Thursday Morning Links

I hope y’all had a nice Fourth of July. It rained here pretty much the entire day and downtown flooded, as usual. But today looks a little better.

ESPN showed how much they care about their readership when they turned off comments without any explanation a couple days ago.  So now I think I’ll seek out my basic sports (scores and quick headlines) somewhere else.  Let me know in the comments where I should go. (Note: I do not want to go somewhere where I have to scroll for a mile to get past the hundred videos they have of their talking heads yammering on about a trade deal, new shoe release, etc before getting to the actual game scores and recaps.) And on that note, Boston, the Yankees, Cubs, Indians, Dodgers, Cardinals, Astros, Marlins, Phillies, Athletics, Angels, Brewers, Reds (they’re on fire!), Mets, and Rockies won. Wimbledon has a few good matches today. I recommend tuning in if you can.  No soccer until tomorrow.

Barnum employees

If you were born on this date, you share the day with such famous and infamous folks as: Mary Walcott (accuser at Salem witch trials and herself probably a witch), Admiral David Farragut (of “damn the torpedoes!” fame), genius entrepreneur P.T. Barnum, inventor of tree-ring dating A.E. Douglass, football coach John McKay, musician Robbie Robertson, rocker Huey Lewis, pitcher Goose Gossage, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki, Wu-Tang member RZA, (too) skinny person Eva Green, and Dolly The Sheep.

Its also the day Newton’s Principia was published, the USA beat the Limeys and Canadians at Chippewa, Ontario (and should have kept the place as a trophy), FDR signed the NLRA (like a good socialist), the famous tank Battle of Kursk began, Ian Fleming graduated from spy school, the bikini made its debut in Paris, Israel passed the “Law Of Return”, William Shockley invented the junction transistor, that creator of billionaires Robert Mugabe was re-elected and “Seinfeld” debuted on NBC.

Hope that suffices for needless stuff.  Now we can do…the links!

Coming soon to NYC: rape workers peacekeepers!

Rather than simply allowing the people to arm and defend themselves, New York City will be rolling out buses of “peacekeepers” in the wake of spreading violence in the city. I guess personal responsibility truly is dead in that town.

That brave person who scaled the Statue Of Liberty most likely has a screw loose and an unhealthy obsession with Donald Trump. Shocking, I know.

Angela Merkel warns of a worldwide financial crisis if Trump presses NATO. You know, we should stop this insanity and go ahead and pull all of our troops out of Germany, Italy and elsewhere in Europe if their nations don’t want to pay the required percentage of their economy to the organization.  Its high time they paid their fair share as outlined in the charter rather than keep letting us piss our money away defending their lazy asses.  Same goes for the United Nations.

Can’t it be both, hippie?

Well, at least these yo-yos are smart enough to do this in Oakland instead of a Texas city.  Christ, what a bunch of assholes.

Michael Avenetti eyes White House. He says he will run if there is no other candidate “that has a real chance of beating” Trump.  Well, he should start getting those PACs together, because unless the entire nation takes socialist crazy pills and buys their bullshit, I don’t see the Dems coming back to the political center.

Orlando group pushes for more “diversity” in medical marijuana business. They go into the barriers to entry and the steep startup costs including licensing fees and compliance costs.  Unfortunately it never occurs to any of these people that they are essentially asking the government for handouts rather than calling for free market solutions to a problem created by the government themselves.  Maybe they’ll catch it the next time it flies by, but I doubt it.

Kim Dotcom has lost his appeal and will be extradited to the United States. His crime: creating a website that people used freely to conduct their own business he knew nothing about. As a side note, he never visited or resided in the United States and his business was never incorporated there. How’s that for justice?

I’m not saying it was aliens, but it was…holy shit, it was fireflies!

I’ll just copy this headline word for word: Bath salts land two in jail for shooting at ‘alien lasers’ that were really fireflies, police say  Ok then!

Local death penalty trial resumes in Houston in “honor killings” case. I know there are some anti-death penalty people here, but I ain’t one of them. I hope they cook that fucker after he’s found guilty.

I went deeper in the catalog than most of you would have expected. Hope you enjoy.

Give em hell, friends!

Comments

444 responses to “Thursday Morning Links”

  1. Slammer

    The Athletic is very good. Subscription, though

    1. straffinrun

      Guess that makes you…

      an Athletic supporter.

      1. Slammer

        +1 IcyHot

        1. “Shit, we forgot to practice.”

    2. Evan from Evansville

      I’m doing the free month subscription. I have been incredibly impressed. Outstanding stuff and no bullshit.

      They will be paid by me to further suck my Cubs boner when the free-trial ends.

    3. Ayn Random Variation

      Hmm, I never pay for internet content but that is very tempting. I’ll try the free trial. Thanks

      1. Slammer

        It’s worth it to me. I subscribe to very few things, but so far I’m very pleased.

    4. Juvenile Bluster

      The Athletic is 100% worth the subscription price. It’s the only sports content I read nowadays.

    5. Tundra

      I love the Athletic. By far the best sports site I’ve ever read. Amazing hockey content.

      And no fucking politics.

  2. >>As a side note, he never visited or resided in the United States and his business was never incorporated there. How’s that for justice?

    How exactly does that work?

    1. I’m pretty sure they used the FYTW Exemption to national sovereignty laws.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Lots of Fuck You’s That’s How

    3. cyto

      Yeah, that one is shocking to me – and once again nobody in the media seems to be interested.

      I suppose the nexus is “harm to US copyright interests”. But as you ask, how does that work? I don’t see the US indicting Chinese copyright and trademark infringing people. They file complaints and objections with various governments and agencies like the WTO.

      Then again, maybe it is more like a foreign drug kingpin. The US goes directly after those guys. But I think the theory there is that there is a large criminal conspiracy that extends into the US, committing crimes in the US against US citizens.

      Much more difficult to make that argument with “set up a website in another country that US citizens could access or that could host US copyright materials”.

      1. But in this case, it would be like going after Cessna instead of the drug kingpin who used Cessna planes to fly drugs into the US.

      2. ElspethFlashman

        Yes, it’s like the loosest of “contacts” with the jurisdiction . . . think International Shoe with thoughts of doing crime in the jurisdiction as being enough “contact” to bring a defendant to court.

        1. A Leap at the Wheel

          Plus, wasn’t International Shoe an issue about interstate, not internation, contact?

          1. ElspethFlashman

            Yes, it was – but it’s the same sort of stretch, in my opinion.

      3. Count Potato

        Copyright is mostly bullshit in the first place.

  3. Not an Economist

    Damn the links, full speed ahead!!!!

  4. >>I hope y’all had a nice Fourth of July.

    It was a great day – except for the full-on night battle that was happening outside my house. Oh wait, it was the neighbors blowing off fireworks until ?? whenever I finally passed out.

    1. Shit was that way here too. We drifted off around 10:30 and they were still shooting them off like crazy.

    2. Drake

      Last night did sound like there was a pretty good battle going on in the neighborhood. The son and and went out and contributed a few rockets to the firefight.

      1. Bobarian LMD

        This past Saturday, my neighbor must have burnt up thousands of dollars.

        He had shit one step down from the professionals, and went for about 45 minutes.

        I’m glad he did it then and not last night (which was still noisy).

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Where is that?

        1. straffinrun

          No idea. Just found it online today.

      2. Bob Boberson

        Without government we wouldn’t have nice things like parks…..or arbitarary rules handed down from some asshole bureaucrat that prohibit any enjoyment you might derive from them.

      3. “Why does no one get together in the park for the holiday?”

        “We should commission a study for $100,000 to find out.”

    3. Ayn Random Variation

      Went to see Snoop in Jersey City. Luckily all of the reports of 200k gangbangers showing up must have scared a lot of people away, so it wasn’t as crowded as anticipated

    4. Juvenile Bluster

      They were still going near me when I finally fell asleep at 12:30.

      Seriously, people. I can understand you setting off fireworks, but 10 PM is the limit. Any later than that and I hope you blow off a hand.

      1. Jarflax

        It doesn’t even get dark until almost 10 this time of year. What do you guys want? Firework’s from 9:45 till 10?

        1. Set them all off at once – the biggest blast!

    5. A Leap at the Wheel

      Had a great day. Took the whole day off. Got in a work out with with my 8 year old kid, played some video games, grilled some brats, read a bunch of comic books* and own a pet who’s terrified of the vacuum cleaner and lightning but not fireworks.

      *thanks for the rec to check out Comixology Unlimited. The selection is much, much better than when I checked it out when it first rolled out. Currently working my way through Atomic Robo.

  5. Drake

    Working at home today so MLB Channel’s Quick Pitch is on. Good analysis and highlights, local announcers on the the videos. None of the politics like ESPN or filler with sports nobody cares about like WNBA or soccer.

    1. Bobarian LMD

      Yeah, but it does cover one sport nobody cares about.

      1. Drake

        It’s the only professional sport I have even mild interest in any longer.

  6. straffinrun

    Ali Mahwood-Awad Irsan, 60, a Jordanian immigrant and fervent Muslim, is accused of killing his son-in-law, Cooty Beavers, 28

    His daughter is responsible for that nickname?

    1. It’s Coty. Sorry to burst your funny name bubble.

  7. The Late P Brooks

    How exactly does that work?

    That’s a rhetorical question, right?

  8. Old Man With Candy

    William Shockley invented the junction transistor

    Bardeen and Brattain were chopped liver?

    1. I just report what I read. Shockley was in charge of the workgroup, so I guess he gets top billing.

      1. trshmnstr

        IIRC, he also got the math named after him, too.

        1. trshmnstr

          Yup.

    2. Brett L

      Wasn’t it an honest dual independent invention like calculus?

      1. Old Man With Candy

        No, Bardeen and Brattain worked for Shockley. If memory serves, they shared the Nobel with him.

        1. Brett L

          Huh. For some reason I thought the TI team was first by a couple of days and some other team had basically started down the same path at Bell Labs. Now I have to waste the day reading about it. Thanks, Sloop!

          1. Old Man With Candy

            You’re thinking of the IC.

          2. Brett L

            Shit. Yes I am.

          3. trshmnstr

            My wife’s grandfather was on one of the TI teams. I don’t think he did the actual IC design, but he showed me an early patent of his for an IC based computer. Also showed me an ALU made of very crude transistors.

          4. Juan-Baptiste Emmanuel Seguin

            The main guy afaik was Jack Kilby. My dad went with him to defend some patents one time. Apparently a really down to earth guy.

  9. Scruffy Nerfherder

    This is delusional.

    Ignorance is destroying America.

    Our country is being destroyed from within because too many of us believe things that are simply not true.

    Decades of hate radio, Fox News, and internet websites pushing “information” that is the opposite of the truth have resulted in millions of Americans who firmly believe falsehoods.

    Examples of FALSEHOODS believed by half the country include:

    Immigrants are stealing our jobs and bringing disease and violence to our country.

    Christianity is under attack.

    There is an epidemic of violence in the “inner cities” (a reference to African American neighborhoods).

    Liberals want to take money away from “hardworking real Americans” (a reference to rural whites) and give it to people who don’t work (dog whistle).

    Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt individual to ever run for office.

    Hillary Clinton planned to go to war.

    Climate change is not a very big problem.

    Obama destroyed the economy and our reputation in the world.

    Democratic politicians are stupid and corrupt.

    (Believed by many on the left, who don’t understand that majority rules in Congress) – Democrats are weak because they’re not fixing all these problems.

    Trump is fixing all these problems. Trump is making America safe and prosperous again for “people who are willing to work.”

    I’m not sure how to turn this around other than GET OUT THE VOTE among those of us who have the facts.

    This is no time for purism. The Democrats need to regain the majority. It’s our only hope.

    1. Denial is a stage of grief.

      1. Floridaman

        I thought it was a river in egypt?

        1. You must be thinking of the Suez, which isn’t really a river.

          1. Gustave Lytton

            A man, a plan, a canal, Sinai?

      2. Not denial; projection. Think of how the left believes the Russian collusion bullshit, or how they talk about “working families”.

    2. Pat

      The helpful parentheticals to explain the hidden meaning of the actual language being used is a nice touch when you’re calling out everyone else for being ignorant and wrapped in an ideological bubble.

    3. This is satire, right?

    4. straffinrun

      Democratic politicians are stupid and corrupt.

      She’s half right.

    5. Suthenboy

      The Democrats are like a deer that’s been shot through the heart. They are running because they dont know they are dead yet.

      1. Drake

        The whole “Blue Wave” in November is just wishful thinking by the Dems and media (redundant). They are going to lose seats in both houses.

