I am fed-up with the nonsense that dominates our political discourse. Nothing substantive is discussed at all anymore. We have the establishment media still throwing a hissy fit over a presidential election that they lost and it is becoming impossible to discern between the Democratic Party, CNN, the New York Times (sorry, but Stossel is right about the ‘old grey lady’), the Washington Post, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS anymore. The stupidity of our current national conversation is no more evident than the fact that on January 16, 2018, the US Senate voted to end debate on the FISA Amendments Reauthorization Act of 2017, thereby preventing an attempted filibuster by Senators Rand Paul, Ron Wyden, and Mike Lee. This act renewed (since its passage is nearly certain now, as of this writing), for six years, the federal government’s authority to gather communications between people from the United States and foreign nationals, without a warrant. Though the legislation has always been presented as ‘anti-terrorism’ legislation, the law also allows the FBI to peruse these communications to identify a crime. Thereby thoroughly gutting the 4th Amendment’s protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures.”
But, it doesn’t even matter what the particulars of the law are. What is more important is that there was no national conversation about the renewal of such an expansive piece of legislation. Instead, in the days leading-up to the Senate vote, our national media was fixated on ‘shit hole’-gate. Did the president refer to some countries as ‘shit holes’ in a private conversation in the White House? Truly gripping stuff. And, as if in an attempt to go full retard, our national media then began dissecting the president’s physical and mental health (because it’s totes cool to ask those questions now). And when the media’s speculation was rebutted by a navy physician that also served the previous president, they doubled down on stupid. These stories were more important than debating whether or not the federal government should be allowed to eavesdrop on your personal conversations without a warrant?
Where are the grown-ups today? In years past, we had commentators like Christopher Hitchens, William F. Buckley, Gore Vidal, Mike Royko, and HL Mencken, to name a few, who cut through the minutia and focused on bigger issues. Today we have this ass hat, a bag of dicks, and shit for brains. And when our imbecile pundits aren’t ignoring important issues like unreasonable searches and seizures by our government, they are actively attacking commentators who do warn against such actions. Meanwhile the bulk of our political class is just as buffoonish, asinine, and unclever as the ass hats, bags of dicks, and shit for brains that cover them. There are some exceptions within our political class, and to their credit, more Republican Senators voted against renewing FISA under a Republican president than Democrats who voted against renewal under a Democratic president. And for that, I would grant Republicans a participation ribbon. This ribbon is as useless as the Republican Senate and redeemable at the midterm elections for one “I will never vote for you worthless assholes again” from me, with love.
The worst part is that the cause is most assuredly over. If a universally reviled and unstable president cannot convince Congress that the executive wields too much authority, than nothing will. FISA is permanent now. The next time renewal comes around, I doubt even a mention will be made. The State will continue to erode away at the Fourth Amendment and will continue to chip away at other parts of the Bill of Rights. All the while, our chattering class will be fixated on the latest faux outrage committed by whomever occupies the title of “literally Hitler” at the moment. Nothing is sacred anymore. This is a lost cause now.
I wish I could disagree with any of it, but things really are that bad.
We are doomed sooner than later…
Yup.
Thanks for being such a downer, Just Say’n.
https://twitter.com/JustinRaimondo/status/956182889665843201
Not to worry- we have the brightest minds in ostensibly ‘libertarian’ circles hashing it out like adults
Summary of Raimondo v. Soave bitch fight:
“No, you’re a poopy head, because Democrats are all pure and totes care about government surveillance, even when they vote to expand it”
“No, you’re a poopy head, because Trump was duped into supporting government surveillance. Why don’t you just marry Democrats if you love them so much?”
“You’d like that wouldn’t you. Next time I see you, I’m going to slap you like a man”
“I’d like to see you try!”
*kiss*
(end scene)
a couple of men could have a decent conversation on this. not Raimondo and Soave off course, but a couple of men
Justin Raimondo is the Nick Gillespie of Antiwar.com
Justin Raimondo is Nick Gillespie.
Robbie Soave is the Nick Gillespie of men
HOT
He does seem to have Robby pretty well pegged.
Justin is Nick’s strap-on. Or is Robby, Justin’s?
Probably not the first time Robbie has been pegged.
