Saturday Morning Links of Horror

I warned you. Well, nothing more needs be said, let’s get to links, which will not help you to forget that image.

 

Any news story that has the words “ejaculating puppets” in it is worth reading. In this case, it’s a legal battle between the son of Jim Henson and the commercial juggernaut of Sesame Street. It’s nice to see that Brian Henson has inherited some of his dad’s creativity and a lot of his dad’s delightfully dark side. I know which side I’m pulling for.

 

Dogs, eggplants, Australians… this story has it all. Victoria is the antipodean Florida.

 

So let’s get this straight- there’s no evidence of asbestos in the product, there’s no evidence connecting the product to this lady’s cancer, but they’re an EEVUL KORPORATION, so let’s mulct $25 million from them, just because. Ahh, the wisdom of California juries. And did I mention how much I hate lawyers?

 

If I were to carve out an exception to the First Amendment, it would be to ban media outlets and politicians from talking about science. These are some ignorant congressmen. The writers at factcheck.org are equally ignorant and highly mendacious “journalists.” Their sources are a dead giveaway. Want to know the actual truth? Read the analyses of actual scientists here, here, here, and here. Bottom line: it’s complicated, buried in the noise, and basically we just don’t know. Just like anthropogenic climate change. Perfect for politicians and politicized “journalism.”

 

Speaking the high quality science being done by our government, here’s another gem, this time to bolster the latest pants-wetting SCARIEST DRUG EVER NEED MOAR LAWS panic. It’s… a reach. But it hits the narrative in an intersectional way, all directed toward more government. Note that there’s nothing quantitative presented, no links to peer review, no actual risk assessment. And of course, the mandatory ties to unrelated but SCARY research.

 

I always said that I’d be a gynecologist if I could specialize in hot young girls. I had no idea that this specialty actually existed, but apparently my spirit brother managed to carve out that niche.

 

OK, Old Guy Music, as if you were going to get away without it. A wonderful song, and some delightful playing by a talented kid.

Comments

265 responses to “Saturday Morning Links of Horror”

  1. Scruffy Nerfherder

    I ordered the Heaviside book. I read his Wikipedia entry last night and realized that he coined pretty much every term of significance that I used as an electrical engineer.

    Not certain how I wasn’t more aware of him before.

    1. DiegoF

      That guy was awesome! If I remember, he invented vector calculus and used it to put Maxwell’s equations–theretofore presumably in a jumble of scalar variables–in some form that human beings could understand. He also devised the function named after him (can’t take that for granted, since not everyone does!) and on top of it all he was rather a little fellow which I love in light of his having one of the coolest names of all times.

    2. Old Man With Candy

      You’ll enjoy it, I guarantee. One more bit of trivia: the equation for the radiation from an accelerated charge, which I learned as the Feynman equation, originally came from Heaviside.

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        You mean Cherenkov radiation?

        1. Old Man With Candy

          Yes, Heaviside did it first, but for the case of an accelerated charge in a vacuum.

          1. Old Man With Candy

            Clarification: OH made the theoretical prediction.

  2. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Letters to the Local Rag: I Need More Saviors Edition

    With all the craziness in the world, why don’t we require all public safety persons to carry weapons? I think firefighters and medics should be armed not only to protect themselves but also to protect the public. They go through the same background checks — why not have more safety on the streets?

    1. leonadasiv

      ” I want to offset the cost of my protection to everyone else in society”

    2. Count Potato

      I’m not against letting them carry at work.

    3. DiegoF

      Shooting the fire sounds like the plan of first action ordered by Fire Captain Kathryn Janeway.

    4. Spudalicious

      As someone who spent a career in EMS and the Fire Service, I absolutely would not want the public to think that I was armed.

      When you look at how Public Safety is viewed in this country, especially in the more impoverished areas, there are two distinct groups. Law Enforcement and everybody else. For better or for worse, people tend to shy away from cops and become less forthcoming. A visible, visceral distinction between those two groups is the firearm. The public knowing that Fire and EMS are now armed like the cops would have the very real effect of eroding the line between the “good guys” and the “bad guys”.

      “Everybody loves a firefighter.” And for them to do their jobs to the greatest extent possible, that mindset can’t be undermined, which is exactly what arming them would do.

      1. Old Man With Candy

        “I lost them all in a boating accident.”

        1. Spudalicious

          Very different from on duty.

  3. straffinrun

    Sakes alive. I hope that is just a fold of fat flap behind the Trumpidildo.

    1. Chafed

      We were warned.

    2. westernsloper

      Labi it is, labi it isn’t.

  4. The Late P Brooks

    You’re right. That’s an ugly tattoo.

  5. The Late P Brooks

    why not have more safety on the streets?

    This is a question we all ask ourselves.

    1. Lachowsky

      Put the Libertarians in charge and then we won’t have streets anymore. Problem solved.

  6. Dogs, eggplants, Australians… this story has it all.

    The dingo’s got my eggplant!

    1. Nephilium

      Damn it Youtube. How do you not have a clip of the Tick screaming, “Dingos took my baby!” from the animated series?

  7. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Letters to the Local Rag: I Pledge Allegiance to the FBI/CIA/NSA/QWERTY Edition

    I am not a genius, but one thing I know for certain: If a person calls the FBI and the CIA his enemy, that person is either a criminal or an enemy of the United States.

    1. +1 Frank Church

    2. Chafed

      There is no other possible explanation.
      /mouth breather

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      Of all the certainties to be certain of that’s what he or she or it chooses?

    4. MikeS

      I am not a genius

      Yes, we know.

  8. Imagine if that were an Obama dildo.

    1. straffinrun

      Baroke Yomamma!

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        If you say that three times while looking in the mirror, you know who will appear behind you.

        1. westernsloper

          The wookie?

      1. westernsloper

        Be the first to review this item

        How has that item not been reviewed yet?

    2. DEG

      Better than a Baby Jesus Buttplug (NSFW).

  9. straffinrun

    The areas where the oxycodone-tainted mussels were sampled are considered highly urbanized and are not near any commercial shellfish beds.

    Nice dog whistle.

    1. Pulling oxycodone-tainted mussels from a shell?

  10. Scruffy Nerfherder

    That mussel article is a treasure trove of retarded.

