Introduction
Thirty years ago, I helped my father build a house. I worked with him for the previous few summers on smaller projects…decks, screened-in porches, fences and the like, but that year I was finished with school and so for the first time I had a hand in the construction of a home from start to finish. I learned how to set up a transit level and surveyed the site with Dad, we discussed views, elevations, and placement options when the plans were still sketches, and later I walked through the completed home, room by room, checking for undotted I’s or uncrossed T’s before packing up the last of our tools and leaving the home to its new owners. This spring we will start building our sixtieth-ish*.
‘That’s really sweet The Hyperbole,’ the impatient glibers may ask, ‘But what does any of that have to do with Liberty, Limited Government, Beer, Pizza, Board Games, or Boobs?’ Good question, I’m glad you asked. Turns out we built all but one of those homes in the same gated, HOA-run community, and over the years I have watched as rules, regulations, fees, and fines skyrocketed, at times it seemed as if the powers that be were actively trying to discourage new construction.**. In the same time, I have also witnessed the development of new tools and products. Some of those changes added value to the final product, some of them only made it cost more. I imagine you can guess which was which.
And so I figured that I would write a few articles comparing the building of that first home back in ’88 with this year’s model. Focusing on the above-mentioned observations, with the odd anecdote tossed in here and there, like the story of the building inspector who would walk through doorways and down stairwells with his thumb placed on top of his head with his fingers extended upwards*** to check headroom clearance. As per Brett’s instructions, I will try to use sentences and paragraphs but I can’t promise anything, I never done too good in writin’ class.
Caveat
My father likes to oldmansplain that when he was a kid the phrase “Why don’cha make a federal case out of it?” was a common rebuff when someone made too large of a deal over some perceived insult or slight. As he points out**** it was a rebuff because very few things were federal issues, today it’s a meaningless phrase because everything is a federal issue.
Except, remarkably, residential home building which has largely stayed a local issue. To get a building permit In one county all you may need is the approval of your proposed septic system, in the next county over you might need to submit plans showing every little detail down to the color of the tile in the guest bathroom. Thus when I bring up a code change, some of you may have always lived under stricter codes, while others of you may not even have to comply with the old code that is being changed. In short, don’t take any of what I say as a general rule. Always check with your friendly and helpful local building code enforcement department official and get all necessary permits before you build that deck. Unless you can’t easily see it from the street and you can put on your shocked face and say “I need a Permit? For a tiny little stoop? I had no idea!” believably, if so get cracking, those post holes aren’t going to dig themselves.
Stake Out
Richard Dreyfuss #metoos all over Madeline Stowe while Charlie Sheen’s more talented brother watches and Forest Whitaker languidly mast…What’s that? …Oh, STAKE…OUT, not Stakeout. That makes a lot more sense. One of the first steps in building a house is figuring out where you are going to build it, as I mentioned above, back in 1988 my father and I surveyed the property to make this determination, by survey I mean in both the ‘looked over the grounds’ and in the ‘found corner pins, pulled strings down property and/or backset lines’ sense. Thus we made sure the house we intended to build fit on the lot in the orientation we wanted. In 2018 we still do the same but we ‘approximate’ more, ‘Close enough’ has replaced ‘lets double check.’
You see, in ’88 after siting the house we would carefully stake out its’ footprint, so that the guy with the back-hoe knew where to dig and so that the representative from the HOA***** could verify that we were building where we should, and most importantly, so that WE could verify that we were building where we should. What could be more embarrassing (and costly) for a home builder than to build over a backset line or on the wrong lot? but much like how drug companies will kill their customers without government oversight, greedy builders will build on wrong. So now, In ’18 we are required to have a state licenced surveyor stake out the house so we figure ‘close enough’, it saves us a few hours but cost the homeowner $300-$500 in surveying cost.
This change happened fairly early on, perhaps in the mid 90’s. The association hired a local architectural firm to take over the inspections that up until then were done by a board member or volunteers on what was called the Environmental Control Committee. Turns out the lackey that the Architect sent out to do the inspections was an idiot******, and approved a number of jobs that encroached on backset lines. The association could have hired someone competent or required surveys in cases where the building is very close to the backset lines. Instead, they went one size fits all, whether you are trying to stuff a 10-gallon house on 5-gallon lot or you are tossing a hot dog of a home down a hallway of a lot, you are required to pay for a survey.
