now and then I’ll have somebody load (or not) the shotgun and hand it to me. Every now and then I still flinch. We can’t all be Scary White Boys.
+1 dry-fire training: for perfecting the squeeze
But most flinchers have an aggravated physical condition even if they have a perfect trigger finger; they flinch for the same reason their pulse is up: nerves. Few ever range train themselves out of that; the mind and then the body get comfortable only after a ton of rounds.
I also agree with the light load approach as the best way to get in those rounds. Most of us who are good shots were born to it and came up in it the right way: hundreds of rounds of rimfire at easy targets; low cost, no recoil, no emotional or physical risk. We got good at that, and then some day someone hands us a 410 or 30-30 and says “you’re ready to try this” and, not knowing any better, you just drill something with it and light up thinking only “that was fun.” You have zero qualms about the recoil because you’ve internalized the calm of the routine; your breathing and posture and aiming are 90% rote.
I’ll say it again: recoil just doesn’t matter to a marksman; even an elephant stomper doesn’t distract me from my focus and the routines my father taught me when I was five. There is nothing that I do with a gun that is special and that any other guy can’t master in 50,000 rounds.
“There is nothing that I do with a gun that is special and that any other guy can’t master in 50,000 rounds.”
Cant be emphasized enough. I have amazed and wowed people before and my response is always the same. “I am not magic. I am not doing anything you cant learn to do.”
But most flinchers have an aggravated physical condition even if they have a perfect trigger finger; they flinch for the same reason their pulse is up: nerves
I’m the epitome of this. Loud things make me jumpy. Fireworks, sirens, gunfire. My body flinches (whether perceptible or not) when other people don’t. Takes about 5 minutes for me to stop instinctively flinching at every shot at the range.
Its mostly sound for me, too (I am deaf in one ear, but the other is extraordinarily sensitive to loud noises). The confounding factors really are that I don’t have a strong desire to own a magnum handgun (over and above the current 9mm and .45 ACP currently inhabiting my safe), and that I don’t have the time/energy to shoot much. As my hearing has gotten more damaged and sensitive, I feel like I have to choose between shooting and preserving some hearing. And, yes, even if I “double-bag” with earplugs and earmuffs, I still get tinnitus from going to the range.
“The primer is a small swaged brass cup. Inside the cup is the priming material and on top of that is a little three legged anvil so that the priming material is mashed between the cup wall and the anvil upon being struck by the primer.”
I’m guessing you meant to type “firing pin” or “hammer”.
“American gun powders are small disc shaped flakes.”
American gun powders use small disc shaped flakes.
I mean that the powder itself is formed into small discs. The powder doesnt use them, it is them.
Yes, I know what you meant. But “American gun powders are small disc shaped flakes” isn’t true because there are plenty of American powders that aren’t flakes.
The point you were trying to make in reference to flake powders, was that American gun powders use disc shapes, and European powders are square.
“American gun powders use small disc shapes.”
“American flake powders are disc shaped.”
Well, you get the idea.
Your Spudness, I’m going to have to pendantically argue with you.
The first sentence defined the primer as “a small swaged brass cup”. While the primer as defined is struck by the firing pin or the hammer, the brass is what hits the priming material and smushes it against the anvil.
OOps. You are correct. Firing pin.
It doesnt matter how many times I read over these, I always miss something.
Blame it on the editors.
Next week: “Why was Hyperbole banned?”
Or Trump. In a pinch, maybe global warming.
In Trump’s America, editor’s are too traumatized by the prospect of increasing GLOBAL WARMING to do their jobs.
Beautiful
What about pinless designs? Okay, those are either electrically fired or muzzleloaders, but…
Ah, forget it.
If you are in a firefight with a BP muzzleloader, you are a poor planner or very unlucky.
There’s a reason you carry as many pistols as you can bear.
/vest full of flintlocks
I keep telling you this isn’t the war of 1812!
So… this letter of Marque against British shipping…
*80’s Oh Boy*
The article is clear that it about boxer primers.
Article?
Apparently a guy at our local range was shooting reloads. He pulled the trigger nothing happened… Few seconds later there was a bullet in the ceiling. Something tells me it’s a made up story to get people to focus on range safety.
Probably not. If you look back at part 5 there is a short discussion of hang-fires. There is also a very special video. Go see. Trust me, it’s worth it.
I don’t doubt it doesn’t happen, just the manner in which the RO told the story made me think he’s bullshitting, because he thinks I’m an amateur… Well technically I am an amater but I know the rules.
I don’t doubt it happens* sorry posting from phone
Did you see the video? It is a must-see.
Yes, Darwin almost got him.
Did he lose an eye? That has to be the luckiest S.O.B. on earth.
The last time I was at the range, we were marveling at the number of bullet holes in the ceiling right above us. The scary one was in the back wall of the range, right above the range officer station.
A person would have to have rocks in their head to open a shooting range.
The NRA will give you money to open one. You have to give back to the community though, so the juice isn’t worth the squeeze.
A couple of buddies had talked about trying to find some space to set up a range in the area just because there aren’t good rifle-distance ranges closer than an hour or so away. Took about two days of research before they decided it’s just not worth it.