        1. WTF

          I think the Dems pick up a couple of House seats, but Reps maintain majority, and Reps pick up some Senate seats.

        2. The Last American Hero

          Nope. They lose the house, keep the Senate.

          1. Drake

            We’ll see – I’m getting the same media totally separated from reality feeling as I had 2 years ago.

          2. The Last American Hero

            Team Blue is very fired up with Trump hate, history – 2004 excepted – says America wants divided government, and Team Red has a nasty habit of throwing away winnable races by nominating the batshit crazy guy when a standard issue conservative could win. Throw in a bunch of retirements and I think that adds up to a slim Team Blue majority in the House.

    6. Brett L

      I’m not sure I have the same definition of falsehoods.

      Liberals want to take money away from “hardworking real Americans” (a reference to rural whites) and give it to people who don’t work (dog whistle).

      Leaving aside the parenthetical, this is almost a literal quote from Pelosi immediately after the tax cuts.

    7. Forget it Jake, it’s DU.

    8. Bobarian LMD

      Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt individual to ever run for office.

      Nobody who has put any thought into it believes that.

      The most corrupt individual to almost be elected president, sure, but I’m certain her corruption wouldn’t even be middle of the road if she were running for alderman in some big city.

      1. Brett L

        Only in its breathtaking scale. The alderman is selling votes and favors for a nicer house and walking around money. Hillary was selling votes and favors to the tune of $500M. The Clinton Foundation appears to have done nothing but sell the Clintons as advocates to whatever cause you could afford.

        1. Drake

          ^ This.

          Sharpe James is the epitome of a corrupt city politician to me. He spent his whole life collecting a pay-check, a couple of pensions, and all the petty graft that he could. Everyone knew it. He was caught and convicted when he got greedy and scammed the city for a couple hundred K on land sales.

          Never in his worthless free-riding life could somebody like James come close to the scale and audacity of the Clinton grifts.

    9. Bob

      Violence isn’t a problem in inner cities? Many of these examples are provable.

      1. Pat

        John Singleton has a sad

  10. Pat

    You know what really grinds my gears? How nobody says “Independence Day” anymore. It’s always “Fourth of July” or “July Fourth”. When was the last time somebody wished you a Merry December 25th or a Happy January 1st? It’s Independence Day.

    1. Slammer

      Happy Traitor Day, Colonial

      1. The Last American Hero

        Hope your pride was worth losing most of a continent over the stubborn refusal to give us a few seats in Parliament.

    2. What corner of the country are you not hearing Independance Day in?

      1. Pat

        I’m in NV but I didn’t hear it much when I lived in Washington State either. Marketing materials and local news items seem to have universally transitioned to the date reference.

    3. Juvenile Bluster

      July 4th is the day where we remember the brave man who selflessly flew his plane into the alien mothership, stopping the invasion and saving humanity.

      1. Tejicano

        Well, don’t forget his primary motivation was that he had been abducted and physically violated, after which he lost his sanity becoming an outcast. So when he saw his chance to publicly take his revenge and clear his name it was all he could have prayed for.

    4. Pope Jimbo

      Growing up in NW Minnesoda, it was always “The Fourth”.

      I never heard anyone really call it Independence Day.

    5. Akira

      My guess is that people are just choosing the option with fewer syllables.

  11. Pat

    Nevada plans execution with never-used-before drug cocktail

    LAS VEGAS — One sedative will be substituted for another, and prison officials said Tuesday they plan to use two other drugs never before used in executions in any state for Nevada’s first lethal injection in 12 years. The drugs include a powerful synthetic opioid that has been blamed for overdoses nationwide.

    A revised and redacted death penalty protocol for the scheduled July 11 execution of Scott Raymond Dozier calls for injecting midazolam to sedate him, then the opioid fentanyl to slow and perhaps stop his breathing followed by a muscle-paralyzing drug called cisatracurium.

    Haha! Suck it Texas! We’re #1!

    1. Shit, we’ll probably execute three people between now and then. You guys be the first to try that new combo, we’ll keep killing em our own way.

      1. Pat

        I’m still not sure why a big old barbiturate or morphine overdose isn’t just as good as whatever cocktail of drugs they’ve been using and having to tinker with to dodge around restrictions the last few years. You can get enough pentobarbital from a veterinary supply house to kill every death row inmate in the country.

        1. Why not just inject them with about a quart of drano? Or the hangman’s noose. Fuck that pussyfooting around. Nothing cruel or unusual about either of those for a death penalty, IMO.

          1. Pat

            Yeah, I mean, I’m presuming of course that we retain the quasi-medical nature of modern executions. The guillotine, firing squad, and hanging are all effective and not any less merciful than the 3-drug-combo method. Back in the ’90s nitrogen asphyxiation in disused gas chambers was proposed as well, which would probably be more humane if anything.

          2. straffinrun

            Lock them in a cage with a bathtub full of water, razors and Samantha Bee blasted in over a speaker.

          3. Scruffy Nerfherder

            Definitely cruel and unusual

    2. Slammer

      Livestream and TV hangings.

      1. SoberPhobic

        PPV. Wheel of Death. the convicted spins a wheel with different ways of dying . The purchase is split in four Victim/family, production cost, Public defenders and DA

        1. Bobarian LMD

          Hosted by Ryan Seacrest in a gimp mask?

          Celebrity panel: Janet Reno, Dick Cheney, John McCain, and Simon Cowell?

          1. SoberPhobic

            I was leaning to holographic vincent price or richard dawson

    3. Juvenile Bluster

      If we’re going to have a death penalty (we fucking shouldn’t), it should be by firing squad. We’re obsessed with making it look clean to make ourselves feel better about it.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        This

      2. Tejicano

        The best way to go would be to have the convict choose a movie and a six-pack. Have him watching the movie drinking beer – relaxed and engrossed in the movie. Then somebody who can pull it off quietly walks up behind him and puts a 38 through the back of his head. The bullet should pass through an imaginary line connecting the convict’s ear-holes. He will never even know it happened.

        1. The Last American Hero

          Or you could just pump CO into the room and he could pass out an never wake up.

      3. A Leap at the Wheel

        This.

    4. The Sleeper

      At what point is it more humane to just shoot them in the back of the head?*

      *That sounds really callous and I’m generally against the death penalty, but the drug cocktails used for lethal injection open up a lot of questions about cruel and unusual punishment in my opinion.

  12. Atanarjuat

    The statue climber chick has only been in America 10 years, and she goes to idiotic protests weekly and has made a string of frivolous lawsuits.

    And in 2009, she won $1,500 off a towing company, County Recovery, after she accused an employee of calling her a ‘n*****’ and saying she should be shipped back to Africa, reported Heavy.

    I don’t condone the racism, if there was any, but she should be shipped back to Africa.

    1. You know who else shipped people to Africa…

        1. Evan from Evansville

          +1 aureus.

      1. SIFAX Group?

      2. Abraham Lincoln, in the alternate timeline in which he ducked?

      3. Gustave Lytton

        Operation Torch?

    2. Old Man With Candy

      I don’t understand why anyone even bothered with trying to get her down. Just wait, the problem will take care of itself.

    3. cyto

      Eh… how do you “win money off of” someone for insulting them? Did they just settle to make it go away? $1500 is less than the cost of having the attorneys draft the settlement agreement, so maybe that’s it.

  13. Adam Smith’s rescue from the libertarian right

    Over grilled lobster and spice-rubbed lamb, we discuss Smith’s ideas and the future of capitalism. “Smith became a figure of reverence for libertarians and a figure of hatred for the left – both of which are completely absurd,” says Norman, his plummy baritone reverberating through the restaurant.

    Far from being a dogmatic opponent of state intervention, Smith supported measures such as a cap on interest rates and public works. Nor did he regard markets as invariably self-correcting (the phrase “invisible hand” appears just once in The Wealth of Nations (1776) and once in The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)). He was alive, says Norman, to defects such as “asymmetries of information and power and rent extraction” – when capitalists merely appropriate value, rather than create it. Smith believed that low profits and high wages were indicators of a healthy market and he was critical of large inheritances that concentrated wealth across generations. Though Smith’s libertarian acolytes favour flat taxes, the economist supported progressive taxation in some circumstances (“A tax upon house-rents… would in general fall heaviest upon the rich”).

    1. Pat

      Wait until the left re-discovers that Smith proposed a labor theory of value that is currently only recognized by Marxists.

    2. Brett L

      It’s a good thing no advances of his work have happened in 242 years.

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Smith was remarkable for anti-mercantilist. That’s about it.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        being

      2. leonadasiv

        Smith noticed and popularized the idea that people seeking their self interest can still lead to outcomes where there is enough food, and commodities for others to live. But he wasn’t some anarchist theorist.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          I was being a little flippant, but he did leave the door open for Marx et al simply because he was a reaction to the economics of his day. Nobody had called for communism as of yet.

          1. leonadasiv

            Oh I was echoing your point. He was noteworthy for a few things, but he wasn’t there saint if there free market that progs think

          2. A Leap at the Wheel

            He was astonishingly prescient, to the point where you can look at almost any major economic revelation from the next 150 years and accurately say “That’s actually in the Wealth of Nations, he just didn’t unpack it.”

            Being “merely anti-mercantalist” in 1776 is like being “anti-slavery” in, well, 1776 or anti-nobility in 1214 the year before magna carta, or anti-neutonean in 1904 the year before Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper.

            Doesn’t make his policy prescriptions correct, or incorrect, 250 years later.

    4. Bob

      Smith was interested in figuring out why some nations became wealthy while others were poor. This is a question the west seems to rarely ask itself now.

  14. cyto

    So, we celebrated Independence Day with several families at the beach – as is the custom ’round these parts. A good time was had by all, and the weather threatened to turn stormy but held off, keeping things pleasantly cooler.

    But there was something that caused a raised eyebrow. The police presence was much larger than usual. Lots of motorcycle cops. Lots of Ford Explorers with light bars. And on top of the parking garage…. the police had set up a sniper nest.

    Not really camouflaged, but they had a tent with a large sniper rifle set up on a tripod and two other guys with large-caliber long-range weapons carried in hand (not slung), maybe M40 variants? They also had spotter scopes set up.

    I’ve seen them with rooftop a presence with scoped rifles before, but never anything this “heavy”.

    Turnout was noticeably light this year, which made several of us wonder if there wasn’t some threat that the police and a bunch of our neighbors knew about but neglected to tell us…

    1. Suthenboy

      Where was this?

      1. cyto

        Pompano Beach, so Broward County Sheriff’s office. They do like their tactical gear over at BSO.

        Another thing we noticed was that they had trouble figuring out what to do with the fireworks barge. They usually anchor it just beyond the reef at the end of the pier, but this year it was towed up and down the beach for about an hour before they finally settled on a location about a quarter mile further out than usual and maybe 300 yards south of their normal location. Then they proceeded to slowly drift north during the entire show, ending up a couple hundred yards north of their usual location. Odd. And it kinda killed the mojo of the fireworks, because they were too far away for that big impact.

        The other thing they did that was a bit odd… they changed up the music mix for the show.

        Traditionally, you go with Sousa and/or the 1812 Overture for an Independence Day fireworks show. Or you go with the alternate new traditional which includes rock and country pop songs from more than 25 years ago… thing like “Born in the USA”, “Proud to be an America”, Ray Charles singing “America”…. you know the list.

        But they mixed in a couple of those with more contemporary pop and hip-hop tunes that had no discernible “GO USA” theme. They also made sure to hit all demographics, with some Latin pop tunes.

        Still, it was a great time and the smaller crowds meant it was more comfortable for the families that were there.

    2. Slammer

      We went up on the rooftop (Brooklyn).

      There were a lot of drones, big ones with aircraft navigation lights. . I’m assuming Fire Department and NYPD

  15. The Late P Brooks

    Hyperion linked this yesterday. NYT magazine infomercial for the ACLU.

    I took a brief walk with Gelernt after the call. He looked totally spent. I’d thought about this a lot over the past few months, of course, but the profundity of the burden that he was under, fighting against the government for these families, seemed suddenly unimaginable. “I feel terrible that I couldn’t get him to budge on the timeline,” he said. “I did everything I could think of. Wednesday. That’s another five days. How can we wait another five days?” (The judge later amended the deadline to 9 a.m. Tuesday morning.)

    A little while later, I sat with Anthony Romero, the A.C.L.U.’s executive director, in his office looking out on the Statue of Liberty. “Rome burns,” he said. “Rome is burning. And the government’s lawyers can’t work a weekend.”