Some of you may be thinking “What’s the big deal it’s just a few hundred dollars? and it’s a good idea to get a professional survey anyway.” Yes, it’s not a ton of money but bear in mind we don’t even have a building permit and haven’t moved one shovelful of earth yet. And if like 90% of our clients you recently purchased the lot the property itself will have been surveyed, the title companies make sure of that. The professed purpose******* of the stake out is to ensure that the proposed house fits on the lot, something a properly drawn plot plan does. And guess what? we have always been required to include a plot plan with our permit application. The stake out survey is a redundancy at best. It doesn’t protect the property owner, it only shifts liability from the builder to the surveyor, and allows the HOA to act like they are doing something by approving the stakeout, without having to actually check the stakeout.
That’s it for Part One. If there is any interest in Part Two, I will delve into the permit process, and discuss Excavating, foul-mouthed masons, lasers, and more!!….
Not sure if only the links posters get to sign off with a song or not [ED: go right ahead!], but if it’s cool here’s The Woggles covering Chubby Checker.
*I haven’t kept count.
** And in some cases they were.
*** Imagine an inverted Little Rascal’s high-sign.
****Repeatedly, Jesus wept, do all old people tell the same damn story over and over?
***** For a while it was a retired realtor who was also one of the first full-time residents of the community, in short, he knew what he was doing, the idiots that came after? not so much.
****** He once questioned whether the window in a bedroom met the egress size requirements, it did, also there was a patio door right beside it.
******* You may think it’s about ensuring that the house is actually built where it should be, it’s not. More on that in Part Deux, if there is a Part Deux.
This kind of over-regulated, economy stifling code enforcement seems one of the more pernicious things happening at the local level.
To think that my great-grandmother’s house was built in the 30s before any of this shit and it hasn’t fallen down! /sarc
To think that my great-grandmother’s house was built in the 30s before any of this shit and it hasn’t fallen down!
Yeah, but if it’s from that era you know it’s racist.
I simply cannot tag today.
In 1776 we had one tyrant 3,000 miles away. Today we have 3,000 tyrants one mile away.
Yes. And not just old people. Ask Mr. Riven–I do it all the time.
I have the perfect product for you!
Lol! That was pretty good. Mr. Riven’s workplace got him one of these (among other things) for Christmas last year. We still haven’t hooked it up…
Yeah I don’t blame you. My ex hooked up an Alexa in my apartment… it freaked me out. Always sitting there… listening
You burned it and scattered the ashes, right?
“What happened?”
“There was an accident. The hammer dropped and landed on the Echo.”
“Once shouldn’t have done this much damage.”
“It was seventeen times.”
You need a bigger hammer
You need a linkier link
bigger
The ‘Uh Huh’ feature is brilliant!
Uh huh.
Yes Tundra.
Uh huh.
And then there was this other time when the guy from North Dakota got his hand stuck in the cow…
Given the nature of bovine maintenance work, it’s entirely possible.
…boy. Man, was he embarrassed!
Given the nature of bovine maintenance work, it’s entirely possible.
“…whatcalf?”
What space? Edit faerie? Edit ferry? Edit Phair? Help!
You know, Delta County Colorado does not have building codes. And they fight tooth and nail to keep it that way.
Yurt? go ahead.
ShotCrete Dome half buried? Done.
awesome
Pitkin Co., CO is their opposite.
Delta has a feisty and vocal libertarian group.
Pitkin Co. is dominated by Aspen which is run by nanny-staters. The really high end homes there are mostly second homes so the owners don’t have much input into local rules & regulations.
I hope they can keep it that way, the county this HOA is in has no building codes either. The one house we built outside the development was an eye-opener, I think someone checked the septic system that was it. I was still a fledgling libertarian and remember realizing that all these houses were built with no oversight and yet they were just as nice as any inside the HOA. Well, to be honest, scattered around the county were small pockets of shanties and other crude buildings, but they were the exception.
