Czech-born filmmaker Miloš Forman died on April 13 at the age of 86. Libertarians who want to think about anti-authority political messages in any of his movies would probably gravitate to One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and The People vs. Larry Flynt, both of which have fairly obvious messages on the subject and are movies which would be better known to Americans. But I have a soft spot for one of Forman’s early movies made back in his native Czechoslovakia: The Firemen’s Ball.
The Firemen’s Ball was made shortly after Forman had finished Loves of a Blonde, both of which are set in smaller towns without much going on. In The Firemen’s Ball, the story centers around the now-retired chief of the local fire department. Last year was the 50th anniversary of his service with the department, but the department couldn’t be bothered to commemorate that event. Now, however, he’s dying of cancer. This was the bad old days when doctors thought the ethical thing to do was not to tell people they were dying of cancer, although to be fair to doctors back then, 23andme has shown that a lot of medical types still don’t want people to know about their possible medical conditions. Back to the movie, with the old guy dying, the current firefighters decide that the right thing to do would be to hold a big shindig in his honor and give him a ceremonial fire-ax.
Or, at least, that’s the plan. We see right from the beginning that anything that can go wrong with the idea will: one of the firefighters, like a senior citizen who has gotten his first copy of Print Shop Deluxe, gets the idea that having a banner look singed will be a nice visual touch; the attempt to singe it leave another fireman dangling several feet off the floor. They set up a raffle, and items meant to be raffled off mysteriously go missing. Young people have other ideas about how they should be celebrating, and so on.
Two incidents, however, linger much longer. First is when one of the firemen comes across a photo of a western beauty pageant, and thinks the idea of a pageant to determine which local girl should give the old fireman that ceremonial ax would be a brilliant idea. The only thing is, none of the girls look like either Ginger or Mary Ann, and worse, the boyfriends of the girls who didn’t get picked want their girlfriends in the contest. Whether the girls want to be in the pageant is another story.
And then a fire breaks out. It’s here that the real uselesness of these hero first responders is shown for what it is. A poor old man is having everything he owns burn to the ground, and the fire company first has difficulty getting to the fire and then has the most inappropriate compassion for the poor guy. Don’t let him look at the fire — but move him closer to the fire to keep him warm!
It becomes clear over the course of The Firemen’s Ball that the whole point of the ball wasn’t really to honor the old chief now that he’s dying; it’s about the individual firefighters trying to make themselves look good in the eyes of others. It’s a subtle statement on Communist-era “solidarity”, and shows how having power and prestige be prime motivators can warp actions in any government or bureaucracy. And when the chips are down, the state isn’t there to help you, but you make you fit what they want.
With that in mind, it’s easy to see why The Firemen’s Ball was banned by the Communist authorities (it was made in 1967, a year before the Prague Spring and Forman’s subsequent emigration to the States after the Soviets quelled the Prague Spring). Forman, for his part, always claimed that he wasn’t making an anti-Communist movie, and frankly, his claims on this are plausible. I grew up in a small town where my father was a member of the local volunteer fire department, and as I watched The Firemen’s Ball for the first time, I couldn’t help but think of the similarities between the small town in the movie and the one where I grew up: the penny socials, the generations of families being prominent names, the extremely petty politics, and on and on it goes. The Firemen’s Ball could just as easily have been about any small town anywhere.
Ted’s rating: 5/5
Criterion released both The Firemen’s Ball and Loves of a Blonde to DVD, although their website states that The Firemen’s Ball is currently out of print. However, as of this writing Amazon has it on streaming video, and free for those of you who already have a Prime membership and can do the streaming thing.
I’ll have to see it, Thanks Ted, nice job
Sounds like I’d have to read subtitles. No thanks.
To clarify; I’m a slow reader, and with subtitles I end up missing half the dialogue. Also anytime there are words on the screen I get distracted from the image; which is the most important part of a film. Not that it means I don’t expose myself to such things if it is a really good work, I did do an entire semester of Ingmar Bergman after all.
Could always learn Czech… or whatever it is they speak there.
It makes me a philistine, but I prefer dubbed content for the same reason. But I’ll give this a looky-loo.