The 4th amendment underwear is hilarious. I can’t imagine it going over well with tsa. Maybe it was just a fluke how things worked here before, but neither political party supports much of the bill of rights anymore and culture is only getting further away from that. I think the whole Obama/Hillary doj scandal will drag on, fade and die just as quietly whenever the next dem or GOPe is in charge.
Penn & Teller sell a piece of metal with the 4th amendment engraved on it at their show in Las Vegas. Fits neatly in a pocket, and meant exactly for what you think its for.
It’s a pity that Penn beclowned himself so badly during the last election. I lost massive amounts of respect for him.
Same here.
I’m being unnaturally productive today. I’m failing to live down to expectations.
Come on, man. The one benefit to paying for all this government is that we don’t get our money’s worth.
I’m constantly torn between thinking that the system will change through some means or another and thinking that the country is going to turn into a socialist shithole and I should just move to a shack in the middle of Montana and spend the rest of my life as a hermit.
I’ve done a lot of thinking on that. When you take all the possible scenarios and work all this out based on probabilities, the conclusion is overwhelming that you eventually get socialist shithole. The main reason being that they keep adding new marxist bullshit, like Obamacare, and as it has been shown already, then you can never get rid of it. But they will continue piling on until there is no longer money to pay for it. Then you get austerity. The free shit will still be there, but it will be severely rationed and the government will have control of every minute aspect of your existence. The system will basically be broken and dysfunctional, but no one will be interested in trying to get rid of any of it. That’s the most likely future, a bunch of dumbed down impoverished citizens ruled over by an elite ruling class.
I like to think the cat’s out of the bag where capitalism is concerned: ain’t nobody who’s earning dough and paying his mortgage got time for that Marxist bullshit. It’s a fruitless crusade for leeches and idiot college students. Nobody else gives a good goddamn fuck about Communism or its conjoined twin, identitarian politics. Nobody is going to give up their central air or iPads or immersion blenders to realize the grand dream of universal poverty. Campus twerps can wax ignorant about mutualism and the sharing economy or whatever, but they’re living on their parents’ dole or borrowing out taxpayer-backed student loans. They’re worthless shit-for-brains cocksuckers. They’re trivial. The vast bulk of Americans prize their earnings and their possessions and their families. They’re not about to dispense with prosperity for the sake of European-style economic sclerosis.
I like to tell myself.
“I like to think the cat’s out of the bag where capitalism is concerned: ain’t nobody who’s earning dough and paying his mortgage got time for that Marxist bullshit.”
I agree with you about that. Unfortunately, despite that, American voters keep putting Democrats back in power, and the Democrats absolutely will do every marxist bullshit scheme they can. Right now, if Hillary was president and the Democrats controlled congress, do you think we’d be getting tax cuts? Nope, we’d be getting tax increases to pay for free college, free healthcare, free fucking everything, while the old hag stacked the courts with leftist judges. The GOP can’t even get rid of Obamacare. And the next marxist bullshit Democrats ram through, they won’t be able to get rid of either. That’s why it eventually ends up at what I predicted. And there’s no way back from there. The Democrats move the goalpost left again and the GOP says ‘ok, we’re at the center now, let’s stay here’. Until the next time the Democrats move the goalpost leftward again and that becomes the new status quo.
It’s called the ratchet effect.
Rachet effect.
Every great empire fell because the people not only went soft, but stupid. Not saying we are an empire, but we are suffering the same fate. And one political party is hoping to expedite that fate while the other sucks on its thumb.
Just look at the left’s daily escapades. It looks like some sort of bizarre comedy show. But those people are serious. We’re totally fucked. Academia is churning out an entire generation of raving mad idiots.
The other party isn’t just sucking its thumb. It’s actively drawing lines in the sand as it back peddles as quickly as possible.
Mostly in agreement with Hyperion here. In my view the ultimate reason that the gubmint keep piling on entitlements and can’t ever get rid of them is that that’s what more people want. For all that he was ridiculed and pilloried for it, Romney was dead right about the 47%. When you get right down to it, more people are on board with redistribution and socialism than are against it. I think the margins are relatively close now, but they’re going to steadily move more and more with each passing decade in the direction of the gimmedats and I don’t see what will change that.