*checks author’s name* This seems legit.
*starts reading article*
This is a really entertaining article. Well done Hyp
Not sure which state you’re in, but in the Delmar area the site plans have a mandate of down to the inch accuracy. (My father recently started his fourth or fifth career as an architectural draftsman with a developer there and had a great deal to say about how little error they were permitted by the authorities and how much the fines could get to.)
My dad was a building inspector. I think that’s a state thing in NY.
Alternatively, he was a Code Enforcement Officer, so you could call him an enforcer.
The thing I most remember was that the town hall’s fire extinguisher hadnt been recharged in *years*. Dad wasn’t happy about that.
Too many cooks in the kitchen asking for permission.
I can understand the argument for permitting. But it’s stupid and unnecessary. And gets expensive for that reason.
Says the man who can’t buy high capacity magazines.
Something about pots and kettles, Mr. Connecticut.
Thought you were responding to something else… I’ve been stuck in a useless meeting all morning, my brain is fried. I shall wear my cone of shame.
My dog is hoping against hope that his cone of shame is retired this afternoon.
Oh this again?!
Take that corruption away and there won’t be any affordable housing issue. How is a grievance monger supposed to get any power if all the corruption is taken away??
Shaking people down is a lucrative business…
Especially when done legally.
The only difference between living in a communist state, or being subject to an HOA, is that the HOA will let you leave if you don’t like it.
HOAs and Local building code enforcement … petty tyrants best avoided. Nevermind any of his policies, the reason Rand Paul should have his libertarian cred scrutinized is the fact he lived under one of these arrangements willingly.
(Yeah yeah I know, he agreed to it voluntarily …. but that’s the same arrangement as those who choose to live in a commune.)
I live in a development governed by a HOA. It owns (we own collectively) the well system. It pays (we pay collectively) the electrical bill and insurance on the well system. The covenant basically restricts people from starting a noisy business or raising livestock on their property. But that is about it.
Perhaps our HOA is rare, but it is not a monstrosity that is so common in bigger communities.
No guy running around with a ruler measuring the length of your grass, huh? Count yourself lucky.
Nope. We are lucky. The covenant is remarkably loose, except the terms for changing the covenant. The covenant is in force for 25 years. It takes a super majority of the homeowners to change the rules the next time the covenant is renewed. It takes a super, super majority to imposed new rules that take effect in 3 years.
Wait until they start banning orphans and monocles…
So people who use more water aren’t charged proportionally more for the upkeep of the well?
No meters.
All the houses are roughly the same size. Most are occupied by families of the same size. I suppose my wife and I are getting the short end of the stick since we don’t have kids in the house. But the monthly charge per household is only $25.
But the association has already replaced 2 of the 4 wells (at $10K a pop) completely funded by the accumulation of that $25 / month fee. It is far from a bad situation.
The MTBF of the wells is 10 to 15 years. The development is just over 15 years old. They will replace all of the wells a couple of times during the rest of my life. Twenty-five a month to keep the wells running is dirt cheap.
Ours is very similar. Annual dues pay for the wells and clearing the roads in winter.
We never hear from the HOA folks. They even stopped sending out the newsletter a few years ago.
… Hobbit
My parent’s HOA is similar. They live on a private lake, and the HOA manages the lake; mostly stocking it with different types of fish, maintain the water level and quality, etc. There are a few restrictions on the homeowners, all of them related to preventing pollution in the lake. Everything else is fair game.
The HOA-hole in our old neighborhood would drop by for a friendly chat if a car was parked on the street overnight. But the obnoxious frat across the street throwing ragers and getting into fistfights ten feet from my bedroom window? Aw, shucks, who cares about that.
Did you sue the HOA for breach of contract?
Is there anything to prevent the HOA from becoming monstrous if a neighbor retires and decides their focus to is use the HOA as a hammer in the name of protecting property values?
This is the theme I’ve heard with once idyllic HOAs becoming nightmares when an unforeseen tyrant with too much time seizes control.