    I particularly like the Contaminants of Emerging Concern, it reminds me of the Rodents of Unusual Size.

    1. Nephilium

      So, you don’t believe they exist?

    2. Pope Jimbo

      Don’t worry, Rodents of Unusual Size are completely harmless (sometimes they might be dangerous if encountered on the ice, but that was years and years ago).

      1. DiegoF

        What the fuck is in that link? Anyway, have these.

        1. SoberPhobic

          Or this

      2. Count Potato

        That link needs a shot of insulin.

  11. DiegoF

    The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of Ireland has been repealed.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Is that the prohibition on sobriety?

      1. Abortion.

        I don’t know if they have amendments outlawing circumcision or deep-dish “pizza”.

        1. Scruffy Nerfherder

          Which one concerns potatoes on pizza?

          1. DiegoF

            Hey given how much the Italians themselves love mixing potatoes in with pasta, I guess you can’t blame the Irish.

            I always pick out the potatoes from the pasta and eat it myself; I cannot stand mixed starches. Dominicans mix rice and pasta, I have heard. And Americans like putting rice in their burritos and so-called “wraps,” which is fucking disgusting.

            Oddly enough I do not mind potatoes in dough, as in samosa and other Indian goodies. Rutgers students put french fries in their revolting “fat sandwiches,” though, which again is back in disgusting territory.

          2. DiegoF

            Also, in 1990s New York there was a very peculiar fad of offering ziti as a pizza topping. I never actually saw anyone order it except a foreigner from a very nonpizza country.

          3. Scruffy Nerfherder

            Ugh

          4. straffinrun

            Nonpizza country sounds evil.

          5. DiegoF

            If Ireland starts offering fetus I can’t imagine it’ll be much of a downgrade from their current pizza situation.

          6. slumbrew

            I will go to bat for ziti pizza:

            http://www.foodrepublic.com/2013/10/17/in-praise-of-the-elusive-baked-ziti-pizza/

            carb-o-licious. A single since is all you need, but it’s tasty.

            If anyone happens to be on the north shore of Long Island, I will heartily recommend this place:

            https://www.facebook.com/DiRaimo-Pizzeria-105175736043

            It’s interesting pizza – crispy crust but with some real chew to it. I’m probably biased due to childhood memories, but it’s also a favorite of my NYC-raised cousin.

          7. C. Anacreon

            Perhaps it’s only us in the Bay Area aware of the San Francisco treat, Rice-a-Roni? That’s rice mixed with pasta, you know.

          8. Count Potato

            Putting pasta in pilaf is very common all around the world. Arguably that’s how orzo started.

          9. DiegoF

            I’m googling rice and pasta pilaf, rice and pasta together, etc., and all I’m getting on page 1 is a bunch of nasty shit that looks like it comes from 1970s American housewife magazines. Like you’re going to serve it to the kids this Tuesday night, mixing it up from the chicken chow mein you tried for last Tuesday’s experiment.

            I’m also not seeing what orzo much would have to do with mixing pasta and rice together. It’s clearly meant to evoke rice, but it would seem like more of a substitute. And just one of the many “little shapes” that the Italians (who love their shapes!) make for soup.

        2. DiegoF

          Don’t you mean amendments outlawing Land Value Taxes and deep-dish? Do Glibs have a hot-tempered ongoing circumcision debate that I’m not aware of? I have to say I am exceedingly disappointed. That is the tiredest cliché on the Internet and I honestly thought we were better than that.

  12. straffinrun

    trustees awarded Nikias a one-time $1.5-million bonus three years ago, making him the third-highest paid college president in the nation that year.

    Sounds like he made more than 7 digits a year.

    1. Pope Jimbo

      Yup and now that he is done raising all that cash, the school is giving him the finger

  13. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Let me just say that as a business owner, I feel compelled to register my business with every goddamn social media outlet in existence just to protect myself from someone else registering it.

    As a result, my email inbox gets pummeled with bullshit constantly. However, one of the worst offenders is the newest kid on the block, Alignable. They suck.

  14. OK, Old Guy Music,

    Not Peaches en Herb?

  15. Derpetologist

    the accidental libertarian strikes again

    Trump makes it easier to fire poor-performing federal workers
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/25/trump-makes-it-easier-to-fire-poor-performing-federal-workers.html

    1. straffinrun

      Hold on. I like poor-performing federal workers. It’s the effective ones I want fired.

      1. DiegoF

        The entire URL has hyphens. How do you know he isn’t targeting poor performing federal workers? I think after 83 years it is time to pull the plug on the Federal Theater Project, and it seems Trump is just the man to do it.

        1. straffinrun

          I’m the one who’s drinking, Diego. ?

          1. You’re drinking Diego? Enough with the euphemisms.

      2. Certified Public Asshat

        Why not both?

        1. DiegoF

          Funny, I was just reading Rothbard, whom I am overall not a particular fanboy of, on his regret for having supported Joe McCarthy initially when he figured his particular anti-Communism was commendable because unlike HUAC’s it limited itself (at least initially) to rooting them out in government. He says, among other things, he should have listened to Frank Chodorov: “How to get rid of the Communists in the government? Easy. Just abolish the jobs.”

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The third executive order, focused on federal unions, is aimed at reducing waste and expenditures and requires federal employees to spend at least 75 percent of their time working on the job they were hired to do, as opposed to working on federal union work. It will also allow the federal government to start charging unions for office space in federal buildings.

      Ignoring the mind-numbingly obvious comments about this, if the GOP had balls, they would pass a law on this instead of leaving it to be reversed by the next administration.

      1. J. Frank Parnell

        Well, the courts keep ruling that it’s unconstitutional for a new administration to overturn a previous president’s executive orders, so it should be fine.

      2. Gustave Lytton

        Fuck that. Expel the unions from federal office space. They can rent commercial real estate on private terms.

  16. The Late P Brooks

    FIRE!

    Like the 2017 fires in Northern California, the cause of the fire that burned our neighborhood, according to the government database, is still under investigation. One source is more likely than others: On that day, strong winds whipped power lines that hung over dry brush.