    ————-

    On Nov. 9, 2016, millions of voters woke desperate for something that might quell their anxiety that this was the beginning of the end of democracy in America. Overwhelmingly, the place they turned to was the A.C.L.U.

    I hope the NYT CFO imputed a value to the publication of this story which can be declared as a deductible corporate contribution to the ACLU.

    I haven’t hacked my way to the end, yet. It’s one of those infuriating, breathlessly melodramatic narratives designed to stir the soul. It makes you feel like you’re right there on the battlefield, shooting and stabbing the evil fascist hordes. Those guys from the ACLU live on a higher plane of existence than we mere mortals. Also, Trump is the greatest threat to democracy since that Austrian guy.

    1. Old Man With Candy

      that Austrian guy

      Hayek?

      1. Aaaah-nooooold!

    2. Suthenboy

      We dont live in a goddamned democracy.

      1. Bob Boberson

        Repeat the lie enough and everyone starts to believe it…

        1. Bobarian LMD

          You’re assuming they understand the meaning of the word.

    3. Obama used the Espionage Act more than all other presidents combined, including after NYT journalist James Risen. And he had a filmmaker jailed because his admin shit the bed in Benghazi. And he fought (through Citizens United) against people pooling their money to make a political movie.

      The fact that they’re publishing this now instead of when a real warrior against a free press was in office speaks volumes. Fuck the partisan and cowardly NYT. And fuck the partisan and cowardly ACLU. Neither of them will ever see another dime of my money.

      1. cyto

        Normally I would jump to the defense of the ACLU when this sort of rhetoric is used. But then the disavowed protecting free speech for people that progressives disagree with.

        And I was really left with not much to defend.

        1. I used to give a good chunk of money to them. And I did not type that easily. It pained me to point out how far they’ve fallen.

          They’re nothing but a progressive advocacy group for solely progressive speech. They don’t care about principles anymore. They can eat a turd.

  16. straffinrun

    French fellow winemakers leap to defend Japanese couple facing deportation, hailing their ‘extraordinary’ reds

    But immigration officials said the couple could not stay in France because they were not earning enough and their business was “not viable”.

    The Shojis sunk 100,000 euros of their savings and took out a 50,000 euro loan to buy their vineyards on difficult terrain where the Pyrenees mountains plunge into the Mediterranean

    Wonder if they apply this standard to all immigrants.

    1. Oh, no, these standards are only for legals. If they’d ridden a boat from Algeria without permission to enter, they’d be fine.

      1. straffinrun

        I thought they all brought 150K in Euros with them when they got in those rickety boats.

    2. Old Man With Candy

      They left out the most important part: is their wine a Banyuls or a Collioures?

    3. Scruffy Nerfherder

      That reeks of French cultural nationalism

    4. Grumbletarian

      You know who else had extraordinary reds?

      1. Sparky Anderson?

      2. A Leap at the Wheel
      3. invisible finger

        Hunter S. Thompson?

      4. Warren Beatty?

        Oh, I thought you said extra-boring.

  17. Ayn Random Variation

    It’s gotten nearly impossible to find any sports sites to read that aren’t overloaded with SJW nonsense.

    The best place for me to get sports scores and info is on the fantasy sports sites. They’re pretty straightforward and informative. For baseball writing, Fangraphs is the gold standard. Pro Football Focus for real football.

    For just checking scores, I recommend rotoworld.com. The top of the screen shows all of the current scores; you just click on the sport you want and that sport’s scores come right up on the top – no crazy pages or ads to deal with.

    1. invisible finger

      Fangraphs peppers in some asinine political commentary every now and then. Whenever a commenter points it out, another asshole is sure to comment “that means you support blah blah blah.”

  18. Pat

    Who Is Angela Ponce? Model Will Be First Trans Woman to Compete in Miss Universe

    A Spanish model is set to become the first transgender woman to compete in the Miss Universe pageant.

    Angela Ponce was crowned in the countrywide Miss Universe Spain 2018 over the weekend, becoming the first transgender woman to win the title. The 26-year-old beat 22 fellow contestants to claim the top spot in the Spanish city of Tarragona, Pink News reported.

    Her win grants Ponce a place to compete in the worldwide Miss Universe contest set to be held in Philippines in December 2018.

    See? Men really are better at everything.

    1. Suthenboy

      Whatever happened to Barfman?

      1. He transitioned to Barfgirl and is puking xer guts up at HuffPo as we speak because Trump made a joke.

    2. cyto

      Transgender contestants were first allowed to compete in Miss Universe six years ago.

      The change was enacted after trans contestant Jenna Talackova was disqualified from Miss Universe Canada when organizers discovered she had transitioned from male to female.

      After weeks of discussion, LGBT charity GLAAD later persuaded then-owner Donald Trump to open the competition up to trans contestants. In the 2012 Miss Universe Canada contest Talackova placed 12th place, but won Miss Congeniality.

      I wonder how they are going to make this one fit the narrative….

      1. “Trump shames trans beauty contestant by placing her 12th”

      2. “but won Miss Congeniality.”

        So men are nicer than women?

        1. straffinrun

          Miss Congenital Warts.

      3. Pope Jimbo

        I’m stunned that Canadians would stoop to fake beavers.

  19. Scruffy Nerfherder

    This is also delusional

    So, about Ocasio-Cortez’s positions: Medicare for all is a deliberately ambiguous phrase, but in practice probably wouldn’t mean pushing everyone into a single-payer system. Instead, it would mean allowing individuals and employers to buy into Medicare – basically a big public option. That’s really not radical at all.

    And if we’re talking economics rather than politics, every advanced country except America has some form of guaranteed health insurance; decades of experience show that these systems are workable; and they all have lower costs than we do. Calling for us to do what everyone else has managed to do is perfectly reasonable.

    What about a jobs guarantee? Ocasio-Cortez’s proposal can be thought of as a rise in the national minimum wage to $15, combined with a sort of public option for employment in case that wage rise leads either to private-sector job losses or an increase in labor force participation.

    Now, there’s a huge amount of evidence to the effect that minimum wage hikes don’t significantly reduce employment. To be fair, however, $15 is outside the range of historical experience, and you can make a plausible case that in low-productivity regions like much of the south there would be some job losses. On the other hand, those are precisely the regions that could really use some aid.

    1. Suthenboy

      Commie rag shills for commie shitweasel. News at 11.

    2. straffinrun

      and they all have lower costs than we do

      Depends on where the cost is being bourne. My national health care bill is a bitch (500 a month) and only covers 70% of the stuff they will cover. The remainder I end up paying for supplementary insurance which costs another 200 a month.

      1. Hyperion

        “and they all have lower costs than we do”

        This is one of the left’s biggest lies. No, they do not. Their citizens pay 3x the amount of income tax Americans do, plus a 20-25% VAT tax, and the care is heavily rationed. Disgusting liars are liars.

        1. Akira

          True facts, brah.

          They also ignore the fact that elderly people will be denied care in many of these “universal” healthcare countries. In the US, you’re free to spend as much money as you want on medical procedures, even if it just means that you live to 90 rather than 88.

          In addition, people frequently die while they’re waiting for a procedure. It certainly does keep costs down if cancer patients just kick the bucket before ever beginning their treatment.

    3. leonadasiv

      “decades of experience show that these systems are workable”

      Charlie Gard, and other children would like to say otherwise, but they can’t.

    4. leonadasiv

      “proposal can be thought of as a rise in the national minimum wage to $15, combined with a sort of public option for employment in case that wage rise leads either to private-sector job losses or an increase in labor force participation.”

      How much will those people be paid? And what will they do?

      1. Suthenboy

        $15/hr to move piles of dirt from here to there and back to here.

          1. That’s ridiculous. They’re not gonna have these people move piles of dirt with sooons.

            They’ll have them do it virtually with the 50,000 oculus rift VR sets the government will buy to supplement the program so that none of these people will be exposed to extreme heat or cold.

          2. Bobarian LMD

            See! Technology is a multiplier!

    5. leonadasiv

      “minimum wage hikes don’t significantly reduce employment. ”

      Depends on how to define employment. There is significant evidence that minor hikes will reduce average worker hours, and income, and that the hikes will cause new hires to fall.

      And that’s all for minor increases. No study has been done on raising the minimum wage by almost 100%

    6. Brochettaward

      It’s a broken record with these people every time a leftwing government gets into power. It’s like the last commie catastrophe they supported never even happened.

      …and they all have lower costs than we do.

      I get really tired of this canard. It pretends that there is some amount that should be spent on healthcare. It is an inherently collectivist outlook that never even bothers to concern itself with what people choose or even need to spend. It ignores price controls and pretends that rationing doesn’t exist under socialized healthcare. They’re paying less and getting better results! It’s blatantly shallow thinking. And when it comes to the “experts” in these matters, it’s intentional. They start with a desired result (pretend universal coverage, because that’s all it is – pretend) and work backwards looking for anything to justify it.

      1. leonadasiv

        Yeah, they often cite statistics that hide costs, like rationing.

        The truth is that there will be rationing, always. How do you want it to be limited? By yourself or government dictate?

    7. Evan from Evansville

      To be fair, however, $15 is outside the range of historical experience, and you can make a plausible case that in low-productivity regions like much of the south there would be some job losses.

      I wonder if they purposefully put that jab at the south in there or if it was just their subconscious.

      1. leonadasiv

        Yeah. Let’s ignore that in Seattle such an increase caused a drop off in worker wages. Increasing the minimum wage such nationally (progs have to do everything nationally, cause those damn red States will come kicking and screaming weather they like it it not) would be worse in big cities, where there are “high”productivity jobs, but a lot more people still work “low productivity” jobs

      2. Pat

        The poor uncivilized savages suffering under a lower cost of living…

    8. Ayn Random Variation

      “And if we’re talking economics rather than politics, every advanced country except America has some form of guaranteed health insurance; ….”

      Bullshit conflation. Everybody in this country is guaranteed health CARE.

      They have to be doing this on purpose.

      1. Tejicano

        And I always love the “advanced country” dodge. Find a reasonably developed nation that doesn’t have their standard of health insurance and they can just pretend it isn’t advanced enough.

    9. B.P.

      “…those are precisely the regions that could really use some aid.”

      Jacking up the minimum wage isn’t “aid”. It’s money paid out by private-sector employers.

  20. gbob

    Your anus really got rocked.

    A massive collision forever tilted Uranus into a jaunty angle and may be why the planet is so cold.

    According to new research, a young protoplanet roughly twice the size of Earth is responsible for changing Uranus’ orientation and dooming the world to freezing temperatures.

    I’m sorry Uranus. Typo.

    1. Suthenboy

      It is also 2 billion miles from the sun. I am thinking that might be a factor in the weather.

      1. cyto

        Also, new research? The protoplanet collision has been the prevailing theory for as long as I can remember. The “new” is that a group ran a bunch of simulations and figured out the most likely size and direction of the probable hit.

        Everywhere I’ve seen this research written about, they talk as if we never knew the reason for the orientation of Uranus’s axis.

    2. WTF

      STEVE SMITH CAUSE MASSIVE COLLISION WITH URANUS!!!

      1. Bobarian LMD

        STEVE TILT MANY ANUS AT JAUNTY ANGLE

    3. Grumbletarian

      So if it was just something that hit the planet why do all of the moons orbit Uranus around its axis of rotation? I get that some might be remnants of the collision, but there must have been objects orbiting along the original axis of rotation prior to the impact.

      1. Brasidas

        Tidal forces?

  21. a rebuttal:

    Libertarianism and white nationalism are actually very different

    In Foley-Keene’s final point, he writes, “Libertarianism is infected with the Nietzschean valorization of the will, the domination of obstacles, the celebration of personal ambition. Those impulses — uninterrupted by notions of love or mutual care or social obligation — aren’t unfriendly to nationalism.”

    This is like saying progressive celebration of economic equality is uninterrupted by notions of economic efficiency or productivity. Political ideologies held by reasonable people are sets of values that people believe are important to emphasize in governance and do not necessarily reflect a total rejection of all other values.

    As a libertarian, I hold personal liberty and individuality as some of my highest values, but this does not mean I’m not concerned about the welfare of the least fortunate, or the values of love, family and community. In fact, it is because I love others that I would like to see them grow based on what matters to them, not what I suspect would be best for society. Major libertarian thinkers are even open to non-paternalistic welfare proposals like a universal basic income to help those unable to help themselves.

    Libertarianism is not just borne out of selfishness. It is borne out of the genuine notion that peace, liberty and markets are the best means to alleviate poverty, increase prosperity and create a happier society. That doesn’t sound like white nationalism to me.