-nvm, just saw your post above. Sounds like good protection. I don’t know if such strong obstacles to new rules are the norm for HOAs.
The developer had originally bought just a hair under 40 acres and tried to become a gentleman-farmer as a side gig to his primary occupation. The soil is horrific for growing any crops (weird for Iowa), so he planted trees to get some kind of tax benefit. Eventually, he sub-divided the property, installed the well system, and sold all but one of the lots. The covenant is strong enough to keep out the riff raff and prevent the neighbors from turning their property into a nuisance. But that’s it.
He had intended to live on one of the lots. But his wife developed some illness, and he sold off the lot. He passed away a few years later.
Did you look to see if there was a mule too?
No mule, but he had an aging John Deere.
The only enforcement mechanism in the covenant is that you and your aggrieved neighbors go to court sue the offending party.
That exact thing has played out a number of times in this HOA, It truly is a microcosm of government, only people with an agenda try to get elected to the board. Most people are happy that the trash is picked up on time and don’t get involved in all the political shit.
I think this might be a microcosm of America in general.
My first house was in an HOA. It was about $40/month and paid for a swimming pool, park, basketball court and tennis courts. It was worth it for just the pool. My default position is to be against HOAs, but not all of them are bad.
Our HOA is small and very easy to deal with. I think, because its small (13 homes or thereabouts), so its easy to see that whatever goes around is going to come right back around, and soon.
“petty tyrants”
Boy you said it. There will always be someone looking to have an orgasm by exercising whatever pathetic authority they have. The only thing separating Stalin from most HOA presidents is opportunity.
Ours is very benign. I had heard that it was bad before I moved in, so we just made sure the board got filled with nice people. I’m not staying here forever and it is really an excellent neighborhood. Ours is also a really long term one that requires virtually impossible numbers to change it.
New warnings on Youtube content… connected to “Russia”
I think that’s fine. I would be happier if they did this for every govt, including our own. Just for lols.
*also, the linked vid is interesting. turn your volume down in advance. Brazilians are loud
“RT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government Wikipedia”
As opposed to the BBC being funded in whole or in part by the UK government? Or different from RAI being funded in whole or in part by the Italian government? Or different from Al Jazeera being funded in whole or in part by the Qatar government? Or totally different from NPR being funded in whole or in party by the American government?
This is some unbelievable bullshit. Keep telling me about threats to the First Amendment, neoliberal shitbags
I can’t believe you left out Canada and the CBC.
I’m trying to give the anti-Canadian bias a rest. They have enough to deal with up north
Well, as long a you keep your anti-Protestant bias I, for one, will be happy.
I won’t.
Of course you won’t- you enjoy cardboard pizza.
I will be in NYC next week and I hope there will be something decent to eat there as obviously their hot dogs and pizza are subpar
For the last time – Open the damn box.
CanCon hit hardest.
“neoliberal”
You misspelled communist.
Obviously, I’m being factitious here, because YouTube is not violating anyone’s First Amendment rights. But, if criticizing our garbage media brings howls about ‘censorship’ and ‘anti-journalism’ from all the right thinking people. So fuck them
For giggles I checked out a BBC News video, and you get the same disclaimer: “BBC is a publicly funded British broadcaster”. Deutsche Welle also has the disclaimer. As long as they are applying this message across the board, I have no problem with it.
Aw, son of a bitch. Gilmore was pushing fake news and I took the bait. I’m too easily wound-up today.
“”As long as they are applying this message across the board, I have no problem with it.””
Neither do i, as i said in the beginning. this was just the first example i came across.
BBC is a
publiclygovernment funded British broadcasterEnough with the euphemisms, already. The public is not the government.
He once questioned whether the window in a bedroom met the egress size requirements, it did, also there was a patio door right beside it.
5.7′ area if over 44″ (I think?) above grade, minimum 20″ width and 24″ height. I’d have to check my notes.
I did a course on residential construction this term. All weep screeds and raised-heel trusses. I like commercial better. Steel rocks.
