The 98 Mauser Sporting Rifle
The fame of the 98 Mauser action comes not only from its utility in military applications – where in its many incarnations it is without peer among military bolt guns – but also in its ability to cross over into being a basis for a fine custom sporting rifle. Some of the greatest works of art in steel and wood to come out of the shops of fine rifle artisans are based on Mauser actions, with the 98 being the frontrunner.
There are, however, a number of cautions and important considerations to take into account when gunsmithing the Mauser action.
Pre-98 actions.
One of the most important safety notes involves the pre-98 actions. Since this is a forum primarily for the 98, the pre-98s are somewhat off-topic, but the following safety tip is crucial: Pre-98 actions, including the 91 Argentine, 93-95 Spanish, and 94-96 Swede actions, lack sufficient strength to be rebarreled for most modern sporting calibers. These actions should only be rebarreled for cartridges developing a chamber pressure of 40.000 psi or less. The difference between these actions and the 98 series is not metallurgical so much as structural – an excellent illustration and text can be found in Kuhnhausen’s Shop Manual for the Mauser[i]. It is best to stick with the cartridges for which these arms were originally chambered.
98 Action Types
The 98 actions, in all their variations, are a somewhat different and more complicated story.
There are several different variations of the basic Model 98 action design; these can be loosely lumped into three categories. These are the large ring standard 98, which the GEW98 and k98k actions are included in; the small ring 98 actions, to include the German 98az, G33/40, and the M1910 Mexican rifles; and the large ring “intermediate” actions, typified by the Yugo vz24. Of course, thousands of minor variations exist, and addressing all those variations would be impossible in the space allowable here, so let’s stick to the standard large ring 98s, including the WWII German 98k actions. For a complete description of every make, model and variation, I recommend picking up a copy of Ludwig Olson’s “Mauser Bolt Rifles,” pretty much the Bible for Mauser fans.
The 98k is, as mentioned previously, a standard large ring 98 action, (although some 98k pattern rifles were converted from small ring 98az carbines[ii]) and as such is one of the more versatile for customization. Other common examples of the standard large ring 98 include the WWI GEW98, the 1908 Brazilian contract, built by Deutsche Waffen und Munitionsfabriken (DWM); the 1909 Argentine, also built by DWM; and the M1912 Mexican, built by Waffenfabrik Steyr.
Metallurgy
The military 98 Mauser actions differ quite a bit, metallurgically, from modern sporting rifle actions.
To clarify a couple of terms; there are basically two manners in which a rifle receiver can fail. The first is a “yield failure,” where the receiver ring may be deformed or “ballooned;” this type of failure frequently results in escaped gas and bits of cartridge case.
The second type of action failure is an “ultimate failure” sometimes referred to as a “catastrophic failure.” This is where the action basically explodes, and results in chunks of receiver flying all over the place, to include imbedding themselves in the shooter’s face and other vital regions.
Modern sporting actions (to include the newer FN and Zastava Mausers) are made from hard, high-carbon steel, and are homogenous throughout. Older military Mausers are made from softer, low-carbon steel that is heat treated or “case hardened” resulting in a fairly soft receiver with a hard shell or “case.”
The result of this type of construction is a receiver with lower yield strength than a modern gun, but a higher ultimate strength.
What makes the large ring 98 action capable of handling higher pressures than the pre-98s is the design of the receiver ring. The large ring 98 receiver ring measures 1.41” in diameter as opposed to the pre-98s 1.3”; also, the 98 action has a longer thread-bearing surface, improved torque bearing surfaces, and a large reinforcing web inside the receiver ring.
It is generally considered that the standard large ring 98 action is capable of handling most modern standard-length sporting cartridges.[iii]
Gunsmithing the 98 Mauser
Now I’ll admit that I’ve never based a custom sporter on a WWII 98k action – because I’ve never found an “action grade” gun or disembodied 98k action in a condition suitable for “sporterizing.” I have, however, used a variety of Mauser actions in building custom rifles, including a number of standard large ring 98s.
It is somewhat sacrilegious to cut up an original collectible military rifle for customizing, and I’ve had a few originals in the rack at various times myself. So, I try to buy disembodied actions where I can. I will also scour gun shows, pawnshops, and estate sales for “action grade” guns – rifles that have already been modified to some extent, making them fair game for gunsmithing.