    1. leonadasiv

      “Major libertarian thinkers are even open to non-paternalistic welfare proposals like a universal basic income to help those unable to help themselves.”

      Open as an alternative to the shit we have, but let’s be clear that it is not consistent with libertarianism.

      1. straffinrun

        Defensive libertarianism. Meh. Fuck that. You came into the world with nothing and you might as well go out swinging even if that means you leave with nothing.

    2. cyto

      “Libertarianism is infected with the Nietzschean valorization of the will, the domination of obstacles, the celebration of personal ambition. Those impulses — uninterrupted by notions of love or mutual care or social obligation — aren’t unfriendly to nationalism.”

      This is like saying progressive celebration of economic equality is uninterrupted by notions of economic efficiency or productivity.

      No, that is like saying a love of sports and fitness isn’t unfriendly to coronary artery disease and diabetes.

      Nationalism is anathema to the celebration of personal ambition – the other bit about will and obstacles, well, that could just as easily describe anyone or anything.

      However, notions of love, mutual care and social obligation are completely friendly to nationalism. In fact, those are definitive qualities of nationalism – the difference being in how you draw the boundaries of those impulses.

      This nozzle has everything exactly backwards. A white nationalist might thrive in a libertarian system – because it wouldn’t seek to impose any ideals upon him. But a white nationalist system could not be libertarian.

      Meanwhile, a white nationalist system could easily be a communist or socialist or fascist or any other collectivist economic system. They go together quite nicely. In that case it would all be in how you define the nation-state. See Germany, Nazi; China, Maoist; North Korea, Communist, etc. And while it encompassed many ethnicities, I don’t think the USSR was exactly a haven for gay or trans rights, or political free thinkers, or anyone not aligned with the state.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        And while it encompassed many ethnicities, I don’t think the USSR was exactly a haven for gay or trans rights, or political free thinkers, or anyone not aligned with the state.

        Only in retrospect and with much photo alteration.

    3. Bob

      They make the racism accusation to put people on the defensive. They’re not interested in a reasoned response. It’s a waste of time.

      1. Akira

        Crying racism is their standard opening move. If it doesn’t work, no matter – they’ll move on to the next strategy. Calling someone a racist doesn’t cost you anything in the immediate term, even if the target thoroughly disproves it.

        The only problem is that it is getting worn out. Most notably, Trump has largely ignored accusations of racism because he realizes that a most of the “progressive” Left is going to call him racist no matter what, so there’s no point in going on the defensive and making yourself look weak. He’s figured out that the best strategy is to tell them to piss off and just say whatever you’re going to say.

  22. Drake

    Nice to see rules still apply in some court rooms. A story you’ll never see on CNN.

    U.S. District Judge Gloria M. Navarro dismissed conspiracy charges against the four men on Jan. 8 after finding that prosecutors had acted “with prejudice” throughout the trial, The Oregonian reported. Federal prosecutors violated federal law and failed to share evidence favorable to the defendants case with the court.

    1. leonadasiv

      But, the government would never be biased against those who hate said government.

  23. TW: Cosmo magazine, UK version

    Meet the men who get off on their wives having sex with other people

    What do you like about cuckolding?

    “I love the way my wife comes alive. Her body is almost constantly primed, partly from the excitement of the relationship, and partly from the feeling of being wanted by someone new. When she feels sexy and wanted, she becomes a more sexual being, leading to a much more fulfilling sex life for the two of us.

    “I also believe that wanting something is more powerful than having it. So, feeling like I’m being denied things that my wife is freely sharing with others is a powerful aphrodisiac—it makes me pursue and compete for my own wife in ways I haven’t in a long time.

    “I’ve always considered myself a feminist. As such, I want my wife to be true to her own desires so that we can meet as equals—she’s not putting aside what she wants for me; we’re moving forward together, accepting one another as we truly are. Autonomy is important to me, and I don’t want my wife to ever feel trapped with me. With cuckolding, I know she could choose anyone she wants, but she always chooses to continue to spend her life with me.”

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Whatever blows your skirt up.

    2. Pat

      I’ve noticed the cuck exposé has been a trend in a few quasi-mainstream publications here recently.

      1. Suthenboy

        Give up your weapons and let someone else fuck your wife.
        Where have I heard that before?

        Reminds me of a line I have used a lot lately – no one ever wants you to be defenseless for your own good.

        1. Pat

          Meh, I think it’s more just lazy and salacious “journalism” based on PornHub search trends than necessarily narrative-pushing.

        2. Pine_Tree

          Reality reminding us once again that “The Gods of the Copybook Headings” is the greatest poem ever written. Amazing that it was almost 100 years ago.

          1. robc

            I don’t know about greatest, but its in the top 10.

            Reflections on Ice-Breaking may be the greatest.

    3. wdalasio

      “Calling progressives ‘cuck’ is just a lazy, racist, abandonment of serious debate. Now that that’s out of the way, let’s talk about the joys of letting other men f**k your wife.”

  24. The Late P Brooks

    A Spanish model is set to become the first transgender woman to compete in the Miss Universe pageant.

    This is why they should get rid of the bikini competition.

    1. straffinrun

      Pizzaro world.

    2. “Laces out, Dan!”

      1. Evan from Evansville

        Truth Time: That movie came out when I was 6. My brother and I watched it ad nauseam. Love and loved it.

        I never understood what was going on with that big reveal. Now that I’m older, I *still* don’t understand it. They moved his dick to his ass? WTF? That is, I’m assuming, the joke. It made more sense when I had no idea what was going on.

        1. You live in Asia, where about 1 in 5 women you meet in a bar is probably a dude, and you don’t know about tucking?

          1. Pat

            If you’re still uncertain, this should clear it up.

          2. Evan from Evansville

            Several quibbles. To wit:

            Not in Korea! And some of the hottest women I’ve ever met have been men! It’s very confusing.

            I was a child! I didn’t know that my balls would eventually get bigger. They just WERE.

            No one can tuck like that! Finkle/Einhorn’s package has been relocated to the fucking small of his/her lower back! AND! It’s fucking massive. That ain’t a scrotum, it’s a balloon filled with oats! It would take a sadistic Joker’s back-alley surgeon to do such a thing.

            Shenanigans. All of ’em!

        2. He tucked like Jame Gumb.

    3. cyto

      My honest first reaction was: “they still have beauty pagents?”

  25. A day late but I still get a thrill from this Calvin Coolidge quote:

    “About the Declaration there is a finality that is exceedingly restful. It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning can not be applied to this great charter. If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers.”

    1. leonadasiv

      Coolidge was a racist. So I was told in school.

      (Lets forget every politician was racist back then)

      1. Calvin Coolidge was so racist he said this:

        Well-nigh all the races, religions, and nationalities of the world were represented in the armed forces of this Nation, as they were in the body of our population. No man’s patriotism was impugned or service questioned because of his racial origin, his political opinion, or his religious convictions. Immigrants and sons of immigrants from the central European countries fought side by side with those who descended from the countries which were our allies; with the sons of equatorial Africa; and with the Red men of our own aboriginal population, all of them equally proud of the name Americans.

        https://coolidgefoundation.org/resources/speeches-as-president-1923-1929-4/

        1. Red men?

          Oh shit, the problematicness!

        2. mindyourbusiness

          Thanks, LH. Just bookmarked the Coolidge Foundation for further exploring.

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder

        And untrue.

        Letter to Mr. Charles F. Gardner
        Fort Hamilton, New York
        August 9, 1924
        My Dear Sir:

        Your letter is received, accompanied by a newspaper clipping which discusses the possibility that a colored man may be the Republican nominee for Congress from one of the New York districts. Referring to this newspaper statement, you say:

        “It is of some concern whether a Negro is allowed to run for Congress anywhere, at any time, in any party, in this, a white man’s country. Repeated ignoring of the growing race problem does not excuse us for allowing encroachments. Temporizing with the Negro whether he will or will not vote either a Democratic or a Republican ticket, as evidenced by the recent turn over in Oklahoma, is contemptible.”

        Leaving out of consideration the manifest impropriety of the President intruding himself in a local contest for nomination, I was amazed to receive such a letter. During the war 500,000 colored men and boys were called up under the draft, not one of whom sought to evade it. They took their places wherever assigned in defense of the nation of which they are just as truly citizens as are any others. The suggestion of denying any measure of their full political rights to such a great group of our population as the colored people is one which, however it might be received in some other quarters, could not possibly be permitted by one who feels a responsibility for living up to the traditions and maintaining the principles of the Republican Party. Our Constitution guarantees equal rights to all our citizens, without discrimination on account of race or color. I have taken my oath to support that Constitution. It is the source of your rights and my rights. I propose to regard it, and administer it, as the source of the rights of all the people, whatever their belief or race. A colored man is precisely as much entitled to submit his candidacy in a party primary, as is any other citizen. The decision must be made by the constituents to whom he offers himself, and by nobody else. You have suggested that in some fashion I should bring influence to bear to prevent the possibility of a colored man being nominated for Congress. In reply, I quote my great predecessor, Theodore Roosevelt:

        ” I cannot consent to take the position that the door of hope, the door of opportunity, is to be shut upon any man, no matter how worthy, purely upon the grounds of race or color.”

        Yours very truly, etc.

        1. gbob

          I honestly got a little misty reading that. No idea why it impacted me. Perhaps after a 4th of people yelling on the internet, reading from a man of principal reminded me of some of the real virtues of Americans.

          Or I’m hung over so bad that I can’t restart my cynical portion of my brain.

      3. A Leap at the Wheel

        I always confuse Woodrow Wilson and Coolidge, because they both have Marvel-comics-esque alliterative names. But they were very, very different folk. Coolidge was AOK by me, while Wilson was bit by a radioactive progressive and gained the arrogance and racism of a man of proportionate size.

        1. ron73440

          My wife used to watch Glenn Beck, the one thing really I agreed with him was we both HATE Woodrow Wilson.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I think that is an excellent quote and is incredibly accurate in the sense that the counter-Enlightenment and its heirs were a reaction to the elevation of the individual over over the collective. Kant et al were despondent about the church being deposed from its seat of power and wanted to replace it with some other moral fixture.

      1. ruodberht

        Kant? What is Enlightenment?-Kant?

  26. Ayn Random Variation

    “They go into the barriers to entry and the steep startup costs including licensing fees and compliance costs. ”

    I used the ‘poor person who can cut hair for money but can’t because of govt imposed barriers’ scenario as an example of how regs hurt the poor more than the rich.

    The prog’s response is that it’s a good thing or else we wouldn’t know who was qualified to give a haircut.

    Credentialed vs qualified with a heaping pile of how we can’t do anything without the govts help.

    There’s no reasoning with these people.

  27. Rebel Scum

    About 60 activists disrupted a Fourth of July barbecue

    About 60 activists are lucky they did not receive a proper beat-down.

  28. Pope Jimbo

    My Somali is better than your’s.
    My Somali brings all the sheiks to the yard

    Local kid wins some international competition to become the “best reciter of the Koran” in the world.

    Mohamet “Hambaase” Ali, the former principal of the Islamic school at Abubakar As-Saddique mosque in Minneapolis where Ahmed trained, said Somali parents often dispatch their kids to Africa for what’s known as “dhaqan celis,” meaning to “rehabilitate kids,” so they are better accustomed to their culture and religion.

    Most families, he said, are wary of their kids growing up in the West and losing their identity, which parents say makes youth vulnerable to all kinds of problems.

    Yeah, welcome to our country. Thanks for assimilating.

    1. Brett L

      Eh. If it was for some Jewish kid getting it for Torah recitation, I wouldn’t get riled up. I’m thinking of the scene at about 1:38.

      1. Pope Jimbo

        I have no beef with the kid winning the contest. What urinates me off is our local Somalis trying to avoid assimilation. They demand that employers locally don’t make them handle pork or booze. They demand that schools create a prayer room – with foot washing stations. Then in the quote above they send their kids back to Africa to learn “the old ways”.

        Jewish kids might have to go to Hebrew school, but they don’t have to go back to Israel.

        I will admit that the hijinks of the locals from East Africa here in Minnesoda might make me a bit more sensitive than other people. What really gets me is that they will fight assimilation and talk about how oppressed they are here, but if you even suggested that they be sent back to Somalia, they’d fly off the handle in a rage.

        1. cyto

          I dunno. I used to live in a Jewish enclave, and trips to Israel were as perfunctory as trips home to see grandma.