    A power line can start a fire if it breaks in the wind. It can start a fire when a tree or a branch falls across it, or when lines slap together, or when equipment gets old and fails without anyone noticing. In 2015, fires started by electrical lines and equipment burned more acres in California than any other cause. Power lines sparked fires that set records in New Mexico and fed a blaze in Great Smoky Mountains National Park that entered the city of Gatlinburg, Tennessee, and killed 14 people in 2016. In recent years, they have consistently been among the three major causes of California wildfires.

    ————

    In the months after my neighborhood burned, I waited fearfully, which means I waited angrily. In particular, I hoped power companies would put their lines underground. In 1995, fire-related costs ate up 16 percent of the U.S. Forest Service budget. By 2015, half of the budget was devoted to fire. Some of us wondered how safe our power can be when utility-company profits drive power operations. PG&E has been found guilty of negligence before in wildfires, and some of us point at negligence and greed again this time.

    ——–

    In general, power lines only cause fire when things go wrong above ground. Even utility companies agree, after a 2012 study by the Edison Electric Institute revealed that underground lines had fewer problems during storms and were better for public safety all around. But California has 210,000 miles of electrical lines. The cost to put lines underground is about $1 million per mile to start, and much more in mountainous areas. That’s five to 10 times what it costs to hang a line overhead, which usually makes underground lines logistically or economically impractical. In North Carolina, for example, a plan to put power lines underground was dropped because utility rates in the impacted area would have risen by 125 percent.

    Long meandering tearjerker about fire in he west. It’s all in there. Evil moneygrubbing kkkorporations, global warming, stupid people (like the authoress) who want to live in places they shouldn’t be allowed to live, blah blah blah. She casually tosses out the notion of simply burying all those power lines but does not for some reason mention the rabid freakout by the I Fucking Love Nature types which would inevitably result when they realized just what that would involve.

    She actually tiptoes near the cliff of comprehension when she talks about regulation, but scurries to safety before reaching any truly discomfiting conclusions. I kept waiting for her to say, “Put solar panels on those houses, and take down the power lines.” But, to her credit, she never did.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Cheap electricity is a gift from God if there ever were one.

      These people are self-loathing Luddite Malthusians.

  17. straffinrun

    Do I really want to find out why Tommy Robinson was arrested again?

    1. Drake

      Because he’s the only man in where England used to be with the balls to speak the plain and obvious truth.

      They arrested him outside a trial of immigrants who committed mass rape of underage girls. His speech obviously worries the authorities far more than English girls raped and pimped out by invaders.

      1. straffinrun

        From what I saw, he was arrested for reporting on a trial of gang rapists. The stuff he put out had already been reported by the local paper. It is Orwellian memory shit.

      2. Stinky Wizzleteats

        An interesting tweet thread concerning this case. Apparently the judge issued an order under some BS act or another that criminalizes reporting on this case and it appears that articles are being scrubbed and deleted from (some) UK affiliated websites.

        https://twitter.com/willchamberlain

        It’s absolutely shameful.

        1. Drake

          If he isn’t murdered, he’ll spend more time in jail than the rapists.

          1. Stinky Wizzleteats

            It’s a travesty but the Brits are too emasculated to grab the torches and pitchforks and storm the castle. I’ve always been a bit of an Anglophile but the recent events there have broken me of that.

          2. Drake

            Sane here. I’d like to thank my ansestors fir leaving that hole.

    2. Drake

      They didn’t just arrest him. He was tried, convicted, sentenced, and shipped off to prison yesterday. Some incredible Orwellian shit for speaking up.

      https://gatesofvienna.net/2018/05/update-tommy-imprisoned-already/

    3. Count Potato

      “One raped women and the other spoke out against child rapists.

      Please explain to me the comparison.”

      https://twitter.com/ashtonbirdie/status/1000138963439497216

    4. Count Potato

      “UK among worst in Western Europe for freedom of press after ‘staggering decline’, Reporters Without Borders index claims”

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-among-worst-western-europe-freedom-press-reporters-without-borders-index-a8320691.html

      This is my surprised face.

      1. Rufus the Monocled

        Oh. That’s surprising.

        A country that starves babies to death and ignores Muslim gang rapes.

        When does a country qualify as a ‘shithole’ again?

        On the upside, their national soccer team finally learned how to play soccer. Wooo!

        1. Bob

          South Africa turned their country into a shithole to win at soccer too. It’s worth it.

      2. Stinky Wizzleteats

        What’s happening there is terrible but I call bullshit on that list, the US is ranked #45:

        https://rsf.org/en/ranking_table

        No way.

        1. Brochettaward

          Do you even follow what Trump tweets about the media? THEY’RE UNDER SIEGE!

        2. Rhywun

          Without digging, I expected exactly that.

        3. Rufus the Monocled

          I’ve come to ignore these rankings.

          1. Scruffy Nerfherder

            Dude, people are getting blocked on Twitter every day here, we’re dying!!!!!

    5. Count Potato

      Apparently, this is a screenshot of the court order.

      “The judge in Tommy Robinson’s case, Denise Marson, pulled a neat trick today. She threw him in jail for 13 months, and banned anyone in the UK from talking about it.”

      https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/1000112150201884672

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        They’re in dire need of a first amendment and a few others too.

        1. Drake

          They had a Constitution and a Bill of Rights – then decided they didn’t like it.

  18. Pope Jimbo

    Fake news, but funny. It is also like MLW’s fake magazine covers. Not instantly apparent as a spoof because our world has become so silly.

    1. How quickly people forget the artisanal dwarf cats

      1. Scruffy Nerfherder

        LOL

      2. DiegoF

        So, let’s suppose you have a dwarf cabbage, a dwarf cat, and a dwarf goat, and a single tiny rowboat…

    1. straffinrun

      That’s almost the same ending as Fahrenheit 451. I was rooting for you, Bud.

  19. Pope Jimbo

    Speaking of hipsters…..

    Three people, two dogs and 24 hours? Only 100 ticks?

    Sorry, but those people haven’t spent much time outdoors during tick season in Minnesoda if they think that is news worthy.

    1. I’m amazed at how few ticks I find on me considering how much time I spend outdoors in the woods and the amount of nanny-state fear mongering over Lyme Disease there is.