I’ve had many a hang-fire with black powder. Keep that muzzle pointed downrange and count to 10 before doing anything else (unless you are in an actual firefight).
I’ve been shooting for about 8 years now. Only issue I’ve ever had was a stove pipe on a AR-15, when I was new to shooting. RO came over stripped the gun down in seconds and handed it back to me. His advice was don’t load the magazine to capacity to prevent it from happening again. Sure enough I haven’t had a stove pipe since. I’ve been told if I have only had one issue then I need to go to the range more.
https://youtu.be/3xbtlW16Gts
Imma let everyone else comment on your story Suthen (good article by the way), but I have to share this story. I put it in the morning thread but not sure it will be seen there.
This story is so ridiculously damaging I almost suspect it is a con job by the GOP. But they would never be that smart.
tl;dr; “When I wrote that bullshit story on FB, I didn’t realize people would take is seriously and ask for proof.”
People keep saying why would Ford allow herself to be raked through the mud if she wasn’t telling the truth. Umm because minus a few outlets she isn’t being raked through the mud. She’s being hailed as a hero.
She’s a hardcore Dem, a Berniebot. She knows her brethren would worship her forever for taking Kavanaugh down.
She is guaranteed a fat book deal. I’d be surprised if she wasn’t already promised a solid 6 or 7 figure deal.
She is in academia. She will face zero social or professional blowback. Quite the contrary, she will be valorized socially and will likely get a promotion out of this – an endowed chair at her current place, or a sweeter gig at another school.
Anita Hill got a book deal, got a much better job at Brandeis, and probably can chalk her other book deals up to her heightened profile for going after Thomas.
So it was either this, or claim to be Indian in order to advance her career?
This will give her a lot more fame. It’s basically a circus intended to force the team red cowards into backing down in the face of a concerted and loud attack by the usual suspects. As LJW pointed out, she was told the team blue agents masquerading as reporters would provide her cover.
Besides, the real goal here was not to really prove Kavenaugh was a dirty woman groper (DiFi would have released that nonsense letter and made the accusation as soon as she had been contacted if team blue had even a 10% confidence that this story might pan out as truth), but to force the team red dunces to delay the vote on Kavenaugh until after the elections, when team blue hopes to have somehow picked up enough seats to permanently bury all the criminal activity of the Obama admin and double down on the destroy Trump and Trumpers campaign they have been running, and make this appointment impossible.
^predicated on her testifying
if she doesn’t testify, then less publicity and fame.
“I WAS BULLIED AND SCARED OUT OF TESTIFYING!!!1!!eleventy”…
/Team blue cheers her on and pays her money for her failed Kamikaze attack.
This is 2018. To a lot of people, being the type of guy who would do a thing is the same thing as actually doing that thing.
I notice that she is identified as a “Professor” but not named at any university. Makes me assume she teaches but does not have tenure. This charade should put her on a tenure fast track at a leftist school.
She’s currently a full professor at Palo Alto University.
Which thus gives her a handy excuse to say “I teach college in Palo Alto” and leave it to the listeners to draw their own conclusions.
To be fair, according to her CV, she began her teaching career at Stanford. Regardless of what one might think of her, she has nothing to prove academically.
Makes me think she wasn’t good enough for Stanford and ended up at a school I’ve never heard of instead.
Could be. Or she wanted to focus less on research and more on teaching at this point in her career and took a position at a teaching university. There are advantages to being a big fish in a small pond.
There are advantages to being a big fish in a small pond.
Like humping the graduate teaching assistants ?
Judging by the TAs I remember, that wouldn’t be considered a perk, but then it’s not as if Virginia is a school known for hot women.
Like humping the graduate teaching assistants ?
Only acceptable if he’s gay and she’s purportedly lesbian.
I was sure it probably did [happen] = may have, may not have
“I had no idea that I would now have to go to the specifics and defend it…”
*facepalm*
Was this school and institution for the retarded?
If the GOP was smart, they’d line up about 50 women and have all of them come forward to make claims that they have “proof” that Kavanaugh rape-raped Ford.
We all know that all 50 times the MSM would rush to their houses and be sure that this was the time that they would truly fuck over Kavanaugh. Then all 50 times, the woman would use that quote: “I had no idea that I would now have to go to the specifics and defend it”
Bonus trolling points if the women they trot out become increasingly absurd. The 50th would be a 112 year-old woman who has never left New Mexico. Still she would act miffed that people don’t automatically “believe” her.
Double bonus: use women who weren’t even born yet in 1982.
Uffda. I hope they don’t do that. I’d be too depressed to cope after seeing how many people would still believe them. “You have to believe a woman!”
The school was definitely retarded if you go by the people analyzing the archives of the scrubbed yearbooks.
The longer this goes on, the more I’m beginning to think that the entire thing is a straight up fabrication. There was no party. There was no “assault”. Nothing happened. As an activist #RESIST prof, she sat down with some Dem Operatives and cooked up a story with just enough details to sound ominous, but completely vague and unprovable. After all, the whole point of this was to at worst, cause the spineless Pubs to move the vote until after the midterms and, at best, cause Kavanaugh to withdraw.