          1. Old Man With Candy

            Yeah, I got sent on one of those when I was 16. I discovered two things:

            1. First-rate hash was like $2 an ounce.
            2. The ratio of female to male American Jews sent on these trips was about 4:1, and for most of them, it was their first time away from mommy and daddy.

            It was a great summer. It did not make me religious.

          2. Scruffy Nerfherder

            Now I wanna be a Jew.

          3. Tundra

            Hell, it might have made me a convert.

          4. $2 from when a self-described ‘Old Man’ was 16 will have seen some inflation. What’s that in 2018 dollars?

          5. Tundra

            $15.82

            I’m still in.

          6. Tejicano

            I made the cut but didn’t join the team. But with a recruitment campaign like that who knows?

        2. wdalasio

          I will admit that the hijinks of the locals from East Africa here in Minnesoda might make me a bit more sensitive than other people.

          Honestly, I think this gets as much to the heart of the problem as anything else. Broad assimilation is, by and large, the normal equilibrium situation. My guess is that Joe Somali is probably happy to remain Muslim while adapting the specifics and circumstances to modern day American life. Yes, there are a few bastards who insist that everyone else has to adapt to them. But, the normal course, if the government tells them “F**k off! We’re not about to coerce anyone to suit you.”, is for those sorts to shut the hell up, move away or get told to bugger off by their own community. Instead, we get governments eager to appear “woke” and “respecting their cultural identity” pushing things that actively work against assimilation. Unsurprisingly, this empowers the bastards, incentivizes their complaints and basically tells the rest of their community that there’s no need to assimilate, since the rest of us feel guilty for no reason.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Why did you leave again?

  29. Drake

    Brexit Department could be scraped for being too pro-Brexit.

  30. Lachowsky

    I was listening to a podcast on the history of the civil war on my home from work this morning. I found out that along with ft. Sumpter, ft.pickens in Pensacola bay also had federal troops in it when Lincoln was inaugurated. Had things in Pensacola gone a little differently and had troops from Florida fired the first shots of the civil war instead of troops from south Carolina, the national headlines the next day would have been-

    “FLORIDA MAN STARTS CIVIL WAR”

    1. straffinrun

      That the Calton podcast? The Pratt Street Riot episode was excellent.

  31. Brett L

    Man, the FBI has really started cracking down on their lowest performing colleagues. Feds Blow Up Dummies on Mall

    1. straffinrun

      CPSC spends $25,362 on video warning not to launch fireworks on top of your head

      That’s not what she said.

    2. Suthenboy

      Anyone that wants to stick rockets up their ass or launch mortars from atop their head, I encourage them to to go ahead.

      1. mindyourbusiness

        +1 Darwin Award

        1. ron73440

          A few years ago a 37 year old man was killed when he looked down the tube of an unexploded home-made firework.

          My first though was “How did he live to be 37 if he’s that stupid?”

          1. Brett L

            It reminds me that people are like cockroaches, remarkably hard to kill sometimes.

  32. Tundra

    I went deeper in the catalog than most of you would have expected. Hope you enjoy.

    I do. Huey and the boys always seemed to me to be a solid bar band that suddenly found themselves famous. Fun band. Unintentionally hilarious video.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      That’s actually my favorite album from them. Sports was a little too commercial for my taste.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Four Chords and Several Years Ago is the runner-up

    2. BATEMAN: You like Huey Lewis and the News?

      ALLEN: Um, they’re okay.

      BATEMAN: Their early work was a little too new wave for my taste. But when Sports came out in ’83, I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically. The whole album has a clear, crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the songs a big boost. He’s been compared to Elvis Costello, but I think Huey has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humor.

      ALLEN: Hey, Halberstram?

      BATEMAN: Yes, Allen?

      ALLEN: Why are there copies of the Style section all over the place? Do you… Do you have a dog? A little chow or something?

      BATEMAN: No, Allen.

      ALLEN: Is that a raincoat?

      BATEMAN: Yes, it is. In ’87, Huey released this; Fore!, their most accomplished album. I think their undisputed masterpiece is “Hip To Be Square”. A song so catchy, most people probably don’t listen to the lyrics. But they should, because it’s not just about the pleasures of conformity and the importance of trends. It’s also a personal statement about the band itself.

      1. Pat

        What about Phil Collins?

      2. ElspethFlashman

        God, I love that movie. *points finger*

      3. SugarFree

        The little dance he does in the raincoat was unscripted. The first time Bale did it, everyone was laughing so hard they had to cut.

  33. Pat

    Mother Teresa India charity ‘sold babies’

    A woman working at Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity in the eastern Indian state of Jharkhand has been arrested for allegedly selling a 14-day-old baby.

    Two other women employees from the centre have been detained and are being questioned about other possible cases.

    Police took action after the state’s Child Welfare Committee (CWC) registered a complaint.

    The BBC has attempted to contact the charity for comment.

    “We have found out that some other babies have also been illegally sold from the centre,” a police official told BBC Hindi’s Niraj Sinha.”We have obtained the names of the mothers of these babies and are further investigating.”

    I guess after withholding treatment from patients because you fetishize their suffering, you can justify pretty much anything.

  34. Rebel Scum

    Sarah Silverman doesn’t know what words mean.

    Silverman made her declaration in response to a comment from former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino on “Fox & Friends” that “socialism is a disaster.”

    “Socialism is a disaster. The only people who support Socialism are people who don’t know what it is or people who want to win elections,” Bongino said on Monday.

    This comment prompted Silverman to call Bongino “daft” from her Twitter account, and argue that socialism includes such important government entities like the police, even though providing police, military, and fire departments are the most basic responsibilities of any state: the protection of citizens.

    “Forgive me but you are daft,” Silverman said. “Socialist democrats are for socialized programs within our democracy. Like, education &health care available 4all, making sure all@kids have the same opportunities.. u don’t like socialized programs? Do you like the police dept? The fire department?”

    The government having agents to enforce the governments law =/= “socialism”.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Silverman is an idiot.

    2. Pat

      R O A D Z
      O
      A
      D
      Z

    3. Oh I’ve seen that idea before – “How can you not like socialism? Fire Departments = Socialism!”

      My reply: So the Romans, who had one of the earliest fire departments, were socialists? The more you know.

      1. The Roman fire departments were for-profit enterprises, and would not extinguish burning buildings whose owners did not pay.

        1. But they weren’t charging the building owners every month, were they? I personally prefer that model to paying taxes to support firemen I will almost certainly never use, not to mention paying their ridiculous pensions they managed to “negotiate” with the politicians whose campaigns they helped fund.

          1. Pat

            Like 99% of the rest of the functions of modern government, it would be replaced by insurance in a private market. So you’d still effectively end up paying monthly for a service you’ll probably never use in order to hedge against the risk. The difference would be that the insurance company couldn’t send you to jail for declining to participate in its risk pool by paying your premiums.

          2. robc

            Since most non-renters have a mortgage, the bank would probably require the fire service just like they require insurance.

            (I had to check to make sure, about 1 in 3 owner-occupied houses have a paid off mortgage, so my statement stands).

          3. kinnath

            Either the bank would require enrollment in a fire service or would require insurance that would require fire service or charge a sufficiently high premium to cover lose of the building due to fire.

            If you own the building outright, then you can decide on your own if you want to lose it or pay for fire service.

          4. R C Dean

            One of the things about fire is that it spreads in built-up areas. If you let one building burn because they didn’t pay for a fire department, you may lose a few more.

          5. kbolino

            Which would be a dumb way to do things. Car insurance includes uninsured motorist coverage. I don’t see why fire insurance wouldn’t include something similar. Not having fire insurance of your own is not an indemnity against liability, either. If a fire starts on your property and you fail to contain it before it damages someone else’s property or causes harm to them, you’re still liable. Moreover, most jurisdictions allow property to be violated for the sake of saving life and limb.

            So the only situation in which a fire department stands idly by while a house burns in a crowded neighborhood is one in which everybody involved is really, really dumb. In other words, where it’s being done by a government.

          6. R C Dean

            That creates a free rider problem, the same one that led to mandatory car insurance.

          7. Count Potato

            That’s what I meant.

          8. kbolino

            Liability is not free-riding.

          9. R C Dean

            If your neighbor has uninsured homeowner coverage and you know the fire department will put your house fire out regardless of whether you paid up your policy, what’s your incentive to pay your premiums?

          10. kinnath

            When I was a youngster, we lived in a subdivision outside Chattanooga. One day, a house down the street caught fire. The local, private fire department came to the scene and watched the house burn to the ground. They made sure it didn’t spread to the neighboring houses, but they did not risk life or limb to save a house that they weren’t paid to cover.

          11. kbolino

            If your neighbor has uninsured homeowner coverage and you know the fire department will put your house fire out regardless of whether you paid up your policy, what’s your incentive to pay your premiums?

            1. To not be sued
            2. To have coverage for the damage that the fire department does

            People have a romantic view of fire-fighting but the reality is that it’s quite destructive. Firemen don’t carry around axes just for show and the hoses don’t spray a fine mist of gentle fire-stopping powder. They will quite literally flood your house and they will tear down any part of it that is necessary to control the fire. No insurance means you and you alone have to foot the bill for those repairs.

          12. Pat

            If your neighbor has uninsured homeowner coverage and you know the fire department will put your house fire out regardless of whether you paid up your policy, what’s your incentive to pay your premiums?

            The insurance company and/or the other homeowner could sue you for their incurred costs, same as with an uninsured motorist.

          13. kbolino

            They made sure it didn’t spread to the neighboring houses, but they did not risk life or limb to save a house that they weren’t paid to cover.

            Then it sounds like the property in question was not so close to the other properties as to create the moral hazard that allegedly necessitates mandatory fire protection dues.

          14. Count Potato

            That would never work in urban areas where there is no separation between buildings with different owners.

    4. straffinrun

      All kids have the same opportunities. Let’s give all the kids Leukemia because a few have it?

    5. Her best work was on Star Trek: Voyager. Think about that for a minute.

    6. wdalasio

      Sarah Silverman doesn’t know what words mean.

      Maybe not. But, more likely, she hopes everyone else doesn’t know what words mean.

      At this point, honestly, I think it’s high time we stopped making the “naive and idealistic” excuse for socialists. They support an ideology that means, when the rhetoric is stripped away, the enslavement of all to all, even in the most idealized version of the ideology. Socialism is slavery. Period. Full stop. Socialists don’t support a noble ideal that doesn’t work in reality. They support an evil ideology. And, really, the rest of us should stop ceding them the moral high ground by pretending otherwise.

    7. Let’s start a Go Fund Me to get all these hammer and sickle celebs a one-way ticket to Venezuela. Then they can only come back if they voluntarily forfeit their voting rights.

      1. Hyperion

        “Let’s start a Go Fund Me to get all these hammer and sickle celebs a one-way ticket to Venezuela. Then they can only come back if they voluntarily forfeit their voting rights.”

        Yeah, unfortunately, Venezuela already arrived at the ‘ran out of other people’s money’ stage. They want socialism here because we still have a lot of money to steal.

    8. robc

      If its not anarchy, its socialism!

    9. Michael

      She is an empty-headed bimbo of the highest order. This is a fine example of her idiocy, but it’s a bit weak in comparison to her previous work:

      https://twitter.com/sarahksilverman/status/830923187479277568?lang=en

      1. I love the responses.

      2. Rebel Scum

        I ‘member that. Hilarious.

      3. kbolino

        She should suffer the same indignity as Ted Stevens for just regurgitating something spoon-fed to her that she doesn’t understand, but she won’t.

    10. So that’s why they keep killing black people!

    11. SugarFree

      There’s this weird conviction, esp. among the politically ignorant, that socialism means “Be nice to everyone.”

      1. Akira

        It’s a classic Leftist tactic: Take some part of the ideology and rename it as something that almost nobody would disagree with, then accuse them of being against the pretty-sounding concept if they object to any part of the ideology.

        Disarming civilians and steamrolling the 2A = “Common-sense gun safety”
        Feminism = “The notion that women are people”

        1. Rope Snake

          +1 motte–bailey doctrine

      2. kbolino

        I think it’s just branding. If we were selling libertarianism to others, and we were halfway decent salespeople, we would play up a romantic view of it. “Don’t hurt people or steal their stuff” is both a pithy encapsulation of what we believe and also a somewhat empty catchphrase that fails to capture the depth of libertarian thought.

        That having been said, it is quite a larger stretch to repackage “state ownership of the means of production” to “be nice to everyone”. It is funny how they use Bastiat’s, rather than Marx’s, definition of socialism.