To convert the military 98 action to “sporter” configuration involves four basic steps: 1) reforging or replacing the military bolt handle with one that will clear a low mounted scope; 2) install a low-swing or side-swing safety, again to clear the scope; 3) drill and tap for the scope mounts themselves; and 4) restocking. Many excellent Mauser sporters have been turned out with the original barrel but given the condition of many surplus guns currently finding their way into the States, rebarreling sometimes becomes a necessity.
With a bit of luck, you can find a Mauser action or barreled action with the gunsmithing work already done.
A good example would be a rifle I built for my own use elk hunting. I’ve described Thunder Speaker here before; it is a 1908 Brazilian contract action, built by DWM, chambered for the .338 Winchester Magnum. My original intent was to use one of the large ring ’98 actions I had in the shop, fit a new barrel, stock, bolt handle, etc., which would have entailed no small expense. The expense of this sort of work can easily outrun the cost of a brand-spanking-new Remington 700 or Winchester 70.
In my case, fate chose to intervene at the August 1996 Tanner Gun Show in Denver, back when once could still make good deals in Colorado gun shows.
While sitting at my table, trying in vain to part with a few of my surplus stuff, a gentleman walked by with a rifle slung over his shoulder, the sign on it reading: “Mauser rifle, .338 Win Mag.”
Like a trout faced with a well-placed dry fly, I rose to the bait.
The rifle was the aforementioned 1908 Brazilian (large ring 98) action, with a teardrop bolt handle, Buehler safety and Weaver bases. The 26″ Douglas heavy sporter contour barrel was Mag-Na-Ported, a plus when you are talking about .338 Mag recoil levels.
Since the barreled action was already in good shape, I made few changes – I just replaced the military two-stage trigger with a Bold modular, added a Bell & Carlson Kevlar stock and a Simmons Aetec 2.5-10X scope on Redfield bases and rings, which I prefer to the Weaver design on rifles with stout recoil. I loaded up some ammo with W-W brass and 225-grain Barnes X boattails.
The first trip to the range was enlightening. Between the Mag-Na-Porting, and the straight-line design of the Bell & Carlson stock, the .338 didn’t seem to have any more perceived recoil than a lightweight .308. Very pleasant to shoot; I ran through all 20 rounds I had loaded before I realized it. Even more pleasant were the results on the other end of the lane; groups averaged about 1 1/4″, with the largest going just over 2″. The Simmons Aetec scope proved superb, very bright and clear.
Cost vs. Benefit
When the project was completed, I had a high quality .338 Win Mag sporter with a total investment of about $500 – pretty much what I’d have paid for a new commercial gun in 1996, without the scope, dies or accessories.
Thunder Speaker is a pretty good example of the kind of “custom” work that any reasonably capable gun crank can do by him or herself – no rebarreling or action modification involved, as that work was already done. These kinds of project guns are readily available, often at bargain prices. I’ve since spent a little bit more to have a Winchester-style side-swing safety mounted, as the Buehler was too close to the scope objective when set to Safe.
Cost isn’t all that the true gun crank considers, however, and the chance to take game or gather ooh’s and aah’s at the range with a unique sporting arm of one’s own making, will often outweigh mere financial concerns. I know it does for me.
Inspecting the 98 action
When considering an action for extensive gunsmithing, the prospective custom Waffenmeister should inspect the following areas closely:
- The bolt face should be clean and free of pitting and erosion.
- The extractor should fit tightly and function correctly with a dummy cartridge of the appropriate caliber.
- The locking lugs should be clean, rust-free, and show minimal wear.
- Cocking piece/sear engagement should function smoothly and flawlessly – ditto for the safety.
- Ejector box should have good spring tension and function freely.
- If the original barrel is to be used, the bore should be clean and free of rust and pitting.
- Visually inspect the entire action for rust and/or pitting. I’ve seen a few actions for sale that were pitted badly enough to be potentially dangerous.
- If the action has been drilled and tapped for scope mounts, ensure the screw holes are not in the area of the barrel threads or reinforcing web.
The action should also pass the following standard function check.
- Close the bolt and apply the safety.
- Pull the trigger. Nothing should happen.