She should publish her story in Rolling Stone. They accept fiction.
Ed Whelan’s insistence yesterday is straight-up bizarre. Like, if I didn’t know better (and I don’t), I’d think he’d had it with playing it straight and narrow and decided to feed the left’s batshit inanity back to them.
He acts like he knows of stone-cold evidence that will bury the accusations. Which I can’t imagine what that would be, short of someone coming forward and saying he and his buddy attempt to rape her at a party in the Maryland suburbs that summer the way she described, so it actually happened, but she is mistaken that it was Kavanaugh, probably because she was drunk off her 15 year old ass.
She is some piece of shit. These psychology majors are idiots.
OT:
We have have a 3rd year psychology major at Boise State who babysits…eerrrrr mentors the retarded at work. She was cute and I chatted her up re: psycholgy. Tl;Dr… She didn’t know what either cognitive dissonance or confirmation bias was. I told her she needed to sue the school and get her money back.
Just fuck her and move on.
Then she’d know what cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias was.
Psychology is the everyman’s major. It’s basically what you choose when you have no idea what you want to do after college.
Communications is the major for people who aren’t good enough at math to enter Psychology.
Ponder that on the Tree of Woe.
Then at my U, for those who couldn’t cut it even in Communications, ended up in “Family Studies”. Still not sure what exactly they learned…
If this was anytime recent I’m going to guess it was “Families are evil, oppress women and minorities, go communism!”
You went to Mines, right? What the hell are they doing with a Family Studies program?
Washouts were attracting the Title IX harpies?
Undergrad: U of Arizona.
Family Studies was for the athletes and their groupies.
Ah, I see.
Still not sure what exactly they learned…
Making babies with other comm class washouts?
Generally, when you get to the bottom of that slide, you end up in ‘Education’.
Sociology is a hard science. I know, it was really tough.
You forgot Education majors.
Ed majors usually know that they want to teach. Your average Psych major may be brighter, but you ask him or her what they want to do after college and it’s usually “*shrugs* I dunno. Maybe a non-profit?”
I thought real teachers were people like you. Get a Phd in a real subject then take a few Ed classes to get in the door.
The straight up Ed majors I knew in school were…special. I tutored a bunch on them through trig and algebra.
This is true. “Early Childhood” especially.
The straight up Ed majors I knew in school were…special.
The Ed majors at Purdue were the first in line at the bars every weeknight, easy, and dumb as a box of rocks. Psych and poli Sci weren’t too far behind, but at least there were ways to find some academic rigor in those departments if you looked for them.
My wife was an Ed major, and she eventually got her PhD in it. She was an Art History major for about a semester until her mom, a teacher, let her know that she’d have about two weeks after she graduated before her stuff would be in boxes and her room would be given to her younger sister, and that no, the couch was not an option.
Oh, you’ve met my brother?
I was hoping that you wouldn’t bring that up.
“Business Administration” would like a word.
Oi, crabcakes! Plenty of smart folks in Business Administration who have some sort of plan. Particularly the ones focusing on finance (I’ve got a B.S.B.A. – finance/MIS). Your comparison with Communications majors wounds me, sir.
To be fair, I’m reaching back to the early 90s when I was in school. It was a cliche that every other idiot you met had that major. Maybe times have changed 🙂
I went to a school whose name ended in “Institute of Technology”. We picked on the liberal arts majors because who goes to a tech school for liberal arts?
Was it RIT?
Yes.
Or, as we used to joke, the “South Henrietta” Institute of Technology.
Yeah, that campus might as well be in Iowa for all it has to do with Rochester. Good school, though.
Like English majors at Virginia Tech, yeah.
Much as I make fun of it, VT is a very good school for engineering or computer science. Anything else – lulz.
That’s when I was in school as well – likely depends on the school, though I’m sure there were plenty of idiots with that major, just not in the honors finance classes 😉
I know a guy who went to Carnegie Mellon – for Drama.
(I also have a friend who went to MIT for Economics, but that’s not quite as jarring)
MIT is one of the very best schools in the world to study economics.
My SIL, having racked up thirty grand in student loans, and in the years since graduating having paid it down to thirty-six grand, is back in school for business admin. Her latest employment prospect is real estate. Not the land developer kind.
My SIL, having racked up thirty grand in student loans, and in the years since graduating having paid it down to thirty-six grand,
*perks up ears, cocks head quizzically*
As far as I’m aware she’s been sitting on the debt, racking up the interest, and making piddling little payments now and again.
All that unpaid interest probably capitalized.
MIT is one of the very best schools in the world to study economics.
Yep, I know that but I’m professionally conditioned to think it’s all just EECS. Though, granted, my co-worker was AeroAstro.
Fun fact – a sometimes drinking buddy has 3 degrees from MIT and had both Marvin Minsky and Noam Chomsky as professors.
I thought history was the everyman’s major?
Poli Sci checking in…
Mine was actually Foreign Affairs, because 19 year old me somehow thought that was more useful than mere history. Oh well.
Yeah, I thought that focusing on IR classes at a state school would translate into a career involving strategic foreign policy analysis, which is why I’m a web developer for said state school working on an MBA and have a hell of a lot of experience in the restaurant industry.