  35. The Sleeper

    I’ll just copy this headline word for word: Bath salts land two in jail for shooting at ‘alien lasers’ that were really fireflies, police say Ok then!

    I hope they find serenity.

    1. I am very disappoint that this didn’t happen in Florida.

      1. Bobarian LMD

        It happens so often it doesn’t get reported.

        Dog bites man.

    2. R C Dean

      They were definitely aiming to misbehave.

  36. Gaze upon women whose kindness and value as a human you would overestimate because of their looks; that is if you weren’t too afraid to talk to them.

    http://archive.is/HrggJ

    For 24 a sammich would be preferable, but pizza will suffice. 42 and 65 tie for the titty award. 56 wins the Annie Oakley award. 36 and 72 may join my harem.

    1. Tundra

      81 checks quite a few boxes for me…

    2. Pat

      I would allow 12, 53, 64 and 90 to dispossess me of my time and money.

    3. Count Potato

      #4

  37. Michael

    I’ve been away from here for a bit, so my apologies if this has already been posted. It is…glorious.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/05/i-stopped-going-to-the-gym-because-of-trump-now-i-cant-open-jars

    1. The stupid it burnz.

    2. Count Potato

      “”He’d promised to build a wall and called Mexicans “rapists”.”

      Because rape trees aren’t an actual thing?

  38. The Late P Brooks

    From Krugabe’s wordpuke about Brooklyn’s new socialist heroine (linked above):

    So here’s what you should know: the policy ideas are definitely bold, and you can make some substantive arguments against them. But they aren’t crazy. By contrast, the ideas of Tea Party Republicans are crazy; in fact, Ocasio-Cortez’s policy positions are a lot more sensible than those of the Republican mainstream, let alone the GOP’s more radical members.

    ————

    And even progressive economists like Josh Bivens aren’t sure whether a job guarantee is a good idea, mainly because they wonder whether the government can figure out how to manage large numbers of workers hired under the program and are uncertain about the cost. For what it’s worth, I’m pretty much with Bivens here, although I think he may be overstating the difficulties a bit; the goal of the jobs guarantee is laudable, but there are better ways to get there.

    Also for what it’s worth, estimates by the leading academic advocates of a jobs guarantee – Paul, Darrity, and Hamilton – say that it would be expensive, costing more than $500 billion a year, although they believe that part of this cost would be offset by lower spending on safety-net programs and higher tax receipts.

    ———-

    The point, in any case, is that while a jobs guarantee is probably further than most Democrats, even in the progressive wing, are willing to go, it’s a response to real problems, and it’s not at all a crazy idea.

    So next time you hear someone on the right talk about the “loony left,” or some centrist pundit pretend that people like Ms. Ocasio-Cortez are the left equivalent of the Tea Party, ignore them. Radical Democrats are actually pretty reasonable.

    More of his special brand of argument-by-assertion.

    “Crazy? I know you are, but what am I?”

    [T]hey wonder whether the government can figure out how to manage large numbers of workers hired under the program and are uncertain about the cost. No shit? Why would anybody question the practicalities of a vast government make-work project? I mean, those chronically unemployed/unemployable people will slot right in at the FDIC, no problem. Or are they all going to be park rangers, or Coast Guard tugboat captains? Maybe mine inspectors.

    1. Michael

      The point, in any case, is that while a jobs guarantee is probably further than most Democrats, even in the progressive wing, are willing to go, it’s a response to real problems, and it’s not at all a crazy idea.

      Someone get this man to his faining couch, stat!

      https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

      1. leonadasiv

        It’s sad that it took 8 years to get down to pre-recession employment levels. Must be that dang free market to blame. Must need some interventions and then it will run smooth.

        1. kbolino

          We still aren’t at pre-recession labor force participation (currently 63% vs. 66% prior) but it has at least leveled out for the past 4 years.

    2. Old Man With Candy

      +1 Milton Friedman spoon

    3. Grumbletarian

      Also for what it’s worth, estimates by the leading academic advocates of a jobs guarantee – Paul, Darrity, and Hamilton – say that it would be expensive, costing more than $500 billion a year, although they believe that part of this cost would be offset by lower spending on safety-net programs and higher tax receipts.

      So if the government gives money to people to work, the program can be partially paid for by taxing those additional workers … on the money they were paid … by the government who now needs money to pay those workers… who will partially pay for the government to pay them later… derp.

    4. When your ideas mirror those of regimes that murdered 10s of millions of people and invariably lead to poverty, misery and death, they are crazy. Sorry Krugnuts, yet another swing and a miss.

    5. Rebel Scum

      the ideas of Tea Party Republicans are crazy

      Constitutional government is just completely insane.

  39. Tundra

    Should we invade Mexico?

    TW: TownHall/Schlicter

    It definitely didn’t go the way I expected, though.

    1. We are overdue for another mexican campaign.

      1. Tejicano

        I grew up on the Mexican border – about 10 minutes by car to a good sized Mexican city.

        I was home on leave from the Marines on a Saturday. I told my mom I was going with some buddies (guys I grew up with, all but me Hispanic) over to Mexico for the evening. Mom tells me “Be good and have fun”. My reply – “Mom. Make up your mind”.

      2. WTF

        “From the halls of Montezuma….”

    2. Drake

      If we draw the border as a straight line this time, it will save a ton of money on the wall.

      1. Tejicano

        Somewhere, there has to be a photo of a hardware store in Mexico that is – fully or partially – festooned with ladders. I would love to have such a photo to post every time somebody says anything about a wall.

        Do a google earth search for Cloverdale, New Mexico. Drop down for a view on any road featured there. Other than the road itself you could be excused for thinking it was a photo from Mars.

        1. Drake

          Don’t be surprised if you are on that border with a weapon before your enlistment ends. That’s the only way a fence, wall, or line in the sand will work.

          I volunteered for a border mission once when I was in the National Guard. I unvolunteered when they told me we were’t bringing any weapons.

          1. R C Dean

            That’s the only way a fence, wall, or line in the sand will work.

            True. A fence that you can cross with impunity doesn’t do much of anything. To make a fence work you need armed men to enforce consequences.

          2. Drake

            That is what borders used to mean.

          3. Semi-Spartan Dad

            Yes. The fence also makes boundaries clear and gives, at least in my mind, the NAP justification to shoot scalers (not legal justification for homeowners but surely so for countries at their borders).

            Tejicano, to play devil’s advocate, doors do not keep out intruders either. Might as well show pictures of a lockpick or fireaxe in argument against having exterior doors and locks. They do provide a warning to stay out and time to prepare while being breached.

    3. The one option he fails to talk about (which he wouldn’t because he’s a libertarianish-neocon) is legalizing drugs and ending the fucking WoD. The violence and corruption in Mexico is almost exclusively fueled by the cartels and where does he think they get their money?

      Much simpler, cheaper and more humane solution, but of course it’s a non-starter because MUH OPEEOIDZ!

      1. ^This. Legalizing drugs ends your cartel problem. I personally doubt that it will significantly increase abuse problems, because, frankly, keeping drugs illegal hasn’t stopped anyone from getting them. On the other hand, booze and tobacco are perfectly legal and every day there are people who successfully navigate their lives without touching either one. And, importantly, there are people who have drinking problems or who are addicted to nicotine who quit successfully because they don’t run the risk of going to jail if they admit that they use one or the other.

      2. invisible finger

        The violence maybe. The corruption is baked into the cake of government.

      3. Pan Zagloba

        What, bunch of violent men with guns and power are just gonna go “Well, it’s a fair cop, back to subsistence agriculture for me”?

        Abolish WOD all you like, they’ll keep kidnapping, murdering, smuggling drugs (yes, yes, in anarchotopia there’ll be no regulation of any kind on drugs anywhere in the world – think that’s gonna happen?) and just straight up start taking territory until Mexico turns into 1920s China.

  40. The Late P Brooks

    TW: TownHall/Schlicter

    That hysterical screeching dipshit is as dumb as Maxine Waters.

    1. Tundra

      That’s what surprised me about the article.

    2. Drake

      Relax – the title is pure click-bait. It concludes with the obvious – we’ll have have to get serious about guarding the border as Mexico descends into Valenzuela-like chaos.

      1. Old Man With Candy

        He was an overrated pitcher.

        1. Brett L

          I was thinking of a certain pop singer scattered across a corn field.

    3. Schlichter needs to stick to twitter. He’s clever there because his thoughts are limited to just enough characters that he doesn’t completely go off the deep end.
      And yes, we do need to work on our security on the Mexican border. But they’ll not devolve into Venezuela as long as they have free elections and as long as we continue to be their biggest trading partner.

      1. Pat

        Meh, every place has free elections right up until they don’t. I wouldn’t put it completely out of the realm of possibility that the USA devolves in Venezuela on a long enough time line.

        1. Drake

          Once you vote the right way enough times, you don’t need elections any more. Or opposition candidates.

      2. R C Dean

        We’re Venezuela’s biggest trading partner also.

        Like Venezuela, Mexico labors under a Bolivarian national mythos that lends itself to supporting a caudillo strongman who can install himself as a permanent ruler. I think (don’t really know) that Mexico has more of a history and tradition of elections, but let’s not forget that Mexico had a one-party socialist government for decades. Now, they stepped aside when they lost an election, but I don’t think Mexico has the kind of cultural resistance to socialist dictatorship that would prevent it from happening there.

        1. Yep, it’s the Bolivarian tradition that will pretty much ensure that most of Latin America will remain impoverished and shitty. The success stories that you see tend to have democratic traditions, free(-ish) markets, and diverse economies. Every time you have a “Gib me dat” government, any wealth produced by the preceding governments is frittered away and you scare off foreign investment. Venezuela was one of the wealthiest nations in Latin America, and now people are killing stray cats for food.

        2. kbolino

          I think Simon Bolivar would have a similar view of “Bolivarianism” as John Maynard Keynes’s view of “Keynesianism”.

    4. He should stick to twitter.

  41. The Late P Brooks

    we’ll have have to get serious about guarding the border as Mexico descends into Valenzuela-like chaos.

    TEH BLODDTHIRSTY RAPEMURDER DRUG CARTELZ!!!!!!1!!1!!11

    Yeah, whatever, Kurt.

    1. whiz

      Valenzuela-like chaos

      Yes, Fernando’s delivery was rather unusual.

      1. whiz

        Damn, OMWC beat me to it!

        1. Young children hit hardest.

    1. Pat

      Damn Scots! They ruined Scotland!

  42. The Late P Brooks

    Gone fishin’

    Special Counsel Robert Mueller is tapping additional Justice Department resources for help with new legal battles as his year-old investigation of Russian interference with the 2016 election continues to expand.

    ———–

    Mueller’s probe has come under attack from President Donald Trump and his allies who say it’s going on too long, expanding too far and costing too much. But the special counsel’s charter, issued by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, includes investigating whether Trump or associates colluded with Russia and “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.”

    It’s a big investigation haystack. Yuuuuge. But there’s gotta be a needle in there, somewhere.

    1. Brett L

      As another dictator once said:

      “You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!”

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Amazon has long been accused of stretching the city’s transit and education systems, and its highly paid workers have driven up prices of goods and housing.

      Only in proggie America can having well-paid employees be a problem.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Gilmore’d

    3. R C Dean

      But the special counsel’s charter, issued by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, includes investigating whether Trump or associates colluded with Russia and “any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation.”

      And that is precisely why his appointment is invalid under the governing statutes and DOJ rules.

  43. The Late P Brooks

    So if the government gives money to people to work, the program can be partially paid for by taxing those additional workers … on the money they were paid … by the government who now needs money to pay those workers… who will partially pay for the government to pay them later… derp.

    Fasten your seatbelt. You don’t want to get slung out of the tilt-a-whirl.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      I missed that little nugget in there. It’s the infinite money machine.

      Somebody needs to check Krugabe to see if he caught toxoplasmosis from his cat.

      1. SugarFree

        He did, but not in the way you might imagine…

        1. Floridaman

          Or if you read this site regularly, exactly in the way you might have imagined.

    2. Brett L

      This from one of those yahoos who argues the modifier on government spending is greater than 1. So really, if the government paid everyone, ALL wealth would increase by the spending modifier! We’re literally burning money by having private companies!

      1. The multiplier. Ugh. There is definitely a gubment spending multiplier. It’s just that it can never actually reach 1.0, never mind anything higher. It can’t; by definition, it takes wealth out of the market in order to put it somewhere else, and in the process incurs costs. It may provide some value in doing so, but that value will never be higher than what could potentially have been generated by that wealth remaining in the market.