- Without operating the bolt, turn safety to “fire.” The sear should remain engaged. If the striker falls when the safety is disengaged, you have a serious safety problem.
- If the sear remained properly engaged in Step 3, pull the trigger. The striker should fall normally. The trigger pull should not be gritty or stiff.
If the action passes all of these tests, it should be a good candidate for your custom project.
Gunsmithing Do’s and Don’ts.
Do’s:
- Have your action or barreled action inspected by a professional gunsmith prior to any customizing. If you are using the barrel already on the gun, the inspection should include headspacing.
- When rebarreling, invest in a quality barrel. The barrel is the heart of a rifle, and a quality tube from Douglas, Shilen or ER Shaw will be worth the extra bucks.
- True action and bolt faces and lap locking lugs. This process evens bearing surfaces and improves inherent accuracy.
- Use an aftermarket modular trigger if desired. I’ve had excellent results from Timney, Bold and Dayton Traister triggers. Keplinger makes a very good single-set trigger for the 98 Mauser, which does require professional installation.
Don’t:
- Open the feed ramp to allow feeding of .300/.375 H&H, or full-length magnum cartridges. This removes metal from the area immediately behind the lower locking lug – not a good practice.[iv]
- Trust chamber stamps on used guns. A Cerrosafe chamber mold should be done on any and all used guns.
- Fire any rifle with an improperly functioning safety mechanism.
- Fire any 7.9x57mm Mauser manufactured prior to 1905 without first miking the barrel. A few J-bore (.311) guns are still extant – and may generate dangerous pressures if fired with S-bore (.323) cartridges.
And finally – please – don’t cut up or modify an original collectible! There are ample action grade guns around, and also ample collectors who will be willing to take your original off your hands.
The 21st Century Mauser
It’s often said “the more things change, the more they stay the same,” and this certainly applies to rifle design – given Winchester’s and other gunmakers run back to the original controlled feed design of the 98 Mauser. Paul Mauser’s M98 has set the standard by which all other bolt action rifles are measured for 120 years now. I’m confident that it will continue to be the gold standard of bolt guns well into this century.
[i] “The Mauser M91 Through M98 Bolt Actions – A Shop Manual.” Kuhnhausen, Jerry, 1991, VSP Publishers, pg. 160
[ii] “Mauser Bolt Rifles” Olson, Ludwig, 1976, F. Brownell & Son, pg. 118
[iii] Kuhnhausen, pg. 86
[iv] Ibid., pg. 86.
Awesome! Thanks for the info?
Are you not sure? Or are you the Judge?
I’ve talked myself out of getting a VZ24 several times now. I’m reluctant to start stocking yet another caliber.
Good article.
My dad had (notice tense) one of these that was brought back by my grandfather from the war. It was such an awesome rifle. Then some asshole broke in to his house and stole it.
Many sadz.
Yeah, my grandfather was a WWI vet and had what I always believed was a Gewehr 98. He brought it back with him and had it for a couple of decades before it went missing. It lived on in one photograph – one of a handful of photos of him from that era. By the time my dad was old enough to start shooting, the gun was gone and just a bit of family lore.
Still, I always enjoyed looking at the photos of my grandfather in his WWI infantry uniform. It was cool to be connected to something from as close to pre historic times as my kid-brain could comprehend.
I’m just here to escape the Lohan pics in the morning links.
*hurls*
Cool article, as a non gun smith doing anything to a gun like that always seemed past my abilities.
Thunder Speaker sounds like a hell of a gun for $500.
There’s got to be a STEVE SMITH joke in there somewhere. Or maybe some SugarFree prose.
STEVE KNOW WHAT THEM ARE…
“yield failure,” OR AS STEVE SAY ‘RUNNY NOSE’; THAT WHEN HIKER AM FULL.
“ultimate failure” AKA ‘UNTUCKED’ OR ‘PROLAPSED’.
Animal, for an asshole you sure have good taste in guns.
I have a K98 and a M48 Yugo. I sometimes shoot the Yugo, the other is more of a collector. I was lucky enough to have a chance to buy a few thousand 8×57 surplus ammo after the was in the caucuses was over. It turned out to be suplus german ammo from WWII. The ballistics on it are quite superior to modern off the shelf ammo but it is not non-corrosive. I think that stuff may turn out to be as collectible as the rifle with all of the swastikas on it.