      1. DiegoF

        Or you could be like the Hadids (Gigi and her siblings and mom Yolanda) and gobble vitamins by the handful every day because you suffer from “chronic Lyme Disease.” Go ahead and google that, and see how many of the articles (in “respected” journalism) covering their “struggle” or “activism” suggest that “chronic Lyme Disease” is a form of Lyme Disease, rather than a form of hypochondria. Oddly enough, this was a significant early step in my realization as to just how worthless journalists are.

    2. MikeS

      If there was 100 per dog I wouldn’t even be shocked.

  20. Scruffy Nerfherder

    If only we had more laws, this wouldn’t be a problem

    The study’s central finding showed that nearly 80 percent of the perpetrators carrying a gun recovered by Pittsburgh police were not the lawful owners, but rather in illegal possession of a weapon that belonged to someone else — “a strong indication that theft and trafficking are significant sources of firearms involved in crimes.”

  21. The Late P Brooks

    WTF?

    The meritocratic class has mastered the old trick of consolidating wealth and passing privilege along at the expense of other people’s children. We are not innocent bystanders to the growing concentration of wealth in our time. We are the principal accomplices in a process that is slowly strangling the economy, destabilizing American politics, and eroding democracy. Our delusions of merit now prevent us from recognizing the nature of the problem that our emergence as a class represents. We tend to think that the victims of our success are just the people excluded from the club. But history shows quite clearly that, in the kind of game we’re playing, everybody loses badly in the end.

    Speaking of self-loathing liberals… That’s as far as I have gotten. I’m sure it gets even dumber.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Don’t worry, inflation will take care of that

    2. straffinrun

      We have left the 90 percent in the dust—and we’ve been quietly tossing down roadblocks behind us to make sure that they never catch up.

      So let’s have more cronyism.

    3. Semi-Spartan Dad

      The meritocratic class has mastered the old trick of consolidating wealth and passing privilege along at the expense of other people’s children.

      Is this the old trick of spending less than you make and planning for the future?

      1. J. Frank Parnell

        spending less than you make and planning for the future?

        Those sound like some loopholes that need to be closed, comrade.

    4. leonadasiv

      Yes History has shown that systems where people are awarded by merit are the worst…

    5. Not an Economist

      It is another article that identifies a real problem and then recommends a solution of more of what helped cause the problem in the first case. The self-described meritocratic class has risen to the top and because they are the (self-described) best and the brightest make sure they and their kids get the best of everything and only associate with their own kind. And the meritocratic class, now that they are in power, have put roadblocks in the way of people seeking to join their class.

      I agree with the author this is a problem. I’m not sure of all his data because I’m to lazy to look it up. My issue with him is his solution is more government. He doesn’t realize government is full of people in this meritocratic class and have spent a fair amount of time putting roadblocks up. It is as if he has a fairly common blind spot regard government. That the government has some special insight into what is best for people.

      A large number of people think most (got to account for people like Trump) people working for the government (or certain non-profit organizations) leave their baser instincts behind. They don’t. And when they convene a group of “experts”, the experts already agree a “general” solution and just need to work on the specifics. I know I’m preaching to the choir here but government is full of people. And they are just as dumb and emotional as everybody else.

      1. Akira

        A large number of people think most (got to account for people like Trump) people working for the government (or certain non-profit organizations) leave their baser instincts behind. They don’t. And when they convene a group of “experts”, the experts already agree a “general” solution and just need to work on the specifics. I know I’m preaching to the choir here but government is full of people. And they are just as dumb and emotional as everybody else.

        They also forget that the government IS a special interest group just like a corporation. On average, government workers make more than any private sector equivalent, they have much less pressure to get results, and their risk of getting fired is practically nil. And of course, there are those filthy fucking government sector unions who pretty much fund the Democrat Party – the one that always wants more government.

    6. Bob

      Basically these people think that if they buy something they want like an IPhone then they made someone richer. Then they should be allowed to steal their money back because it’s unfair that the guy they gave their money to now has more money.

      I try to think progs aren’t stupid but they make it hard.

    7. Gustave Lytton

      Hereditary meritocratic class? Contradiction much?

    8. dontreadonme

      “Our delusions of merit now prevent us from recognizing the nature of the problem that our emergence as a class represents” So they are the problem and should commit mass suicide?

  22. I’ve joked in the past about using the Yellowstone supervolcano as a geothermal power plant producing scads of “green”, “renewable” energy.

    Apparently NASA (why is it NASA doing this?) put out a study last year about the feasibility of doing this to vent off the heat and keep the supervolcano from having a massive, catastrophic eruption.

    1. Here you can listen to an interview with the NASA scientist in question. If you want to download the MP3, it’s a little over 12MB.

    2. leonadasiv

      Mission Creep. NASA is the de-facto science arm of the US. If you think this is wrong, you hate science!

      1. MikeS

        As well as a racist because Global Warming effects minorities more.

  23. straffinrun

    North Korea’s Kim meets with South’s Moon for 2nd time

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in met for the second time in a month on Saturday to discuss carrying out the peace commitments they reached in their first summit and Kim’s potential meeting with President Donald Trump, Moon’s office said.

    South Korean presidential spokesman Yoon Young-chan said Moon will reveal the outcome of his surprise meeting with Kim on Sunday. The presidential Blue House did not immediately provide more details.

    Interesting.

    1. Brochettaward

      The Dem-op media is already mocking Trump and calling him a buffoon and failure for falling for Kim’s tricks.

      But the guy already succeeded at something tangible by getting those two sides to meet. They are incredibly shallow motherfuckers.

      1. Urthona

        And he got hostages freed. And they disabled pieces of their program. Somehow accidentally successful again.

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          I’d bet on the Trump-Kim summit still happening, it’s just been delayed a bit. Trump does need to tell his underlings to stop mentioning the Libya model though.

  24. The Late P Brooks

    Is this the old trick of spending less than you make and planning for the future?

    Shush, you! Do you want everybody to know?

  25. And did I mention how much I hate lawyers?

    and I’m married to one!

    1. Old Man With Candy

      Then I hate you by extension.

      1. I thought you hated him because he’s too old.

    2. Doesn’t everybody hate lawyers?

      1. straffinrun

        Argumentative and leading.