I was just going to mention that. It’s pretty interesting how those things work. Spanish too is mostly dubs, Portuguese mostly subs. Franco wanted to give local voice actors a bit of a boost, Salazar had other priorities.
Oh man… I almost always watch with subtitles when it’s an option. I’m not a slow reader, but I guess I’m pretty selective with my hearing. I tend to gloss over a lot of “what’s said” for “how it’s said,” instead.
I never used to, but my wife and I started putting subtitles on at night so we could keep the volume lower for the sake of the kids’ sleeping, and I discovered that I’ve been missing quite a bit of dialogue.
Yeah… I find I miss a lot when there aren’t subtitles. Rewatching episodes of GoT when the initial viewing didn’t have the option of subtitles, it’s almost a whole new episode.
Another thing. Sometimes when I watch some anime or something else that has been dubbed over, the translation for the sub-title is different than the English spoken, which sometimes adds to or changes the context of what is being conveyed.
I needed subtitles for Taboo. I couldn’t understand half of what they were saying with the volume up…
Whenever I’m at my aunt’s house, where she uses closed captioning, I end up get confused by shows that are in english. Words on the screen are too distracting for me.
I watch so many foreign films I find real life hard to follow due to the lack of subs.
Though my ultimate goal is to do a What’s Up, Tiger Lily style dub of Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom.
120 Days of Sodom?
Is that a Royal Navy training film?
Are you subs for cartoons too? I have seen both Spirited Away and Princess Mononoke dubbed, and I have to admit the voice talent was so good it really has to be seen as a worthy work of art itself. I figure this will start to fall by the wayside as the obnoxious practice of casting big-name Hollywood stars in American animated features gains ever more ground each year.
Regarding anime specifically, I do prefer dubbed versions… but I’ll still turn the subtitles on. I’ve found sometimes the subtitles more closely align with the original foreign dialogue, which may have been altered for better understanding in American audiences. (Specifically, there’s often clever Japanese word-play that doesn’t really translate over, but I still find it interesting to read.)
I get a kick out of the… divergent… quality of voice acting in the SAC series. Like the unrelentingly spirited Tachikomas chewing the scenery vs. Batou’s actor sounding like he’s trying to swallow every word whole.
I’ve reached the point that I really don’t care for dubs at all. That’s not meant to disparge the efforts of the actors doing the dubs. When I first watched anime that’s what all I watched.
As for the SAC – if you watch the dub you lose out on Atsuko Tanaka’s incredible voice as Motoko Kusanagi! She has one of my all time favorite voices.
Motoko Kusanagi
Oh, I’ve only seen the dubbed version. The English voice actor sounds almost bored. That voice is MUCH more fitting for that character.
Some dubs are superior to others.
Even Rita Repulsa would wonder WTF.
My wife puts the subtitles on as well. It’s horribly distracting. Anyone who does this is worse than Hitler.
Speaking of which, what must it be like to attend a foreign film with HM’s family? On the one hand, they would like to yell things at the screen. On the other hand, they cannot read.
I have earned this joke, because my family has to clean up all the popcorn containers they left behind afterwards.
Admit it, your lips get tired after ten minutes.
And SP ain’t old enough to read yet.
Hey, she’s reading well above her grade level!
I hoped you liked seeing Ingrid Thulin cut her vagina in Cries and Whispers.
Seriously, that’s the sort of movie that gives ammo to the philistines who think foreign films are all pretentious. The Fireman’s Ball is an antidote to that.
And if you don’t like reading subtitles, get some of Jacques Tati’s movies, which have a lot fewer subtitles.
I was in Poland once and some of the people I was with decided to go to the movies partly in order to take a break from having everything translated. They opted to see Indochine: filmed in French with Polish subtitles.
It’s only about 73 minutes. Or you could just learn Czech.
I’m on the anti subtitles bandwagon. I’m not against reading but if the movie is directed for you to actually watch it subtitles are a distraction. It’s like reading a translated book it can be great but it can often be compromised.
It’s very interesting to me how so many film makers end up making movies with messages they didn’t intend. Just fascinating. (Looking at you, Joss Whedon, you sack of shit.)
“You can’t stop the message Mal”
“Guy killed me, Mal. He killed me with a sword. How weird is that?”
BTW, I sent you the link for ep 3.
I got it! Haven’t set it up yet… but we will! Sorry on the delay.