I had a WW1 small-ring kar98 for a while, complete with original foot-long bayonet. I let someone talk me into trading it off for something else; still regretting that one.
I have never sold or traded a gun away without regretting it.
I’ve never regretted buying a gun, but I’ve regretted parting with them, with one exception: A cheap-ass Chinese SKS that wouldn’t hit a paper plate at fifty feet. Was glad to see that piece of crap go.
Two I haven’t missed was a sporterized 1903 and a jam-a-matic Kimber. Got more value out of the used riding mower I bought with them.
I’ve heard about that issue with Kimbers but mine has been flawless.
Same here. Smooth as silk and eats anything I put in it. Also, hits like a 6″ K-22.
The knock on them is QC, not design, I think. Would explain the wide range of experiences.
It was a beautiful pistol, but I didn’t feel like trying to figure out where the problem was when I already had others that didn’t. And since it was supposed to be a concealed carry piece, questions of reliability even if I managed to get it right kinda killed it as well.
Sounds like me and guitars. I traded my 1968 Gibson rosewood flying V for a brand new Ibanez, a super nice guitar, but DOH! Why the fuck did I do that? That V is worth thousands of dollars now. I haz a sad every time I remember that.
I sold my 5 string P bass. I feel your pain.
I Sold my 5 string J Bass, It was a pain… in the ass Heavy
^EXACTLY!^^
OT: Don’t know if this has been linked to before. Al-Shabab bans plastic bags.
TW: New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/04/world/africa/somalia-shabab-plastic-bags.html
It’s the popular trend. Kenya did it last year.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/08/28/world/africa/kenya-plastic-bags-ban.html
New Zealand getting ready to as well: https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/06/government-flip-flops-on-plastic-bags-ban-but-one-is-coming-eventually.html
According to this columnist it’s important that NZ “catch up.”
I don’t mind paper bags as long as they are the kind Wholefoods use, with the handles. A paper bag with no handle is an abomination and is really what should be banned.
I like paper bags, and don’t mind the reusable bags, but plastic bags are better for reuse around the house.
My wife is a big ol’ treehugger and absolutely insists on reusable bags. We’ve now got something like, oh, thirty reusable bags in various states of wear. My feelings on the matter are, shall we say, complex. On the one hand, I have an almost pathological aversion to waste and I hate when grocery store clerks put like two things in a plastic bag and call it a day, I hate having to find somewhere to put all the bag (hate throwing them away–see previous remark about waste and then ask me how many old screws I have in the shed) and I like the reuse angle. On the other hand, walking into a store with empty bags makes me feel like I’m a hobo, those things get disgusting after a while, I don’t like being associated with environmentalists, and they’re way bulkier than plastic bags so there’s an even bigger issue with finding a place to stow them.
I’ll say this for paper bags. While they suck in many ways, I do use them to light charcoal in my charcoal chimney, and they see a lot of use during fireplace season.
“I hate when grocery store clerks put like two things in a plastic bag and call it a day”
This is an NAP violation.
I have returned from the grocery with more bags than items.
My wife uses a razor to cut the plastic bags into loops which she then knots together into a long rope/string. She then crochets them into rugs, mats, potted plant holders, etc.
Tell your wife to use more bags and I will plant more trees. My brother is showing up here this evening so that tomorrow we can look over the land cut last year and come up with a plan for planting it. I’m thinking about 45,000 yellow poplar as it is the Salem creek bottom and the water comes up on about 3/4 of it on rainy years. Yellow Poplar can handle those conditions better than pine. I will see what he says. He might want mixed. We might shoot some guns too, and by might I mean definitely will.
Do your part for carbon sequestration. Use more bags.
Pretty please, may we have some pictures (or even an article)? I would certainly love to know more about such handicrafts.
I wish I could write an article but as you might guess I know jack-shit about crochet.
Here is an article on it, maybe the one my wife found. She makes some cool stuff.
https://www.wikihow.com/Prepare-Plastic-Bags-for-Knitting-or-Crochet
Ask about the timber and I can talk all day. Crochet, not so much.