  26. Pope Jimbo

    Fucking Congress is a bunch of pussies. What don’t they understand about their role in providing oversight into the FBI, NSA and CIA. You know if they aren’t complying, maybe cut off a few billion in spying? Or hold some of the leaders in contempt?

    Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, is being stonewalled on at least three inquiries. The House Judiciary and Oversight committee chairmen required a full-blown summit in April with Justice Department officials to get movement on their own subpoena. The FBI continues to block a fuller release of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia report.

    Not that the documents that Justice sends over are of much use. Mr. Grassley this week excoriated the department for its routine practice of redacting key information, and for similarly refusing to provide a “privilege log” that details the legal basis for withholding information. His team recently discovered that one of the items Justice had scrubbed from the Peter Strzok-Lisa Page texts was the duo’s concern that former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe had a $70,000 conference table. (Was it lacquered with unicorn tears?) A separate text refers to an investigation that the White House is “running,” but conveniently blacks out which one. The FBI won’t answer Mr. Johnson’s questions about who is doing the redacting.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      The agencies are stalling until the mid-terms in the hopes that Democrats will take seats and be able to stop the oversight.

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        Winner winner chicken dinner, you got it.

      2. dontreadonme

        Entirely correct, but it is ridiculous that a congress and president cannot demand accountability of agencies that answer to and work for them as representatives of the American people. I kinda wish for a Designated Survivor scenario to happen. (Dear NSA/CIA/DHS, I don’t even know how to build a fire, much less obtain and detonate a bomb. And this is not a threat, just a wish. Like a little girls hoping and wishing to meet a prince or be Beyonce one day and knowing that’s not gonna happen without a parent like the Kardashian chicks have.)

    2. leonadasiv

      Get rid of them all. We will be safer

    3. westernsloper

      I’ve said it before and I will say it again. The FBI needs to be shuttered. The decent agents can fold into other agencies with overlapping jurisdictions. Congress should give them a budget of $0. The whole gaggle of Federal prosecutors needs to be gone through and looked at across every district. When you have douche bags like Mueller and his top dog Weissmann move up in the DOJ after ruining peoples lives and being routinely overturned by the courts for decades there is a big big problem. Close the doors and start over if it needs to exist at all.

      1. Pope Jimbo

        I’m with you in spirit. The problem is that if you shut down the FBI, the good agents would probably leave govt and go work for some private firms because they will be wanted. Only the slimy incompetents will find other govt jobs.

        That is what happens any time a company does a buyout instead of firing. The competent people grab the money and go get another job. The losers are left behind.

        While we are dreaming, why not pass a new tax rate of 110% on special prosecutors?

        1. dontreadonme

          IDK. I have a cousin who is FBI and while he is a good, honest, hardworking man, he tells of incredible waste, abuse, and outright illegal actions taken by many in the agency. He is disgusted by it all, but stays because of his beliefs, duty, and, er, pension. I don’t think there is a solution other than starting over, or, perhaps, leadership that demands honoring the Constitution. Okay, so start over.

  27. Count Potato

    “A Victorian farmer accused of murdering a man who ran over his dog has claimed his shotgun went off accidentally when he tripped on an eggplant.”

    That’s going to be the best sentence I’m going to read all day.

    1. Semi-Spartan Dad

      A neighbor trespassed on my land soon after I moved in. Claimed the previous owner let him whenever he wanted.

      SSD: I’m not the previous owner. See this Doberman, she would have gone after you if I had not been here. Do not come on my land again unless given permission.

      Trespasser: *Eyes Doberman* I’m not worried about your dog, I’ll always keep a gun on me just in case a dog comes up.

      SSD: *rests hand on grip* And I’ll always keep a gun on me in case someone shoots my dog.

      Neighbor immediately apologizes for trespassing and threatening my dog, have never had another problem with him in 5 years.

      1. Negroni Please

        goddamn I don’t know how you refrained from shooting him on the spot. I’m not saying that would be an appropriate or ideal response but if an armed asshole trespasser threatened to kill my dog, I’m not sure I could have stayed calm at all.

      2. DiegoF

        What a bizarre dude. I do not think you are permitted in any state to shoot someone just because they trespass on your real property and destroy movable property located therein. But you’d probably do OK in practice if you shot a person on your property not only brandishing a weapon but discharging it, and discharging it into an animal used for your personal defense at that. It’s a pretty special case.

      3. dontreadonme

        Property right seem like a thing of the past. I have owned several large tracts of land over 20 years and without exception numerous people trespass with impunity despite every boundary being properly fenced, marked and signed. I have no idea how this seems okay to them. The only times I have ever ‘trespassed’ was tracking wounded game. And I did so with both fear and respect for the landowner and with the belief that compassionately completing the kill took precedent. And, more than once, I offered game to the landowner where the animal died. And I would concede the same access to anyone who entered my property for said reasons and conditions. But recently everyone seems to think that ‘open’ land is public land. There for their enjoyment and abuse. As much as the defilement of our amendments I see this as a destruction to our society.

        1. Akira

          As much as the defilement of our amendments I see [disrespect for property rights] as a destruction to our society.

          It’s not an exaggeration at all. Free societies are built on cooperation and trust, and you can’t have that if there’s no definite rule over who owns what and people don’t honor their obligations.

    2. westernsloper

      Ya, I am not sure the eggplant defense is the best route. I think shooting someone in the face because they intentionally ran over your dog is justifiable homicide.

    3. Rhywun

      I thought Australia was a gun-free zone??

      1. DiegoF

        It would seem not all citizens have been properly informed of the buyback.

  28. Count Potato

    https://pagesix.com/2018/05/21/jessica-mulroneys-pippa-moment-was-no-accident/

    I guess that explains how Sir Mix-a-Lot got his title.

    1. DiegoF

      See, this is why I am a loyal Post reader. When there is a butt story, I can always rest assured that Richard Johnson will be all over it.

      1. All’s right with the world?

  29. The Late P Brooks

    The FBI won’t answer Mr. Johnson’s questions about who is doing the redacting.

    If they told him… well, you know.

  30. DiegoF

    Israeli child vs. New York Times “intellectual.” Ooo, the suspense is killing me!

  31. Rhywun

    These are some ignorant congressmen.

    Amazingly, all Republicans! What a scoop, factcheck.org!