Yeah, it’s not a tricky formula, I still chuckle when I think of that idiot measuring the window and rubbing his chin thoughtfully. When my dad asked him why he was concerned about the egress size of that window, he went on a long rant about fire codes and sleeping rooms needing two exits and ‘you guys should know this’ blah blah blah. When he finished my dad said, “If there was a fire and I couldn’t get out through the house I’d just walk out this patio door instead of crawling through that window.” The guy got all red and mumble that he guessed that might meet the codes.
LOL
I’ll bring that up in class. That’s gold!
“the Architect sent out to do the inspections was an idiot”
My FIL owns a roofing company. I’ve been led to believe that calling an architect an idiot is usually redundant.
Most of them are wannabe artists. I’m yet to meet one in person that knows anything at all about concrete.
(Actually I know one who does, but he’s the exception that proves the rule)
Our instructor knows a great deal, but from what I gather he’s done more teaching than architecting for the past ten years.
It’s concrete, of which cement is a component. And you “place” a concrete slab, you don’t “pour” it, because you don’t want to disrupt the consistency of the slab. And that’s OSB, not plywood. And call it gypsum board, not Drywall. And you forgot the drip-edge flashing in your roof detail. And your lineweights are wrong.
So what’s the concrete mix doing when it come out of the truck if not pouring? And what does he think Drywall is that isn’t gypsum board? And how many people just give him a knuckle sandwich for pedantic assholery that almost fits in with this crowd?
Keep the maximum drop of the concrete to about 14 inches to avoid separation since the stone is in suspension in the mix.
That’s still a pouring technique, not a reason to describe pouring as something other than what it is.
It’s a warning. Placing and finishing a concrete slab is like baking a cake. Except when you screw it up, you now have to demolish the cake before you can dispose of it and start over.
It may have been sheetrock, I can’t remember which he objected to as a brand name, about which we’re supposed to be professionally agnostic. And the “placement” distinction was in reference to slurry walls. You don’t want to pour the mix down two stories of rebar, apparently, you’ll cause separation.
He’s a nice enough guy, if a little statist in his deference to inspectors and the IBC. But even he admits the city council is staffed with some nitpicking assholes.
Yeah, “Sheetrock” is a brand of gypsum panel. I would sure think “drywall” would be acceptable. Plenty of drywall companies call themselves a drywall company.
I guess I see where he’s coming from with most of that. Right or wrong, using incorrect lingo out in the professional world can lower other professionals’ respect for you without you even realizing it.
+1 sawzall
^^^^this
If you’re not using the right shibboleths, do you know what you’re trying to say?
We’ll just compare checksums on intent versus recieved message. No big deal.
Just because the message is received correctly doesn’t mean the receiver will care to have a second conversation.
And yet we all come back here…
Touche
OSB and plywood are two different things, so I get that one. The rest…smh
That’s the only reason I left it off my string of questions.
*sigh*
It’s like an HOA with all the rules around here!
Damn good article Hyp’
Thanks, Mike S.
The first time my parents built a house (paid someone else to do it), the contractor laid the foundation facing the wrong direction. He then went bankrupt because of some scheme he was running in another county.
That said, I work with contractors every day on all kinds of jobs. The red tape and contractual gotchas are everywhere these days. The stories I can tell are many and varied.
A contractor is like a wife; get a good one and you’ll be happy and content, get a bad one and you’ll want to commit a murder-suicide.
So you’re saying all your contractors have large bosoms.
More like huge tracts of land
Every time you want to get something laid, they tell you it will be two weeks?
The first time my parents built a house (paid someone else to do it), the contractor laid the foundation facing the wrong direction
The exact same thing happened to my parents. Fortunately, we caught it right before they poured the concrete. Turned out the architect had used an odd symbol for “North” and the contractor got it backwards.
When I worked as a construction auditor, my boss was adding on to his house. He was out there at every major step (marking the foundation, digging, building the forms, framing). He stopped them building one side of the frame upside down. The window would have been a foot too high. He (rightly) told the crew foreman to get used to it or move on. I believe there was less bitching when he told them they built a side of the frame upside down.
We were the general contractors. I was onsite pretty much every day to see how things were going.
Loved the article and looking forward to more.
Seconded
Thanks, Gustave and Scruffy.