Hey, that’s a good plan. I might be able to parlay that into some other angles. Maybe I’ll do something like, “Ok, so, for every round I shoot at the range I’ll donate one cent to the environmental charity of your choice.”
*Two years later, Naptown files for bankruptcy*
I took the word “might” to refer to the adjective “some”.
My local grocery store has a plastic bag recycling bin.
I take it your wife hasn’t read the studies that find that, in terms of ecological impact, plastic bags are lowest and reusable bags are highest.
No offense to your wife, but that kind of tree hugging drives me up the wall.
Almost all their ‘save the planet’ rituals are just signalling….guys like Suthen do 100x more for the environment than they ever will.
Yeah, we get into it in a very low-pressure way pretty often. My point is that the worst threat plastic bags pose to the environment is that they blow around easily when they’re empty and look unsightly when they’re stuck in brush or up in trees. Otherwise, they take up virtually no space in landfills, which, incidentally, work just dandy and themselves take up very little space, all things considered.
We mix it up about recycling often. I point out that the “carbon footprint” of a recycling plant probably exceeds whatever limited benefits you’d get from recycling rather than disposing of anything. You can tell which things are worth recycling by whether or not people are willing to pay you for them: glass and aluminum are big; paper, absolutely pointless. In fact, the more paper you use the more trees get planted for pulp, so go to town. Otherwise, most civic recycling programs are the environmentalist version of the TSA.
I’d never say this to her because I might mess up the process, but she seems to be mitigating her views somewhat the more and the longer she’s exposed to people in the environmental movement. Put another way, the more she actually learns about environmental issues at the ground level the more refined and considered her views are becoming. I mean, she still does all the environmentalist signalling that is expected of any right-thinking lefty when it comes to stuff she doesn’t actually work with, but where she has personal experience she’s coming around.
I vaguely recall reading that your standard issue grocery bags degrade pretty quickly. Its not like a bag is still going to be around in a few years.
Yeah, they’re not exactly meant to be permanent. People moan about plastic microparticles or whatever but as far as I can tell the verdict so far is that, yes, microscopic particles of plastic have been found in fish guts, but there may or may not be any actual problem with that. Or maybe a better way to put it is that the fact that the bits in the guts are plastic is no worse than if they were silica or anything else, and a damn site better than, say, mercury.
But, of course, as has been said many times, the point isn’t to save the environment, it’s to harm humanity. If you made bags out of a water-soluble starch or something that behave just like plastic bags, were as cheap to manufacture, and dissolved after a few days, you’d hear wailing about the effects of increased starch sludge on ground water or some shit.
aka the Mexican Suitcase 😉
I love Mauser chat
But I ain’t whittling on no rifles any more. So whose contemporary action do you like? A Ruger 77 is probably the best over the counter answer.
For new-today manufacture, yeah, I’d take a Ruger 77 MkII over most of the stuff out there. I still have a soft spot for pre-64 Model 70s, which is really just a 98 Mauser prettied up some. So is the Ruger, for that matter.
My grandfather gave me a Remington bolt action 22 when I was 10. That was my very first rifle. Not sure how old that thing is, but it has to be at least 40 years old.
There was (or is) a tabloid – like newspaper that would list guns for sale across the country. They often had mil surplus listings. Can anyone here remind me of what it was (is) called?
Shotgun News?
Yeah, now renamed “Firearms News.” They are online: http://www.firearmsnews.com/
Now called Firearms News.
Yeah, I’m pretty sure that’s the one I was thinking of, although it looks like they changed their format a bit.
Sorry, playing catch up. Yes, Gustave is correct. It was the Shotgun News. Are they still around? I figured online classifieds and auction sites would have killed them over night.
Don’t know about paper, but they rebranded as “FIrearms News” and are online. http://www.firearmsnews.com/
Are the Germans even allowed to own guns now?
Only Prussian aristocrats, provided they have a dueling scar and a monocle.
Yes. As I understand it, the ownership laws are pretty restrictive and often require them to keep their guns locked up at the range, but they can own them.
Wiki has an article on it, there are certain types of guns which are pretty much not allowed. Two things jumped out at me:
1. A firearms ownership license (Waffenbesitzkarte or WBK), or an entry to an existing WBK, is mandatory for each weapon purchased.