    1. DiegoF

      As a native of an island territory, the global warming issue has special resonance for me, as it is we who are on the front line of mankind’s shortsightedness. And of course that’s not even the most urgent danger we face.

      1. dbleagle

        That never gets old. Every time my respect for the Admiral goes up.

      2. dontreadonme

        He is such a fucking idiot….and somehow still in office. One more reason to never live in Georgia. As if anyone needed a reason.

  32. Suthenboy

    “sea levels over the last 3 million years have gone up and down in line with the cycles of ice ages.”

    No shit. And the last one is still in the process of ending.

    1. MikeS

      That caught my attention, as well. He says something like that, but then goes on about global warming. I only skimmed it, but it seemed like he said rising seawater is due to AGW and lowering sea levels is due to AGW. Same thing for less Antartic ice as well as more. SMDH

    2. westernsloper

      The fact checkers go to Michael Mann for clarification of the facts in one case. When they go to a known bullshitter for facts and call that proof of their facts I don’t know how you fight it. They peddle bullshit with a straight face.

  33. Rufus the Monocled

    I looked at Factcheck.org and the science. They rely heavily on government agencies to support and back their claims. Also, Nature and Science Direct I’ve seen – safe to ignore them?

    I guess their tactic is to blitz the reader with an appeal to authority in a long article to give the impression it’s a serious essay.

    I suppose to the ignorant or people who just don’t have time, they simply defer to government agencies and trust their telling the truth.

    Bad move in my view.

    1. DiegoF

      Government tentacles are everywhere. That is why I stick to trusted, independent sources of junk science debunkery.

      1. westernsloper

        I am pretty sure it is in the terms of service of this site that it is against the rules to link to that. *closed the tab as soon as I saw what it was and shuddered

      2. Rufus the Monocled

        That never gets old.

      3. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Thanks for reminding me how stupid that was.

      4. Rufus the Monocled

        Man this has to go in the pantheon of all-time great comments:

        Builder
        Builder
        9 months ago
        I clicked back on my porn because its easier to explain if someone walks in

        940

        REPLY

      5. dontreadonme

        That was just retarded.

    2. Lachowsky

      We need separation of science and state.

  34. The Late P Brooks

    Goddammit. I’m laboring mightily to get through that Atlantic article about Teh Evul Meritocraceez! The one I linked above.

    Holy fuck, it’s like being trapped a La Brea Tarpit of moronic whining. Oh, the humanity.

    An example-

    Let us count our blessings: Every year, the federal government doles out tax expenditures through deductions for retirement savings (worth $137 billion in 2013); employer-sponsored health plans ($250 billion); mortgage-interest payments ($70 billion); and, sweetest of all, income from watching the value of your home, stock portfolio, and private-equity partnerships grow ($161 billion). In total, federal tax expenditures exceeded $900 billion in 2013. That’s more than the cost of Medicare, more than the cost of Medicaid, more than the cost of all other federal safety-net programs put together. And—such is the beauty of the system—51 percent of those handouts went to the top quintile of earners, and 39 percent to the top decile.

    What the fuck is that even supposed to mean? I suspect it’s some kind of reference to the dire need for a punitive wealth tax, to turn those hoarding bastards upside down and shake the filthy lucre out of their pockets.

    My head hurts.

    1. Suthenboy

      “tax expenditures through deductions”

      All of your shit belong to me.

      1. dontreadonme

        “That which is not taken, is given” QED

    2. R C Dean

      the federal government doles out tax expenditures through deductions for retirement savings

      Can’t remember who coined “Not giving is taking”, but there you go.

      1. whahappan

        I believe it was Sarcasmic at TOS.

      2. Akira

        “Progressives” have an odd view of wealth – they think it is a substance that rightfully belongs to every single person in the country in equal measure, and if any person has more wealth than everyone else, they have to justify why they should be allowed to be that rich.

        It’s a classic example of “unsupported premise” in an argument, and unfortunately, it has mass appeal with non-rich people. Everybody wants what everyone else has.

  35. Scruffy Nerfherder

    Every time I think they’ve reached their low, they continue to disgust me further with their mutual admiration society.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/25/clinton-declares-crisis-in-our-democracy-as-harvard-gives-her-medal.html

    1. Suthenboy

      I’m sick of hearing this. We dont have a democracy. We have a republic.

      Franklin – “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

      Clinton/Obama – “You didn’t keep it.”

      1. DiegoF

        Well, almost a quarter century ago she “wrote” a book declaring the raising of children to be a public matter, titling it with the wisdom of a fictitious collectivist “African” culture. And then there’s…well, everything else since. So much as I agree with you (and am constantly bitching about the same thing), sharing a misguided and ahistorical political fetish with Antonin Scalia is probably the least of her problems.

    2. Stinky Wizzleteats

      “Attempting to erase the line between fact and fiction, truth and reality is a core feature of authoritarianism,” she said.

      She doesn’t do self-awareness very well does she?

      1. Mad Scientist

        She’s an evil piece of shit:

        “Attempting to define reality is a core feature of authoritarianism … this is what happens in George Orwell’s classic novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, when a torturer holds up four fingers and delivers electric shocks until his prisoner sees five fingers as ordered. The goal is to make you question logic and reason and to sow mistrust towards exactly the people we need to rely on: our leaders, the press, experts who seek to guide public policy based on evidence, ourselves.”

        1. Stinky Wizzleteats

          Good catch, I’d forgotten about her, um, interesting take on the message of 1984 and it fits in well with her fresh statement.

        2. Scruffy Nerfherder

          That’s an amazingly wrong take on that passage.

        3. Brochettaward

          our leaders, the press, experts who seek to guide public policy based on evidence, ourselves.”

          How do you go into a room with educated individuals and completely misinterpret a book that is assigned to people in middle and high school without getting called out on it? Hm…

        4. Brochettaward

          In other Hillary news, Drudge is currently running with several stories demanding answers as to why she’s wearing the heaviest pant suit in her collection during a heat wave.

          Her people suit is breaking down. It’s past its expiration date. Her failure in the election must have convinced the reptilians that she was a lost cause.

        5. dontreadonme

          What an evil cunt.