Talk to some of the people who never work and have been gaming the system for years, decades. I mean for as long as you can stand to talk to them without vomiting or throttling them. One guy I knew, knew his family and knew him since he was a little kid, like 5 years old. I’m not sure that the guy ever worked, maybe for a few years, but then he got on the gravy train of gaming the system. Claimed he had a bad back or whatever. Almost certain it wasn’t true. Him and his wife had like 5 kids and were planning another last time I talked to him. Neither of them worked or had, in years, both of them able bodied, in their 30s. They were getting free everything, welfare, food, housing, the entire deal. He told me he’d have to make 35k a year to go to work to make it worth it, but the guy had no marketable skills since he’d never really worked. There are millions of that guy in this country. And we’re going to keep getting more of them. And all of them are going to vote for more free shit. In the meantime, they democrats will be up to importing more of them from whatever shitholes.
We may be in a boom right now, but Trump is an outlier with the entirety of our government opposed to him. As soon as he’s gone, whatever Democrat or wishy washy Republican gets in there, they’ll go right back to business as usual, more social programs, more regulations, more spending, and of course the resulting tax increases.
I just think of this brief period of chaos as a temporary relief. Something like a jack-booted thug ever so slightly taking his weight off the back of your neck.
And good luck having media outlets do stories on this guy and his cohorts. No, they’ll find little Suzie with some rare childhood disease and talk about why the selfish conservatives and libertarians want her to just die so they can spend more money on rodeos, NASCAR and/or monocles.
I just spent a couple days in Billings, Montana on business, and liked it a lot. Cool, funky town with a lot of interesting people and lots of freedoms we aren’t used to elsewhere. Plus, far as I could tell there isn’t a sales tax.
Moving there might not be so bad, and you wouldn’t have to live in a shack either.
Well! Thanks for the heads up! We could’ve had a beer. … Jerk.
And there’s absolutely no sales tax in the entire state… Eh, sort of. I think Red Lodge has a local sales tax.
Butte > Billings > Missoula> Bozeman > Helena> Every other place in the US.
I have some awful, awful choices coming in November. DWS is running unopposed for Congress. Well, essentially unopposed. Someone will try and primary her and will fail again. Senate we’ve got Bill Nelson, who’s the incumbent and is just awful, against our term-limited out Governor Skeletor. Governor we’ve got John Morgan, ambulance chasing lawyer (though he was the money behind medical marijuana in Florida), who denies he’s running but he’s absolutely going to run against Adam Putnam, who’s the… Commissioner of Agriculture I think? He’s an asshole according to what I’ve heard, and his policies are going to be no better than Governor Skeletor.
I think I’ll write in random Glibs instead.
They aren’t even putting up a Republican candidate? Probably wouldn’t win, but could have a shit-ton of fun at her expense talking about her role in many of these controversies.
It is shocking that she could run unopposed. She’s one of the worst candidates by a country mile.
How hard would it be to beat her?
“Vote for me. Nobody on my payroll is a Pakistani terrorist”.
“I’ve never exposed thousands of classified documents to the enemy”
Does’t Allen West live there? Come on, that would be some fun!
He lives one county up.
Not sure if the Republicans are putting someone up against her, but it doesn’t matter. The area is very deep blue. County went 67% for Hillary, and I’m pretty sure it was higher than that locally.
You can either move or suck it up. My local unopposed communist is Gerry Connolly. I right my own name in for Rep for FYTW.
Or write…fuck it.
At least we get to watch Corinne Brown shuffling off to prison.
And don’t forget about Jack Latvala (Senate President) as a gub’ner candidate. I’ve heard Putnam speak a time or two. I didn’t think anyone could be worse than Scott but I could be wrong. There are no good choices…maybe we can get Augustus Sol Invictus to run again.
The legislative session is strangely quiet so far this year. No one in the legislature even pretends to like Gub’ner Scott anymore and he is too busy running for Senate to notice.
Is it possible to win a lawsuit against Government Motors?
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42801772
http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/23/comey-friend-leaked-fbi-memos-now-claims-attorney/
Oh, for fucks sake. Really?
They are profoundly desperate. This is obviously an attempt to hide their communications behind the attorney-client privilege.