They are both majors for chicks seeking an MRS. degree in college.
If they don’t like speaking in public, they major in psych. If they can’t stop talking, they major in communications. If they are rich and don’t like public speaking, and are hot in a mousy way, they major in Art History.
Sounds like the same gal a friend of mine spoke with at a party in Eagle. She was spouting typically proggy stuff so he politely started asking her questions that would require knowing something about the subjects she was ranting about. She locked up and couldn’t respond. He soon gave up and moved on.
— Christine Blasey Ford
— Cristina King Miranda
Have we amended the three-name rule now to include people that aren’t accused of spree/serial murder?
She was “empowered”? What, with cabernet? I sincerely hope this woman doesn’t expect anyone to sympathize with her having to be accountable for accusing someone of rape just because she got cocky on Facebook and wanted to grab some attention dollars.
You know she was thinking “I was so much cuter than her when we were in high school. If anyone was going to get raped, it would have been me! Not that skank” as she tried to crowd her way into the limelight.
I like that she posts this enormous letter on Facebook stating in no uncertain terms that she has first-hand knowledge that Kavanaugh raped this woman, and then goes on multiple social media outlets to insist that she had absolutely no idea anyone would actually pay attention to her and she has nothing more to say on the topic. I’m going to guess that within a week she’ll be doing interviews talking about how the attention she’s received as a result has traumatized her, and she’ll be writing a book on the topic within the year.
Complete with “right wing” “death threats” against her and her family.
The only way I am certain no punches will be thrown is when someone announces that he’s “going to kick my ass.”
Conversely, the squashings I’ve taken were delivered sans preamble.
With these people it is the end justifies the means. And when you have lived in a bubble where nobody previously challenged your bullshit and thus you got away with telling the most ludicrous nonsense in pursuit of the narrative/cause, they are hard pressed when suddenly even with team blue playing goalie for them, others are asking for real proof.
My hope is that this incident does to the #MeToo movement exactly what the constant calls of racism for no real reasons did to the racism peddling pirates and their movement and makes the whole thing irrelevant.
Ha! This digging to everyone’s high school awkward encounters is fun. Corey Booker is an admitted teen groper, although I have serious doubts about his friend being a female.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/20/bookers-push-for-kavanaugh-vote-delay-called-out-over-his-1992-column-detailing-teenage-groping.html
clearly attempted rape and she feels like he tried to kill her.
Booker is such a blithering idiot, even by Senate standards.
He’s in the running for dumbest congresscritter and that’s saying a lot.
I AM SPARTACUS!
Easy you guys, he’s gonna be our President some day.
/His Turn
You are correct. My God, that is a low bar. He has to have excavating equipment to get under it.
And not only is he dimwitted, he’s dimwitted in such a buffoonish, embarrassing way.
OK. So what you’re saying is that the actions of the man in the years after high school are what are important. I agree.
Senator Booker’s experience working to help rape…survivors.
That is some phrasing.
This seems like as good of a place as any. A few weeks ago I was randomly included on a group text involving a lot of numbers I did not recognize from the LA area. The only message was “me too.” This freaked me out because I know exactly one person in LA
I’ve been getting local numbers call and when I call back the people say their number is being spoofed and no one can help them. That’s got to be annoying.
I used to be one of the numbers spoofed by scammers.
They stopped using mine for some reason. But they still make spam calls to me, despite never getting anything out of me.
I hate whoever invented the robodialer.
That sucks. There has to be some way to stop that stuff. Not really a big deal in the grand scheme, but definitely irritating.
Basically if it’s not someone on my contact list, and I’m not expecting a call, I let it go to voicemail.
That’s what I’ve resorted to. I get on average 1-2 spam calls per day. And they are almost always from a local number.
Mine are usually from the same area code as my phone… I don’t live there anymore, so they stand out from the people who have cause to call me but are not on my contact list.
Yeah, I should clarify “local”. Same area code and prefix as my phone number…which is for a town about 50 miles away from where I currently live. So same deal; they stick out.
I get calls that start with my Prefix, I don’t know anyone with the same one , so, spam….
Once upon a time, those first three were your exchange number. So they were supposed to belong to your nearby neighbors.
My exchange number is used for verizon cell phones in my phone’s area code. The only cells in that area code that would be calling me are people already in my contacts.
741 prefix for life, homie!!!
Honestly, spoofing phone numbers should be illegal. It’s a form of fraud.
*waits to have his libertarian patches ripped off his uniform, his monocle smashed and his top hat stomped on*
#I Stand with (Not) Adahn
Continued…
with my cell number: I used to date a girl who is a hardcore California Progressive who, after I broke up with her, sent me an email telling me how that one time she blew me in my parents’ hot tub was the most degrading thing she had ever done.*
*Apparently more degrading than banging multiple dudes in one night to get back at some other dude while she was in college.
So . . . still have her number? Asking for a li’l friend.
No, my wife saw to that…
But, I am still connected to her gmail calendar somehow (I’m way to lazy to disable it) and keep getting reminders for various La Raza events.