2. A 2009 amendment to a 2002 law, “introduced routine verifications of safe firearms storage by local firearms control offices at the homes of licensees.”
To go to the other end of the timeline, my 224 Valkyrie upper is coming in today. Now I just need to find a range with more than 300 yards. I didn’t think of that before I ordered the upper.
I’ve got a Gewehr 88, allegedly the predecessor to the 98 and made by Loewe rather than Mauser. I’ve never shot it, although my father did years ago and it’s been maintained very well. I need to slug the bore and see what it will take. I know those guns were made when cartridges were typically using much lighter loads, so even when you can find ammo for them you have to be really careful about powder weight.
OT: Record low number say they are “extremely proud” to be American.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/236420/record-low-extremely-proud-americans.aspx
What I find interesting about this is that the downward spiral of “liberals” being proud to be American started long before Trump. It’s almost as if the progressive project is incompatible with belief in American values like liberty and property rights.
Eh. Probably good people don’t have to much pride wrapped up in their national identity.
NOTZEEEEEEZ!
There’s a difference between jingoism and patriotism, I personally wouldn’t claim to be proud to be American, I’m proud of the things I’ve accomplished and I am grateful for the freedoms that allowed me to, but being proud just for being American strikes me as being proud for being left-handed.
You are correct. I might be more accurate to say I am very fortunate for being an American. I dont see how anyone could honestly take issue with that.
I agree. If I was born in South America I may be more successful than the average South American, but nowhere near as successful as I am in the US
You can say that again. There are a lot of great places in the world, and there are certainly problems with the US, but when I think about what my life could be like anywhere else I thank my lucky stars I was born an American. There is absolutely nowhere on Earth I’d rather live than this country.
For the left that is unsurprising. Their philosophy is based on Hegel, Marx and the Frankfurt School – the exact opposite of the founders philosophy. When the Wookie said she was finally proud of her country for the first time I dont think she said that for the reasons people thought she did.
OT: G-D BLESS AMERICA
https://www.seventeen.com/beauty/news/a41466/american-women-apparently-have-the-biggest-boobs-in-the-world/
Boobs are never off-topic, Q.
That article doesn’t seem to take ‘store-bought’ into account. Also claims D-cup is the american average? Skeptical of that claim….
Lot of fatties out there…
Good point, didn’t think of that…..
Also, I wonder if they were only analyzing natural ones, or if they included enhanced ones.
Yeah that’s all fat chick tits pushing the size up.
Just like the average male weight is up at 195 pounds now, and not because everyone’s been following the Tao of Warty.
Huh. I wonder how much they got paid for that work.
I know of two men who suffered from breast cancer. Both were Gynecologists. There may be something to the viral theory of certain cancers. Still, I would take that gig.
IDK….I’d take the salary sure but I think the ratio of work you enjoyed to the”OMG that’s f-ing gross” would be pretty lopsided
I’m keeping my amateur status so I can be on the gynecology team in the Olympics.
Yeah, there’s a reason they have to pay men to look at random women’s vaginas all day.
I meant boob measuring not the gynecology.
I want to be the guy who does the final post-op quality check for breast enhancements….
Excludeing the xer’s of course
It’s beyond question that certain environmental & lifestyle factors play a role in cancer development, I definitely think it’s possible.
John Shaft was a gynecologist?
For a magazine aimed at women, they really fucked up. Cup size varies on bra size, it’s not a constant volume unit.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt just resigned.
Another scalp for the proggies and NeverTrumpers.
Still, he was just a cog in the machine. Let’s see who Trump replaces him with.
Hopefully, it’s a true shitlord. I doubt Trump is going to replace him with a leftist.
Someone who made their living in the coal industry I hope! We’d run out of containers to contain the delicious tears
He could say “Well we don’t have anyone to run it, let’s just get rid of it!”
I think my erection would knock over my monitor.
There would be calls for his assassination……oh wait, they already played that card
One of the Koch brothers just retired. He’s old and ill so it’s perfect – prog rage and can’t come in to work.
Not surprised. Hope Trump appoints a better replacement and rubs progs faces in it.
Wow, I’m surprised I haven’t gotten an email yet. I’m working from home, but I can almost hear the shouts of glee from here.
Pruitt had a lot of issues. I’m not convinced he was any less of a swamp creature than who he replaced.