But, Comey is pretty much on record that this guy wasn’t his attorney not long ago, and they have to be able to prove when the attorney-client relationship started to put the privilege on any communications. Not only that, but attorney-client communications that relate to current or future violations of the law aren’t privileged, and Comey’s disclosure of the internal FBI documents to this guy was arguably criminal. This putz just put his license on the line, and I hope he loses it.
they have to be able to prove when the attorney-client relationship started to put the privilege on any communications
Interesting, I did not know that.
Obviously, I assume you’re referring to the “normal people” rules.
The privilege doesn’t apply to any conversation that a lawyer has with anybody. When I order Taco Bell at the drive-thru, that’s not a privileged communication.
It applies only to conversations lawyers have with their clients, and even then only to a subset of conversations relating to legal advice. If the guy taking my order at Taco Bell happens to be my client, that still doesn’t make my order privileged.
Any attempt to claim the privilege is going to require them to show when the attorney-client relationship arose. If Comey was under oath when he referred to this law professor as his friend, then he is pretty much foreclosed from now saying that he was his lawyer the whole time – not saying he was his lawyer would have been a material omission, and thus perjury.
Even if they can argue that it arose informally/by implication back before Comey leaked the memos to him, that opens a whole new can of worms for the lawyer. First, he has to show that memos were leaked to him in connection with Comey seeking legal advice. If they were, then he needs to show that Comey waived the privilege (which now attaches to the memos) so the lawyer could disclose them to the press. If Comey didn’t waive the privilege, the lawyer violated his license. If Comey did waive the privilege, well, the privilege is waived. Its really hard (to impossible) to selectively waive a privilege, so you can disclose what you want and hide the rest.
It took me about three minutes to see how this can’t work the way they think (absent, of course, a complicit judge). How stupid does this law professor have to be to put himself in this position?
If this guy is claiming that he was Comey’s lawyer in his capacity as the director of the FBI….
Show me the retainer agreement with the FBI or get the fuck out.
RC, thank you for the insight.
One of the many things I appreciate about this site is access to professionals for insights/opinions. Thanks RC and Playa.
wait is this article using “national conversation” unironically? Cause I find few concepts as ridiculous as that of a national conversation
I find Romania to be a ridiculous concept, but here we are
oh get the burn unit
You’re disappointed because your expectations are unreasonable. Once you realize that politics has always been about hordes of hooting baboons throwing turds at each other, you’ll begin to enjoy the news again.
True, but the turd-flinging primates never had so much power over our lives.
So much this…
I wouldn’t care so much if these people didn’t hold the power to destroy my life and want to exercise said power yesterday.
Ehh… Read the detailed history of Athenian democracy mishaps or Roman Republic shenanigans and it’s the same bullshit. Sociopaths and morons trying to gain power through demagoguery.
If you haven’t read “The Storm Before the Storm”… it details the Roman Republic “pre” downfall before Caesar came along.
I’ll put it on the list. Read a lot about the late Republic. They seemed to have produced ruthless demagogues with no use for the rules at an amazing pace for a century or so.
It would be ok if it wasn’t for the parts about the baboons robbing us and using our own stolen money to oppress us.
Where you been, Warty?
Listen to an album by Hersiarch called Death Ordinance
I’ve been around, but I’ve mostly been too busy to have anything worth saying. The new job has me busy in a good way.
This Heresiarch album is pretty solid so far. Lately I’ve been listening to a lot of cheesy guilty pleasures like Arkona and Summoning, so some straightforward death metal is a nice change of pace.
Glad you enjoy your job.
New Zealand has a bunch of great death metal.
And Summoning rules
The new Summoning album came out right after I had started to reread Lord of the Rings, which is pretty obviously a sign from Jesus.
Hie thee to the Antipodes!
Well played, Warty! That should be submitted as the dictionary definition of ‘National Conversation’.
ugh.
Hear friggin’ hear.
What’s beyond frustrating is the rules that apply to Us never seem to apply to Them
If you’re a US congressman, you can probably drive down Pennsylvania ave at 2 in the afternoon, too drunk to walk, and run over nuns holding babies and nothing will happen to you. I mean you’ll get some sort of reprimand from congress right before you win your 7th term.