So her “degrading” statement is probably out of date now.
Dude, you don’t have a player phone? Talk about whipped!
*From a guy who can barely use his own phone.
Letting your parents watch was probably what pushed it over the line.
She sounds like a sweetheart.
We met in DC and she was probably only like a 6 on Prog scale at the time but then when she moved back out to CA for law school she went of the rails. Her parents hated that she was dating some white dude from South Carolina that did not attend an Ivy.
I imagine the progginess is a symptom of personality type. Progressive politics doesnt attract the best kind of people. She was spiteful and vindictive enough to call you and try to hurt your feelings with something that petty? You are lucky she is out of your life before she could do any real damage.
6 on the DC Prog scale, or 6 by normal standards?
Prog scale
1 – R
2 – Re
3 – Ree
4 – Reee
5 – Reeee
6 – Reeeee
7- Reeeeee
8 – Reeeeeee
9 – Reeeeeeee
10 – No one has survived this amount of Ree
I dated one of those 10s… Left as soon as she started asking me to punch her during sex.
Not your fault she left early.
Thanks again for taking the time to write this series Suthen.
Thank you Sean. It has been a real pleasure. Thank everyone for taking the time to read and comment.
You purchased the Springfield 911 correct?
After shooting the Sig p238 and liking it, the Springfield 911 is now on my radar.
You got one with and without the laser correct?
How is the laser working out for you?
Yup, got em both. The lasergrips are nice, but a little thicker than the regular grips at the safety and makes it just a bit awkward to disengage. I probably wouldn’t have even noticed if I didn’t have them side by side to compare.
Nice essay.
“Heavier bullets generate more recoil than light ones.” I know what you mean: it takes more juice to propel a heavy bullet to any given velocity. But, in and of itself, the bullet contributes nothing to the recoil other than helping one empirically derive that value. I guess I just wouldn’t want anyone to think that by simply switching a cartridge recipe to a lighter bullet that the same powder charge would then miraculously produce less recoil.
stop a 1 ton weight in free fall, it still weighs a ton….
something like that?
High school physics. Force = Mass X Accelleration. and Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
The question is whether you get proportionally more accelleration with a lighter bullet with the same powder charge. That starts to bring in additional questions including friction. But if you’re loading to a consistant velocity, then yes, lobbing a greater mass will generate greater recoil. If your loading to a consistant charge, maybe not. You could put what is effectively a blank in there and get very light recoil because the poweder is all burning up but throwing nothing but the mass of the powder and a wax plug out the barrel.
Thank you. I didn’t quite follow you Don, but Uncivil put it perfectly.
Right; here E = .5mv^2 is probably more the point
and yes, at some short enough barrel length, the charge would still be burning are the bullet left the muzzle, so there are theoretical thresholds and combinations of recipe and barrel for which my comment would not apply. In a suitably long barrel, X drams of Old Number 13 powder will create so much heat, so much expansion, but the inertia of the bullet counts for a lot: the heavier bullet would achieve a lower muzzle velocity, and the resulting muzzle energy (and corresponding recoil) would be about the same. That’s the simple way of thinking about it.
I’m always reading here that you don’t really need calculus to be a (useful, practicing) engineer, so I’ll point out that yes, yes you do, and this the perfect example of why. E = .5mv^2 is the calculation (integral calculus right there! but that’s not a big deal at all) for a single place/moment/speed, in this case at the muzzle. But there are all kinds of time-dependent changes going on in this system, and only by integrating PdV or VdP (too bloody to go into) can you model the energy delivered to the bullet by the combustion (hint: compressibility matters, but let’s leave thermo out of this for today). If you test-fired the same powder load with different bullet weights, you’d get a small map on the muzzle energy plot (as a function of weight); it wouldn’t be linear, and the curvature in the data would be attributable (neglecting measurement error) to the differences in the areas under the curves for the bloody integration (there’s the big calculus deal in this case).
I get the impression you are thinking of a the powder charge being fixed and I am thinking of the velocity being fixed. I am thinking that way because changing bullet weight and keeping the velocity constant requires changing powders or powder weight.
I stipulated that: “it takes more juice to propel a heavy bullet to any given velocity.”
Also you are looking at terminal energy, I was talking initial energy.
Your equation uses velocity while the one Uncivil posted uses acceleration.
The second is more useful for calculating recoil. The first more useful for calculating terminal bullet energy.
*scratches head*
I hadn’t counted on these articles being so popular. I thought they would put everyone to sleep. I was just trying to give material to the site in case of down time.
Now I am thinking of three more: bullet casting, accurizing rifle ammo, internal – in flight – terminal ballistics
“I guess I just wouldn’t want anyone to think that by simply switching a cartridge recipe to a lighter bullet that the same powder charge would then miraculously produce less recoil.” To the extent that I was commenting on different bullet weights, I implied that the powder charge would be constant.
Later: “the same powder load with different bullet weights”
This stuff doesn’t lend itself to light text blocks. Ideally, I’d write it all out like a dynamics lecture.