        1. +1 That Which Is Seen, and That Which Is Not Seen

      2. whiz

        I thought recent research indicated that the multiplier was less than 1, maybe around 0.8.

    3. How this man somehow won the Nobel Prize for Economics is beyond me.

      It’s like Stormy Daniels winning the Chastity Prize.

      1. Akira

        As I understand it, Krugman used to be a fairly middle-of-the-road economist, perhaps even a little right of center. Tom Woods frequently dredges up old textbooks and columns that Krugman wrote, and while he’s certainly no Austrian, he seems to believe that every policy has trade-offs and side-effects that have to be considered.

        My theory is that Krugman decided to become a total political hack in order to advance his career. In other words, he was hoping that President Obama or President Hillary would appoint him to some high-power position in the administration (thank fucking goodness that didn’t happen).

        1. commodious spittoon

          Or he realized that prestigious columnist spitting out pigswill for true believers pays better than principled lecturer.

          1. Pan Zagloba

            This is my theory. I want him someday to write a retirement column titled “Why I spent last twenty years riling up idiots”.

        2. wdalasio

          Tom Woods frequently dredges up old textbooks and columns that Krugman wrote, and while he’s certainly no Austrian, he seems to believe that every policy has trade-offs and side-effects that have to be considered.

          You don’t really need to look at old columns for that. Krugman’s last textbook has a lot that contradicts his scribblings for the Times. It isn’t that he’s gotten stupid. It’s that he writes fundamentally different remarks for his Times material than he argues in an academic setting. He’s not a fool. He’s a fraud.

      2. Pat

        To be fair, he won it for some very specific contributions he made to the study of international trade, namely “economic geography”, dating back to the 1990s and having virtually nothing to do with his political commentary or even his domestic economic analysis.

      3. Floridaman

        His early work was very different, and sane. It is clear he has been replaced by one of mr. Lizard’s infiltraitors.

        1. Mr Lizard

          Oh ya we totally skin-suited him back in the mid-90s. And you guys were right about him angling for a job with mammal with the kankles. But that was more of a backup plan in case she won…

  44. Pine_Tree

    My maybe-not-so-far out there thought right now is that AMLO (new el Presidente) will provide the catalyst to actually pull the US substantially out of SW Asia. Lots and lots of the public (and not just Trump’s base) is both tired of these particular foreign entanglements and also openly describing the Southern border situation as an “invasion”. Pair it up with being tired of paying for the defense of Europe, and you might be able to add a US-Amy-free Deutschland to the list, too.

    AMLO’s recent comment’s hinting as much might just click with enough of the electorate to do it…

    1. I can’t tell if AMLO is saber-rattling for his base or if he’s serious. If he’s serious, it’s not that short of an act of war.

      With the caveat that I agree invading Mexico or conducting some kind of aggressive military campaign is an insanely retarded idea, the President of one country actively encouraging his people to engage in mass migration to another country pretty much defines invasion.

      I don’t think it’s outside the realm of possibility that Mexico could go the way of Venezuela. If that did happen, the US would be in a very unfortunate situation.

      1. Pine_Tree

        Yeah, I really mean something like “bring the Army home and put them on the border”, not “invade Mexico”.

      2. kinnath

        End the War on Drugs, then turn Mexico in to a US territory and appoint a governor to sort it all out.

        1. kbolino

          Philippines 2: Electric Boogaloo

      3. Also, can we talk about the state of the nation that elects a guy who’s running on a platform of, “Run for the fuckin’ hills, boys! This place has gone straight to shit and your only hope is to join the gringos!”

    2. R C Dean

      Let’s say he’s serious, and people take him seriously, so that we actually do a big spike in illegal border crossing.

      How would we respond? I don’t really think we’re going to machine-gun illegals as the climb the wall, or light them up from Hueys as they run for cover in the US.

      Honestly, I see two options:

      (1) We pretend it isn’t happening and don’t change what we do now. Result: immigration system is clogged and collapses under delays and overwhelming volume, leading to catch-and-release and an essentially uncontrolled border.

      (2) A heavily patrolled border where illegals are arrested and dumped in camps close to the border until they can be processed or volunteer to return to Mexico (or wherever they came from).

      1. WTF

        (2) A heavily patrolled border where illegals are arrested and dumped in camps close to the border until they can be processed or volunteer to return to Mexico (or wherever they came from).

        So you’re saying you’re in favor of concentration camps for Latinos?

  45. The Late P Brooks

    From that Guardian thing about Bezos vs Seattle:

    “It’s incredibly difficult to find housing in Seattle now,” said Nicole Keenan-Lai, executive director of Puget Sound Sage, a Seattle thinktank focused on low-income and minority communities. “Two years ago a study came out that said 35% of Seattle’s homeless population has some college or a college degree.”

    John Burbank of the Economic Opportunity Institute said there is a a direct link between the surge in highly paid jobs and the numbers of people forced on to the street.

    “There’s an incredible correlation between the increase in homelessness and the increase in the number of people who have incomes in excess of $250,000,” he said. “That has grown by almost 50% between 2011 and 2017. The population of homeless kids in the Seattle public schools has grown from 1,300 kids to 4,200.”

    Something something correlation is not something. It’s obviously Amazon’s fault that white liberal NIMBYism has choked off expansion of the housing supply.

    I guess not many of those college-educated homeless people were information systems majors. For some reason, I assume a “thinktank focused on minority and low income communities” functions as a conduit for wealth redistribution; redistributing plenty of wealth to themselves along the way.

    1. commodious spittoon

      The population of homeless kids in the Seattle public schools has grown from 1,300 kids to 4,200.

      Maybe they could open up centers tailored to housing children… of course, the opportunity for abuse or worse would be high in such institutions, so you’d have to accommodate adults elsewhere. And you wouldn’t want every Tom, Dick, and Harry strolling up through the gates, getting their hands on little kids, so there’d need to be a fence around the place.

  46. RE: Mexico.

    With few exceptions, I don’t think there’s any group that agrees the status quo WRT the southern border is acceptable. With that in mind, let’s bounce some ideas:

    1) Go the Dems’ preferred route, say national sovereignty is outdated and erase the border completely. I think recent developments in Europe provide ample examples of this not working very well.
    2) Go the isolationists’ route and build the Berlin Wall/DMZ on the border with no immigration whatsoever. This is like taking the precautionary principle to an absurd extreme and applying it to important national policy. It’s stupid (IMO) from an economic standpoint and (not to sound like a prog) it’s counter to American value and tradition.
    3) Go the Q route. End the WoD. Secure the border as best you can against illegal immigration and criminal incursion then reform the legal immigration such that if an immigrant presents himself at an actual port of entry, is willing to submit to medical testing and some type of background check, he gets in on a temporary visa. If he meets some minimum requirements (doesn’t commit a crime, holds a job, has a place to live, actually keeps his immigration hearing dates), he can be upgraded to a green card after X years. If he continues to meet these milestones, is willing to show proficiency in English and renounce his country of origin’s citizenship after X additional years he can become a US citizen if he wants to. Otherwise, as a green card holder he can travel freely back and forth between his origin country and the US in perpetuity if he prefers.

    1. Old Man With Candy

      4) Go the OMWC route:

      a. Open immigration.
      b. No welfare.

      1. That’d work too, but I assume ending the welfare state is as much of a non-starter as spinning lead into gold.

        1. Old Man With Candy

          Or actually changing the immigration system.

          Hey, a girl can dream.

        2. MikeS

          You think ending the WOD is any more likely?

          1. Count Potato

            Portugal did it:

            “We want to legal drugs.”

            “Sorry, I’m against drugs.”

            “But drugs come in on boats, so we’ll get to spend more time on a boat”

            “Well, now that you put that way.”

          2. Like OMWC said, a girl can dream.

      2. Count Potato

        Still need to legalize drugs and secure the border.

    2. Drake

      End the WoD. Go back to the pre-65 Visa / sponsorship system. Turn people around at the border who don’t qualify for entry, get rid of this ridiculous drawn-out detainment and hearing process.

    3. Pan Zagloba

      3) makes sense to me. I don’t think WOD ending (which is an admirable goal) is required, which would make it easier to pass.

      Biggest problem I see is, how do you enforce it? Once they’re in the country, how do you track them down if they overstay temp visa or miss one of your milestones? Right now, that’s I think the biggest source of illegals, and enforcement is pretty hapless against it.

      Other than that, it’s one of the few reasonable immigration reform plans that doesn’t favor people who can walk to US over those who have to take a plane. That way it at least ensures diversity of cultures, so you may be able to keep your melting pot.

      1. “how do you track them down if they overstay temp visa or miss one of your milestones?”

        I guess the only humane way that doesn’t massively empower the surveillance state is to have them report their address and they have to show up for hearings once per year or something. The hearing would be really minimal: do you still live at X? Can you prove you either have a job or are being supported by a family member (no welfare/public assistance)? Someone who’s motivated to stay and follow the rules should be able to manage that. Not reporting his address and/or missing a hearing automatically disqualifies him from ever getting a green card and makes him immediately deportable no questions asked. Obviously, if such a person is arrested for some other reason he is deported immediately whether he’s been hitting his milestones or not.

        It wouldn’t be perfect but that’s what I see as the best way that doesn’t abuse people’s rights too much.

        1. Count Potato

          “Obviously, if such a person is arrested for some other reason he is deported immediately whether he’s been hitting his milestones or not.”

          Arrested isn’t the same as guilty.

          1. Fair cop. If someone is convicted of a crime.

          2. kbolino

            If we apply the same rationale as the Supreme Court did to uphold the sex offender registry, then just say that the deportation is not punishment and voila.

          3. R C Dean

            Except he’s being deported for being an illegal alien, not as punishment for whatever he was arrested for.

          4. Count Potato

            If he has a visa, he’s not an illegal alien.

  47. The Late P Brooks

    Also, can we talk about the state of the nation that elects a guy who’s running on a platform of, “Run for the fuckin’ hills, boys! This place has gone straight to shit and your only hope is to join the gringos!”

    Yeah, that’s bizarre. I wish I had a better grasp of the context of whatever the hell he really said. Running an election campaign with the slogan, ABANDON SHIP! doesn’t seem like a winning strategy, but I’m not politically sophisticated.

    1. 32 going on 52.

      1. Drake

        It’s the milecockage not the time

    2. Akira

      Looks like it was a rough 32 years. She used to be so beautiful.

      Drugs are a hell of a drug.

    3. Jesus, her mother looks younger than she does.

    4. Gustave Lytton
  48. commodious spittoon

    It’s been nine days since injuring my foot. I can freely move my toes and ankle, though it hurts, and am walking with only a slight limp now. So I don’t think anything is broken or fractured. But it throbs painfully if I spend much time on it, and it’s tender in spots and still a little swollen and bruised. I figure I just have to wait it out. What else can I do? Go to urgent care, spend several hours waiting to be seen, and be told it’s probably sprained and to take some Tylenol if I’m gonna be a big baby about it? I guess I could keep off it… but I gots to get paid.

    1. Count Potato

      Maybe get an X-ray?

    2. MikeS

      Vicodin and Jack Daniels

      It worked for Brett Favre!

      1. Bobarian LMD

        Does that mean we’re all gonna get dick pics later?

    3. >>But it throbs painfully if I spend much time on it, and it’s tender in spots and still a little swollen and bruised.

      You’re still talking about your foot? 😉

      1. On a more serious note: get an x-ray, better to be safe than sorry.

        But I’m doctor-phobic so don’t listen to me. Last yearI really pulled/broke some muscle fibers on my lower ankle. It took a few months before I was walking limp free. I didn’t see the point of going to the doctor since I knew nothing was broken; it was going to be a case of “ice and wrap it up”… and time.

    4. Evan from Evansville

      How’d you hurt it? I detest hospitals and doctors, and for toes at least, they can’t do shit to help you.

      First step–where does it hurt? If you press against the bones does it hurt? How does it hurt? Is it a sharp, fundamental pain? Might even have an emotional impact? Or does it just hurt? If you can walk around then I’m guessing it can’t be anything too serious. If your limp has gotten better in the past few days, then that’s WAY too fast for a broken bone to heal enough to make a difference.

      I’m not a doctor, but I’ve broken at least 13 bones, including two sawn-off-and-replaced hips.

      “Bones heal, and chicks dig scars.”

      1. commodious spittoon

        Yeah, see, I really should know better than to complain. Your article was horrifying.