I’m starting to think that Democrats are in real trouble. Take what you want from this, but if it’s true, it spells big trouble for Democrats. They are counting on millennials to save them. So what happens when half of them desert? And then what happens when the generation after them are more conservative than any generation in decades?
BLUE WAVE?
I have been saying something similar to this since 2015
both parties face a generational problem
(as the older core members of one political umbrella-group die off/retire/stop being relevant, the next takes over and has new constituents to pander to)
the GOP had *less* of a problem w/ its aging leadership, and disaffection between core and fringe, mainly because of the Tea Party, which shook up the establishment and made them recognize they needed to get their shit strait – if only rhetorically, and not ‘actual budget or policy-wise’.
Trump provided an additional leg up in that he has served as a sort of non-ideological bridge figure which rallies disaffected people, and at least gives establishment room to adapt.
But the dems, while being in a similar position in say, 2012…. has basically made their same problems worse in 4 dimensions. they didn’t recognize that the only reason they remained popular with millenials + blacks was Obama. Running clinton, simply because of her legacy power base, effectively told Gen 2.0, “Shut up and vote for 1990s DNC”
this seems to have fucked-off both blacks (who saw little real material benefit from Obama, and ended up less-wowed by him than they began), and the Millenial progs. The way DNC did Bernie dirty showed that the political establishment might sing the SJW tune every now and then, but they really don’t give a fuck about these squishy socialist morons. so now they all want to play Leftier-than-thou and join an incipient DSA, which is basically political suicide for the left, because the lefter-the fringe goes, the less appeal the mainstream has w/ independents. And blacks aint much into the Quasi-Commie shit either.
I don’t think the Dems could have fucked themselves harder if they tried. the fact they’ve made stuff like “impeaching trump” and “nazi scare” their main themes shows how little they trust their own platform as a rallying issue. iow, they have no economic or social policy in particular: its just pandering lamely to identity groups, and that sort of thing , while its good for Optics like the women’s march type stuff… often has short lived usefulness, and gets undermined by things like the way extemists (e.g. Linda Sarsour) end up being associated w/ them.
Its a shitshow, basically.
still – i think they’ll pick up seats in the house, but failing to recapture it is basically “monumental failure” by any reasonable standard. All they really should have needed to do to make large mid-term gains would be to ‘not be retarded’. But they’ve been retarded. And the media isn’t helping, because the only way they make Click$ anymore is through non-stop rabble rousing over petty shit that erodes their own credibility
oh, and throw the SCOTUS issue on top of this dumpster fire? Its basically a cherry on top because it reveals how significant the Dem failure really has been, and how lasting the effects of their incompetence… and additionally, will force them into desperately trying to block nominations at a time when they’d rather be trying to demonstrate some “Here’s why you should want us to be in charge”-gravitas. Instead its going to be shrieking nonsense all through the summer/fall. The SCOTUS thing really kills any attempt to ‘shift the narrative’ and make Trump the focus. Instead its going to be on ‘actual constitutional issues’, and that’s just not good for them.
Solid Mauser freak here.
I used to have a 1930 Chilean 98 in 7mm Mauser. The action was slick as wet glass – difficult to tell the difference between charging the bolt with or without ammo in it.
My hunting rifle was a Spanish 96 action which Spain had re-barreled to 7.62X51mm. Not really a good idea but it never gave me a problem. On this one I chopped, reforged, & re-welded the bolt handle, sporterized the stock, dropped in a Timney trigger (yeah, probably lipstick on a pig), added a cock-on-open firing pin sear, and did some other work.
Both rifles are gone now.
I do currently have an un-fired Yugo 48 with all issue items but I would like some day to have another 98 hunting rifle.
As an aside – I once made the pilgrimage to the Mauserwerke Museum in Oberndorf while visiting Germany for a wedding. Pretty much as close to a “Haj” for me. I got to ask the guide a few questions – luckily a fellow enthusiast was able and willing to translate for me. I guess some of my questions seemed significant enough to the guide that he brought out some additional material – including a photo of himself as a young man in a black uniform sitting in the cupola of a Tiger tank.
OK, I just had to post one more time just to make it 98 posts. I mean, this is about the 98 Mauser so it should have 98 posts, right?