Not to worry, if your coke habit gets out of control, you can always go into rehab. Again. And again. And again.
And also get your stuff from the free Congressional drug store, all you want, anything you want.
+1 Patrick Kennedy
The rules were made by Them to apply to Us.
(sorry, but Stossel is right about the ‘old grey lady’)
Duh, they published ENB, of course Stossel is right.
Quality rant.
Very good article/rant. I also like the Spy v. Spy inclusion. Classy.
How do you copy and paste embedded links here?
– Stupid guy asking stupid questions
right click, copy link text
if you use monocle, paste link text into dialogue… if not, insert your new highlighted link
lol, i tried typing the html, forgetting it would make a link.
read the below
http://www.echoecho.com/htmllinks01.htm
Eh, sounds complicated
Monocle plugin makes it much easier. Or, you can find a generic plugin for your browser that will give you an html editor toolbar that does the same thing (lets you paste in the link and your descriptive text into a pop-up dialog box, then spits it out as html in the comment edit box).
Or, just be lazy and paste the raw url, it will recognize it as a link, and, most important of all, will save me the effort of hovering over your link to see where it goes.
Once you’ve done it a few thousand times, it’s like typing a regular sentence. Less than sign + a + space + href + = + double quote + URL + double quote + greater than sign + some display text + less than sign + / + a + greater than sign. Easy peasy.
as per warty’s “baboons throwing shit”
news media has always been partisan. it was born that way, it will end that way. news media has also always been tabloid, at its root.
there was a brief period from 1950-1990 where mass media took on the appearance of a “non-partisan Objectivity”, and seemed to diminish its tabloid role…. partly due to the unifying effects of the cold war, and partly due to the technological coincidence of Television – both of which incentivized a certain degree of consensus, and enabled clearer distinction between ‘entertainment’ and ‘news’ devisions.
cable news and the internet basically shattered that entire structure. the collapse in news media revenues meant they had to create a new business model, and quick
this new model often involves creating the appearance of cultural conflict where little/none actually exists. because it grabs attention, creates the basis for ‘narratives’ (us, them), and is cheap and easy to report on.
this new model often involves creating the appearance of cultural conflict where little/none actually exists
You sure about this? It sure feels like a large portion of the country desires a socialist, if not outright communist, government system that forms the foundation of their beliefs. No need to fabricate a false “us vs. them” appearance when you have one side that wants the gov to own you and another side who’s base mostly does not.
I don’t think the ‘socialist, statist’ impulse of all media is because there’s some ideological driver for it… but because that’s the way all institutions inevitably begin to lean
rule #2:
http://www.isegoria.net/2008/07/robert-conquests-three-laws-of-politics/
i think the parts of the country that want cradle-grave welfare are actually quite small (even tho they are the dominant voices in media);
Yeah, I get that this is a return to the norm. But, from what I recall, there has never been a time when the entire major news networks and publications were solidly aligned in one party’s favor. Even during the New Deal you still had the Chicago Tribune, Newsweek (yeah, that use to be a legitimate publication), and even the New York Times economics section who at least were a thorn in the side of Democrats.
fox seems to have alleviated them all of that burden
Yeah, but that channel is a joke. The only right-of-center publications that are not jokes are the Wall Street Journal (only the editorial page) and that’s about it.
The NY Post, Washington Times, and Fox are like a parody of what a news publication should be
Although I liked the old Fox Business Network when they had Kennedy, Stossel, and Judge Napolitano. That was sweet
The WSJ only seems right of center because of what you have to compare it to.
It’s right in the middle of the center.
It’s mainstream neoconservative mixed with traditional conservatism and populism. It’s become far more traditional conservatism and populism since most of their neoconservative writers have left, like Bret Stephens (who I enjoyed reading, even though his endless love for dead Arabs made me scream) and Sohrab Ahmari (who I also enjoyed, but also made me upset when he discussed foreign policy). It’s populist writers sound like clowns, as Trump has throughly made all of those writers look like asses.
possibly because most came into being at the end of what i described as the “exception to the rule”.
your notion of what a ‘news publication should be’ is based on a standard that is likely never coming back
Awesome rant.