        I backed myself up against a wall with a motorized pallet jack. Caught my foot pretty good in reverse and stupidly didn’t let go. It’s most painful around the big toe and along the instep, and also up the ankle on the other side. It’s still pretty tender to the touch on top and along the arch. And no, I don’t think it’s serious either. Just a PITA.

    5. Spartacus

      Time for the hot-cold treatment. 10 minutes soaking in hot water, then 10 minutes in ice water, then repeat (40 minutes total). Do that daily…the swelling and bruising will go down as the clots get flushed out.

      1. That’s good advice. It sounds like a deep bruise, and those take a while to heal. I had a similar incident years and years ago when I worked at a hardware store. One of those big steel racks they stick plants on squashed my ankle against a curb at some speed. Hurt like a bitch, but nothing broke. It probably took two weeks to get back to a hundred percent.

    1. SugarFree

      There are easier ways to contract Hep C.

      1. Count Potato

        I’m pretty sure she’s clean. Or did you mean to post that under the Lohan article?

        1. Pan Zagloba

          I think Lohan qualifies as “easier”.

        2. SugarFree

          That girl nasty.

      2. Pan Zagloba

        More fun, too.

    2. She does nothing for me. At all.

      1. MikeS

        Ditto.

    3. Evan from Evansville

      Y’all mafuckas need Jesus.

      I actually like tasteful ink, but I do see that hers are…unfortunate.

      However, she’s obviously hot as fuck. Would 12 times before morning.

      1. R C Dean

        I suspect it would be quite the wild ride, but that the regret would still outweigh the . . . benefits?

  49. Raven Nation

    An update from my personal news last night: wife and in-laws evacuated their house to stay with my SIL boyfriend. About 3am, they learned the fire had changed direction and they had to evacuate again. However, all safe and the family home is fine.

    The kicker to all this is what caused the fire. The area (Roaring Fork Valley, CO) had been under a red flag watch for weeks (no fires, etc.). The fire was started by two people at the local gun club’s outdoor range doing target practice which included using tracer bullets.

    1. kinnath

      stupid is as stupid does

    2. Count Potato

      Most ranges if someone fires a racer by accident (which can happen with military surplus ammo) everyone stops and grabs shovels.

      1. Count Potato

        um tracer

        1. Bobarian LMD

          We had a competition in the military we called ‘tracer racer’.

          It involved eating corn.

  50. The Late P Brooks

    Believe it or not, I think there might be a significant amount of misinformation and duplicitous mischaracterization happening in the “immigration debate”. From both sides. In that NYT thing about the ACLU, there’s a lot of weepy hanky-waving about some alleged refugee from the Congo, who, with her young daughter, “at great peril and hardship, made her way north to San Diego (WTF? From the fucking Congo? I guess I forgot more of my elementary school geography than I realized.) and crossed into America and declared herself a refugee”. And then (I have no difficulty whatsoever in believing this part) was treated callously and wrongly by the indifferent and uncaring System and separated from her daughter, who was sent to Chicago, for some reason. Including, they say, getting duped into waiving her hearing and agreeing to be returned to Africa because she had no translator or legal representation. Which is all Public Enemy Number One’s fault. Heart-wrenching, to be sure, but I cannot but suspect there are a lot of pertinent details left unmentioned. BUT- she made it to Home Plate and called “allee allee in free” or however it works. She rates a trip through the system, however uncaring and overburdened it might be.

    That is not the same as groups of people hoofing it across the border out in the middle of nowhere. I don’t have much of a problem with just turning them back, right there and then. Same with people huddled in the back of large trucks.

  51. The Late P Brooks

    Biggest problem I see is, how do you enforce it? Once they’re in the country, how do you track them down if they overstay temp visa or miss one of your milestones? Right now, that’s I think the biggest source of illegals, and enforcement is pretty hapless against it.

    Yes. I think that’s another major factor which is subject to misdirection. A lot people want to focus on the little familia on those yellow warning signs (Caution- Peasants Crossing), but there are an awful lot of people who are not hispanic, who flew in on a tourist or short term work visa and liked it so much they never bothered to leave. I personally have known and worked with quite a few of those people over the years.

    1. Count Potato

      The U.S. is terrible at enforcing immigration laws.

      1. Bobarian LMD

        The only effective answer is to crack down on employers.

    2. I’ve known several people here illegally from various countries, interestingly enough Ireland being a common one, who just overstayed Visas. It’s easy to do, and if you’re working for cash you can stay under the radar for years and years.

  52. I’d give more props to the crazy Statue of Liberty lady if she got past the foot.

  53. The Late P Brooks

    The fire was started by two people at the local gun club’s outdoor range doing target practice which included using tracer bullets.

    Demonstrating, once more, the dire need for common sense idiot control,

  54. Count Potato

    “Liberal Vs Conservative

    HAPPY 4TH OF JULY! what better way to celebrate the day god invented beer 2018 years ago than going to a gun range with a friend you politically disagree with?”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5ivbqib3qM

  55. Tundra

    Germany willing to cut tariffs on US cars, lifting automakers’ shares

    On Wednesday, the chief executives of prominent German auto companies – including Daimler, BMW and Volkswagen – “liked” a Trump administration proposal for both sides to reduce those tariffs to zero, according to German business news outlet Handelsblatt. The proposal was said to have been made by U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell during a meeting at the U.S. embassy.

    The EU tariff rate on all U.S. car imports is 10% while the U.S. tariff on imported European cars is 2.5%.

    Huh.

    1. kinnath

      Trump behaves like a businessman who knows he has a stronger bargaining position at the table. Hard to imagine where that comes from.

      1. Tundra

        Weird, isn’t it?

        Jack Baruth weighs in.

        The point of all this? Simple. It’s not insane for President Trump to want a truly level playing surface. It is insane to think that America can survive a tilted-table approach to trade indefinitely. And America is now ready to compete on the world automotive stage, both as a producer and as an innovator. Stop being ashamed of your own country. Give us some credit. If you’re experiencing some doubt about that, book yourself a test drive in a Corvette ZR1, Shelby GT350, or widebody Hellcat. If you can find any unsold examples, that is. This is still a pretty decent country, filled with good people and good ideas. Happy Independence Day. See you next week.

        1. kinnath

          Great article. Thanks for that one.

    2. Gustave Lytton

      the U.S. tariff on imported European cars is 2.5%

      *cough* chicken tax *cough*

      1. See Double You

        “Ford (ostensibly a company that the tax was designed to protect), imported its first generation Transit Connect light trucks as “passenger vehicles” to the U.S. from Turkey, and immediately stripped and shreded portions of their interiors (e.g., installed rear seats, seatbelts) in a warehouse outside Baltimore.[1] Mercedes imported complete vans built in Germany, “disassembled them and shipped the pieces to South Carolina, where American workers put them back together in a small kit assembly building.”[8] The resulting vehicles emerge as locally manufactured, free from the tariff.”

        Government intervention in the market = economic waste, and for what?

        1. kinnath

          Mid-90s Russia:

          A company built buses that shared a common chassis with a dump truck.

          The dump truck was delivered to the bus company. A team of guys with sledgehammers removed all the pieces of the truck not part of the chassis. The chassis was they introduced into the bus manufacturing line.

          This is Socialism.

    3. Hyperion

      See, we were warned that Trump’s trade war will destroy the planet.

  56. See Double You

    So, my fellow Montanan glibertarians, do you think Tester will lose his seat this November? Is Matt Rosendale a worthy replacement (I don’t know much about him other than he received Rand Paul’s endorsement in the primary and, at least according to those tolerant Democratic PACs, he is a dreaded outsider from Maryland)? Interestingly, the only ads I’ve been seeing (TV, Facebook) have been pro-Tester/anti-Rosendale. Makes me wonder how much effort the RNC and associated PACs are putting behind Rosendale.

  57. Hyperion

    Finally, the NYT writes something I agree with.

    YES, PLEASE

    1. Raston Bot

      Collins is a pro-choice moderate who voted for Gorsuch. as long as Trump’s nominee doesn’t preach from the pulpit during confirmation, then Collins will vote for her/him/xer/xerxes/xerox.

      1. R C Dean

        So what you’re saying is that Collins votes the way Trump tells her, which means she takes orders from Literally Hitler.

        1. Raston Bot

          After praising Collins vote against a partial-birth abortion ban and against a 20-week abortion ban, the fickle Left will have no trouble burning her in effigy after she confirms his Catholic pro-life nominee.

        2. The name is Litler, please.

      2. Hyperion

        So, I hear it’d down to three nominees now, one the chick, another Kavanaugh, and someone I’ve never heard of.

    2. Raston Bot

      Maine Senator (and Congresswoman) Margaret Chase Smith, Ms. Collins’ political foremother and idol, often broke ranks with her party — to defend, for instance, F.D.R.’s New Deal legislation from conservative attacks. On June 1, 1950, she became one of the first members of Congress to denounce the anti-Communist witch hunt of fellow Republican Senator Joe McCarthy. She began her Declaration of Conscience speech: “I would like to speak briefly and simply about a serious national condition. It is a national feeling of fear and frustration that could result in national suicide and the end of everything that we Americans hold dear.” She did not want “to see the Republican Party ride to political victory on the Four Horsemen of Calumny — Fear, Ignorance, Bigotry and Smear.”

      After six moderate Republican senators signed the declaration, Mr. McCarthy labeled them, in Trumpian fashion, “Snow White and the Six Dwarves.” He had Ms. Smith removed from her post on the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (replacing her with Richard Nixon) and lavished support on her challenger in the next election (she won anyway).

      yeah, that’s a cute story. but today the guy looking under everyone’s bed for Russians and making life difficult with his special prosecutorial powers is Mueller.

      1. R C Dean

        I would like to speak briefly and simply about a serious national condition. It is a national feeling of fear and frustration that could result in national suicide and the end of everything that we Americans hold dear.” She did not want “to see the Republican Democrat Party ride to political victory on the Four Horsemen of Calumny — Fear, Ignorance, Bigotry and Smear.”

        “We have a Democrat party apparatus and a national media which is promoting fear of foreign interference in our elections, even though President Obama himself assured us there was none, and no credible evidence of such interference has been produced.

        “We have increasingly loud voices, especially in academia but with support both within our government agencies and the Democrat Party, claiming that all men are toxic, that all white people bear racial guilt, and stoking the fires of envy and resentment with the fuel of bigotry.

        “We have a political party, again with the willing collusion of media outlets, which engages in smear after smear of their political opponents and the American people, recklessly and groundlessly accusing all and sundry of bigotry and racism, with no more basis than differences on policy, and with no more motivation than the desire to silence and destroy people they disagree with.

  58. The Late P Brooks

    So, my fellow Montanan glibertarians, do you think Tester will lose his seat this November? Is Matt Rosendale a worthy replacement (I don’t know much about him other than he received Rand Paul’s endorsement in the primary and, at least according to those tolerant Democratic PACs, he is a dreaded outsider from Maryland)?

    Where I live, people mostly seem to love Tester. I’m not so sure about the rest of the state. Somebody told me she saw some sort of “Veterans for Sending Tester Back to the Farm” bumper sticker, which is encouraging. I don’t know anything about Rosendale, but the right (left) people really hate him, so he can’t be all bad.

    1. See Double You

      You live near Bozeman, right? His support there doesn’t surprise me in the least. Up here in north central, people generally want a Republican but like Tester because he’s “good for veterans” (not clear to me how other than he likes to talk about them a lot). He’s also from the area (Big Sandy). But I thought I read/heard that Tester was one of the vulnerable Democratic senators up for reelection. He also voted against tax reform and generally votes big government on everything, so he sucks ass.

      Judging by his presumed vulnerability, and if that bumper sticker is indicative of anything, maybe Rosendale can defeat flattop this November.

  59. The Late P Brooks

    Also, I have reached the point where anybody accused of “destroying our public lands” automatically gets my support.

    Fuck ” protect our public lands”. It’s just a smokescreen for, “Restrict that land strictly to uses which I enjoy and approve of.”

    1. See Double You

      “Fuck ‘protect our public lands’. It’s just a smokescreen for, ‘Restrict that land strictly to uses which I enjoy and approve of.’”

      It also means “I want federal administrative agencies to possess and control vast swaths of Montana land instead of Montana citizens through their state legislature or as private individuals.” That reality robs any supposed “good” behind the “public” in “federal public lands.”

  60. The Late P Brooks

    He also voted against tax reform and generally votes big government on everything, so he sucks ass.

    He got carried into the Senate on Obama’s coattails, and went native in a big hurry when he got to DC. But he still spouts that “real Montana values” crap.