“Muzzle” is pretty much “maximum” if that’s what you mean by “terminal.” E = .5mv^2 is the calculation (integral calculus right there! but that’s not a big deal at all) for a single place/moment/speed, in this case at the muzzle.”
ugh…hit Reply too early
“Muzzle” is pretty much “maximum” if that’s what you mean by “terminal.” I wrote: “E = .5mv^2 is the calculation (integral calculus right there! but that’s not a big deal at all) for a single place/moment/speed, in this case at the muzzle” because we were addressing recoil.
But later I note that the single point isn’t perfectly useful for describing how the energy is delivered TO the bullet. So I wrote this long fun piece about the math when all I wanted folks to know is that this doesn’t work: “simply switching a cartridge recipe to a lighter bullet (at) the same powder charge …..miraculously produces less recoil.”
This is starting to look like one of John or Hihn’s “then you said X but I never even referred to X so…..”
Your equation would apply nicely for calculating bullet energy on striking the target at muzzle or any at distance. The old fashioned way to measure terminal energy was to suspend a log horizontally and shoot into the end of it then measure how far it moved.
What keeps popping in my head is a conversation I had years ago with a guy that was convinced 30-06 was the perfect cartridge for any medium game. Any other cartridge was just blasphemy to him. He was offended by the 30-30 I was carrying. We sat down on a log and he gave me a long lecture on the superiority of the 30-06. My contribution to the conversation was 6 words.
“The deer can’t tell the difference”
“This is starting to look like one of John or Hihn’s “then you said X but I never even referred to X so…..”
Meh. This is exactly the kind of discussion gun people live for. I can talk about this all day. I can also listen all day. I never learned anything by talking.
Thanks for forgiving.
What I was saying was that, for a given powder charge, you can change the bullet quite a bit and the distance that the log moves won’t materially change.
There is nothing to forgive. Like I said, I can talk all day about this stuff. The more detailed you get into the subject the more you find that everyone has their own take.
I took my daughter out to teach her to shoot last night. She did pretty well for a first time shooter. We started with my Springfield EMP 4 and moved to the Sign p238 and p938. She handled the p938 pretty well.
So other that FYTW, is there any technical reason that 380 ammo costs 50% more than 9 mm?
Demand, i should think.
Fewer shooters, lower demand, less surplus military ammo undercutting retail.
Yep – anything that was a standard military cartridge was produced in the tens of millions annually.
Economy of scale. Not many people shoot 380 in large quantities. A few pops at the range and then back in the nightstand/under car seat/glovebox…wherever.
9mm is a very popular round for shooting in large quantities so they manufacture and sell a great many more.
I buy 45 auto mag brass at a much higher price than 45 acp. By much I mean multiple times the price per 45acp. Except for a quarter of an inch or so in length the cartridges are identical.
thanks all.
that was what I suspect, but I need to “mansplain” this to my wife.
Online you can probably find .380 a lot cheaper than the stores.
https://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/category/categoryId/25
I’m thinking about a rifle next year. The cool new calibers like 6.5. Creedmor are tempting, but a $1 a shot for decent ammo, and no possibly of finding more in a real crisis gives me pause. I might go for .308 instead.
https://www.sgammo.com/catalog/pistol-ammo-sale/380-auto-ammo
Fiocchi @ $.22/rd
Nice ammo too. I bought a case of it recently.
My next purchase will be a rifle in .357 Mag. That way I have a rifle and a handgun in a very popular caliber. If the shit were ever to hit the fan, I figure a rifle and handgun in the same caliber would be very useful. And since they will both accept .357 mag and .38 special, finding ammo will hopefully be much easier than some other calibers.
I get it. IIRC, .44-40 was the cowboy version of this.
But I just don’t know about it. The beauty of a rifle is foot-pounds: one shot = one kill; the rounds that qualify just can’t be shot in a pistol because it’s three times the energy.
If you’re looking for portability (the point of the pistol), why not just skip the pistol entirely and just tote a carbine that packs the punch you need (say, in 300 Savage). If handy ammo is the case, then AR15 (I’m not an AR guy, but it closes the case).
If you insist on the cowboy combo, at least go 44Mag?
Oh, I know it’s not an ideal rifle round. And I already I have a “proper” rifle (.243). One ammo for both appeals to me. And again, they’ll both shoot two different, very popular rounds.
I considered .44 mag, but it seemed like overkill. (both in terms of recoil and $$) Of the readily available options, .38/.357 seemed like the logical answer. One reason being is that I can plink with the cheaper .38’s but can go to the more powerful .357s when the Zombie Apocalypse happens. And if some sort of “oh shit” situation happened, I could grab two guns and one box of ammo and get the fuck out.
I actually first looked for .243 pistols, but single shot didn’t appeal to me.
For what your considerations you made the right choice. 357 is adequate firepower. I am assuming you are looking at a lever action rifle? That would be a good choice as they are notoriously reliable workhorses and easy to clear jams.
Still….I am with Don. My preferred combo is 44mag, but then I have several thousand rounds already loaded up at a small fraction of over the counter ammo.
Yep. Lever action. I haven’t looked very seriously yet, but it seems like my best choices are Henry, Marlin, or Remington.