No prob, just wanted to make sure you got it.
That line runs through my head quite often. Weird.
What are you talking about? It’s a movie about a girl who kicks ass. The Star Warsy evil empire bearing down on the charming crew of renegades in no way reflects on the political realities of little people vs. the State.
Next you’ll tell us Brazil was an unflattering meditation on pervasive bureaucracy.
Clearly a romantic comedy.
Kazan, on the other hand, was quite plausible in his claims to be making anti-Communist movies. On the Waterfront was of course one of the most elegant defenses of snitching ever made. Less well known, Viva Zapata is one of the greatest libertarian films ever made (and perhaps the one, along with Ghostbusters, I personally find the most fun); it’s got a special place in my heart because, in keeping with its director’s personal perspective, it shows you libertarianism from a distinctly “leftist sensibilities” perspective.
Kazan should have raped a girl like Polanski did instead of naming names. Then Hollywood would have loved him.
That’s what Forman always said. Exactly how much he meant it, I’m not certain.
Excellent writeup but boring-ass stills selection. Where’s the part where you get to see Halle Berry’s tit-tays?
Q will provide
Sorry, but the point is that the ladies in the beauty contest are decidedly plain looking and not to Q’s liking.
I haven’t seen this in about 12 years, but I seem to recall one or two of the firemen trying to steal a couple of the ladies from their boyfriends because of their sense of entitlement.
You…monster!
*narrows gaze*
I think Swordfish are monsters
Amazon has it on streaming video, and free for those of you who already have a Prime membership
Sold.
Added to my Amazon watchlist.
Isn’t every movie free for the Primes?
No. There is a subset they have in active licensing agreements.
I have found very little on there I’m interested in watching.
I have Prime for the shipping. On rare occassions I go browsing videos, and often end up not waching anything.
Agree. Frankly, I’d be happier if they ditched the video content entirely, and used the savings to re-hire UPS as their package delivery service. The one thing that’s kept me on Prime since they launched it, and they’re fucking it up.
I get more out of their TV programs. I missed BSG the first time around and am binging that. Also The Expanse, The Americans, Orphan Black.
Comrade Detective on its own made my Prime sub worth it. We gotta get Pie to review it!
I didn’t realize that was on prime. I’ll have to watch it.
Depressingly few I want to view, ‘struth. But that’s true of Hulu, too, so whaddayagonnado.
Pay for your porn! Uhhh, I mean, content.
Remember kids, it’s not free. It’s rolled into your membership dues. Take advantage!
In the queue for this weekend, many thanks!
Nice article, Ted!
I enjoyed the review Ted. Glad you did one for here. I look forward to more, maybe a review of a Noir flick?
Related; I watched Act Of Violence this weekend. Wow…that is a powerful movie. Ahead of it’s time.
Mary Astor is a revelation playing totally against type.
I was actually thinking at one point about submitting a post on the docudrama wave of the late 1940s, but I wasn’t certain exactly what direction I wanted to take it. Fox put out some interesting movies, and there’s even one for our Canadian contingent.
TL;DR.
So, what happened to it? Lost it in a fire? Kinda sick as plots go.
Oh.
Nevermind.
*sighs, re-narrows gaze*
Firemen have no balls.
/sadtrombone
Seriously, pretty much everybody leaves the party to go gawk at the fire.
Also fun for anyone interested in Milos Foreman: watch the making of “Amadeus”,
It was filmed in Prague – MF’s own former home – while the commies were still running things.
he basically was returning to the place he fled, and trying to make a hollywood film in a place where getting a can of peaches required bribery and political influence.
its full of great stories and insights into why the soviet bloc collapsed.
there’s also the whole thing about the Czech attitude at the time; i visited prague in 92 (10 years after this) but they were still by far the most anti-commie, pro-american people you could find anywhere in eastern-europe. Hell, in Western Europe as well.
I don’t have a ton of interest in going to Europe in general, although I wouldn’t turn my nose up at the Grand Tour, but I would like to see Prague. I’ve heard it’s a beautiful city, and that the Czech Republic in general is very scenic. Plus beer, and the picture above notwithstanding Czech girls are absolute smokeshows.
Prague is my favorite city in europe by a long shot. or at least was for a long time.