    3. Rufus the Monocled

      It can’t be said enough: She’s a cunt.

      A cunt with a stupid Harvard medal around her neck.

      1. Mad Scientist

        A cunt with a stupid Harvard medal around her neck cervix.

        (giggles!)

  36. Count Potato

    Just when I thought Mike Stuchbery couldn’t be any less human.

    https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1000026509380280320

    1. Raven Nation

      Well, he’s a douche, but is he correct about why Robinson was arrested? If there’s a law against filming suspects before conviction and he was on a suspended sentence for doing it then does it again in public…?

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        He did actually violate the law but the response and the sentence is far out of whack from what is apparently seen in similar cases. They’re trying to silence him for his political opinions and send those who agree with him a clear message.

        1. R C Dean

          He did actually violate the law

          There was a time when only things that were malum in se were supposed to be crimes, not things that were merely malum prohibitum.

          1. dontreadonme

            My latin is long in my past, but I would say he was not wrong attempting to expose those who were accused of rape and did not deserve to be punished for speaking freely about it. The UK is fucked beyond repair. Winston Churchill would be ashamed.

      2. Count Potato

        “People gloating at the fact Tommy could possibly die in jail can honestly go and fuck themselves.”

        https://twitter.com/CountDankulaTV/status/1000029580781027329

    2. AlmightyJB

      “Mike Stuchbery couldn’t be any less human”

      Unfortunately, his sentiment is shared by most Americans. The law is always right. FYTW.

    1. Lachowsky

      Saying something questionably racist can get a cop fired. Doing a mag dump into a dude holding a cellphone gets you a medal. Copy.

      Perverse incentives, how do they work?

      1. AlmightyJB

        The fact that it’s a black female officer being disciplined by a white female police police chief for racist comments I think is going to blow up. Especially right after a white cop who took a running kick into a restrained black kids face was just reinstated.

    2. Scruffy Nerfherder

      “In an audio recording of a meeting with internal affairs investigators, she said she used the phrase “black on black crime” during an employee evaluation as part of the reason she did not give a Columbus Police sergeant, who is also black, a negative mark.”

      Say what now?

      1. R C Dean

        See, this is why Meaning comes from context. lack of context = lack of meaning. Quod erat demonstratum.

        1. Count Potato

          What are you a time-traveler from ancient Rome? 😉

          1. R C Dean

            Just getting my Latin on. Sadly, you’ve seen most of it on this thread. But I at least threw in a couple of Japanese words, too. Thought I’d try working furrin’ words into every comment, but ran out of steam. Que sera, sera.

      2. Bob

        It sounds like spin. She didn’t give a black cop a bad mark because that would be black on black crime. That’s racial favoritism. They are spinning it like she’s being punished for being insensitive to blacks when she’s really racist against non blacks and let’s it effect her evaluations.

        1. R C Dean

          Good guess. If that’s right, she’s an admitted racist who makes personnel decisions on the basis of race, and should have been disciplined, if not fired.

  37. Count Potato

    “Very Hot Alt-Right InfoBabe Faith Goldy Assaulted by Antifa – Idle Cops Watch (Video)”

    https://russia-insider.com/en/very-hot-alt-right-infobabe-faith-goldy-assaulted-antifa-idle-cops-watch-video/ri23570

    “UPDATE: She liked our headline”

    1. DiegoF

      Oh Lord how have I never seen this site?

      1. Stinky Wizzleteats

        Это интересный сайт, не товарищ?

        1. DiegoF

          Hehe. Remarkably enough, the last word is the only one I don’t understand even though I don’t speak Russian. I understand the two functional words, and the other lexical words are both easy cognates. Last word probably “chief” or “boss” or “pal” or whatever, I am guessing. Yes, it’s a very interesting site to say the least.

          1. Old Man With Candy

            Looks like “fren,” Tovarish.

          2. “Comrade”.

    2. AlmightyJB

      Faith has nice lips.

      1. dontreadonme

        And even better the words that pass.

  38. J. Frank Parnell

    the commercial juggernaut of Sesame Street

    What are you talking about? Sesame Street only survives because of public funding, which is under constant attack by Republicans who want to destroy the happiness of small children in order to fund tax cuts for their rich buddies.

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      Not that HBO licenses them, I expect a Muppet Game of Thrones. It just looks like Henson beat them to the punch and they’re bitter.

  39. Scruffy Nerfherder

    I would like to thank Old Man for the image that flashes every time I refresh my browser. It’s now indelibly burned into my subconscious.

    *rummages around for tanto*

    1. R C Dean

      *passes scruffy wakizashi, stands behind him with katana raised*

  40. Count Potato

    “Hybrid human chicken embryos: HALF HUMAN – HALF CHICKEN abomination created in US lab

    A TEAM of stem cell researchers have done the seemingly impossible and successfully combined artificial human cells with the embryo of a chicken in a shock new experiment aimed at trying to better understand developing life.”

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/964507/Human-embryo-research-stem-cell-experiment-chicken-hybrid

    I DON’T LIKE THEM MAKING HALF-HUMAN CHICKENS THAT WILL PECK THE FRIGGIN’ FROGS GAY!!

      1. DiegoF

        Ah yes I was going to mention that, but I forgot where it originated. I remember it from one or two skits when the dude joined SNL.

    1. Pope Jimbo

      Gay peckers? Uffda.

  41. J. Frank Parnell

    Also, re: Sesame Street

    What do they give Tickle Me Elmo before he leaves the factory?

    Two test tickles.

    1. J. Frank Parnell

      lulz

  42. Count Potato

    “Facebook and Google Face $8.8 Billion Lawsuits on First Day of New EU Data Laws

    The Verge reported that the two companies were hit “with a raft of lawsuits” accusing them of “coercing users into sharing personal data.”

    “The lawsuits, which seek to fine Facebook 3.9 billion and Google 3.7 billion euro (roughly $8.8 billion dollars), were filed by Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems, a longtime critic of the companies’ data collection practices,” they reported, adding, “GDPR requires clear consent and justification for any personal data collected from users, and these guidelines have pushed companies across the internet to revise their privacy policies and collection practices.”