Yeah, I won’t argue that 44mag would perform better in the rifle, but 357mag made more sense in my mind, for me. Like you said, it is still adequate firepower. And it’s not like I am planning on taking it bear or elk hunting.
I also thought the 357mag revolver would be a little more concealable. I’m not saying it’s a CC gun, but it wasn’t as large as the 44mag revolvers I saw. (I’ll admit, I didn’t look at a lot…I settled on .357 pretty quickly)
308….wise choice. Buy in bulk, one case for the closet ICOE and one for the range.
If the shit really hits the fan you can probably find it just laying around.
Economy of scale?
380 also not available at Walmart.
Really? I used to buy it by the bulk box there before the last great ammo shortage.
Kinnath; keep an eye out for Remington UMC “Mega Pack”. 250 rounds of .380 is the same price as 9mm.
.380 != 380
You got a cite for that? I’ve only every heard of one ‘380’ or ‘.380’ and that was .380 ACP.
380 ACP is for a little purse gun, like a Ruger LCP (um, like mine) and .380 is not.
Source: Mistakenly bought .380 ammo that was way too big for my little peashooter; have been urged to mistakenly buy a .38 and not tell my husband.
Generally, I hear 38 for 38 Special and 380 for 380 ACP. I have never heard anyone use .380 as short hand for 38 Special.
^this^
My mistake.
I made the same mistake several times in one of my first conversations while looking at pistols in the shop at the range.
The guy at range kept politely saying “380” when I said “38” without actually calling me an idiot.
Lingo is everything; special luger magnum parabellum H&H….it goes on an on.
And your 5.7 liter Chevy is more than a few cc off of that; advertising is everything, it seems.
Further, a .38Spl bullet is 0.357 and, IIRC, a .380ACP bullet is 0.355.
.380 = 380
.38 Special is .38 special
I’m still learning, sorry.
Never apologize.
🙂
You have to start somewhere.
I solved the problem by buying a 9 MM pistol.
I do regret the purchase, tbh, and wish I’d gone with a 9mm.
Don’t regret it.
Just buy another one. 😉
My wife and I will probably buy Sig p238s or Springfield 911s this fall. It fills a niche.
I have six or seven different sized hammers at home. Tools have purposes, and tools are specialized to each particular purpose.
You probably didn’t spend a whole lot, got a very concealable gun and learned about shooting and your tastes in handguns. All good.
As Colion Noir points out – you’ll never be satisfied with one gun – you’ll always be looking for the next gun.
Get an .88 Magnum.
It shoots thru schools.
It’s 9mm Kurtz
The horror…
I think the same thing every time I read 9mm Kurtz!
Oops. Blockquote fail.
Luger was only a Lieutenant, Kurz was a Colonel.
Actually given our #metoo moment a better joke would be:
People pay a premium for 17 over 19
If were talking about plastic guns, then it gets really expensive at 16.
But where can I get the high capacity magazine clips for my ghost gun?
Are we tallking fully automatic magazine clips, fully semiautomatic, or are you planning to use automatic rounds?
OT: Can’t have totalitarianism without eliminating due process.
https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2018/09/20/circus-around-kavanaugh-accusations-expose-extraordinary-sexism-left/
They’re just applying the same divide and conquer strategy as the one that they’re using to destroy race relations in America. It’s been spectacularly successful for them so why stop now.
OT: Those Soviet tactics are oldies, but goodies.
https://www.thelocal.fr/20180920/french-far-right-marine-le-pen-told-to-visit-psychiatrist
that would fuel the populist revolt, i’d think.
I don’t reload but this was a very informative series regardless. Nice work, Suthen.
Same for me. I don’t reload, and right now I don’t think I ever will, but I have really enjoyed this series.
HOLY SHIT!
bah….cont…..WAPO DONE GOT THE GOODS ON KAVANAUGH NOW! He’s dead in the water.
I just have to keep scratching my head – how is it that so many people are so convinced that the press is heavily slanted towards one side??
Walking past the men’s dorms on the ASU campus one day . . .
Plastered across several windows on the top floor . . .
F C K all that’s missing is you.
This is your brain on testosterone.
The press has apparently disavowed all knowledge of being young.
Now, there’s a deadly outbreak of the vapors over this, from ODU a few years ago.
That story about DKE actually makes me like Kavanaugh more.
I’m trying to remember back to my college days, I think DKE was a real bunch of rednecks. But I can’t remember worth a shit.
We had one at my school called TKE which was where all the, uh, scoundrels pledged. I had the misfortunate of being suite-mates with one of them.
“‘But hey,’” he told the female student, according to the letter. “‘Your panties might be here!”
Well played, frat boy.
I encourage them to keep it up. They are turning into the lunatic fringe.
Hang on…are you telling me that even as far back as the ’80s young men were doing stupid shit because they thought it was funny? GET. OUT.
LOL OK then.
But he associated with these fellows! He probably had fun with these hooligans! Obviously a monster.
That doesn’t matter, because shut up.
He’s the type of guy who would do that, so probably he did. Now don’t come to my door asking for details.
The nanny-state scolds really are trying to take over.