It was especially great in the early 1990s because of the currency differences basically letting you live like a prince for peanuts, and the native population (completely unlike some of its neighbors) incredibly welcoming and enthusiastic towards Americans…. but much of that may have changed in the last 20+ years.
part of its beauty was that almost nothing was bulldozed and replaced when under the soviets. there was no ‘modernization’. (which is why Forman used it to represent 18th century Vienna/anywhere else in europe). Much of it was just left untouched. it retained a coherence and authenticity you couldn’t find many other places
(also – because many other cities in europe had been smashed to shit during WWII and then rebuilt; prague, as far as understand, was mostly untouched)
its definitely a bucket-list destination.
In the spring of 1990, when I was 13, our school chorus did a tour of Europe. I can’t say I remember THAT much about it, but I do remember liking Prague the best of all our destinations. And, as you say, it was definitely dirt cheap at that time. I bought my parents a set of Bohemian crystal champagne flutes for next to nothing.
Agree on Prague but try to avoid late summer. When I was there, (mid-90s) it was overrun by Germans and American wannabe hippies. Budapest is also very pretty along the Danube and one that gets less attention that Prague.
More than Hungarians?!
without question.
tho i think it should be understood that Prague was a boom-town in the early 1990s, where everyone was making money hand over fist, where there were 100s of young americans everywhere you looked, and mingling heavily with young locals…you could meet Vaclav Havel in a bar 3 or 4 nights a week, etc.
…whereas budapest was far more ‘mixed’, economically. there were some businesses moving in to take advantage of the post-soviet crash, but there were lots of unemployed people drunk in the streets, lots of grim prostitutes, and younger people – while generally friendly, rarely spoke english as well, and tended to be leery of tourists, half of whom they were trying to sell fake commie-souveniers or fake hashish to. When we did interact w/ young locals and asked whether they were optimistic about the future, most talked about migrating away as their best-bet, rather than optimism about the near-future at home.
its hard to generalize, given these are mostly superficial impressions from nearly 30 years ago – but you simply never heard anyone in Prague ever say, “things were better before” (and if they did, they’d probably get beer thrown on them and kicked to the curb)…. whereas you did hear that quite often in Poland, Hungary
OT: Sex parties in upscale suburb distress soccer moms. Sign me up!
http://kdvr.com/2018/04/24/neighbors-say-wild-sex-parties-disturb-upscale-castle-rock-community/
“The neighbor described guests as being from all walks of life. ‘Some of them are so old that they struggled walking up the stairs,’ the neighbor said.”
Then again, maybe not.
SLD of course, but I could see where you’d get a little tired of somebody hosting large parties with tons of cars taking up the parking spaces and the slappin’ sounds of the old and mediocre bangin’ their bits together.
Then again, you only live once…
I can live without that.
… and THAT is why you need a good HOA!
/condo salesguy
With a few exceptions here and there, I’m not a big fan of movies, even less of movie reviews. But I still enjoyed reading that. Enough details to keep me interested and you avoided turning it into a slog. Very nicely written.
Forman, for his part, always claimed that he wasn’t making an anti-Communist movie, and frankly, his claims on this are plausible.
Maybe he didn’t want to get pushed in front of a train, or mysteriously contract radiation poisoning.
This was before the Prague Spring, so things were a little more open. If you want to be amazed by a movie that ever got made and not destroyed, try to find a copy of The Ear, which was made after and banned for 20 years. I don’t think it’s available on DVD though.
A really disturbing movie about Communist surveillance.
Siri, where can I get a copy of Ucho?
On a par with The Lives of Others? That one was excellent.
Different. It’s less drama and more paranoia turned up to 11.
ps- nice review, Ted. I’ll definitely look for it on Amazon.
Another good reason to stay out of others problems
I guess there’s a first for everything.
L more or less OL
Right, they normally happen inside of a Walmart.
I’m just surprised it wasn’t at a Chuck-E-Cheese
Nice write-up. I look forward to watching the movie. My wife hates movies with subtitles, though. “It’s like having to go to school instead of watching a movie” she said after I forced her to watch The Battle of Algiers.