    “Both Google and Facebook have rolled out new policies and products to comply with GDPR, but Schrems’ complaints argue those policies don’t go far enough,” the Verge explained. “In particular, the complaint singles out the way companies obtain consent for the privacy policies, asking users to check a box in order to access services. It’s a widespread practice for online services, but the complaints argue that it forces users into an all-or-nothing choice, a violation of the GDPR’s provisions around particularized consent.””

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/05/25/facebook-and-google-face-8-8-billion-lawsuits-on-first-day-of-new-eu-data-laws/

    TW: Breitbart

    1. Brochettaward

      Facebook is a human right that Facebook is taking away from people.

      1. Pope Jimbo

        If Twitter is now a public forum and blocking people is a first amendment violation, why shouldn’t FB be considered a basic human right?

        Personally, I wish FB, Google or Amazon would block any one in the EU and delete all their data. Then tell the mob that erupts that it is all because of the GDPR. It would be sad that blocking access to FB causes more outrage than rape rings or other bullshit, but at least it might scare the pols.

  43. Count Potato

    “Google employees are spending heavily to elect Democrats in California and to flip the House

    California’s congressional elections are crucial to Democratic efforts to take back the House of Representatives.
    Tech workers in Silicon Valley have been contributing to the Democratic cause, with employees from Google leading the way.
    Some Alphabet employees are hosting fundraisers and calling on their friends and colleagues for help.”

    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/24/google-employees-are-funding-california-democrats-in-midterms.html

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder

      For a second I thought they were trying to flip the CA House.

      *puzzled face*

      1. DEG

        It’s the most important election ever!

      2. Raven Nation

        Huh, Republicans hold 14 of 53 districts. First shock: I didn’t expect to find that many Rs in CA. Second shock: 53 districts??!!

        Looks like 6 of the 14 are in play. I wonder how many of the Silicon Valley folks live in the R districts?

        1. Urthona

          The vast majority of counties in California are Republican.

          1. DiegoF

            Including that giant one that’s bigger than most East Coast states!

          2. Rhywun

            Except for the ones where most of the people live.

    2. R C Dean

      I’ll bet you anything a hardass prosecutor could string Google up for any number of technical campaign finance violations.*

      *SLD: not that corporate resources being spent on politics should be illegal in the first place.

      1. DiegoF

        I think there’s something to be said for the traditional hard/soft money distinction. Bribery is not really speech.

    3. DiegoF

      I don’t believe I saw anything there that suggested that there are more than a tiny number of remotely flippable Republican seats left in California by this point. I hope they do continue to poor money into these efforts. Perfect companion to all the money Tom Steyer is spending trying to impeach Trump.

      1. creech

        Rohrabacher (semi-libertarian)’s seat is apparently in jeopardy because he’s allegedly a “climate change denier” and has opponents who are scientists and all.

        1. DiegoF

          I would be curious as to what district that would elect a libertarianish politician would boot him because of his alleged “climate change denial.” Seems odd.

          But the fact that the Realtors have taken to telling baldfaced lies about him (see video) for some reason I cannot really understand, perhaps this indicates he really is weak.

        2. Old Man With Candy

          Let’s be honest, Dana is not the brightest bulb. Nor the sanest. Still better than 90% of the rest of congress.

    4. Everyday I’m happier that I dropped gmail.

  44. Mad Scientist

    As usual, OMWC has the very best taste in music.

  45. Count Potato

    “Is She Serious??? This Is Why Men Are Often Skeptical When It Comes To These Accusations”

    https://twitter.com/NotChrisFrom216/status/1000087952448516096

    1. Brochettaward

      I just lead the deadpan delivery Freeman uses. The man can make anything he’s saying sound classy.

    2. Stinky Wizzleteats

      Good grief, talk about taking a comment out of its obvious context.

  46. Tres Cool

    JB’s link about the Columbus cop sent me down the googleimage rabbit hole, since the anchor and reporter both caught my eye. I know there’s a Rule #34, but this little gem seems oddly specific, approaching HM levels:

    https://appreciationofbootednewswomen.blogspot.com/

    1. AlmightyJB

      Tonights google porn category selected.

    2. Brochettaward

      For those into booted newswomen, things seemed to have really slowed down in 2018 judging from the number of posts.

      The dude who runs that is more meticulous and passionate about that subject than I am anything.

    3. Count Potato

      Wow, there really is a website for everything.

  47. Count Potato

    “A Michigan Marxist Restaurant Closes After Failed Group Decisions and Long Sandwich Waits”

    http://fortune.com/2016/12/12/michigan-marxist-vegan-restaurant-closes/

    1. slumbrew

      Are we doing “best of” links?

    2. Rhywun

      lolperfect

    3. Rhywun

      And… what is it with the inevitable linkage between “marxism” and “vegan”? I don’t remember that being part of the program but it always is nowadays. I can only imagine it’s because some of them get off on telling you what to eat and the rest get off on being told what to eat.

      1. Probably some BS about vegans being oppressed or something.

        Do you even intersectionality bro?

      2. Scruffy Nerfherder

        Stupidity is the common link

      3. Akira

        They’re trying to rekindle the glory days of the Soviet Union, when there was no meat on the shelves whatsoever.

    4. “why is it that progressives refuse to acknowledge that socialism doesn’t work and never has? It can’t work because it runs afoul of natural law and human nature.”

      Because they live in a delusional fantasy world.

      1. Akira

        They would probably call that a naturalist fallacy, to which I would reply: “There’s a difference between a naturalist fallacy and a law of nature. It’s not a naturalist fallacy to tell an incompetent architect that his building is going to collapse because he has failed to account for the force of gravity.”

  48. I wouldn’t mind doing some amateur gynecological exams on these ladies.

    http://thechive.com/2018/05/25/there-are-sexy-chivers-among-us-6/

    No reason to go past #1.

    1. slumbrew

      #15 just makes me sad. Those look uncomfortable.

      1. Spudalicious

        I’ll take me a 47. I don’t care what the rest of her looks like.

        1. dontreadonme

          Agreed.

    2. westernsloper

      No reason to go past #1.

      But then you would miss 43. Proof even hot chics live in trailer houses.

  49. Spudalicious

    Trump dildos, ejaculating puppets and a gynecology scandal.

    You, my friend, are in a very strange place today. I suggest you start drinking early.