I clicked on all of the embedded links, very depressing, 1/10 would not click again
Even the good ones had comments like this:
rose manning
@Manning023Rose
Jan 18
Replying to @RandPaul
Still can’t wrap my head around why people think someone is listening to your every word, get over yourself, if you are not breaking the law why do you care. Criminals are scared. Listen all you want I am honest, law abiding, what are you so afraid of.
Why do people hate freedom?
But I am breaking the law. Dozens of times a day.
Go on…
Asking for
the FBI a friend.Let’s start with the traffic violations.
I don’t think it’s that they hate freedom. I think they don’t realize they are likely doing something illegal, considering the sheer number of things that are illegal nowadays.
ETA: plus, most people really want to think that the people enforcing and making the laws are good people. They’re not, of course, but it’s easier to sleep thinking that.
It’s worse than hate. The concept of freedom just doesn’t enter their thought process.
Maybe it was never there. Or it got crowded out while keeping track of all the different genders and bad stuff white guys did.
Well, they don’t hate freedom. For themselves. Only for other people. The thought of other people just doing whatever they want, even if they’re bothering no one else, is unbearable for a lot of other people. They’d rather give up some of their own freedom if that’s what it takes to have an authority to stop other people doing things they don’t approve of. Sadly, that’s how to get to the level of nannyism we have today.
The “Why do people hate freedom?” was from me.
The more I read that twitter comment the stupider it sounds.
There has never been a government to abuse it’s powers, so I don’t know why I should be concerned.
And if it ever did happen anywhere, we know it couldn’t happen in the USA.
OK I feel better now.
Most people don’t know what freedom is. They think freedom = not having to produce before you consume. More free shit = more freedom.
I think freedom is making choices and living with the consequences. Freedom is living without a safety net.
It is like that for sure. You look at the approval rating for Congress and it’s abysmal. So you think everyone agrees that Congress is doing a shit job. The thing is that it’s for completely different reasons. You have people here at Glibs who all think government is shit because they’ve assumed too much power and are doing too much. Then you have people over at DU who are all raging because the government is not exercising enough power to ensure they are taken care of cradle to grave, no matter how much needs stolen from other people to do it.
That’s just the first world naivete in a lot of people. Just like inflation doesn’t exist. Well, it does, but you know it can never happen here. Same way with the police state thing. Sure that exists somewhere, just not here, it can’t ever happen here. We have some sort of magical protection fairies running around here ensuring that. Our benevolent government would never actually use all of these new powers they ask for.
Why do people always jump to “what are you so afraid of?” Fear’s got nothing to do with it. It’s my privacy and my civil liberties being violated. I don’t need a reason to oppose it. It’s the government that needs a reason, and a damn good one at that, to violate my rights.
“We’re pro-police reform, but the FBI is beyond reproach. We’re libertarianing!”
https://twitter.com/radleybalko/status/950490798403047427
https://twitter.com/MattWelch/status/944367876760395776
https://www.thejacknews.com/featured/libertarians-alt-right-ludwig-von-mises-would-not-like-institute/
“Also- wrong think. Burn the witch! (Please donate money, Charles Koch)”
Balko is such a cunt.
What the hell happened to him? Or was he always this way, and I missed the clues?
Trump broke his brain.
IIRC, there were early signs of cuntishness that were waved away because of the genuinely good work he did.
He’s useless, now.
I had a few more or less technical differences of opinion with him, but it was in the realm of “reasonable minds may differ”. Then he went Big Media and kind of, I dunno, (d)evolved?
Matt posted that dogshit Watergate article on TOS. Just shrugged off the whole FBI think as hyperbole.
He has to. TOS was deep into Russia fever dreams right after the election.
The whole thing is falling apart now. Mueller isn’t even pursuing Russia fever dreams anymore and is looking for obstruction of justice, which is going to be a hard case to make. TOS thoroughly and predictably be-clowned themselves
Welch has morphed into Gillespie
I’m not sure what version of “Trump fired Comey because he wanted the Flynn investigation dropped”* doesn’t also implicate Obama or another high-ranking official for doing the same thing, much more egregiously, for Hillary.
*It isn’t even clear how you could prove it, given that Comey was basically hated by both parties at that time on account of letting Hillary slide, then fucking her with his email song and dance. It would be a lot harder to point to reasons why -not- to fire Comey.