Thirded – I love this sort stuff.
Tim Draper’s three Californias plan will be on the ballot in November with over 600,000 signatures.
So how many Dem senators does this add?
Based on the lines drawn, my guess would be somewhere between a break even and a net gain of 2 for the Democrats in the Senate.
North California would remain hardline Dem, The LA coastal region would remain hardline Dem, and South California would likely end up either split 1 – 1 or have 2 Republicans in the Senate. So you would go from 2 guaranteed Democratic Senators to either a 4-2 or 5-1 split
On the house side it is harder to tell because it is hard to tell how the 52 congressmen would be split between the 3 states but my guess is the net change would be close to 0 and you would end up with 2 State delegations dominated by Democrats (Northern California would get a couple of Republican Congressmen ever now and then, LA would as pure a blue as you could ever hope to see) and one dominated about 2 – 1 by Republicans
Trying to eyeball the existing congressional districts and place them into the prospective new states works out to
North California
D – 15 R – 2 Push – 1
California
D – 17 R – 0 Push – 2
South California
D – 8 R – 8 Push – 0
The one I am most unsure about is the 4th Congressional District. It looks like based on the map at the website that it is in North California but probably realistically belongs in South California
But that basically reinforces my earlier assessment. Cal and Norcal would be ideologically pure blue, So Cal would be a battleground state and typically end up with either 2 republicans or a split senate delegation. If you add the 4th into the South then it would still be a battleground state but lean R and so the typical senate split would be unaffected as you would get 2 new Senators from each party out of the split.
It would likely have a bigger impact on the Electoral college however as you would be taking 16 pure blue EC votes and making them tossups
Nice job. I really like the increase in extra articles lately.
I miss thick Thursdays…
And Jew Tuesdays…
Hyp, I loved this one and look forward to Part 2!
My buddy and I remodeled and flipped a few houses. It was quite the adventure, as none were in the same suburb and the inspectors were all borderline insane.
My goal is to have a shack in Montana somewhere away from people. Barring that, I just want a house that faces the opposite direction from everyone else’s. With no back door.
You could always become a Sims sociopath.
Back Door is required by all building codes.
Can it be adjacent to the front door?
No, the taint is in between the two.
Someone needs to call metoo#
There is a house about two miles down the road from us that they built backwards.
The backdoor faces the street, and the front entryway is in the backyard.
1st house on the right of the cul-de-sac.
hmmm. Does that make it this?
Deputy chair of the DNC, the party of science and reason and super-smart people, Keith Ellison believes that transparency in government means actual, physical transparency:
SMOD, SMOD, where art thou SMOD?
Government employees are the only ones who should ever get ranted at by other [elected] government employees.
Unelected government employees rant at each other pretty often.
Though sometimes it’s just kvetching.
^^^He’s right. Except, sometimes it’s entertaining.
I like that not even Tony will try to spin gold from that straw.
“On the topic of physical government transparency, Mr. Ellison, I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on how to remedy the fact that government employees, without exception, do not transmit any light whatsoever.”
“Well, we were unable to verify Doctor Griffin’s identity, since we could not see his face, so we were unable to hire him.”
I think I would just say that it’s because white people need privacy to develop new tricknologies and end it with “Praise Yakub”.
I still don’t get what they think some Kashgarian Beg has to do with anything beyond his failed rebellion against China.
This guy Noah Rothman – to his credit – finally attempts some sort of “What vital US interests are at stake that require sticking our dick (deeper) into the Syrian Civil War?“-argument
Its what i endlessly complain no one in the media ever tries. because it will end up being such a bad argument.
He does it.
It is, as expected, not just a terrible argument, but barely a coherent argument at all.
a line-by-line breakdown of why he’s wrong is forthcoming. I’ll probably send it to moderators and demand expedited publication.
Please make sure to write this up. I’m looking forward to reading it.
Glenn Greenwald’s take on the interview with Rothman:
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/984407367667404800
It’s not barely coherent, it’s completely incoherent. The Potsdam argument was especially stupid, as if the civil wars breaking out in the middle east have nothing whatsoever to do with the solid-and-arbitrary lines drawn.