WaPo, viua Mother Jones:
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt is expected to propose a rule Tuesday that would establish new standards for what science could be used in writing agency regulations, according to individuals briefed on the plan. It is a sweeping change long sought by conservatives.
The rule, which Pruitt has described in interviews with select media over the past month, would only allow EPA to consider studies for which the underlying data are made available publicly. Advocates describe this approach as an advance for transparency, but critics say it would effectively block the agency from relying on long-standing, landmark studies linking air pollution and pesticide exposure to harmful health effects.
….Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Union of Concerned Scientists’ Center for Science and Democracy, said in an email that Pruitt’s move would expand on his earlier decision to change the standards for who can serve on EPA’s advisory committees….“First, they came after the agency’s independent science advisers, and now, they’re going after the science itself,” Rosenberg said. “What is transparent is the unabashed takeover of EPA leadership by individuals who have demonstrated disinterest in helping communities combat pollution by using the best available science.”
No more secret proprietary data sets? Truly, this is the end of science.
I’m just a simple country goat roper, but how does requiring research with publicly available data (and, presumably, methodology) constitute “going after science itself”? Furthermore, why wouldn’t “the best available science” have an open database? I thought they wanted to disseminate the truth far and wide.
Public policy must be driven by public data. What a travesty.
By the way, the limit on who could serve on the advisory boards?
The new rule was that the people getting funded couldn’t serve on the advisory board that recommended what gets funded. Before, people getting the funding were making recommendations as to what got funded.
Andrew Rosenberg is full of shit and outright lying.
It’s simply an admission that the agency was run by an unwritten policy that the policy was decided first, and the studies written to support the policy, with no one allowed to second-guess their diktats, so they hid the data (if it ever existed at all)
According to stuff I’ve heard and some things I’ve seen while working alongside EPA folks, that’s absolutely the case. With no nefarious intent whatsoever, there is a lot of research pursued largely for use in publicly supporting conclusions that have already been made. There’s a strong, unwritten policy to not confuse the public by presenting raw data that hasn’t been interpreted by EPA science communicators for fear they come to the wrong conclusions.
“Wrong” meaning “Different from ours”, naturally.
Before, people getting the funding were making recommendations as to what got funded.
Sounds legit.
Nothing says independence like profiting from your own personal decisions.
https://twitter.com/AnnaKobza83/status/988690829668646912
UK police found the time away from arresting people for jokes to guard a hospital so no one can stop them from killing a boy. What a miserable little island.
http://babylonbee.com/news/prime-minister-issues-friendly-reminder-to-uk-parents-that-state-owns-their-children/
Babylon Bee- the most trusted name in news
In a video circulated online, May informed parents who were “getting a little too attached” to their children that they need to keep in mind that the United Kingdom is the actual legal parent, and the kids are simply on loan to them until the State decides it’s time for them to die.
Oof. That’s barely satire.
https://twitter.com/Alfiesarmy16/status/988850167993520128
This is video of the boy who must die for the glory of the State.
The first comment is supportive but still depressing “I don’t understand why the European Court of Human Rights won’t step in.”
The irony is that they did hear this case and decided that the boy should die for the glory of the State. Which is what this all comes down to. He has now been breathing on his own for 22 hours and they still refuse to allow his parents to take him out of the hospital. They are now going to stop feeding him, according to reports.
We must be made to learn that all within the state and nothing outside of the state.
Give them credit – they also find the time to confiscate scissors from people and send people to prison for 8 months for flipping off a speed trap camera. Multitaskers, they are.
What the hell happened and I really hope we aren’t headed towards that but my guess is we are.
And sad to see how many people are defending the authorities on this one.
I’m really trying to see their side of the argument…..and I got nothin’. What exactly is the downside to the British government to let these poor people take their son to Italy??
The British are a fucking diseased, sick society.
Wow, Q got a shout out in the comments.
I was thinking about alt-text for the picture of the beauty pageant contestants that referenced Q, but I didn’t think it was appropriate in the actual article. In the comments, I figured somebody would mention it. 🙂
Should have numbered them.
Thanks for the review, Ted. I was ignorant of the existence of this film, and now I want to watch it!
There’s a strong, unwritten policy to not confuse the public by presenting raw data that hasn’t been interpreted by EPA science communicators for fear they come to the wrong conclusions.
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
J. F. C.