I am ashamed that I ever gave money to those fuckers.
They’ll never live down their cover story advocating for trade sanctions against Russia, while at the same time writing articles denouncing Trump’s trade protectionism (you can’t make this shit up).
You’re far from alone.
Back when I donated, they were doing good work.
They aren’t anymore, so no donations.
The only way I would ever consider opening my wallet again is if they publicly fire Shika Dalmia. It wasn’t just 1 or 2 bad articles. They really need to publicly atone for hiring and publishing her.
There is a fundamental problem in giving money to an organization while it is doing good work but later goes bat-shit crazy. Only the current bat-shit crazy stuff is what most people will recognize. So you become associated with funding bat-shit crazy.
I still have some friends over there. I should try and get the inside scoop on what’s going on.
They have to know that something went really wrong based upon the results of the last web drive. The question is: what are they going to do about it?
I know!
Recent site observations:
Significant discussions of YUM! chains/products and a number of commenters with Mike-derivation names.
How did that turn out? I missed the final result.
They were running behind until in the last 24 hours MIRACLE HAPPENED and they netted $200K+. Kinda like the year before but moreso.
They may be pissing off their readership but their customers seem as satisfied as ever.
There was a transparent face-saving maneuver right at the end. An “anonymous trustee” made a large donation so that the end result wasn’t complete embarrassment.
I’ve been thinking about Yum quite a bit less than usual, and I owe it all to whoever it was that posted the video of the Korean Pizza Hut with the hot dogs in the crust.
Presented without comment:
Oh yeah. That’s when I checked out.
There’s a couple of games on Steam that those guys might enjoy. Orwell and Beholder.
John Kerry to president of Palestine: don’t broker any deals with Trump.
Remember when Logan Act violations were bandied about as Serious Business?
Um…. what deals would we make with the Palestinians?
They’re going to take what they get and like it. Or else.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42810724
I’m shocked, shocked to discover that rich people want more than a dried out piece of beef in exchange for their money.
“They were asked to sign a five-page non-disclosure agreement about the event upon arrival at the hotel,”
Then how are we finding out about this?
Because the
truthfame is more important than a piece of paper or personal honor.Look. Groping someone without their permission is wrong. Period. End of. I shouldn’t have to say that.
But if you were a woman who was invited to an event and told to wear “a skimpy black outfit with matching underwear and high heels” and that you could drink … wouldn’t you kind of suspect what would happen?
It’s happening:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-demands-documents-and-threatens-subpoena-23-jurisdictions-part-8-usc-1373
Follow up with 8 USC 1324 against individual state employees and officials.
woo! old home and new home made the cut!
wait, what was the prize?
Comedy gold
My old home too!
I think a lot of sanctuary cities and states could be in a lot of trouble if the feds start enforcing this law. The penalties, BTW, range from 5 years in prison to 20 years in prison, and anyone who harbored an illegal who committed a crime after being released is exposed to 20 years, and if someone died, to the death penalty.
Well, “knowing or in reckless disregard” is already proven, as these violations are the result of deliberate policy.
The request is being made in connection with grants to these places; refusal to respond will allow the grant to be suspended/terminated. Clever; avoids any wrangling around subpoenas.
This is what was requested:
would certainly apply to extending taxpayer paid benefits such as in-state tuition (vs normal international student tuition rates) to illegals.
Can I volunteer for Jury Duty?
What’s your opinion of a Nuremberg defense?
It only works if you roll over on your bosses. I can live with that.
You know how ICE runs those stop and frisk roadblocks 100 miles from the border? I wonder how long it will take Trump to tell ICE to setup a ring of such roadblocks around a specific sanctuary city to “make an example”?
It seems sort of mean, but I can’t help hoping that they arrest Moonbeam and that loudmouth state rep.
I’m surprised NJ didn’t make the list. Especially with the new governor’s explicit statements about making the whole state a sanctuary.
Not me. I don’t wear a watch.