I built my first home about 40 years ago. The permitting folks were petty assholes but the worst was the electrical inspector named, believe it or not, Dick Suite. Every time he came out he found something that had to be fixed before I could proceed. After the third visit I asked him, “Is this all?” THAT pissed him off even more and he held up my permit for an extra six weeks while I had drywall guys on hold.
I recently looked into subdividing a property I own in Bernalillo County. A building permit is now $45k and a sewer permit is also $45k. $90k before the first nail is hammered. I won’t be doing any more projects in BernCo.
… Hobbit
Too many inspectors think their job is to find something, anything wrong, as opposed to checking that things are done within the codes. It may be a fine distinction but makes a difference, I once had one tell me he just didn’t feel like he did his job if he didn’t find something wrong. After that, I always left a very obvious and easily correctable issue for him to find and feel good about himself, so he’d move along.
I nitpick for fun, but I never got that mentality with regards to work. If it’s working, why do I want to make more work for myself?
A lot of serial killers are attracted to petty bureaucracies.
Ah yes, the old practice of leaving a “duck” so they feel justified.
So they fired the producer for not contributing to the projects, right? Right? RIGHT?!
Ha! You’re a funny guy, UnCiv, I don’t care what that papist with terrible taste in pizza says.
That is fucking brilliant. I may have to consider strategic uses of this duck in the future…
A strategic canard reserve for distracting people from the real issues?
” After that, I always left a very obvious and easily correctable issue”
When I used to work soundboards, one guy who was teaching me told me to always leave an open channel on the board. So when someone on stage started complaining about their foldback mix, you could play with the open channel and they’d usually declare themselves happy.
Holy crap, that’s straight up robbery
Construction.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RilI4KWvvrw/Tu1E1uznIKI/AAAAAAAAUFA/sRpxKS1Rcuw/s320/391565-construction+girl….jpg
Drive in your nail.
http://www.funstruction.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Construction_Girls_00222.jpg
Screwing.
http://www.funstruction.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Funstruction_Girls_1040G1.jpg
Damn, Q. You have pics for everything
Ridgid?
I’d extrude something rigid for that.
Try again…
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RilI4KWvvrw/Tu1E1uznIKI/AAAAAAAAUFA/sRpxKS1Rcuw/s320/391565-construction+girl.jpg
I had a similar experience at around the same time ’87 – ’88. My family lived on the 30 acre farm in Warrenton and they split off (2) 2.25 plots on the back end of the property and built a couple of modular homes on them. It was actually my mother who was the prime mover on that project. She was a realtor and got into the building and development game starting with this project. It was interesting, and I did a lot of (unpaid) work on it. My oldest brother was an HVAC and general contractor and did a lot of the finish work on the houses, and I was his helper. Since this was not an HOA situation, they permitting was a breeze for us. Inspections were mostly about getting the electrical and septic right. I wonder how that would go now, 30 years later?
I’m so happy the HOA in my neighborhood died in 2008.
In 2008 we moved to a new house outside the HOA to escape. They weren’t oppressive, just expensive and unresponsive.
My family’s “business” is essentially real estate. I have simply grown to detest them.
‘That’s really sweet The Hyperbole,’ the impatient glibers may ask, ‘But what does any of that have to do with Liberty, Limited Government, Beer, Pizza, Board Games, Cocktails or Boobs?’
Its like you only read the COTW posts to mock them. It was a Pink Pirate because its actually pink, not a Gay Pirate!
*Storms off, wiping eyes.
Aren’t all pirates gay?
They’re not just sailors butt pirates
I’m now on the board of my second straight HOA. It seems very libertarian to me: I chose to live there fully aware both times. We make fun of Facebook users who didn’t read the fine print and ended up somewhere they really didn’t want to be….same exact thing.
We can’t get a quorum to update bylaws or covenants, so, unless somebody complains (never, really), I just ignore the language about trucks parked outside, fence setbacks, and paint colors….all that can be changed later if a stink arises. Other stuff we enforce: wall setbacks and dues right up to liens if needs be.