I see zero comments on that article
During Brett Kavanaugh’s time as an undergrad at Yale, his fraternity, DKE, marched across campus waving a flag woven from women’s underwear,
As a former frat boy, I’m about 90+% certain that “his fraternity” didn’t march across campus, etc.; the pledges did. Which would explain why he’s not in the picture if he was a full member of the frat at the time. Frats vary, of course, but the pledge class is usually run by one or two pledgemasters who cook up stunts like this for the pledges to do. The rest of the members may not even know about it, although many stunts are hallowed traditions that everybody did when they were pledging.
Yeah. You can tell because the kid (at the time) shrugged and said he didn’t make it, they just told him to carry it around. His quip was solid gold.
Sorry about that. Must have been something I ate last night.
Kavanaugh is no libertarian, but this is funny:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dngm4DSXsAAenm4.jpg
No means yes, yes means anal.
“spoofing phone numbers should be illegal”
I patiently block those numbers since it’s easy on my phone. So, at some point, there will be people getting “new” numbers for new phones/accounts that already have a huge population of recipients that have blocked them; at some point, some legitimate caller won’t be able to get through to someone because of this.
So when do we abandon/stretch the +XXX (XXX) XXX-XXXX format? When do we start using “phone” “numbers” with dollar signs and ampersands and such in them?
I also suddenly remember that the gunsmith in my home town was XXX-3030. Checking, I see that the place has closed, and I can’t help but wonder how many times a week the new guy with the number gets calls from gun nuts.
when do we abandon/stretch the +XXX (XXX) XXX-XXXX format?
Man, that’s an awful lot of porn.
I can’t type 357$22&380 on my rotary phone.
If anyone has a rotary phone, it would be UnCiv.
Technically… it’s in the basement and not even hooked to the PSTN
First wife loathed my refusal to pay the $2 per month for tone dialing, so our phones were switched to “pulse” and she had to wait for the number keyed to be translated into the old surging signals
So when do we abandon/stretch the +XXX (XXX) XXX-XXXX format?
Considering that format has enough room for ten billion numbers per country, I’ll bet we stick to it for a long while yet.
I can count, but I can’t guess how many applications for numbers will arise. Faxes came and went, the main driver as far as I know for new area codes in a recent decade. I figured one of the fancy programmer types here would foresee how the IOT phenomenon might bleed over into a corresponding drive for more phone numbers.
I get this stuff wrong; I’m a late adapter and prefer shifting my own gears; the last time I was right about any of this was my laughing off the “PDA” since I figured the integration of email, phone, calendars, and address books was right around the corner.
OT: Florida Man.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article218723835.html
Um. well, ok then.
I. Uh. Hmm. Did the guys think he was a woman? Did they not notice the swinging bell sack?
An indictment, filed by prosecutors Cary Aronovitz and Mona Sedky, lists three victims related to his operation of “StraightBoyz.” The site promised gay men videos of real straight men being conned into accepting sex acts, all while blindfolded or wearing blacked-out goggles.
I read…most of the article.
Uh oh…
Must post this classic
https://www.theonion.com/why-do-all-these-homosexuals-keep-sucking-my-cock-1819583529
Oldie but goodie…
Eeeewww!
/teenage girl
OT Greedy corporations edition: I mentioned my daughter was in intensive feeding therapy a few weeks back. The doctor had my wife bring our blender last week, then declared it unusable for the task.
Blendtec just shipped us a commercial grade blender for $50 as part of their medical necessity program. Sure its a refurb and only comes with a 3 yr warranty instead of 8. But now I can blend iphones.
In case anyone from blendtec is searching for comments on the internet, that title was sarcasm. You guys are awesome.
That’s really cool of them. Blendtec is the “Will It Blend” people, right?
The answer is yes.
Ooo…don’t breathe that.
Whoa. Those things are 1000 bucks.
You are right, blendtec is awesome. I might have to buy one of their blenders just because they did that. I have been sorta thinking about a new blender lately…
I think this model may be 450 bucks new. Not exactly sure which model we are getting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M71dxHFD3-U
But now I can blend iphones.
I thought if you put an iphone in a blender the iphone got recharged, like, superfast. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
This set of articles should be in a permanent link if they aren’t already. One of the most useful series we’ve had here. Thanks again, Suthen.
Great article Suthen, I always learn new cool stuff about Gun Technology. The whole Metallurgy thing is fascinating,
https://archive.is/cpVaC/5382d1e0ec3ef863775abe9d23acedb995a87570
https://archive.is/cpVaC/220a0a2d9d1d5b98dc88b415a04485679d016b4b
https://archive.is/cpVaC/2260699a0e2ca0dab7ee634d8b1051634b6e5212
https://archive.is/cpVaC/a4f63141599638bb9458d625310af17fdf613406
https://archive.is/cpVaC/b3a23280b9b22b1fd0f22997e0b2f40f559762e9
https://archive.is/wBaYd/c7285e7d08c74c514165576e00d9a0db4b0c0e41
https://archive.is/wBaYd/7495e06e08ba6b309baf9754793f5a4afecb8fe1
WTF…
Oy. I’d be powerless against her.
Which one of you bastards did this?
I’m sure you are able to fuck up links without any of our help.