Other news. But apparently, Lula’s attempt in Brazil to get his sentence shortened from 8 years, instead had it increased to 12 years and one month. But he has the gall of your typical leftist as he’s actually trying to register to run for president again. And a lot of people would vote for him, obviously because they are not able to associate his politics with the economic woes in Brazil today. They don’t understand that it was good while Lula was in office because they hadn’t gotten to the part where you run out of other people’s money, yet. That didn’t happen until Dilma was in office, Dilma who was Lula’s hand picked successor and fellow party member. They fail to connect this to the party’s leftist politics, they blame Dilma. She’s the same person, lol. People are dumb, the water is wet. Nothing changes.
Is it just human nature to want other people’s shit, or is it a cultural thing?
Brazil actually had a pretty thriving economy and a growing middle class until this labor party got voted in. It took them all of 10 years to destroy 30 years or more of economic progress.
Shocking, The Intercept verdict is Lula did nothing wrong.
Well, I mean besides embezzling billions of dollars from Petrobras in cahoots with Dilma and his other merry band of labor party buddies, he might not have done anything wrong.
Read the article, it literally describes the universe opposite of the one you described. Everything was booming and there was no PROVABLE corruption until big business and corrupt judges teamed up on the champion of the people for his refusal to drag the 99% into literal slavery. And now it’s the second Great Depression as all the Wealth of the People was stolen by the capitalists.
Someday Libertarians will accept that Greenwald is a less sexy Chomsky and nothing more…
Sorry, I don’t read anything from the Intercept. I appreciate the excerpts of derp though.
The economy was booming before Lula took office, for at least 20 years. The corruption started almost the moment Lula took office, along with the outrageous spending on new social programs, regulations, and high taxes. All of this eventually started hurting the economy and after 8 years of Lula and a couple of Dilma, the shit finally hit the fan. The person who wrote that article is a dimwit who has not even the slightest idea what they are babbling about.
NB urged to ban blood plasma sales
Let me guess, they want to head off an invasion from Romania?
“When they’re talking about who would be the donor, really they’re talking about students and people living in poverty,” Basque said.
Yeah, fuck poor people for making ends meet! Let ’em rot, right?
Christ, it’s even worse than the antipathy toward payday lenders. Sure, it’s not an optimal financial strategy, but if the alternative is a cash advance on the credit card or kiting checks or letting your utilities lapse, it’s not such a bad idea. But forcing people to choose their second best option is moral, somehow.
It’s just emblematic of the pig-ignorant maternalism that exists in politics these days.
Their thought process is:
“I wouldn’t want to take a payday loan, therefore payday lenders should be shut down.”
“I wouldn’t want to work a job that pays less than $15 per hour, therefore these jobs should be outlawed.”
“I wouldn’t want to live in a crappy apartment, therefore we should implement housing codes that make affordable housing too expensive.”
“I wouldn’t want to have sex with strangers for money, therefore the cops should throw hookers in jail.”
Allow us to rescue you by cutting off a source of easy money for you!
Putting it on credit cards is probably a better strategy than payday loans due to interest rates and repayment. Payday loans are mostly for people whose credit is such shit that they can’t get a credit card.
And that’s perfectly fine. Like you said, it’s not an optimal strategy, but if you’re a poor person who finds themselves in need of immediate cash (say, because of your car breaking down) and the alternative is not being able to make it to work, you’d rather it exist than not exist.
The hatred of payday lenders betrays a lack of understanding of basic economic incentives.
They’re not charging those high interest rates just to be mean. They’re doing that because they’re dealing with a pool of customers who are significantly more likely to default. Sure, they can send it to collections, but there’s no guarantee that a collection agency can get anywhere close to 100 percent of the full amount; if the person doesn’t have the money, they just don’t have the money. And collection agencies take a fee for themselves as well.
I always thought the collection agencies bought the debt from the lender at a steep discount. Or do they actually act as agents of the lender?
Not trying to be a pedant; actually curious how that works.
I think both kinds exist. I know the debt-selling arrangement is common, but the same regulations on “extensions of credit” apply to anyone who is offering deferred payment for a service in exchange for interest payments, even medical practices that put patients on a payment plan (which is how I learned about this).
Typically, relatively fresh and thus more collectible debt is done with the collection agency acting on behalf of the creditor, who still holds the debt and pays a percentage of what gets collected. Creditors typically sell older and more stale debts to agencies at a steep discount.