I’m a mechanical engineer, I build to private (API, ASME) and civic (city and national) codes all day, and i generally agree with the requirements. Ideally, these would all be private guidance, not enforceable at law, but the practical difference over three decades to me has been almost nil except: industrial improvement design for earthquake in legacy buildings is pointless: an individual structure that survives a zone4 event costs three times as much even though everyone will still be killed by failures of ancient, grandfathered, contiguous construction falling on us unless we happen to be under the new, stronger stuff.
Pretty much my experience, six years on HOA board and 2 years as chair. Board was laid back except when some asshole resident threatned to get a lawyer to sue because some petty rule wasn’t enforced. One woman thought it was o.k. to keep a kiddie pool, filled with water, on the common side walk over night. When she was admonished, she said we were picking on her because she was (((one of them))).
(((An asshole)))?
Speaking of building homes, bureaucratic morass, and affordability, I think I would vote for this guy. Not just because of the hat he is wearing, but because I like the idea of homeless people now running one of the most corrupt and failed governments in this country. Speaking of which.. What happened to crackhead Barry?
Not the candidate that the Democrats want, but definitely the candidate that Democrats deserve.
Died 2014.
Radley Balko hears New Gingrigh complain about FBI raids, and gets up on his high horse
From what i can tell, he’s grieving that “no one cares when its the poor black folks”.
But i’m not sure why that’s such a sharp rebuttal to the complaint Newt makes;
it seems like nothing more than WAH WAH WHITE PEOPLE DESERVE IT WHYCOME YOU NEVER TALK ABOUT BLACK FOLKS
“yes newt, you’re right the FBI, and all police, routinely over-extend their authority and misuse of power happens daily”, is a legitimate point. But it would seem to me that he doesn’t want to appear to be *agreeing* with the core complain, so he whips out the race card.
He’s retweeting Jon Favreau (not the cool one, but the hipster douche one that worked for Obama). Radley’s gone full Beltway at this point.
Honestly, at this point, I have to conclude Balko is now more interested in fitting in with his progressive friends than his is in the issues he’s built his career on raising. If someone who I generally oppose were to agree with me on an issue because they or someone they liked was on the receiving end of the issue, my general reaction would be “Welcome to the Club”. But, when a Republican raises an issue that is ostensibly supposed to be important to libertarians, Balko, like so many other establishment libertarians, seems more interested in dismissing their agreement.
Excellent article, Hyperbole. It was good to get the insight from the perspective you’re talking about.
Thanks.
From what i can tell, he’s grieving that “no one cares when its the poor black folks”.
But i’m not sure why that’s such a sharp rebuttal to the complaint Newt makes;
Agreeing with Newt Gangrenous on anything makes you a Nazi. Balko doesn’t want people to think he’s a Nazi.
Put me in the “Please write more” column.
OT: VT
what the fuck was Scott thinking betraying his base like that? does he actually believe there’s a middle ground and leftists will vote for him?
i’m curious if he’ll be primaried or not.
The jig’s up, boys!
Lots of working women feel unhappy that they’re paid less than men. Franke Wilmer is trying to do something about it.
Wilmer, a professor and political science department head at Montana State University, told campus leaders Wednesday that she and supporters plan to ask the Bozeman City Commission to outlaw all forms of discrimination against women.
Why didn’t we think of that sooner?
Is it discrimination if you toss job applications from MSU poli sci grads directly into the trash?
outlaw all forms of discrimination against women
Pretty sure its already illegal, toots.
I thought it was sugar tits?
That’s reserved for the women you want to harass.
It’s obviously not illegal as “Lots of working women feel unhappy.” What more proof do you need?
I wonder if Rosa DeLauro thinks her two tone hair makes her look better.
Nice article!
Great article, TH. Moar, pleez.
Thanks.
Great article looking forward to the rest.
When we built our house 35 years ago the building inspector was an old townie who just came out and looked round and said “nice place”. The meat of the “iinspection” was asking who our contractors were. “Who did the wiring?” “Ralph” “Oh, it’s fine then”. If any of the contractors was not local he’d look more closely and maybe find something.